Great first post.
Oooh, even a shiny banner for greets! Thanks.
In theory, the reason there weren't more Lucifers is that
a)GTVA weaponry was powerful enough to get through the shield
b)It can be crushed by a wing of bombers.
Mmm, I was wondering about that. In FRED, at least, the Lucifer murders the Collossus handily, but only because the Lucifer is near impregnable, not through stronger guns...
kietotheworld beat me to it - the Lucifer class was abandoned because FreeSpace-universe shields cannot withstand a single beam shot - the beam rips a gap in energy field that constitutes the shield.
... though it occurred to me that this was a mere oversight on the part of the game designers, since the Lucifer never made a showing in FS2. They just grabbed the ship models from FRED1 and slapped them into FRED2 for posterity's sake, just like the GTI Hades. Because of this, I wasn't sure if beam cannons were effective against massive scale shields or not, in canon. Now I know.
The bomber theory is the one that I was considering as most likely. The Lucifer seems to be a ship specifically designed for mopping up lesser races, as opposed to the Sanathas, of which I believe it's primary mission role is to nuke stars to make nebula's. Shivans don't terraform planets, they terraform star systems. But I digress. Once the lesser races learned how to track and follow the Shivans into subspace, the invincibility of the Lucifer class became much less assured- probably not enough to justify building such a hideously expensive ship (if the shielding of the Lucifer is indeed that hard to manage.) And since they have all these insanely powerful Juggernauts laying about...
And while a lot of people think the SSL is more powerful than a BFRed, that's just perception. 4 BRed salvos (One blast from a Sathanas) can take out an Orion, it took 5 or 6 for the Galatea. I can see why you'd think it, the SSL was so much more powerful than anything else in Freespace, I thought the same myself for a while.
FRED testing says you're right. The Super Laser has an insane range, which could be a great advantage of it's own, but if the Shivans have the insanely powerful BFRed laying around, they'd most certainly use that. The SSL leaves you vulnerable to clever manuvering (jumping in close,) whereas the BFRed just rips apart anything in it's way.
The GTVA weren't just arrogant re: the Shivans, they were ignorant as well. We knew from the Ancient Monologues that they were a civilisation spanning galaxies, and we knew that there were enough impervious vessels to destroy a civilisation spanning galaxies. That should have told the GTVA all they needed to know about their chances against the Shivans. Although if the GTVA had been realistic and sealed off the Shivans immediately, it would have made for a piss-poor game.
Indeed. I've been going back and forth on how the Shivans managed to aqquire eighty Juggernauts when we could make but one- is it that they've built them up over many long centuries? But if that is true, how is it true that Terran and Vasudan tech is at least within shouting distance of theirs in terms of weaponry and ships? (As evidenced by the fact that their development of beam and flack cannons is somewhat parallel to ours, and when they first attacked during the Great War, their Capships were roughly equivalent in technology, if a bit stronger.) Either they've stayed at the same tech level for many millenia and only began upgrading when we surprised them with their first ever defeat, or (the explenation I prefer) their civilization is simply much, much more massive, and with it the production and manufacturing capacity. Which is, as you say, supported by the Ancient Monologues.
That also makes it more likely that the Sanathas ships were indeed warships first and star killers second, because they
could have been cranked out as a new generation of warship in 30 years, rather then having to be a centuries old star nuking fleet, by dint of it taking centuries just to assemble that number.