Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Joey_21 on June 18, 2003, 12:52:28 am
-
Check out this frog me and some friends blew up with a bottle rocket. :lol:
(click at own risk, frog gore beyond this point)
http://denebsystem.250free.com/froggobyebye.jpg
-
You're a sick ****.
You disgust me.
-
This is what frogs are for. :p
Scientific dissection is fun. ;7
-
:wtf: :wtf: :wtf:
-
Originally posted by Joey_21
This is what frogs are for. :p
Scientific dissection is fun. ;7
sadistic dissection more like...
go to australia, play golf with the cane toads...
-
Originally posted by Turnsky
sadistic dissection more like...
go to australia, play golf with the cane toads...
:wtf:
-
you know, get a five-iron, add cane toad ...
and
[SIZE=8]-THWACK!-[/SIZE]
why don't you try that you perverted bastard..:doubt:
-
What Shrike said. What the hell is wrong with you, your daddy smack you in the head a little too hard or something?
Even money you skinned your neighbor's dog, too. If you have to show off your sicko crap (since you're obviously so proud of your frog-killing power), go do it on some perv board. At least Turnsky's is kinda funny in concept, and he doesn't actually do it.
Hopefully, or I'll have to get him for that as well as the whole furry thing.
-
Mmmmkay. This was intended as a joke, k? I was really expecting this much hostility. :doubt:
-
that what you told ol' kermit there too?
:blah:
-
Dude, just because somewhere in your demented juvenile mind you think it's funny doesn't at all excuse it. Or maybe you'd care to argue that with Bruno when I send him over to skullfuck your mother and set your house on fire, yes? Slightly different scale, about as little humorous about it- see? Also sick, sadistic, and twisted.
-
Who sympathizes with a frog?
Seriously, I see nothing wrong with the dissection of a frog. Why do you think they are usually the experimental rodents in the biology lab? :blah:
-
there's scientific dissection and then there's retarded wanton, unclean destruction. And don't say there isn't a difference between the two.
-
Who sympathizes with a juvenile delinquent? No frog ever tried to set my property on fire or steal my weed. And, I gotta tell you, on average the frogs are smarter and more easy to empathize with.
For that matter, people get killed all the time. There are kids your age getting hacked to bits with machetes every day on the other end of the world. And some of it's good riddance, too- a lot of those kids did a fair deal of hacking themselves in their time, and were planning on doing a lot more. That mean it's open season on you now?
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
there's scientific dissection and then there's retarded wanton, unclean destruction. And don't say there isn't a difference between the two.
Ok, there is a difference. But obviously I agree that the first one was my intention.
-
What the fuck's scientific about blowing up a frog with a fucking bottle rocket? Was there some alternate hypothesis that frogs are explodeproof? That maybe they're not full of frog guts, but rather candy?
-
And what, exactly, isn't there scientific about it? :wtf:
-
jesus dude, you should be a lawyer....
-
Well, let's see.
Anything.
Yes, that sounds right. You killed a fucking frog. A species of animal sometimes used in scientific experiments. And that's the best rationale you have yet to offer for how this is "scientific"- which wouldn't be a justification by itself in the first place. In other words, you're not only a sicko, but a none-too-bright one who honestly thought someone would be amused by you gutting random animals for no apparent reason. Or, at least, buy into the idea that any form of killing is somehow justified in the name of science, even if it has nothing to do with experimentation or anything else but a bunch of dim 15-year-old crackers chortling over the spattered remains of whatever didn't run the fuck away fast enough.
Might as well quit while you're ahead, smart guy- you're letting a little bit too much information about your personality get out.
-
Okay... obviously you don't find the matter as fascinating as I did (and although it may seem a little disgusting to some I have not a clue as to why). Thread up for 0wnage...
Edit: I'd hardly differentiate between blowing rocks up and blowing frogs up, I take it none of you object to the former?
