Originally posted by Tiara
Personally I think its your own choice. My choice is that I don't care when I have sex.
For the age thing, I also say its your own choice. I will probably don't have anyone who agrees with my on this but meh.
Originally posted by Stunaep
What age: Above 15 apparently, since I haven't had any.
Originally posted by Venom
you're wrong, I'm all with you on that. only limit if you "start" young, it has to be with someone of the same age. can't stand sickos who gets young girls.
furthermore, I think it's "safer" to have sex before marriage coz otherwise, there's more risk that once married, you wonder "how it is" outside of your couple, no matter how much you love your husband/wife. and that can lead to bad things, if you know what I mean.
my two cents on that.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
And preferably not with a girl who later turns out to be in someway related to you, then it'd et really weird.
Originally posted by Tiara
Kinda obvious don't ya think? :p
Originally posted by kode
age of consent: 15.
Originally posted by kode
age of consent: 15.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Well, yes, but of course you might not know at the time, or you might be really screwed up, and incestuous.(sp)
Originally posted by Tiara
Age of consent: As soon as the persons involved know what sex really is. (Usually 1 or 2 years into puberty).
So we agree mostly ;)
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
You know, my cousin had a list of worldwide AoC, and in some countries it is as low as 12!
Originally posted by Stunaep
13 here
Originally posted by Stryke 9
I take a strong stance against premarital sex with your own grandmother.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Not necessarily, some people start puberty really early, I thinki I started at nine, but this is getting overly personal.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
You know, my cousin had a list of worldwide AoC, and in some countries it is as low as 12!
Originally posted by Venom
that's why you're like this?
oh, I'd like to add that the first time HAS to be straight sex :p ( well, all the others too, but that's another matter ).
Originally posted by Tiara
We don't really have an age of consent. By law its 16, but you really won't get arrested if you have sex at age 12 :p You are free to do as you please here, but when its done under influence (by adults etc) or force its just plain wrong.
Originally posted by Venom
oh, I'd like to add that the first time HAS to be straight sex :p ( well, all the others too, but that's another matter ).
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
It's 16 in Britain, but not really enforced, and AFAIK you cannpt get charged for rape if you are under 14. Odd.
Originally posted by Tiara
You can here, though sentence is usually juvenile prison or something similar.
Originally posted by Stunaep
KILL!
THE!!
GHEY!!!
SUBJECT!!!!
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
I find it hard to believe that some US states have put a ban on male/male and female/female sex!
Land of Liberty?!?
Originally posted by Tiara
Why r u so anti-talkaboutghey? Its perfectly normal. I'm not saying you have to become ghey :p
Originally posted by Tiara
Also, you HAVE to try both sides :p :D
...errr...ok yeah... ummm whatever...
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
I find it hard to believe that some US states have put a ban on male/male and female/female sex!
Land of Liberty?!?
Originally posted by Stunaep
I just want to be able to post without 50 posts appearing before I get to reply.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Land of deceny.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Land of decency.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Exaclty, I keep having to edit posts as there has been postage in the interval.
anyway, I think anal is illegal in Britain, or so they told us at school.
Originally posted by Tiara
The government telling you how to have sex? :lol: Its not like they are going to check up upon you :p
Originally posted by Tiara
The government telling you how to have sex? :lol: Its not like they are going to check up upon you :p
Originally posted by Zeronet
Nothing wrong with people being gay, just the act.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Isn't there Sex Education in Dutch schools, then?
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
What about lesbians?
Originally posted by Zeronet
Lots of people used to get arrested for sodomy. Then some fool scrapped the law.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Lots of people used to get arrested for sodomy. Then some fool scrapped the law.
Originally posted by Tiara
Sure there is. Quite some actually :p Our teacher brought sex toys and condoms to school once :D
Its really weird to see your teacher holding a vibrating dildo in front of the class you know :lol: Hilarious too!
Originally posted by Zeronet
Same applies, the act is wrong.
Originally posted by Venom
well, it looks very right to me ;7 ( for lesbians I mean :p )
Originally posted by Zeronet
Same applies, the act is wrong.
Originally posted by Stunaep
You know, we estonians could really use a sexual education class. The best we have is our 25 y.o. male history teachers speaking about how he, quote 'hit on the laydeeez' back at the University. :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Stunaep
You know, we estonians could really use a sexual education class. The best we have is our 25 y.o. male history teachers speaking about how he, quote 'hit on the laydeeez' back at the University. :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
If only ours was so interesting, it was just patronizing, really, all these animations and ****. And two old women discussing chlamydia.
Originally posted by Tiara
But don't think it'll get people on your friendly side.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Its actually the Roman Catholics churches opinion.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Well there you are then. If you are Catholic, then good luck to you.
You'll have to forgive me if I start singing "Every Sperm is Sacred"
:)
Originally posted by Stunaep
Now, hit for a new subject:
Love, then sex
or Sex, just for the heck of it?
I'm a strong Love then Sex supporter. I'm not really into drunk bad/naughty girls, I'm more of the good, nice, big cleavage kinda girl type.
