Author Topic: bad links  (Read 3004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline draeath

  • 25
    • Homepage of Draeath
The links in the Current OS X and Linux versions ... thread have all been replaced with some youtube vid...

Anyone have the valid data? If this is some April fools thing, I'm gonna be quite irritable... I needed to grab the source to recompile as the version the installer pulls needs glibc 2.4, my distro has 2.3-something.

EDIT: ALL user links are redirected! WTF?!? Is there any way I can stop this? Some hidden preference somewhere?
PGP Key: 508A8ADE (http://tinyurl.com/3d4ue7)

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Yes, its some april fools thing.  All external links go to that.  The easiest way around it is to quote a post and extract the link from there (but don't post anything obviously).

Oh, and BTW you can thank Goober for that joke.

 

Offline draeath

  • 25
    • Homepage of Draeath
Thanks for the quick answer!

Unfortunately, that's a locked thread so the quote options are not displayed. Great. Thanks Goober... bad taste I would say, not allowing a work-around. So much for getting some gaming done on my day off.


 
Tried to be sneaky and edit my quote URL to point to his thread/message, and it almost worked: "An Error Has Occurred! This topic is locked, you are not allowed to post or modify messages..."
PGP Key: 508A8ADE (http://tinyurl.com/3d4ue7)

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Code: [Select]

[size=12pt][b][color=red]3.6.9 Final[/color][/b][/size]
  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/osx/FS2_Open-3.6.9.dmg]Mac OS X (Universal Binary)[/url][/b]
  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/linux/fs2_open-3.6.9.run]Linux (32 and 64-bit)[/url][/b]

  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/linux/fs2_open-3.6.9.tar.bz2]Source tarball[/url][/b]


[size=12pt][b][color=red]Current stable/trunk build (2008-03-30)[/color][/b][/size]
  [b][url=http://icculus.org/~taylor/fso/testing/20080330_trunk-osx.tgz]Mac OS X (Universal Binary)[/url][/b]


[size=12pt][b][color=red]Current test build (2007-10-28)[/color][/b][/size]
  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/latest/taylor/20071028-osx.tgz]Mac OS X (Universal Binary)[/url][/b]
  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/latest/taylor/20071028-linux32.tgz]Linux (32-bit, binaries only)[/url][/b]

  [b][url=http://fs2source.warpcore.org/exes/latest/taylor/fs2_open-20071028.tar.bz2]Source tarball[/url][/b]


[size=12pt][b][color=red]MediaVPs[/color][/b][/size]
  [b][url=http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,39905.0.html]Release Thread[/url][/b]

You should be able to get any links you need from that.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline draeath

  • 25
    • Homepage of Draeath
Thanks! Compiled and flying! (of course after slaughtering the makefiles to get rid of -g and replace -Os with -O3 (it ignored my cflags... grr))

On a completely unrelated note, trying to compile the clean unmodified 3.6.9 Final with debug and gprof support died with undefined functions... <shrugs>
PGP Key: 508A8ADE (http://tinyurl.com/3d4ue7)

 

Offline chief1983

  • Still lacks a custom title
  • Moderator
  • 212
  • ⬇️⬆️⬅️⬅️🅰➡️⬇️
    • Minecraft
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Fate of the Galaxy
I'm a fan of optimizing for speed vs size, but isn't O3 a bit aggressive for this project?
Fate of the Galaxy - Now Hiring!  Apply within | Diaspora | SCP Home | Collada Importer for PCS2
Karajorma's 'How to report bugs' | Mantis
#freespace | #scp-swc | #diaspora | #SCP | #hard-light on EsperNet

"You may not sell or otherwise commercially exploit the source or things you created based on the source." -- Excerpt from FSO license, for reference

Nuclear1:  Jesus Christ zack you're a little too hamyurger for HLP right now...
iamzack:  i dont have hamynerge i just want ptatoc hips D:
redsniper:  Platonic hips?!
iamzack:  lays

 

Offline taylor

  • Super SCP/Linux Guru
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.icculus.org/~taylor
I'm a fan of optimizing for speed vs size, but isn't O3 a bit aggressive for this project?
-O3 used to cause various strange bugs to pop up at random times, but I think that I've long since gotten all of that worked out (just bad/old code stuff).  So I don't really think that it's too aggressive, and I even tend to use it myself.  Of course, simply using O3 doesn't mean it's actually going to be any better than O2.

I just have it set to use -Os simply because it's a good mix for most people and works well as a default.