Originally posted by Ten of Twelve
And I'm not scared to watch dead bodies or blood or mutant zombies but those BANG! places, where some big piece of junk jumpes out of the corner freak me out...
Originally posted by Setekh
No no, neither. I mean those really horrifying ones. The ones that send a shiver down your spine, and make you paranoid whenever you walk through dark places... :nervous:
Originally posted by Ten of Twelve
Britney Spears?
Originally posted by Stunaep
Horror movies have zombies/vampires/britney in it.
Originally posted by nuclear1
Alien3
Alien: Resurrection
Originally posted by venom2506
depends. The Ring ( the original one, thank you ) was really... disturbing :p
I like a lot.
Movies like braindead are funny, but then again, that WAS the main purpose, braindead was meant to be funny ( little quizz, who made braindead? :D ).
Originally posted by 01010
No no no no no. No.
No no no no no no no no no, Alien was classic thriller/suspense/horror, Aliens was classic balls to the floor action film.
Alien3 and Resurrection were, well, horrible really.
Originally posted by 01010
Wasn't that a Sam Raimi/Bruce Campbell film?
Originally posted by venom2506
( little quizz, who made braindead? :D ).
Originally posted by Stunaep
Peter Jackson.
Originally posted by BorealisDamn! Never thought I'd say it but for once I concur. :lol:
I really only like horror movies with a supernatural or alien premise to them. Slasher flicks put me to sleep. The more realistic the effects and the more the background info ties in with RL the more I'll get absorbed. And of course there must be plenty of action and explosions.
Originally posted by Borealis
And a freaked out boyfriend at my side is great fun too (even if I know he's just pretending ;7 )[/color] [/B]
Originally posted by nuclear1
The first one scared the absolute living hell out of me (I actually soiled myself :o )
Originally posted by venom2506
depends.
Originally posted by Knight Templar
Signs comes to mind although It wasn't really a horro movie, it had the feel kind of.
Originally posted by AceThis thread ISN'T about overall movie tastes. :rolleyes:
For a thread about overall movie tastes, I'm seeing only horror films mentioned :p
Originally posted by mikhael
I don't think I've ever seen a horror movie: there hasn't been a flick yet that is more disturbing than the things in my own head and/or the nightly news.
Originally posted by Setekh
On a bit of a tangent, though, I wonder if anyone could make a genuinely frightening FreeSpace campaign. I'm not sure it's possible...
Originally posted by Setekh
I guess Playing Judas was the closest to 'scared' I've ever gotten while playing FS/ST/FS2. Into The Lions' Den... well, I didn't really have to change my shorts. ;)
Originally posted by Setekh
I find that scaring, not 'scary' (if that kind of distinction can be made). On a bit of a tangent, though, I wonder if anyone could make a genuinely frightening FreeSpace campaign. I'm not sure it's possible...
Originally posted by mikhael
Sorry, Steak. I have a pretty messed up head.
Now you want to talk about scary in GAMES, well, hands down: System Shock 2. Man. That game scared the hell out of me.
If they had been able to take the deeply disturbed fear that permeated the FS1 intro and injected it into the actual campaign, that would have made for the best space-combat game experience ever. Sadly, the lack of personal involvement prevented any type of real, genuine emotional response.
Originally posted by StrykeIX
I think SS2 would probably be scarier for me if the textures didn't invert, giving me this low-res, psychedelic-looking everything. That kinda sucked.
Originally posted by SetekhWha-wha-whaat??? :eek:
in a way, I'm glad I've never experienced that game.
Originally posted by LtNarol
Damn! Never thought I'd say it but for once I concur. :lol:
Option 2 naturally
Originally posted by Stunaep
Quiet, you! :D
Originally posted by lobsterclaw
For me, The Ring is the only movie that actually freaked me out. Even though the plot was kinda dumb, static on the TV still freaks me out.
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Wha-wha-whaat??? :eek:
You've never played System Shock 2? Sweet fancy Moses man, snag a copy ASAP!
Originally posted by mikhael
On the other hand, I do love movies that are scary and suspenseful and dark and moody. I thought that "The Others" was a brilliant film, for example, and it scared the unholy hell out of me at once point.
Originally posted by Stunaep
At this point I will have to mention "The Silence of the Lambs" again.
"The Silence of the Lambs"
Originally posted by Setekh
after which I thought I'd better stay away from it till I had some time to play games in daylight, when I was safe from being completely freaked out by SHODAN.
Originally posted by Setekh
:lol:
I don't think I've played any really frightening games. Ooh, wait... Myst scared me a little, because I was so absorbed into the game... yeah, it was very deep. :nervous:
*smashes head against wall*
This one should work:
http://download.com.com/3000-2097-913338.html?legacy=cnet
Thief is hella scary, the catacombs... hehehe... return to wolfenstein castle's catacombs, next to it, it's the muppets
Originally posted by CP5670
Thief and RTCW scary? :wtf:
Originally posted by Midnight Mercenary
meh...movies have never really scared me...I have yet to watch one that genuinely freaks me out...I have an annoying habit of being unable to forget that what I'm watching isn't real. I can't get into the movie.
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
Have you seen John Carpenter's "In the Mouth of Madness"?
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
Have you seen John Carpenter's "In the Mouth of Madness"?
Originally posted by SKYNET-011
Believe me, I know people who were scared watching Scary Movie! :lol:
Originally posted by venom2506
Thief is hella scary, the catacombs... hehehe... return to wolfenstein castle's catacombs, next to it, it's the muppets :p
Originally posted by CP5670*Remembers picture that CP put up in the "Post Your Ugly Mug" thread*
If anyone sits on any of my math books, i'm gonna to tear them apart; they really asked for it... :mad: :D
Originally posted by Levyathan
No. First Shock 2, then Shock 1.
Originally posted by venom2506
Logic would say the other way around.
Originally posted by venom2506
I'd say get Thief first, anyway.
Originally posted by Sesquipedalian
*Remembers picture that CP put up in the "Post Your Ugly Mug" thread*
:lol:
Originally posted by Levyathan
Have you played both of them? I have, and there are reasons why I suggest going for the second one first.
Originally posted by Levyathan
Thief's nice, but it's not at the same level as System Shock. It kind of gets boring after the first couple of missions, to tell you the truth - not to mention the undead missions.
Originally posted by venom2506
guess what? I've played only the first one, and I stopped after about 10 minutes. there's some games, you just can't pay them nowadays
Originally posted by venom2506
"slaps levy-etc with a trout" there's things you can say, and others you can't. you can't say this one.
Originally posted by venom2506
Thief's great, it's my favourite FPS ( if it can be called a fpS :doubt: ), and maybe my favourite game ever, nothing can compare to it.
Originally posted by Sandwich
I haven't seen any of the Alien series...
Originally posted by Sandwich
I haven;'t seen any of the Alien series
Originally posted by SetekhYou should, but you might not like SS1. It's definitely not for everyone. Aside from the dated graphics (which some superficial graphics-whore types can't get past), it's a pre-mouselook game with lots of keys and no remapping. But if you can handle all that, it has fantastic level design, plotting, and voice acting. Also, playing through SS1 makes a certain level in SS2 *much* more significant and enjoyable.
Alright, I'll do it... I'll get SS2. Wait - should I get SS1 first?
Originally posted by StrykeIX
Ah. I'll nominate Alien as one of the scariest movies ever. I mean, it didn't QUITE make me **** myself like Gremlins did, but that alien was damn cool. I mean, LOOK AT IT.
(http://www.chickenfrier.com/stuff/pintofkitten.jpg)
Creepy, eh?
Originally posted by LevyathanExplain.
If he plays System Shock 2 first he'll have a higher chance of enjoying Shock 1
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Explain.
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Seems like reasons A & B boil down to the same reason-- playing SS2 first will sufficiently interest players in SS1 to overlook its shortcomings.
Originally posted by ZylonBane
What if the player is *already* sufficiently interested in SS1? Do you still think it would be better to start with SS2?
Originally posted by StrykeIX
Logic would be wrong. There are some games, like the Fallout series, where getting the first helps figure out what's going on. There are some, like Syndicate, where the first is downright better. And then there are games where the second is just the first, vastly improved. FPSes generally fall under category 3.
Originally posted by Levyathan
:D
Depends on how interested he is. If he's interested enough, then he should go ahead and play Shock 1 first. The thing is, how interested is sufficiently interested? I don't think Setekh is interested enough, therefore I think he should play Shock 2 first.
Also, as venom2506 showed us, a failed attempt at playing Shock 1 first might ruin all of your interest.
Originally posted by Sandwich
Meh - I'm a wuss; Option 1. I just don't get any real enjoyment out of jumping in my chair, or lying in bad after a movie with scenes going through my mind, unable to get to sleep... :nervous:
On the other hand, commanding an APC through the streets of Jenin, with grenades and makeshift explosives going off on top and all around the vehicle, bullets pinging off the sides, etc etc... wasn't all that scary. Neither was disarming live mines in a hornet-ridden minefield, come to think of it.
*thinks back*
Scariest movies I've seen (to clarify, I haven;'t seen any of the Alien series, any Texas Chainsaw Massacre, nor The Ring, Others, or even Silence of the Lambs/Hannibal. I know - poor, deprived me. Bah.) was when I watched Event Horizon and Sphere back-to-back one boring saturday on base. :p
Originally posted by StrykeIX
FO2 was still a bit more fun though. More stuff to do- Fallout, you just head down, head back up, try to kill the evil Overseer- a bit more linear.
And yes, I mean the Overseer. Guy was a total bastard.:D
Originally posted by Setekh
I think I'll play Shock 1. I'd rather go from difficult-gaming-experience to less-difficult-gaming-experience, and I've heard enough about the games to be at least a little interested by now. :)
Originally posted by StrykeIX
Steak: Actually, I just lost my copy of 1 recently. but they sell the dual jewel most places now.
Originally posted by Levyathan
See? You didn't even have to ask for one of those reasons - you discovered it by your own. It seems your logic betrayed you.
And I see you consider graphics an important factor in games. That's sad at least, really.
This is getting pretty lame. If you can't spell my name you shouldn't even be allowed to talk in the first place.
It's your right to have that opinion. It's my right not to agree with it. If you can't understand that, you should move to a cave and block the entrance.
Originally posted by Setekh
Hmmm, does anyone sell the SSOTY Edition of FS2 online?
Originally posted by Setekh
Oh, and, my question still stands... :)
Originally posted by venom2506Irrelevent to System Shock. The CD-enhanced version supports SVGA rez (640x480), although it does default to 320x240.
2) I do indeed consider graphics an important factor, whats wrong with that? Try playing a VGA game on a 21" and come back to me
The plain simple reason is that ... I couldn't figure the UI outHa! The sad truth comes to light at last. Too bad the SS interface was over your head, since most fans of both games agree that the plot of the first one was actually better.
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Irrelevent to System Shock. The CD-enhanced version supports SVGA rez (640x480), although it does default to 320x240.
Ha! The sad truth comes to light at last. Too bad the SS interface was over your head, since most fans of both games agree that the plot of the first one was actually better.
Originally posted by venom2506
2) I do indeed consider graphics an important factor, whats wrong with that? Try playing a VGA game on a 21" and come back to me ( very funny, I can actually draw the outlines of the pixels on the screen :doubt: ).
Originally posted by venom2506
The plain simple reason is that I got it from a CD cover ( so I should still have it somewhere ) and I couldn't figure the UI out, and alt-tabbing the game every ten seconds just to check in a txt how to swing a stupid metal bar, well, no thanks.
Originally posted by StrykeIX
I like how people try to pass off as "shallow" the preference for good graphics, particularly since computer gaming is 90% shallow. It's like watching a Sylvester Stallone movie, and saying "Yes, but the explosions shouldn't be the only criteria you go on! Personally, I prefer Rambo II for the engaging plot, and the others are merely in poor taste." Games, none of them are Shakespeare. They aren't even Steven King, with a few notable exceptions- none of which are shooters or space sims. If you're gonna be a culture snob, games are NOT the medium to do it in. Go learn about coffee tables or something.
But anyway.
Try playing a VGA game on a 21" and come back to me
Originally posted by CP5670
I have always been a true old games fanatic and don't care about pixellated graphics, sound driver quirks or weird interfaces one bit
Originally posted by StrykeIX
I like how people try to pass off as "shallow" the preference for good graphics, particularly since computer gaming is 90% shallow. [...] If you're gonna be a culture snob, games are NOT the medium to do it in.
Originally posted by CP5670
Anyway, I cannot get the first game to work correctly here due to EMS issues, so I am going to give the second one a shot.
Originally posted by StrykeIX
I like how people try to pass off as "shallow" the preference for good graphics, particularly since computer gaming is 90% shallow. It's like watching a Sylvester Stallone movie, and saying "Yes, but the explosions shouldn't be the only criteria you go on! Personally, I prefer Rambo II for the engaging plot, and the others are merely in poor taste." Games, none of them are Shakespeare. They aren't even Steven King, with a few notable exceptions- none of which are shooters or space sims. If you're gonna be a culture snob, games are NOT the medium to do it in. Go learn about coffee tables or something.
But anyway.
From Venom:
...coz I don't like arguments ( I have way enough arguments with Mikhael and Killmenow)
Originally posted by StrykeIXLet's all give Stryke a big hand for demonstrating the classic debate fallacy known as the "straw man". In other words, intentionally taking your opponent's argument, twisting it into an obviously flawed state, then knocking it down.
I like how people try to pass off as "shallow" the preference for good graphics, particularly since computer gaming is 90% shallow. It's like watching a Sylvester Stallone movie, and saying "Yes, but the explosions shouldn't be the only criteria you go on!
Originally posted by CP5670
I just did that today, in fact. :D (been playing through Doom 2 again) I have always been a true old games fanatic and don't care one bit about pixellated graphics, sound driver quirks or weird interfaces, and I actually use keyboard-only in FPS games even today. :D
Anyway, I cannot get the first game to work correctly here due to EMS issues, so I am going to give the second one a shot. Didn't have any time last night (too busy with PI) but I might be able to try out that demo tonight instead.
BTW the HOTU servers are slow, despite the rest of the site being very good. I got a maximum of around 11k/sec... :doubt: (as opposed to 160 average from other sites)
Originally posted by venom2506
I love a game that hardly anybody knows, it's called Shadow of the Horned Rat ( no, it's not a joke, shut up :p )
Originally posted by CP5670
and I actually use keyboard-only in FPS games even today. :D
Originally posted by Zeronet
Hehe (http://www.warbucket.com/comic.php?id=56)
;)
Originally posted by Zeronet
Hehe (http://www.warbucket.com/comic.php?id=56)
;)
Originally posted by Setekh
Hmmm, does anyone sell the SSOTY Edition of FS2 online?
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
Also, some of us started playing computer games 2 decades ago and we have some good memories from old games, that relied on their gameplay, memories that sometimes can cloud our judgement.
Originally posted by Sandwich
Dude, have someone burn and ship you a copy. Perfecty legal, even if you didn't previously own the game.
Originally posted by venom2506
no it's not. source code doesn't mean the game is free now :p there' still copyrighted art, etc, in it.
Originally posted by Sandwich
What Goober said. I can't believe you missed that whole thread, Venom. You disappoint... :doubt:
:p
Seriously, there's a clause in the Liscence Agreement when you install FS2 (it's not in the readme though) that you can freely distribute copies to friends and aquaintances on a non-profit, noncommercial basis.
Originally posted by Goober5000
(http://dynamic4.gamespy.com/~freespace/forums/images/smilies/wakka.gif)
Suicide is Latin... :lol:
sui = oneself, cide = kill --> the act of killing oneself :nod:
Originally posted by Levyathan
In Portuguese it's both a noun and a verb. Depends on how you use it.
Not that it matters, just felt like sharing it.
Originally posted by Sandwich
Same in Hebrew, as well. I think it's just us messed-up English speakers who have it as a noun only. :p
Originally posted by Goober5000
I know - that's what's ironic about it. The language is probably one of the most complicated in the world to learn, so strictly on an ease-of-use/ease-of-learning ranking, it would be near the bottom for non-native English speakers.
Originally posted by Sandwich
No "probably" about it - it is the hardest to learn. But that's what gives it its versatility and immense capabilites, allowing one utter freedom in self-expression and verbalization. :p
:nervous:
Originally posted by Sandwich
No "probably" about it - it is the hardest to learn.
Originally posted by Sandwich
Seriously, there's a clause in the Liscence Agreement when you install FS2 (it's not in the readme though) that you can freely distribute copies to friends and aquaintances on a non-profit, noncommercial basis.
Originally posted by Levyathan
If I find a grammar book around I'll torment you to the rest of eternity with Portuguese verb conjugations - I don't feel like typing any more right now. Also, I'm not too sure about the vós (which is the plural of you) conjugations. When Styxx reads this he'll be able to correct me and add all the missing forms (I hope).
A future form -
Eu falarei
Tu falarás
Ele/Ela falará
Nós falaremos
Vós falarais
Eles falarão
Originally posted by Levyathan
I wouldn't say that. I wouldn't say that at all.
A 20-year plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
by Mark Twain
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
Originally posted by Setekh
Hey, Mike... how do I send you some money? :o
Originally posted by Sandwich
Ok then, try reading the following by Mark Twain - English made logical:
Originally posted by Sandwich
*looks at Snakeseyes' location*
And some of us can't legally buy computer games anymore, so we have to rely on the old games in the cupboard. ;) :p
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
No, the problem is I can buy the game, but I can't install it.
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
No, the law has been judged unconstitutional(sp?).
Originally posted by Snakeseyes
...unconstitutional(sp?).
Originally posted by wEvilSo, your top 5 must look something like this?
one of my favourite films of all time has to be Event Horizon
Originally posted by Goober5000
Hey, how'd this get back on topic?
Originally posted by Sandwich
Ok then, try reading the following by Mark Twain - English made logical:
Originally posted by Goober5000
Hey, how'd this get back on topic?
Originally posted by Levyathan
That's not even English!
Originally posted by wEvil
more like:
1. Event Horizon
2. LOTR (the old animated version)
3. TRON tied with Human Traffic
4. Moulin Rouge
5. The Time Machine (new version)
Originally posted by Sandwich
"No cost basis", dude. :)
Originally posted by wEvilUmm, we were talking about watching films, not making them. Do I need to use smaller words?
well done, you just demonstrated you know bugger all about how to make a good film.
have a gold star.
Originally posted by mikhael
You have to try hard to make a movie that sucked worse than Event Horizon.
Originally posted by Sandwich
I disagree - I don't think they tried very hard at all with Battlefield: Earth, and it is pretty much The Epitome of Suckiness. :ick
Originally posted by wEvilThat's just it... it didn't do it well. The plot was an aimless mess. The characters behaved illogically and stupidly. ("Hey, I think I'll stick my hand in the hyperdrive!")
Now, its very hard to come up with an origional idea these days [...] and I think it does that very well.
Originally posted by wEvil
well good for you - i fell of the chair laughing at SW:AotC and there were even quite a few horrible peices of CG in LOTR2.
unfortunately most of you seem to be so spoilt you can't actually appreciate the good aspects of most films - nor do many of you have a clue about how hard it is to actually make a good movie.
Now, its very hard to come up with an origional idea these days - as evidenced by the mindnumbing amount of soap opera directed "entertainment" floating around the airwaves - and you just said yourself its a fusion of styles, and I think it does that very well. You didnt like it, fair enough - but that doesnt automatically make it a terrible film.
Originally posted by mikhael
Bad writing
Bad acting
Bad direction
Bad musical score
Bad effects integration
Bad pacing
Bad internal consistency
Bad idea
Please, defend something worthy of your effort.
Originally posted by Styxx
Ok, that had to be said. By the way, I lied.
Originally posted by Setekh
Thank goodness. :D
Has anyone mentioned Mission To Mars yet?
Originally posted by Styxx
Didn't watch it. I was sufficiently traumatized by Red Planet. :D
Originally posted by Styxx
Didn't watch it. I was sufficiently traumatized by Red Planet. :D
Originally posted by Sandwich
Heh - I was the other way around - saw MtM, but not RP.
Originally posted by venom2506
same here. Btw, Steak ( rah, long time didn't call you that way :D ), you think MTM ending is bad? There's oh so much worse ( armageddon, etc ) :p
Originally posted by Setekh
I could say "Worst. Ending. EVAR.", but I don't think that would quite do MtM the justice it really deserves. ;)
Originally posted by Styxx
Bah, now I have to watch it. I love bad endings. :D
Originally posted by Setekh
:lol:
Why don't you pick up Street Fighter, while you're at it? :D
Originally posted by Setekh
(Christopher Lee)!! :D
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Just to confuse people, I'm now going to reveal that I liked Lost In Space.
Originally posted by Sandwich
Meh - I did too. So what?
Originally posted by Razor
Wasn't he Australian?