I stand corrected, although I sourced arguments towards male guilt that might disagree with you.
The trouble with that is that you are arguing against the notion that men are all latent rapists, which is exactly what the Women Against Violence Against Women organization
is also arguing against: Part of some aspects of these attitudes I talked about earlier is that people use the excuse that "Men just want to **** as many women as possible" (or variants thereoff) as an excuse for their sexual misbehaviour. But, well
they have an article on it. Again, this is all from that first link you provided. It's why people find that whole "Arm's length" thing to be rather silly: It puts the onus on women to protect themselves from rapists whilst the onus should be on the sexual assaulters to, ya know, stop doing that.
But you aren't going to solve that problem by simply kicking out all the immigrants. If only that because if we buy that it's immigrants and immigrants exclusively that cause this problem (which they damn well aren't), this would just move the problem elsewhere. Sexual assault is a worldwide phenonom, and these cases in cologne are simply the symptom of a much bigger problem.
Two parts to this, first, you support paid holidays for workers, animal rights, 8 hour workdays, etc.? Can I imply you are a Nazi then?
Actually, I'd be fine with you calling me a socialist, which seems a much more accurate description of the whole thing rather then a Nazi (esp. since the Nazis, for all their talk about paid holidays for workers, used slave labour to fuel their war machine in the latter days of the war). Nazi's are an example of taking an ideology to it's absolute extremes and it's responsible for the deaths of millions of people. The men's rights movement does not have those same connotations. It's a set of ideas, like feminism, socialism or objectivism is.
oh, he is just suffering from internalized misandry.
You are making me suffer with externalized misandry if you keep strawmen like that up