[Galemp]

I think what he means is that your reviews tend to look like

I liked it. Felt very professional and kick-ass.

while his look like

I finally got around to playing this.  First problem: the gibberish needs a bit of reworking.  There are long pauses at the beginning of the mission where there should be fluid conversation.  Perhaps move some of the comments to later parts of the missions - e.g., "I'm getting strange readings from this ship" -- "It is the monster!  It will devour us all!"  That way, the weird comments are actually in response to things, as opposed to being tossed out there. Use less of the send-random-message and place more of the messages purposefully.

for the same mission.
Yes, that's right. We have a mission where Vasudans spout gibberish. Now go away.

[Knight Templar]

Meh, that just means his machine sucks for having more problems running the missions than mine does.

[Goober5000]

Only in the summer, when I was doing a Windows reinstall and my sound card and tape drive both blew up.  It works now.

[Woolie Wool]

EDIT: I never really used the 2.1 ML-16 (I had changed the 2.0 version to a plasma cannon and used it in my campaign, eventually changing the table name), and now I see that it is identical to the original (the 2.0 version is different). Now that I have the proper ML-16, I'll just tweak it a bit and turn it into the TSW ML-19, the TSA's default weapon (the standard loadout for a TSA fighter is an ML-19, an Avenger, a bank of Rockeyes, and a bank of Interceptors). The ML-19 is identical to the Subach HL-7 damage-wise.

[StarGunner]

Originally posted by Woolie Wool
EDIT: I never really used the 2.1 ML-16 (I had changed the 2.0 version to a plasma cannon and used it in my campaign, eventually changing the table name), and now I see that it is identical to the original (the 2.0 version is different). Now that I have the proper ML-16, I'll just tweak it a bit and turn it into the TSW ML-19, the TSA's default weapon (the standard loadout for a TSA fighter is an ML-19, an Avenger, a bank of Rockeyes, and a bank of Interceptors). The ML-19 is identical to the Subach HL-7 damage-wise.

Whats diffrent about the 2.0 ML-16? I would like to know so I can make it look/play the way it did in FS1 version 2.0

[Solatar]

The ML-16 in the port is exactly the same as the one in fs1...

[StarGunner]

Originally posted by Solatar


The ML-16 in the port is exactly the same as the one in fs1...

Ok heres what you do take a screen from the ones that are diffent then post em here don't make claims without a pic for proof!

It's so easy to do if you can't E-mail the pic and have someone els post it.

[Woolie Wool]

The 2.1 ML-16 is the same. The 2.0 one is not. I never actually used the 2.1 version except for filching some stuff for T&T until after I had made those other posts.