Author Topic: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?  (Read 21740 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
I was speaking about this one, not this one
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline Darius

  • 211
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
meanwhile, I've been working on the pre-refit version that doesn't have the heavy armor or artillery-type weapons (and is a carrier-type ship), figured to go a bit more closely with the original for this.

Ooer...what a looker.

(Incidentally, I was floating around an idea for a carrier variant Narayana a couple of years ago but I didn't progress beyond removing the artillery gun submodels and adding new bay paths)

Oh! Here's an idea. Having smaller mass drivers at the tips of the forward hull segments, Karuna-style. That way you still get the signature forward firepower as well as have room for the launch bay.

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
I was speaking about this one, not this one

Oh, right. Derp. In that particular case though, I kinda dislike the new engine section there. Not that it's bad or anything, or that it doesn't fit for the other models posted here, I just think that in terms of fluff, why would they have to replace the entire engine section as well as the front hull?
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Alright are we talking BP or Ashen Wings now. I be confus.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline Destiny

  • 29
  • Twintails are eternal!
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Oh! Here's an idea. Having smaller mass drivers at the tips of the forward hull segments, Karuna-style. That way you still get the signature forward firepower as well as have room for the launch bay.
Droid likes the 'staggered' gun layout of this ship, actually. So not sure if he'd want to go for what LAGGYSHIP's* full gun layout was with full MD railguns blasting at the front and stub wings.




*Block-One Tethys

 

Offline AndrewofDoom

  • In A.D. 2366 war was beginning
  • 29
  • Permanent yuri goggles.
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
So the new Tethys is now in game wheeeeeeeee. (Okay that's the block 3 being shown in the screenshot but it's close enough).



Oi! time for you to get to work Destiny. :p

Oh! Here's an idea. Having smaller mass drivers at the tips of the forward hull segments, Karuna-style. That way you still get the signature forward firepower as well as have room for the launch bay.


My Efforts:
SF Knight

20:08:19   AndrewofDoom: Though I find it mildly disturbing that a loli is giggling to mass destruction.
20:10:01   Spoon: I find it mildly arrousing
20:10:07   AndrewofDoom: Woah
20:10:15   Spoon: sound like my kind of loli
20:10:21   Spoon: and im not even a lolicon

 

Offline Darius

  • 211
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?

 

Offline AndrewofDoom

  • In A.D. 2366 war was beginning
  • 29
  • Permanent yuri goggles.
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Get a load of this sexy beast boys!
My Efforts:
SF Knight

20:08:19   AndrewofDoom: Though I find it mildly disturbing that a loli is giggling to mass destruction.
20:10:01   Spoon: I find it mildly arrousing
20:10:07   AndrewofDoom: Woah
20:10:15   Spoon: sound like my kind of loli
20:10:21   Spoon: and im not even a lolicon

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Minecraft
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
that is pretty awesome
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

 

Offline Destiny

  • 29
  • Twintails are eternal!
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Oi! time for you to get to work Destiny. :p
I will fool around then





Super-splat anime anyone?

 

Offline An4ximandros

  • 210
  • Transabyssal metastatic event
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
I still hold the argument that the front section must have dwarfs living in the armor :p

Or Shivan wannabe robots :nervous:

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Hmm, those windows on the armor skirt do look somewhat out of place.

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • Moderator
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Okay, not the best render but it gets the message across


Red box is human-sized (it's actually bigger than the average human at 2 meters tall)

I wouldn't want to be standing near those windows during a firefight, but doesn't need to be a midget to fit in a corridor in there.
The armor is pretty thick.

Also the front end looks really bland without something glowy there.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
You could put a nameplate there...

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Hey, great idea. A fancy nameplate would look much better than windows in there. While there's enough space inside for a human, keep in mind that there are better ways to use internal space in an armor plate.

 
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Humans are a renewable source of bullet sponges.  Just ask the Soviet Union or the Imperium of Man.
17:37:02   Quanto: I want to have sexual intercourse with every space elf in existence
17:37:11   SpardaSon21: even the males?
17:37:22   Quanto: its not gay if its an elf

[21:51] <@Droid803> I now realize
[21:51] <@Droid803> this will be SLIIIIIGHTLY awkward
[21:51] <@Droid803> as this rich psychic girl will now be tsundere for a loli.
[21:51] <@Droid803> OH WELLL.

See what you're missing in #WoD and #Fsquest?

[07:57:32] <Caiaphas> inspired by HerraTohtori i built a supermaneuverable plane in ksp
[07:57:43] <Caiaphas> i just killed my pilots with a high-g maneuver
[07:58:19] <Caiaphas> apparently people can't take 20 gees for 5 continuous seconds
[08:00:11] <Caiaphas> the plane however performed admirably, and only crashed because it no longer had any guidance systems

 

Offline An4ximandros

  • 210
  • Transabyssal metastatic event
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
So my other theory abour the ship being gigantic was the right one, heh.

 

Offline z64555

  • 210
  • Self-proclaimed controls expert
    • Minecraft
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Okay, not the best render but it gets the message across

/snip/

Red box is human-sized (it's actually bigger than the average human at 2 meters tall)

I wouldn't want to be standing near those windows during a firefight, but doesn't need to be a midget to fit in a corridor in there.
The armor is pretty thick.

Also the front end looks really bland without something glowy there.

It is just big enough for rooms or compartments with their ceilings as the windows... so maybe the red shirts can have their quarters there.  :drevil:
Secure the Source, Contain the Code, Protect the Project
chief1983

------------
funtapaz: Hunchon University biologists prove mankind is evolving to new, higher form of life, known as Homopithecus Juche.
z64555: s/J/Do
BotenAlfred: <funtapaz> Hunchon University biologists prove mankind is evolving to new, higher form of life, known as Homopithecus Douche.

 
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
Ah, now I see.  The redshirts themselves are the armor.
17:37:02   Quanto: I want to have sexual intercourse with every space elf in existence
17:37:11   SpardaSon21: even the males?
17:37:22   Quanto: its not gay if its an elf

[21:51] <@Droid803> I now realize
[21:51] <@Droid803> this will be SLIIIIIGHTLY awkward
[21:51] <@Droid803> as this rich psychic girl will now be tsundere for a loli.
[21:51] <@Droid803> OH WELLL.

See what you're missing in #WoD and #Fsquest?

[07:57:32] <Caiaphas> inspired by HerraTohtori i built a supermaneuverable plane in ksp
[07:57:43] <Caiaphas> i just killed my pilots with a high-g maneuver
[07:58:19] <Caiaphas> apparently people can't take 20 gees for 5 continuous seconds
[08:00:11] <Caiaphas> the plane however performed admirably, and only crashed because it no longer had any guidance systems

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • Moderator
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Development: Narayana? What Narayana. Opinions?
You could put a nameplate there...

The nameplate is on the lower armor plate. Double nameplate would look really dumb :P
And moving the nameplate would make the bottom piece even more bland than the top one.

So my other theory abour the ship being gigantic was the right one, heh.
Ship is the same size the Narayana is. (it's ~1.8km long), so yes it is pretty big.
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================