Originally posted by Venom
in france, it's easy: channel four, every first saturday of each month, late in the night :p
Originally posted by Tiara
Holland:
Nederland 2: Neuken do je zo (This is how to have sex)
RTL 5: 23:00 Playboy Sex Court, erotic movies
FOX 8: After eleven o' clock: Sexcetera, erotic movies
Channel+: After midnight pr0n movies
YOU SEE!? We even have sex education on television! HA! We pwn j00! :p No for real, "neuken doe je zo" is a Sexual Education program.
Originally posted by Stunaep
in estonia, there's 3 months of autumn, and 9 months of bad weather.:p
Originally posted by Stunaep
Now, hit for a new subject:
Love, then sex
or Sex, just for the heck of it?
I'm a strong Love then Sex supporter. I'm not really into drunk bad/naughty girls, I'm more of the good, nice, big cleavage kinda girl type.
Originally posted by Stunaep
in estonia, there's 3 months of autumn, and 9 months of bad weather.:p
Originally posted by Zeronet
I think this thread will end in fire. If it continues down this path anyway.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBBNo.
Sex with animals
Discuss.
Originally posted by Shrike
No.
Originally posted by Tiara
we can have a normal conversation.
Originally posted by Tiara
Heh, lets keep it with human-human relations to keep the admins happy :p
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
Well what is there to say?
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBBProbably a good idea.
OK, it's probably for the best, anyway.
Originally posted by Tiara
Zeronet, you are in violation of the rules :p No bashing was a rule. That also means no bashing of gay people. :p Keep those opinions to yourself ot post them on some other board.
Also, if people won't act childish we can have a normal conversation.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Did you fail to see the part, where i said i used to have those opinions hmm?
Originally posted by Zeronet
I was talking about the shooting them bit, not the "its wrong" part.
Originally posted by Petrarch of the VBB
I never saw anything about shooting them. The Plot Thickens.
Originally posted by Zeronet
Its actually the Roman Catholics churches opinion. I think my current opinion is an improvement upon the days when i thought they should all be rounded up and shot.
First point: True. BUT i said its your choice. If an old man seduces a little girl who doesn't know what sex is or barely, it isn't her choice. And since little children dont know or barely know what sex is they can't make that choice and automatically shouldn't have sex IMO.
Originally posted by vyper
Now for something amusing: What do you call a blonde virgin?
Oxymoron.:nervous:
(remember, the most important thing in all things like this is not to force your opinion on someone else. its like a form of rape)
Originally posted by CP5670:p But still giving them the choice to not accept your way of thinking!
hey, but that's what democracy is all about; trying to get other people to think like you! :D
Originally posted by ZeronetYou afraid of the big bad gays? Geez, you're acting like it's a disease.
I don't have a problem with them as people, as long as they keep it to themselves and away from me.
Originally posted by Shrike
Who cares what people do in the bedroom so long as they're not hurting anyone doing it?
Originally posted by vyper
What about BDSM? :lol:
Originally posted by Shrike
Beat you to it.
Originally posted by CP5670
huh, some thread... :D
what's wrong with animals, or anything else for that matter? same thing as humans really, just bunches of particles... :p :D
Originally posted by silverwolf
i have no prob with homosexuals exept when one stands at the screen door and plays with their wank at you.
Originally posted by Shrike
inflicts no damage worse than a bruise, and that's if you're not careful.
Originally posted by Stryke 9He asks his boyfriend to stop, but it just seems to excite him more.
Happens all the time, does it?
Originally posted by StealthFirstly, unless it involves kids, horses or transexuals, all pr0n is good pr0n and as such is extreme fun to do in real life.
i dunno man, some of the website banners i've seen for bdsm sites the stuff they're doing looks pretty damn painful... quite a lot more than just a bruise. i guess there's degrees of that sort of stuff... then again, i've never been into that or any pr0n site
Originally posted by Shrike
Who cares what people do in the bedroom so long as they're not hurting anyone doing it?
Originally posted by silverwolf
an0n:go jack off
Originally posted by Top Gun
The thing that always puzzles me in the sex department is that why do so many non-religious people still have respect for the practice of ceremonial marriage? Those who have taken an objective and critical look at the superstitious element of monothesium (I'm assuming there is nobody from any other religion here) and come to the conclusion that it's bunk should then instantly reject all the morals, ethics and rules it forces upon its believers. It is justified to say that for the atheist, marriage and 'the family unit' should take its place amongst stonings, sacrificial offerings (human, animal or vegetable), and genital mutilation.
Originally posted by Stealth
i dunno man, some of the website banners i've seen for bdsm sites the stuff they're doing looks pretty damn painful... quite a lot more than just a bruise. i guess there's degrees of that sort of stuff... then again, i've never been into that or any pr0n site
Originally posted by an0nI prefer my women in the flesh, got a problem with that?
Secondly, you just get more and more pathetic with each post. Any self-respecting man should have towering piles of pr0n mags, hard-drives full of filth and a girlfriend to be disgusted by it all.