-
Fuck, I don't object to blowing up buildings. But just because you don't see the difference between making an explosion and killing something living that neither did you harm nor had a chance to fight back doesn't mean there isn't one. Sociopaths don't see the difference between people and trees, perhaps we'd better let Manson out of prison. Once again, you're showing off your low wattage. Fact, I think this thread should be locked, too- highlight it, so everyone can see just what kinda smackhead they're dealing with here.
Run off and cry, little boy- nobody thought your repulsive display of sadism was Nobel Prizewinning material. Go figure.
-
You grew this frog from your own blood, did you?
No? Sure seems like you're defending it in that way...
-
I don't like demented twits, and don't believe in encouraging them. Your parents should be smacked about for clearly not doing same to you enough. I mean, christ, what the hell is wrong with you, boy?
Or, to answer your halfwitted defensive question: No, but I have a degree of respect for life. I am not psychotic, I have a healthy functioning mind, that doesn't find amusement in random acts of pain infliction. And honestly, you can't say that wasn't the reason you did it- to inflict pain on something else.
-
You find this repulsive? You haven't seen some of the things that go into Tool videos, have you? :p
-
Ah- so you can't differentiate between reality and TV now, eh?
Jesus, all the things *****y 40-year-olds keep saying about kids are coming true...
-
It's the exact same visual dictation.
-
Maybe you should watch a little more TV. Say, 24 hours of it a day. Leave reality to those who are psychologically capable of having responsibility for a real life.
-
Maybe a person like yourself has the time to laze around 24-hours a day to watch television but I do not simply because I have life experience, unlike others. This is just that.
-
Torturing something for no other reason than to make life hell for something else is life experience? Well excuse me if I prefer appreciating life rather than ending it in some dickheaded attempt to imitate something I saw on MTV, asshole.
-
It actually did not go through any torture at all. And even if it did, why is that something to sympathize about? It's just a frog.
-
You're just a punkass, stupid kid. Who'd care if I shoved you into oncoming traffic? Honestly. Your "friends" would probably think it was the coolest thing they'd seen since they broomhandled a cat the other day, since their ability to distinguish any line of right and wrong is, like yours, incredibly hazy at best, nonexistent most likely; your teachers would be singing from the rooftops that there's one less of you to deal with; and your parents, after the obligatory show, would just squat out another to miseducate.
-
You're derrogating me just because I minorly damage a part of nature? :wtf: Well then why don't I go blow up that rock? Would it be worth derrogating me as well?
-
You can't read, either, can you?
Jesus, only in America do they let morons like you get past age 5. Fucking get out. Go back to your beloved TV, the one that spawned you. You aren't fit for human society, or anything else to do with reality. At first, I figured you were just a slightly dim delinquent, now I see you're another beast entirely. Your generation depresses me more than anything else ever could. The death of humanity.
Life is wasted on the living, honest to God. That frog would have made more of life than you can.
-
I take that as a "you also blew up a rock so the same applies". It appears, indeed, that there is something wrong with your grip on reality.
I suppose also that rock would be just as useful as the frog... Get real!
-
And now your English begins to degrade rapidly. Hell, if I keep posting will you dissolve entirely, flesh and bone? Break down into some mannequin underneath? It seems I'm peeling back layers, here. First, you have no common sense, then no sense of right, then no mind, then no soul, and now not even the trappings of a mind.
-
My ability to speak a language has little to do with my methods of occupancy. Anyway, I haven't the time to discuss this anymore because I have more important things to do such as sleeping. You need a better sense of reality. Good night.
-
Yes, run and hide. And hope I never run into you in real life, you maggot, or I'll give you the compiled beatings you've so sorely needed over all these years. Maybe by the time I'm finished with you you'll be seeing things from the frog's point of view.
-
On a related note, your inability to keep the conversation civilized seems to imply that I am more civilized than you will ever be. If you have a problem then get it dealt with.
