HLP Network

News:

HLP Donations Page has been reworked for supporting the site.
Please note that the previous "Tiers" are currently not operational (but will be worked on).
You can still cancel any previous re-occurring donations to make new ones which will go to the new Treasurer Admin (Zacam).

 
« Previous Thread Next Thread »
Print
Pages: < Prev 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: FS1 Inconsistancies  (Read 5308 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeff Vader

  • The Back of the Hero!
  • 212
  • Bwahaha
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #40 on: July 21, 2008, 12:16:50 pm
Quote from: castor on July 21, 2008, 12:04:39 pm
Quote from: Lobo on July 21, 2008, 06:18:36 am
"There are several hundred Saths" is wrong, since that explicitly claims that there are more Saths than what has been stated in canon. It is a deliberate, arrogant and unproven claim.
Agreed. Yet the enthusiasm to defend the canon seems to go a bit overborad at times? I mean, canon is what was written by :v: years ago, nothing that could be said here will change that.

If someone makes an occasional non-canon statement why not just read it as what it is, speculation? Most of the time the non-canon alarm going off at the slightest slip seem to just break/derail the discussion instead of doing anything good.
True that. Yet at least I would prefer if people used words like "maybe" and "possibly" and such, when speculating. It would help to emphasise the fact that the things being described are not hard facts.

And actually this time the incident was fueled by Al Tarket's denial of canon. At least I trust admiral Petrarch when he says that over 80 Saths are around the Capella sun. Especially when he also says that there are ships monitoring the Saths. I don't need to go there and count them one by one.
23:40 < achillion > EveningTea: ass
23:40 < achillion > wait no
23:40 < achillion > evilbagel: ass
23:40 < EveningTea > ?
23:40 < achillion > 2-letter tab complete failure

14:08 < achillion > there's too much talk of butts and dongs in here
14:08 < achillion > the level of discourse has really plummeted
14:08 < achillion > Let's talk about politics instead
14:08 <@The_E > butts and dongs are part of #hard-light's brand now
14:08 <@The_E > well
14:08 <@The_E > EvilBagel's brand, at least

01:06 < T-Rog > welp
01:07 < T-Rog > I've got to take some very strong antibiotics
01:07 < achillion > penis infection?
01:08 < T-Rog > Chlamydia
01:08 < achillion > O.o
01:09 < achillion > well
01:09 < achillion > I guess that happens
01:09 < T-Rog > at least it's curable
01:09 < achillion > yeah
01:10 < T-Rog > I take it you weren't actually expecting it to be a penis infection
01:10 < achillion > I was not

14:04 < achillion > Sometimes the way to simplify is to just have a habit and not think about it too much
14:05 < achillion > until stuff explodes
14:05 < achillion > then you start thinking about it

22:16 < T-Rog > I don't know how my gf would feel about Jewish conspiracy porn

15:41 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
15:47 < EvilBagel> butt
15:51 < Achillion> yes
15:53 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]

18:53 < Achillion> Dicks are fun

21:41 < MatthTheGeek> you can't spell assassin without two asses

20:05 < sigtau> i'm mining titcoins from now on

00:31 < oldlaptop> Drunken antisocial educated freezing hicks with good Internet == Finland stereotype

11:46 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
11:50 < achtung> Surely you've heard of DVDA
11:50 < achtung> Double Vaginal Double ANal
11:51 < Kobrar> ...
11:51 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has left #hard-light []
 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #41 on: July 21, 2008, 12:39:26 pm
I guess it's a sort of blasphemy, sort of like why Muslims get pissed when Muhammad appears in Family Guy and stuff.
 

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #42 on: July 21, 2008, 02:05:43 pm
Something like that probably :D
Personally I wouldn't mind unleashing the canon inquisition in its full wrath when speaking about the content going into FSO/MVps/Wiki/etc, but that treatment is a bit harsh to be applied in general discussion.

But yea well, its not such a big deal after all.
 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人＼ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #43 on: July 21, 2008, 02:09:56 pm
"Noone expects the Grammar Canon inquisition!"
（´・ω・｀）
=============================================================
 

Offline Akalabeth Angel

  • 211
    • Minecraft
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #44 on: July 21, 2008, 10:39:08 pm
    One inconsistence I noticed playing FS1, the AI fighters launch missiles at you before you're even in range. Dragons are firing hornets at me a moment before I even start locking on with my own hornets. What's up with that?

     Gorram Cheaters.
 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #45 on: July 22, 2008, 08:47:18 am
Quote from: Snail on July 21, 2008, 06:10:57 am
It is contradictory to canon, however, to say that there were "several hundred" Saths in Capella, because as we've seen, there were only 80. So Al Tarket is talking crap there.

Uh, actually, saying 80 is contradictory too, because I remember it to be 80+ (83?).
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story
  

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: FS1 Inconsistancies
Reply #46 on: July 22, 2008, 09:16:10 am
You know what I mean.
Print
Pages: < Prev 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« Previous Thread Next Thread »