[Phantom Hoover]

There's the 'Toyota Corolla' lander:

I couldn't find a design for an ascent stage but if you can get that into Munar orbit you should be fine.

[Shivan Hunter]

I assembled a thing in orbit and landed it on the mun

[Husker]

There's the 'Toyota Corolla' lander:

I couldn't find a design for an ascent stage but if you can get that into Munar orbit you should be fine.

That's...actually the lander I've been trying to get to the mun. My problem is being unable to get the thing near the mun. I got a modified version there, but on landing approach, well, spaceship + ground - fuel = well I crashed at about 40 m/s.

[ShivanSpS]

The concept its the same on the full version, launcher to get to orbit and 1800m/s before separating, a second stage engines to do the orbit transfer and absorb the brutal part of desaceleration when at 50000km from the Mun, them 180 liquid fuel for landing and you will need another 180 liquid fuel for launching, you can do that by either using a single 360 fuel tank or two 180 with 2 engines using 2 stages, one for landing another for launching. Landing and launching must be done with the 50P engine. And there can be no errors.

The full version allow this to be done in a much better way, because there are best suited fuel tanks for the task, and other engines.

[NGTM-1R]

I'm still lolorbital because I'm not using MechJeb I'm terrible at math and seat-of-the-pantsing.

[ShivanSpS]

This ship can get to the Mun and back on the demo.









[attachment deleted by an evil time traveler]

[StarSlayer]

Heh that actually looks pretty similar to the MK VI design I made back in the BTRL days. 

[Herra Tohtori]

http://www.pcgamer.com/2013/12/12/kerbal-space-program-committed-to-multiplayer-career-and-sandbox-modes/

welp

[Dragon]

Exactly my feelings about the matter. What's with all the multiplayer these days? Honestly, I couldn't care less for that particular feature. It's already holding up some nice features in FSO (gun bank expansion, for instance), it'll probably do the same for KSP. There's a lot of backlash on the forums, though, so maybe they'll give it priority it deserves (i.e. rock bottom of the feature list).

[Herra Tohtori]

Well, I'm not really surprised or disappointed. It's something I always thought SHOULD be in the game, as long as it doesn't negatively affect single player experience.

As long as they still add all the stuff for single player that they would have anyway - I don't mind longer development, or multiplayer being developed first and single player features afterwards. I have all the time in the world.

It does offer certain unique possibilities, though.

It would be great to be able to play with some friends in the same game, and a spectator mode would be absolute gold for live streaming for example.

Also, multiplayer makes it possible to do things like... say, keep a camera crew (another user) on ground at Kerbal Space Center, recording a launch to make even more awesome films. It will be possible to do fly-by camera angles, with chase planes.

As far as I understand, the multiplayer mod already makes these things possible, but I haven't had time to play KSP, much less make videos of it recently...

[Nuke]

we need our own kmp server

[NGTM-1R]

What's with all the multiplayer these days?

...I could say so much here, but instead I'll merely point out that humans are explicitly social animals and this is a very dumb question in light of that.

[Cobra]

I can't seem to get my rockets very far until they explode in hilarious fashions.

[Colonol Dekker]

Add more stages, add more rockets, add more fuel!!
(parachute optional)

[Nuke]

ive been banging my head on the desk trying to get my eve extraplanetary launchpads to not destroy the ships i build on them with their shoddy collision detection. the models in that mod are horrible. then theres also the issue of things i build falling through the ground. i mean i lost an entire vtol because it got eaten by the ground.

[Colonol Dekker]

0.23 is out tomorrow. Maybe that'll help.

[Cobra]

Add more stages, add more rockets, add more fuel!!
(parachute optional)

I must be retarded on creating stages, then, because I've had a few rockets have boosters fire, disengage, then converge on the top. >_>

[Nuke]

0.23 is out tomorrow. Maybe that'll help.

doubtful, i will probibly need to wait a month for all the mods to be updated.

[Scourge of Ages]

I must be retarded on creating stages, then, because I've had a few rockets have boosters fire, disengage, then converge on the top. >_>

Ah, that means that your radial decouplers aren't strong enough for the job and/or your rocket is too heavy. Add struts connecting the boosters to the rocket body.

[Nuke]

space tape is your friend