Originally posted by ZylonBane
Manually copying a DLL is so NOT the correct way to install a codec. A link to the official download source (http://www.divx.com/divx/) is.
Originally posted by Krackers87I haven't downloaded the movies yet (56K here) so I don't know what they look like. But if Icefire said is true it needs better detail. Much like this (http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php/topic,15911.0.html) [shamelessly :thepimp:ing Blender ani]
As soon as i get my web site rehosted im going to start showcasing mods with the use of movies. Currently i have done 4 examples of a showcase for Bobboau's GTF Odysseus and want to know which one looks best.
Originally posted by ZylonBane
Divx codecs are backward-compatible, ya doof.
Originally posted by kode
even while that is true, backwardscompatibility doesn't mean it's as good at playing older video clips than the old codec was.
did windows 95 get better at running DOS applications?
ianweb@genom / $ ls
bin boot dev etc home lib mnt opt proc root sbin tmp usr var
ianweb@genom / $
Originally posted by Krackers87
In my defense, why the hell do you care if I waste my time?
Originally posted by Krackers87
In my defense, why the hell do you care if I waste my time?
Congratulations! You have just proved the theory that there is no limit to human stupidity. You should offer your posting style to hospital operating theatres as a highly-effective alternative to unconsciousness-inducing medications.
If brains were gasoline, you wouldn't have enough to drive an ant's Go-cart around the inside of a bottle cap. You are obviously suffering from Clue Deficit Disorder. Anyway, who was talking to you or even taking you under consideration? How true is Stanislaw J. Lec's famous remark: "Every now and then you meet someone whose ignorance is encyclopedic."
Reading your post is less interesting than watching paint dry. If wit was spit, your mouth would be drier than a shallow well in an African heat wave. Genius does what it must, talent does what it can, and you had best do what you're told, you dyslexic lobotomy patient. Maybe you wouldn't read like such a pathetic loser if you weren't so dense that light bends around you; if your weren't so fat that your cereal bowl has its own lifeguard, or if you didn't have a face so ugly that even your mother didn't know which end to put the diaper on. No, come to think of it, you would.
In closing, I offer these heartfelt words: Go suck on a frozen pineapple, asshole.
Originally posted by Tiara
How the [censor] can you compare OS's with video codecs?
Originally posted by ZylonBane
targets Tiara's flame warhead at Kode
Originally posted by kode
so she actually needs help doing that? she's been slacking off lately.
Originally posted by Unknown Target
How about you do something usefull, instead of buggin people about them helping you out with something that they don't even want? And what would really help you out, come to think of it, is if you would DO something that people want! Now THERE'S a novel idea! :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Unknown Target
*Looks at post*
*Wonders where the hell I threatened him*
Besides, your posts provide entertainment. How could I not look at them?
EDIT: And if you want bad, check out Stryke 9 on one of his bad days.
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Hey, I don't **** on newbies unless they get pushy. He hasn't demanded anything yet, far as I've seen.
Anyway, Krackers, did you have any specific questions? Your film speed is a tad too high (probably low capture rate combined with a high frame rate- reducing the color palette helps with the capture speed somewhat), and the image was a bit small to see anything specific at least in the one I managed to download without my computer crashing (it does that, not your problem), but other than that there's really nothing to actually wrong that I know of...
Originally posted by Unknown Target
:lol: Krackers, stop trying to throw your wait around. It isn't working.
Krackers, what you're doing looks awful fine to me. Keep at it. :yes:
Originally posted by CP5670
The first time I skimmed over that it looked like you were saying "what you're doing looks awful to me," so I was wondering why you put the :yes: in there. :D
Originally posted by Stryke 9But this is a better skin job--
Akh, see it now. Not a bad skinjob, either.