If you actually contributed to this thread before responding to me I didn't read it.
Well that's certainly an interesting admission from you.
Oh yeah, mind blowing isn't it?
The fact I don't care to read two pages of people's opinions before giving my own? It's almost as if I was . . . thinking for myself! That's some crazy **** huh?
The only thing truly peculiar is that while skimming the first couple of posts before replying I found my opinion was not much different from Battuta's. Now that IS interesting.
I don't need an explanation. You apparently do.
Dude, I know how hyperspace works. It's made clear from the previous movies and the choices that characters make in specific circumstances within those movies. In fact Han Solo even tells you how it works in the original movie, requiring precise calculations and requiring the avoidance of objects. It's even clear from the visual effect that the ship accelerates in normal space before entering a different state.
So either you don't get it, or you're deluding yourself.
Take Star Trek 2009. I know that things in that movie don't make sense. I know that they're broken, particularly in terms of Star Trek but I enjoy it so I give them a pass. I don't make up reasons for why it may or may not be different I just accept that overall, I enjoy the movie, but that certain elements are stupid.
Force Awakens doesn't get a pas, because overall I can't enjoy the movie. The faults of the movie outweigh its positives.
The fact that Luke could fly an X-Wing well enough to survive the Death Star assault despite never having touched one has always annoyed me.
Actually, no, wait, it didn't.
And do you know why it didn't annoy you?
Yes. Do you know why it doesn't, or why I do not care about what you deem to be plotholes and errors and universe-destroying rule breakings?
Oh I know why it doesn't annoy me, just wondering if you knew why it didn't annoy you, so far the jury is still out as to whether you know or not.
Difference being that (AA's complaints notwithstanding) the changes to the hyperspace rules in TFA do not actually represent a complete invalidation of plot points in previous films (or, in ST's case, TV series).
What hyper space rules? You said you don't know the rules. What are the rules of hyperspace? How about you list out the rules and we can apply those rules to each situation.
The biggest problem in Star Trek 2009 and Into Darkness is not the teleporters. The problem is the Warp Drive. It's again, a teleportation device.