Off-Topic Discussion > The Classics

WITTY THREAD TITLE ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC/SUMMARY OF NEWS ARTICLE

<< < (3/33) > >>

Herra Tohtori:
ALL THESE ARE ANECDOTES.

FACTS INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED BY MULTIPLE STUDIES ARE NEEDED BEFORE ANY CONCLUSIONS CAN BE DRAWN.

ACTUALLY EVEN IF YOU HAD FACTS YOU SHOULDN'T BE TOO HASTY TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS FROM THEM IN THIS CONTEXT SINCE CORRELATION DOES NOT MEAN CAUSATION, SO STATISTICALLY SPEAKING YOU SHOULD GIVE IT A BENEFIT OF DOUBT.

The E:
META COMMENT ABOUT THIS THREAD DEGENERATING FAST

Mr. Vega:
ANGRY RANT BASHING EVERYONE FOR OVERGENERALIZING

Nuclear1:

--- Quote from: Mr. Vega on November 01, 2009, 01:41:54 am ---PART 1 OF RANT

--- End quote ---

INITIAL ANECDOTAL RESPONSE


--- Quote ---SELECTIVELY PICKED PART OF RANT
--- End quote ---
STATISTICS FROM CLEARLY BIASED SOURCE PROVING MY POINT

SARCASTIC COMMENT ABOUT VALIDITY OF YOUR RANT

Mongoose:
SARCASTIC ONE-LINER IN A VAIN ATTEMPT TO INTRODUCE LEVITY AND DEFUSE THE SITUATION.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page