The Athena entry is actually pretty good. I like that, though I think the stats should be at the top rather than the bottom, mostly for a more professional look.
Mostly I think the wiki pages will end up being used as a reference for campaigns and fanfic, where stats won't be needed or will be secondary to the history.
I think model builders and table guys will use it too. A quick, handy reference without actually pulling up the table file itself. I want to give them the chance to use it with equal effort to writers and campaign designers.
I admit that the way I originally laid out the table stuff was a bit overboard, but mostly it was done that way because, well, I wasn't sure what was important and what was not. So I put everything in. Not the best idea, but I figured it could be cut down later. I think someone mentioned a table for stat comparision, and after seeing the Athena rework, maybe we should invest time in a comparision table. Something so that the little stats (rotdamp) can get their place to shine without cluttering up the tech entry too much.
What about the current entry (apart from the pic location)
I think, since most of the ship entries are rather small, we can ditch the mini-table of contents. Picture centered or off to the side of the performance stats, followed by armamments then the discription stuff. I think it would look reasonable that way. For ships with FS1 and FS2 weapon load outs, put them side by side ie:
And just to throw a wrench into the mix, perhaps we should start working on a generic layout for the ship entries so when the modders and campaign builders come in, they can just use a default layout and imput their data (for their own sections, of course).