Author Topic: Two new screenshots  (Read 26914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com

A scene from the first level, showing off the capabilities of FS Open.


This shot is of the Charon, an older shot without any HT&L ships. You'll see those when we're ready to show them, no sooner ;)
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
As much as I never expected to say it, that new Aeolus is a thing of beauty :)

Nice screens, though I have to say they are particularly non-teasing as we've seen everything there before.  'Cept the backgrounds, of course.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 
Mallory: Alpha 1, requesting deactivation of the deflector shield!

Impressive shots.  That new Aeolus is a beauty.  I was wondering, are the backgrounds you used for the Charon area in BWO somewhat similar to the backgrounds used in the second last mission of FS1 (which takes place in the same area)?
Once known as Grand_Admiral_Abaht

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
FS1 didn't maintain consistency in any of its backgrounds, but we've kept coloration similar to FS2's in game and cutscene backgrounds.
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 
would the designers deign to give us an updated estimated time of completion

please dont hurt me

*runs*

 

Offline Mad Bomber

  • Booooom
  • 210
Considering that Derelict and Warzone are also included in the count as of BWO, the count of Aeoluses reaches to almost _three_ dozen (at least half a dozen of which were non-GTVA in Derelict).

From this I surmise the crew just said "bah, Fenris sucks; let's just say they made another production run or two, and use the Aeolus as much as we want." :p

So IMO the tech entry oughta be updated, to say something like "Though the original order to build Aeolus cruisers only called for two dozen, the high levels of attrition in the NTF war and the Second Shivan Incursion forced the GTVA to build more in order to replace their aging Fenris and Leviathan cruisers." Summin like that.

(Or you could use that sentence verbatim if you want.) :)
« Last Edit: September 27, 2005, 05:15:16 pm by 51 »
"What the hell!? I've got a Snuffleupagus on my scanners! The Snuffleupagus is active!"

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
Actually yes, there was a second run.

Counting all of the ones we know were in FS2 (all of which could be potentially destroyed), Warzone, and Derelict there would be about two Aeoluses left. ;)

Several FS2 Aeoluses (and other ships) as well as ones from Warzone and Derelict are in the campaign.

However, there was a demand for the ship so a new variant was constructed in the five or so years since Warzone. (older surviving ships have also been refitted)

Slightly more powerful beams, longer range flak, etc.

There have been a few GTVA experiments in cruisers using meson cannons... nothing came out of them.

Also I don't see what's so unrealistic about a second run of the Aeolus. There's a precedent for it in FS, the Leviathan being a modified Fenris hull for the V-T war.

As opposed to declaring a second ship class though, these are just rearmed Aeoluses.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2005, 05:45:21 pm by 72 »
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
Is it the "Fenris Advanced" or "Orion Advanced?" No.

We are debating doing a re-release of the demo before the final campaign with updated mods.

The current demo was designed to be used with retail FS2, not FSO. Unfortunately it appears that some of the FSO changes have made the demo no longer compatable.
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
Quote
Originally posted by High Max
There are no planet backgrounds in FS1.


Wrong.

Proof:
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
There were planets in FS1 in the early stages of the game.  Not sure how to explain that shot...could be FS2...

Backgrounds in BWO are consistent with each other and somewhat consistent with what they were doing in FS2.  As much as possible.  Just a heck of alot cooler.

RE: Aeolous - Most of us campaign designers just agreed that there were more built later so we toss them in all over the place.  Its nice to have a good cruiser in there that isn't a Fenris or Leviathan.  Those have been done to death :D
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Taristin

  • Snipes
  • 213
  • BlueScalie
    • Skelkwank Shipyards
Quote
Originally posted by IceFire
There were planets in FS1 in the early stages of the game.  Not sure how to explain that shot...could be FS2...


It's not. It's FS1 P3 OEM.
Freelance Modeler | Amateur Artist

 

Offline StratComm

  • The POFressor
  • 212
  • Cameron Crazy
    • http://www.geocities.com/cek_83/index.html
No better proof than that as to why the FS1 source no longer exists.  Background bitmaps are a FS2 feature that aren't present in most FS1 builds.
who needs a signature? ;)
It's not much of an excuse for a website, but my stuff can be found here

"Holding the last thread on a page comes with an inherent danger, especially when you are edit-happy with your posts.  For you can easily continue editing in points without ever noticing that someone else could have refuted them." ~Me, on my posting behavior

Last edited by StratComm on 08-23-2027 at 08:34 PM

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
Quote
Originally posted by Raa


It's not. It's FS1 P3 OEM.

AHH YES!  I totally forgot about this version.  You are correct.
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Lt.Cannonfodder

  • 210
  • Digitalous Grunteous
As I said before, the most stunning thing I see on the new shots is the starfield. Really, really nice :yes:

 

Offline Goober5000

  • HLP Loremaster
  • 214
    • Goober5000 Productions
Quote
Originally posted by Ace
The current demo was designed to be used with retail FS2, not FSO. Unfortunately it appears that some of the FSO changes have made the demo no longer compatable.
What changes?  Everything in retail should be compatible with FSO.

It's entirely possible you have bad table files, however. :p

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • Moderator
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
The demo works for me in FSO.

The problem is that the demo itself is a little out dated.

 

Offline IceFire

  • GTVI Section 3
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/ce
In order words...the demo can be more purty :D
- IceFire
BlackWater Ops, Cold Element
"Burn the land, boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me..."

 

Offline Ace

  • Truth of Babel
  • Moderator
  • 212
    • http://www.lordofrigel.com
I think it's a given that we'll do a re-release of the demo with the finalized BWO mods. :)
Ace
Self-plagiarism is style.
-Alfred Hitchcock

 

Offline BlackDove

  • Star Killer
  • Moderator
  • 211
  • Section 3 of the GTVI
    • http://www.shatteredstar.org
We'll have to really, it's part of the story.