You might want to look at String Theory and Singularities. There's a vast difference between the idea of a Deity 'setting the Universe in motion', as Stephen Hawkins states, and the idea of Intelligent Design, which suggests 'constant interference'.
Hawkins refuses to rule out God entirely, other scientists believe we can, it's certainly a fact that He is being pushed further and further back in the Cosmological cycle, right to the point where most of the 'unknown and unexplainable' part of that particular process has been reduced to the first few picoseconds of the Universe' existence.
ID is not exactly plausible if you consider the number of extinctions that have taken place, for example, why deliberate design something for it to be obliterated? That doesn't sound sensible, so we fall back on the old 'God moves in mysterious ways' adage, but that really doesn't explain anything either.
Just because Science doesn't have the answers yet doesn't mean that 'God did it', just as not knowing the orbital velocity of the Earth didn't mean it wasn't moving several centuries ago. Science is about finding the answers to those questions, but I think assuming the ID is valid up until the point that science has all the answers is not really a productive way of looking at things.
