Author Topic: BP: War in Heaven discussion  (Read 918249 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Well, terrans reactor do already. It's just that they can't have both the Ultra and an onboard targetting system for it.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
That's something I don't understand.  How can you have power enough for a flashy, beamy thing that is no doubt terribly inefficient, but not enough for a computer that can monitor 30 targets at once?
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Future suck.

 

Offline Commander Zane

  • 212
  • Spoot Knight of Anvils
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
That's something I don't understand.  How can you have power enough for a flashy, beamy thing that is no doubt terribly inefficient, but not enough for a computer that can monitor 30 targets at once?
Balance. :nervous: :P

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
There were actually a lot more ultraAAAs in WiH R1 before release but it was a...well, balance.

 

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Getting hit with a TAG-B in Post Meridian is something of a death sentence unless you've already disarmed the Juarez.

 

Offline Androgeos Exeunt

  • Captain Oblivious
  • 212
  • Prevents attraction.
    • Wordpress.com Blog
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
I've been hit by TAG-Bs in that mission before, but only when I'm escorting the Indus and Churchill.
My blog

Quote: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 0133 UTC +8, #general
MP-Ryan
Oh you still believe in fairy tales like Santa, the Easter Bunny, and free market competition principles?

 

Offline -Norbert-

  • 211
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
That's something I don't understand.  How can you have power enough for a flashy, beamy thing that is no doubt terribly inefficient, but not enough for a computer that can monitor 30 targets at once?
Here are some justifications I just came up for what is apperently a balancing issue:
Energy isn't the only concern. Maybe the UAAA is just too big to have enough room for the targeting computers as well.
Or they cause interference with the usual computer systems because of it's high energy throughput and thus needs very special computers, that are (apart from their resistance to the interference of course) inferiour.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Don't forget the heat issues, always heat

  

Offline crizza

  • 210
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Venting heat into open space should solve that shouldn't it?

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
...and how exactly does one "vent" heat into open space? :P

Sure, space is "cold", but space is a vacuum, the only way you can lose heat to it is through radiative heat loss, a la black body radiation, which is slooooooow.

Or flushing coolant I guess, but that's limited, and I'm not even sure if that works.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Venting heat into open space should solve that shouldn't it?

You can't; there is nothing in space to serve as a thermally conductive medium, therefore the only venting possible is via radiation, which is incredibly slow. Overheating is thus a huge problem for spacecraft.

The solution is to use an active cooling system and then vent or recirculate the coolant.

 

Offline T-LoW

  • 28
  • Planet Earth is blue and theres nothing left to do
    • German Freespace-Galaxy
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
The SSV Normandy has a very nice cooling system.
It spews small liquid particles out of its nose ( :D ) that go all along the hull and harvests them at the rear to transport them to the nose again.
The german Freespace-Galaxy

"There was a time before we were born. If someone asks this is where I'll be."

 

Offline -Norbert-

  • 211
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Even there it is too slow for prolonged use in combat, which contributes to space battles in Mass Effect being rather short (that and how quickly ships get blown up....).

 
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
The SSV Normandy has a very nice cooling system.
It spews small liquid particles out of its nose ( :D ) that go all along the hull and harvests them at the rear to transport them to the nose again.
I'm not quite understanding this. If you're not actually getting rid of the coolant and just recirculating how does that solve the problem? The point is to transfer the heat to the coolant and then throw it out into space, taking back in won't help, it will still be hot and will take an exorbitant amount of time before it cools.

 

Offline Mars

  • I have no originality
  • 211
  • Attempting unreasonable levels of reasonable
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
It's a surface area vs mass thing.

 

Offline Delta_V

  • 26
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
The idea is to eject the coolant in a very fine mist, so there is much more surface area.  The coolant radiates heat as it travels from the front of the ship to the back, where it is recollected so it can be used again.  You don't want to just eject in off into space because that would require ridiculous amounts of coolant.

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Exactly how do you prevent vapours from, well, expanding due to zero external pressure, so you can collect it again? O_o
You must have some massive vapour collectors.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
This thread is the #2 google hit for "ssv normandy cooling system"  :blah:

 

Offline Pred the Penguin

  • 210
  • muahahaha...
    • Minecraft
    • EaWPR
Re: BP: War in Heaven discussion
Does that mean we'll get confused Mass Effect fans here?