Originally posted by Top Gun
The thing that always puzzles me in the sex department is that why do so many non-religious people still have respect for the practice of ceremonial marriage? Those who have taken an objective and critical look at the superstitious element of monothesium (I'm assuming there is nobody from any other religion here) and come to the conclusion that it's bunk should then instantly reject all the morals, ethics and rules it forces upon its believers. It is justified to say that for the atheist, marriage and 'the family unit' should take its place amongst stonings, sacrificial offerings (human, animal or vegetable), and genital mutilation.
Originally posted by an0n
Secondly, you just get more and more pathetic with each post. Any self-respecting man should have towering piles of pr0n mags, hard-drives full of filth
Originally posted by Kamikaze
But marriage rituals aren't a socially necessarily concept are they? Sure you'll need rules and laws to keep people bound , but I'm sure few actually treats that ritual as their social ultimatum. (as can be seen by divorce rates)
Originally posted by karajorma
Cause marriage is not just a religious thing. Plenty of animals mate for life. There are lots evolutionary benifits to it. The time and effort that is wasted on courtship can instead be spent on having sex and raising young.
Secondly once you've formed any kind of long term bond with your partner you'll soon find that it isn't legally recognised. This is perfectly understandable.
If you meet a woman and move in with her within a week when do you think she should have the right to make medical desicions about you should you be incapacitated?
Marriage gives both partners certain rights that otherwise remain with the next of kin. It also makes things easier should the couple decide to split. Divorce may be messy but it's far easier than trying to solve the same problems without having been married.
Also once the state recognises you as a couple you're entitled to all kinds of tax breaks.
There you go. Tonnes of logical reasons.
Unfortunately I'm not that logical :D I'd want to marry my girlfriend more cause I love her and want to show that.
Originally posted by Top Gun
I Understand the concept of Human Nature but it is still not a strong argument, there are lots of things the human race has done that definitely defy its darwinistic purpose (to make more humans). It's not in our nature to read and write books, do maths, go to the moon etc. but it's generally accepted that life is better with these things, so the analogous argument goes from here.
Originally posted by Top Gun
Yes, most countries legally recognise a bond between two people after a certain perioud of time together which further emphasizes my point on the need for any ceremonial marriage
Originally posted by Zeronet
:rolleyes: :hopping: :hopping: :hopping: :hopping: :hopping: :hopping: :hopping:
Originally posted by Zeronet
All im going to say is, what i don't see/hear/know about, cannot disgust me. I have no problem with them as people, i have no problems with lesbians or what they do. Though i am annoyed that people still find my opinions at fault, i cannot help it if i find the idea of what gay men do disgusting, so if you think that means im a intolerant person, or im treating it as a disease, i don't give a damn.
Originally posted by Tiara
Ow, man... Lets not continue on this path :p else we'll have another religion thread ;)
Originally posted by karajorma
So basically you're saying there is no need to get married cause the state does it for you automatically. Hardly an arguement against marriage is it?
Originally posted by karajorma
1) So where do you draw the line? At what point should a couple who live together automatically be considered a couple by the state? Remember no one gets married cause we're all aethists in this arguement so when should the state decide that my girlfriend has more right than my family to pull the plug on my life support machine? After a year? Two years? 7?
Originally posted by karajorma
2) What happens if at the time the state decides I'm married I don't feel ready? What if I felt ready for 3 years? Should I have had to wait?
Originally posted by karajorma
So why not get a Power of Attorney drawn up I hear you say? Well if I get one drawn up for everything that could become important in my life I might as well get married. Marriage automatically includes one. If every good aetheist couple has to at some point decide to get one you're simply swapping one marriage ritual for another. At some point a couple would have to say "I trust you enough to sign over my rights to you if I'm incapacitated. Let's get attorneyed!"
Originally posted by Top Gun
Yes (and should it just be a couple?) as it completely removes any essence of religion from the whole business.
Originally posted by Top Gun
Good for you :D you have failed to explain the reason why you choose marriage as a way of making a gesture of love as opposed to say; standing on a soapbox with a megaphone reciting love poetry to her or tattooing each others names some place etc.etc. etc. etc.
Originally posted by Top Gun
Go and look at legislation in a your respective country for a good idea of 'where the line is considered drawn'. You appeal to emotion in the second part of that point. One could turn that argument around on itself and present in in the form 'My wife, who I married in a hurry and known for only a month has more right than my family to pull the plug on my life support machine.'
Originally posted by Darkage
:wtf: how the **** could i have missed this thread?
Originally posted by Tiara
:lol: You should actually open your eyes once in a while.
Sex is like bridge. All you need is a good partner, or a good hand.
Originally posted by an0n
Sex is like a river. It's wet, sloppy and smells of fish.
Originally posted by vyper
EDIT: Spelling fixed to avoid KT's homoerotic thoughts.
Originally posted by IceFire
I've had big arguments in the past on all of these issues...to the point that I'm of the general belief that everyone is wrong and that nobody is right and so on and so forth. (ha!)
Originally posted by an0n
Kill the *snip*/stupid/*snip* and the world instantly becomes a better place.
Peace through war.
Originally posted by Stunaep
he was being sarcastical.
i think.