Author Topic: fs2_open or FS2? (Read 1871 times)

Solatar · **on:** December 21, 2002, 06:45:13 pm

Just wondering, how many of you have renamed fs2_open to FS2.exe so it is launched from the main fs2 launcher?

Knight Templar · **Reply #1 on:** December 21, 2002, 08:05:29 pm

why not just have both... ?

Solatar · **Reply #2 on:** December 21, 2002, 08:35:34 pm

I should of made another choice for both, oh well.

I myself use fs2_open3.3.

phreak · **Reply #3 on:** December 22, 2002, 09:58:52 am

i'd use 3.3 more often if it wern't for that beam bug (which is now fixed), but i still use it 90% of the time.

<<ERROR>> · **Reply #4 on:** December 25, 2002, 04:20:46 am

I actually prefer Komet's FS2 mod - it looks a lot better, but I use FS2_open most of the time, as it lifts a few .TBL restrictions.

Solatar · **Reply #5 on:** December 25, 2002, 01:40:24 pm

I'll soon have to use fs2_open, as much of the things in the UW require support from the SCP.

diamondgeezer · **Reply #6 on:** December 27, 2002, 12:02:28 am

I may as well wait for 3.4, now

Figure I ought to get on the SCP bandwagon sooner or later

Sesquipedalian · **Reply #7 on:** December 28, 2002, 01:46:28 am

*Looks at nice big bunch of completed sexps in the list. Smiles. Goes back to Fredding in his unoffical Fred2_open3.4*

Goober5000 · **Reply #8 on:** January 06, 2003, 10:21:02 am

Official now.

(And possibly a 3.41 shortly, if we get that thruster bug fixed.

)

News: