Author Topic: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?  (Read 21808 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
I definitely like what I'm seeing so far.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline AndrewofDoom

  • In A.D. 2366 war was beginning
  • 29
  • Permanent yuri goggles.
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
So, the king of all lolicons Droid803 has handed the new Tethys for me to texture. I've been working on and off on it for a while. Here's what I have so far. You may want to note that most of the middle to the rear of the ship isn't really complete.
My Efforts:
SF Knight

20:08:19   AndrewofDoom: Though I find it mildly disturbing that a loli is giggling to mass destruction.
20:10:01   Spoon: I find it mildly arrousing
20:10:07   AndrewofDoom: Woah
20:10:15   Spoon: sound like my kind of loli
20:10:21   Spoon: and im not even a lolicon

 

Offline Rodo

  • Custom tittle
  • 212
  • stargazer
    • Minecraft
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
so... is there a way to activate the texture view? I'm kinda lost here.
el hombre vicio...

 

Offline AndrewofDoom

  • In A.D. 2366 war was beginning
  • 29
  • Permanent yuri goggles.
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
If you're probably having the problem I am, go to the shader selection on the middle left of the screen and select Shadeless underneath it.
My Efforts:
SF Knight

20:08:19   AndrewofDoom: Though I find it mildly disturbing that a loli is giggling to mass destruction.
20:10:01   Spoon: I find it mildly arrousing
20:10:07   AndrewofDoom: Woah
20:10:15   Spoon: sound like my kind of loli
20:10:21   Spoon: and im not even a lolicon

 

Offline Rodo

  • Custom tittle
  • 212
  • stargazer
    • Minecraft
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Ahh, now I see.

The texture looks well on track. I like the selection of colors there, nice blue/grey combo.
el hombre vicio...

 

Offline SypheDMar

  • 210
  • Student, Volunteer, Savior
    • Minecraft
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
I see textures on both the top and the shadeless section. However, the textures look much better shadeless because the shaded one is too shiny and too metallic. I'm gonna assume the shaded one is not gonna be in-game.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
That renderer is completely different from the one FSO uses (not to mention not very good overall).

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • Moderator
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
The Shaded version has all the smoothgroups missing or something, I guess it borked during conversion.

meanwhile, I've been working on the pre-refit version that doesn't have the heavy armor or artillery-type weapons (and is a carrier-type ship), figured to go a bit more closely with the original for this.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Will it have working bay doors? Also, what's inside the frontal armor?

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • Moderator
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Nothing, just a flat deck as a launch catapult, pretty much.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
This one might actually make a good pre-refit Narayana for the BP universe, ironically.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline An4ximandros

  • 210
  • Transabyssal metastatic event
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
You'd probably have to change the engine block and rotators to the original Nara's though since the refit was to change it from "heavy" Frigate to "Artillery" Frigate.

On a topical remark, ship's looking well.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
This one might actually make a good pre-refit Narayana for the BP universe, ironically.
That'd be an interesting twist.

 

Offline Aesaar

  • 210
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
How'd I miss this?  That thing brilliant.  It still feels like a Narayana, but you've put your own twist on it and it just plain works.  Well done.

 

Offline AndrewofDoom

  • In A.D. 2366 war was beginning
  • 29
  • Permanent yuri goggles.
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
How'd I miss this?  That thing brilliant.  It still feels like a Narayana, but you've put your own twist on it and it just plain works.  Well done.

Shameful creature! How can you not see this? I mean this is right below the BP board!

This one might actually make a good pre-refit Narayana for the BP universe, ironically.

It sure won't be textured to fit in with what the UEF has though.

Though, I think I'm pretty much done now with the block 2.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 06:07:20 pm by AndrewofDoom »
My Efforts:
SF Knight

20:08:19   AndrewofDoom: Though I find it mildly disturbing that a loli is giggling to mass destruction.
20:10:01   Spoon: I find it mildly arrousing
20:10:07   AndrewofDoom: Woah
20:10:15   Spoon: sound like my kind of loli
20:10:21   Spoon: and im not even a lolicon

 
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
The blue adds a really nice touch to it. :p

 

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Why did you put windows on armor plates I don't even.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline An4ximandros

  • 210
  • Transabyssal metastatic event
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Because the aggressor destroyer had them (The cannons were built into a "block" of the hull) on this new model it looks strange because there's no "Hull" for the crew quarters to be, and gives the impression that the crew must be made of dwarfs or those guns are multi-kilometers in length. :p

 

Offline Aesaar

  • 210
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Shameful creature! How can you not see this? I mean this is right below the BP board!

I know.  I don't know what to say. *hangs head in shame*
« Last Edit: August 27, 2012, 07:49:00 am by Aesaar »

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
This one might actually make a good pre-refit Narayana for the BP universe, ironically.

Actually, I'm thinking it looks more like a GTVA-ified version of the Narayana design. Heavier Armor, less bits sticking out, that kind of stuff.

Must. Stop. Making up Canon....
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns