Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Stryke 9 on March 07, 2003, 10:08:14 pm

Title: Hmm...
Post by: Stryke 9 on March 07, 2003, 10:08:14 pm

Worth considering, even if I'm not entirely sold...

http://www.counterpunch.org/neumann02282003.html

Title: Hmm...
Post by: Kamikaze on March 07, 2003, 10:24:49 pm

hmm, this goes in direct contradiction to some other article I read. That one indicated taht 9/11 videos (good ones) when scrutinized show that the WTC buildings underwent a systematic destruction top-down, implying that it was a set-up (bombs) rather than an airplane strike... also arguing the WTC could have sustained plane crashes without falling so dramatically.

I'll find it.... sometime...

 'nyway, the article does hold some truth-ish-ness, Bush and his administration seems to be blatantly evading the truth and questions (was funny watching his speech yesterday) about the truth with their classical "but he's had 12 years to disarm" line. (and of course the whole weapon thing is a big evasion of some sort) However I'm not sure if the US is necessarily trying to keep peoples eyes away from Osama...

Title: Hmm...
Post by: CP5670 on March 07, 2003, 10:33:21 pm

sorry, but that was just a waste of five minutes of my time; the guy has a few good points, but there are too many errors to offset that... :p

Title: Hmm...
Post by: Warlock on March 07, 2003, 10:35:26 pm

Anyone watch the M-TV with the Brit Prime Minister answer ?'s from a panel across Europe ?

Funny part is that the three Iraqi speakers, thanked him several times and said without a doubt they WANTED the Military intervention to remove Sadam,...their only worry was to insure the UN would replace the Iraqi Gov. with a Democratic one and stick through it until it was self functioning.

Title: Hmm...
Post by: Kamikaze on March 07, 2003, 10:48:21 pm

http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.html

www.whatreallyhappened.com

http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-enrich030603.asp