Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: jr2 on May 26, 2018, 02:11:16 pm

Title: Uber self-driving car verdict: 3 strikes dumb design
Post by: jr2 on May 26, 2018, 02:11:16 pm
1) Emergency braking is not permitted to the self-driving system
2) Alerts are not configured to alert the driver in that situation
3) The driver is supposed to be monitoring a diagnostic console in the center stack of the vehicle dash (forcing eyes off the road)

LTT WAN Show on that topic (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzDa5sZ9G48&t=960s)

How this made it past QC, I have no idea.
Title: Re: Uber self-driving car verdict: 3 strikes dumb design
Post by: Cyborg17 on May 26, 2018, 02:37:02 pm
It's Uber.  They don't think critically.  Their QC probably introduced #1 to "protect the uber experience".
Title: Re: Uber self-driving car verdict: 3 strikes dumb design
Post by: Grizzly on May 26, 2018, 02:44:08 pm
How this made it past QC, I have no idea.

This *is* their QC.

Uber is bloody horrible.
Title: Re: Uber self-driving car verdict: 3 strikes dumb design
Post by: The E on May 26, 2018, 02:48:42 pm
It's Uber.  They don't think critically.  Their QC probably introduced #1 to "protect the uber experience".

You're joking, but that's actually true. One part of the development process involves tuning the collision avoidance system to not be "jumpy", which would make the ride uncomfortable.

(That they still set it up in a way that leaves the car unable to avoid a collision it definitely knows is going to happen is really baffling though)
Title: Re: Uber self-driving car verdict: 3 strikes dumb design
Post by: Ghostavo on June 01, 2018, 10:34:53 pm
3) The driver is supposed to be monitoring a diagnostic console in the center stack of the vehicle dash (forcing eyes off the road)

I always thought there were supposed to be two people in a car for this very reason. At least from the reports I've read, Google seems to staff their cars this way.