Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: vyper on October 18, 2003, 08:13:00 am

Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: vyper on October 18, 2003, 08:13:00 am
So which is it to be?

iTunes (//"http://akamaidownload.apple.com/530x3824/binaries/iTunesSetup.exe")
or...
Winamp5
 Winamp download site 1 (//"http://www.yazor.nildram.co.uk/winamp50beta_full.exe")
Winamp download site 2 (//"http://perso.wanadoo.fr/persoariari/WinAmp5Beta-xBetas.tar")

Personally I'm not wild on the "Pro" idea of winamp, but I can't find fault otherwise.

iTunes, to me seems a bit bulky like Media Player.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Ashrak on October 18, 2003, 08:40:46 am
wheres winamp 4?
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: kasperl on October 18, 2003, 08:51:38 am
winamp.com doesn't say aything baout anything but winamp 2 and 3, winamp 5 looks like a fake.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: diamondgeezer on October 18, 2003, 09:37:55 am
Winamp 5 my arse.

Anyway, Winamp 2.9x pwnz j00
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Ashrak on October 18, 2003, 09:49:56 am
i agree winamp 2 series is way better than 3
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: HotSnoJ on October 18, 2003, 10:07:04 am
Winamp 2.91 0\/\/|\|5 m3 +0!!11!!!

And it's not a resource hog like winamp3 or WMP.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: vyper on October 18, 2003, 12:27:24 pm
Winamp5 is real, its a beta as I point out in the poll. Neowin ran the story yesterday and it seems legit, the blurb in the version history makes it seem so.  And why in the name of ALL THAT IS LLAMA WHIPPIN IS NO ONE VOTING?!
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Admiral LSD on October 18, 2003, 12:34:37 pm
Where's the "none of the above option"? On Linux I use a combination of MPlayer and XMMS and on Windows I use Windows Media Player 9. I plan on giving iTunes a shot when I get the chance but I honestly doubt it'll have the OS integration necessary to tear me away from WMP.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: diamondgeezer on October 18, 2003, 12:34:53 pm
Quote
Originally posted by vyper
And why in the name of ALL THAT IS LLAMA WHIPPIN IS NO ONE VOTING?!

Becuase I'm busy admiring my quote in your sig
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: vyper on October 18, 2003, 12:48:57 pm
[q]Becuase I'm busy admiring my quote in your sig[/q]

Stop staring at my sig you perv! :p
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: diamondgeezer on October 18, 2003, 12:50:36 pm
:wtf:

I need an adult!
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Drew on October 18, 2003, 03:06:55 pm
Quote
Originally posted by diamondgeezer
Winamp 2.9x pwnz j00


:nod: :yes: :yes:
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Taristin on October 18, 2003, 03:39:15 pm
:nervous: *uses Musicmatch Jukebox...*
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Drew on October 18, 2003, 04:03:01 pm
lamer
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: diamondgeezer on October 18, 2003, 04:30:37 pm
:eek2: Music Match? Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Taristin on October 18, 2003, 04:43:04 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Drew
lamer

Screw you.

I like it, and in the long run for me, that's all that matters.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Kamikaze on October 18, 2003, 07:02:58 pm
*a happy mpg123 user* ;)

Seriously speaking I use mpg123 only when XF86 isn't in use, usually I use xmms.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Zeronet on October 18, 2003, 07:27:09 pm
iTunes=Apple
Apple=Bad
iTunes=bad
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Admiral LSD on October 18, 2003, 10:58:58 pm
Zeronet = ****tard
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Kamikaze on October 18, 2003, 11:10:28 pm
I oppose this use of equal signs. It would make more sense to use the membership symbol.

e.g.  6 (http://whatis.techtarget.com/WhatIs/images/elem-of.gif) R

This is because the equal sign makes for odd statements of questionable validity.

e.g. Apple = Bad
Microsoft = Bad
Apple = Microsoft
which is true by the transitive property (Assuming that applies in this field...)

;)
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: demon442 on October 18, 2003, 11:15:17 pm
Apple, with enough memory, runs better than any XP machine hopes its grandchildren can.  Seriously, if it werent for the prices, Apple Computers would be today's Microsoft, and Jobs would be ol' Billy.

There really is no argument over which is better, the two OS's are designed completely different and it is stupid to assume that one can discern a 'better' OS.  As far as I care, i'd run both if I could.


PS: G4 ownz j00 ass.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Blue Lion on October 18, 2003, 11:40:08 pm
WinAmp works fine for me
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Admiral LSD on October 19, 2003, 12:36:31 am
Quote
Originally posted by Kamikaze
I oppose this use of equal signs. It would make more sense to use the membership symbol.

e.g.  6 (http://whatis.techtarget.com/WhatIs/images/elem-of.gif) R

This is because the equal sign makes for odd statements of questionable validity.

e.g. Apple = Bad
Microsoft = Bad
Apple = Microsoft
which is true by the transitive property (Assuming that applies in this field...)

;)


Shi = Geek

:p
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Galemp on October 19, 2003, 12:51:51 am
iTunes pwns w1n4mp. No contest.

Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Zeronet on October 19, 2003, 01:02:32 am
Quote
Originally posted by Admiral LSD
Zeronet = ****tard


n00b.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: IceFire on October 19, 2003, 09:13:26 am
I'm going to try iTunes sometime soonish, I've used it on the Mac with little complaint (which is AMAZING since I complain alot about them :))...but its hard to beat the load times and performance of Winamp 2.
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Setekh on October 20, 2003, 01:50:41 am
:nervous:

I just use Windows Media Player...
Title: Apples or Llamas?
Post by: Gloriano on October 20, 2003, 01:54:46 am
i am using Windows media player 9 for now:)