-
This from the guy who routinely kills things for the sport of it. You're less civilized than an animal.
-
it isn't the fact that you killed a frog,
but that you did so in such a manner, and only to entertain your self, and you found it so funny that you, without hesitation, deemed it apropriate to take a picture of it, up load it, and display it for us,
_and_ were shocked when we didn't all go "wee haw! that ther frogi shur did blow up real purdy like!"
*AND* the fact that you cannot find anything even the slightest bit wrong with what you have done, and it must be us who are wrong
and you sully the good name of science in your feable atempts to justify you're actions.
what is wrong with you?
-
Bob, he didn't get it in two fucking pages of text, I think he's a goner. It was a nice summary, though.
-
Originally posted by Joey_21
On a related note, your inability to keep the conversation civilized seems to imply that I am more civilized than you will ever be. If you have a problem then get it dealt with.
You blew up the frog, took pictures, and thought it would be amusing to post them.
Stryke is calling you an idiot for doing so.
Which is less civilized?
God, you're an idiot. How can you not see this?
*shakes head and walks away*
-
Erm, but many people routinely kill bacteria.... only in a superficial attempt to clean yourself (i.e. using so-called antibacterial soap which doesn't actually do what it's supposed to) when in fact it's un-necessary. I don't see people labling all antibacterial soap users as inhumane. I fail to see how bacteria are any less deserving of your sympathy than frogs :p
-
Next time you get joy out of killing all those bacteria, wash simply to massacre millions, and then joyfully show off a microscope image of thousands of lysed cells like you deserve an award from it, I'll tell you. And then fucking beat the stupid out of you with a 2x4. But until that point, you're at least recognizably human.
-
The fact that he enjoyed it only shows the state of his own mentality and doesn't really make the act itself better or worse and so the act rests at an equal level with the bacteria thing. I take it you're complaining about his mentality and since I don't really care about that side of the issue I won't argue against you....
-
it's not the fact that he killed a frog,
hell even killing the thing in some sadistic manner just to please himself I would alow without saying anything,
but to post it and expect me and everyone else to get off on it too, and then defend his actions, is what I can not stand about this.
he is like some little kid who kills a bug becase he thinks it's fun to wach the guts and then shows it off to everyone, I always hated those kids.
-
Originally posted by Joey_21
Check out this frog me and some friends blew up with a bottle rocket. :lol:
(click at own risk, frog gore beyond this point)
http://denebsystem.250free.com/froggobyebye.jpg
Its very sad to see you cause suffering and death to a creature.
-
Joey: I'm not gonna call you an idiot, cause Stryke already did plenty of that. But I really would like you to ask yourself, what gives you the right to kill a living thing with no purpose in mind other than your own amusement.
If a frog is ok, why not a squirell? And if a squirell is ok, why not a cat? And if a cat is ok why not a dog? See where I'm going? It pretty arrogant of you to claim that you have the right to kill anything, even a frog? Who gave you that right? I'm pretty sure a lion could kill you just as easily, but if it did I'm sure you wouldnt think its ok....
Realy man, just find different ways to entertain yourself that do not involve killing things. If you cannot, please call your local mental health organization, and check yourself in under the fact that you are a psychopath. I'm not just randomly insulting you, its what the actual condition is. If you cannot place value on life, even the life of a frog, then you are a psychopath, plain and simple
Assuming that you have the right to kill a frog just because you are smarter and stronger is very stupid. As I've said, if a frog, why not a dog, or for that matter why not mentally retarded person? They dont appear to be too smart, and they're pretty weak? If you want to go destroy things, like for exampe rocks, I say go ahead. But living things are another matter
Peace out
-
acutally, you know, he'd be perfect Marine material. Or LA Cop. same difference.
-
Originally posted by Rictor
If a frog is ok, why not a squirell? And if a squirell is ok, why not a cat? And if a cat is ok why not a dog?
And if a dog is ok, why not a thread? :rolleyes: