The prosecutor displayed obvious biases from day one but refused to recuse himself and bring in an independent prosecutor. He completely discarded the usual procedure of a Grand Jury in a way that forced the jury members to behave more like jurors at an actual trial - instead of a quick vote to indict or not indict based upon the arguments that the
prosecutor was obliged to supply to the jury, he made them sift through the entire body of evidence with no direction or recommendation. The prosecutor's job IS to try to convince the Grand Jury that probably cause for indictment has been met. Precedence suggests an indictment would have been a near certainty had the normal procedure not been altered. He sabotaged the case, period. There is evidence of a
police coverup and Wilson's testimony is
literally unbelievable. Does that deserve a response, a very loud, angry response? Damn right it does.
And yes, property destruction is pointless, but property is also just that, property. It's nothing compared to life of a kid.