Author Topic: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?  (Read 4244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
    • Minecraft
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
No ****.

Say, how many months after the NTF rebellion started did the Shivans show up? 18 you say?

Say, how many months has it been since the fighting in Sol started? 18 you say?

Coincidence, much?

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Yes, coincidence, because Bosch was deliberately trying to initiate contact with the Shivans.  The UEF might very well be trying to do that as the Secret Project, but I doubt it, if only because, as you just so handily mentioned, that's exactly how the main campaign of FS2 happens.

Also: How many years after the T-V War started did the Shivans show up?  14 you say?

Two points is a coincidence.  Three is a pattern.  You don't have three points.

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Minecraft
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Also I suspect the UEF would have better luck contacting the Vishans, than the Shivans, but potential Vishan intervention is a point that has been debated to death already
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

 

Offline Mastadon

  • Contributes SCP patches and doesn't afraid of anything
  • 26
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Quote
How could the GTVA feasibly repress Ubuntu after an UEF surrender?

Force everyone to install Windows?  ;7


*Runs*

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
I though the team made it clear that GTVA isn't evil, they just have a conflict of interests with UEF.
Unless they put a certain red cat and his pet "preventer of informational services" in charge of suppressing Ubuntu, then all bets are off. :)

 
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
What do you mean?  The entire reason for going to war was to end Ubuntu, while minimizing its spread

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
You didn't get the joke, didn't you?

 
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Uh. Well I was thinking some vague thing about bsd but... Yeah drawing a blank

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Catbert, the evil director of Human Resources
Mordac, the preventer of informational services
You need to read more Dilbert.* :)
*If you still don't think this makes sense, look at later strips, especially Mordac was a bit different in his early incarnation.

  

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: How could the GTVA feasibly repress ubuntu after an UEF surrender?
Dragon, you do realize that the company Dilbert works for is utterly ineffective, right?

Also, I think everything has been said here.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns