Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: aldo_14 on March 08, 2004, 08:07:07 am
-
May be of interest to those involved in certain previous arguments (you know what ones I mean....)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/73/36074.html
-
Speaking of sheep did anyone else see that picture of the farmer who took hours spreading out feed so that his flock spelt out "I Love U B Mine"
Apparently the girl turned round and told him she already had a boyfriend :D
-
[gay]baaa[/gay]
-
now i know theyr liking it
-
Now tell me do ya,
Do ya have any money?
I wanna spend all your money,
At the Gay Baah, Gay Baah, Gay Baah!
-
It's never too late to go gay.
-
(http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/02/07/arts/gay.1842.jpg)
Penguins can be gay too. These two are the topic of a lot of study in the Central Park Zoo in NYC....
It was an article in the New York Times a while ago (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C1EF83A5F0C748CDDAB0894DC404482)
-
HOMERSEKSHALITY IS UNNATURAL! IT GOES AGAINST NATURE!
Yeah, so now we've got documented cases of gay penguins, gay sheep, gay hawks, and gay wolves (some of which, btw, mate for life).
I love science. :)
-
This one seemed more interesting..
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/73/35370.html
-
[color=66ff00]This might sound strange but the gay sheep theory has been around for years. Supposedly hetero rams to homo rams exist in a 10:1 ratio. Quite a sizable proportion if you think about it. It's been one of the main pieces of evidence behind the idea that being gay is down to genetics.
The thing that gets me is how do you test for a lesbian ewe? Ewe's afterall pretty much just stand there. :)
[/color]
-
Originally posted by Maeglamor
[color=66ff00]The thing that gets me is how do you test for a lesbian ewe? Ewe's afterall pretty much just stand there. :)
[/color]
Look for the one in comfortable shoes?
-
Originally posted by Corsair
(http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/2004/02/07/arts/gay.1842.jpg)
Awww now aren't they a cute couple! :)
-
Originally posted by diamondgeezer
Now tell me do ya,
Do ya have any money?
I wanna spend all your money,
At the Gay Baah, Gay Baah, Gay Baah!
Classic :D
-
Anyone have the Bush-Blair flash with Gay Bar as the song? I'de love to get my hands on that.
-
At the Gay Bar! Gay Bar! Gay Bar! (http://www.campchaos.com/othershows/video/03h.html)
-
Rictor, you're now officially my hero.
-
I never heard of such behaviour by animals...
Wonder what those scientist are doing?
-
This thread's a bit ghey I say.
-
Now that you're here, Vyper, yes. Yes it is. ;)
-
[camp] Hey, be nice! [/camp]
-
There was a thing on www.somethingawful.com about bisexual butterflies a little while back. It's in the archive if you wanna look. Very funny. :D
And there's some gay swans that winter at a nature reserve somewhere - it was either the midlands or over Llanelli-way (town nearish Swansea if you didn't know) :)
-
How can this possibly be, pyro-manic? homosexuality is not natural! There are no gay animals. Liberal scientists must be fixing the data to promulgate the leftist gay liberal agenda!
Seriously, is there anyone left who still thinks homosexuality is unnatural?
-
Not unnatural. A bit counterproductive, but not unnatural. It's their life, not mine, so why should I care?
-
Only evil-robots could be so outright destructive to our way of life. Damned homosexual robots...
Cut them open. Look at their hearts. You will see they pump cold, black oil. Mark my words!
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
Only evil-robots could be so outright destructive to our way of life. Damned homosexual robots...
Cut them open. Look at their hearts. You will see they pump cold, black oil. Mark my words!
Just like the dark, souless clones! God Bless AMERICA for banning them! Otherwise Bin Laden and his clone army would surely doom us ALL!
-
Palpatine/Bin Laden for president 2004
-
Seconded.
-
hooray for the sientific accomplishment :p
-
Originally posted by mikhael
How can this possibly be, pyro-manic? homosexuality is not natural! There are no gay animals. Liberal scientists must be fixing the data to promulgate the leftist gay liberal agenda!
Seriously, is there anyone left who still thinks homosexuality is unnatural?
*raises hand*
-
Mik: Of course, this means that the new (well, "new") argument will be that it's a form of mental retardation, a disease, and hence doesn't merit marraige provisions or anything else.
-
Are the mentally challenged (****ing PC) allowed to marry and procreate in the States? I'm pretty sure they are in Canada, but down South, who knows...
-
Yes. They are allowed to marry people of the opposite gender. :p
-
Oh come on, Sandwich, how can something be 'unnatural' if it happens in--check it out--NATURE? Surely none of those crazy liberal ideas got into the dumb animals.
Rictor, we let any mentally retarded person marry. Look at Bush.
Oh, I know that was wrong. I just couldn't help it. The liberal elite leftist agenda said I had to say it.
-
Originally posted by mikhael
Rictor, we let any mentally retarded person marry. Look at Bush.
The question is who is dumber? Bush for being a sad product of his heredity and environment, or his wife for marrying him... :p
-
Now now, be kind. You cannot blame Bush II on heredity. His father is pretty sharp, and his mother by all accounts, is too. You can't really call it environment either. The kid went to an Ivy League school.
I'm afraid that Bush II is just one of those inevitible genetic dead ends that comes along. Kinda like when too absolutely beautiful people have children that turn out to have three eyes and a conjoined twin growing out of a hump on the back.
-
Actually, Bush is smart in his own way. He's smart enough to realize he can't find his asshole with both hands. He's also smart enough to realize that he wants power, privilege and to be remembered.
Combining these two, he's smart enough to let others think and make decisions for him.
Though I don't know much about them, I think that Bush Senior and Laura are actually both pretty intelligent (oh the irony, I'm not sure how to spell intelligent) if not decent people.
-
Originally posted by mikhael
Oh come on, Sandwich, how can something be 'unnatural' if it happens in--check it out--NATURE? Surely none of those crazy liberal ideas got into the dumb animals.
While some may argue that Humans are just self-conscious animals, paralleling animal behavior with Human behavior - and even worse, using animal behavior as an excuse for Human behavior - is insane.
If wives started eating their husbands before sex, would you all of a sudden label it as "natural", just because the preying mantis does so?
Continue thinking along such lines, as unfortunately I don't have time to compose a more complete reply - gotta go to work.
-
It doesn't happen in nature...Such thing as Gay animals don't exists..
There are male animals that spend much time with other male animals, but they NEVER hump eachother. No physical contact...
Animals don't like havein something in ther behind...
Gays do and that's a big difference..
NOTE: Dominant males of some mamals sometimes jump on other males (posing...no actualy action) to demonstrate that they're the Bigboss around here..(the other one is his b****)
-
Trashman, do you have some kind of general policy against actually having a clue what you're talking about?
-
:lol: @ Trashman
-
Trashman, this is another one of those topics wherein you should be absolutely silent and resist hitting the REPLY or QUOTE buttons until you have some sort of clue as to what we're talking about.
Some wolves and hawks (specifically in species that mate for life) do, indeed, form permanent homosexual mate pairings, including sexual activity. This has been observed in the wild.
Further, you are woefully undereducated as to how homosexuals engage in sexual relations. Your stereotypical, ignorant, heterosexual idea that gay sex is exclusively anal sex is in error. Not only does this leave out other methods, but it blatantly ignores the fact that more gay couples engage in oral sex than anal sex.
Originally posted by Sandwich
While some may argue that Humans are just self-conscious animals, paralleling animal behavior with Human behavior - and even worse, using animal behavior as an excuse for Human behavior - is insane.
If wives started eating their husbands before sex, would you all of a sudden label it as "natural", just because the preying mantis does so?
Continue thinking along such lines, as unfortunately I don't have time to compose a more complete reply - gotta go to work.
Oh tsk, tsk, Sandwich. You're recharacterizing things in silly ways. Last I checked every species exhibiting sexual duality pairs off (permanently or not) for mating. Not all species exhibiting sexual duality feature females that devour the males. After all, I have sex with my mate, and so do monkeys. Does that mean I shouldn't do it just because an animal does? Of course you can reach for extreme examples. Homosexual behavior, however, is neither extreme, nor bizarre.
No one is 'Using animal behavior as an excuse for human behavior'. However, science and common sense both agree that parallelism between sentient and non-sentient organisms is a good way to establish if something is natural or not, normal or not, or insinctive or learned.
Eating meat is natural, despite what PETA might tell you. You can see that this is the case by looking at the natural world. Pairing off in more or less permanent relationships is natural and instinctive: it happens in animals in the natural world. Homosexuality is obviously both natural and instinctive, since it takes place naturally and instinctively in nature.
This might come as a shock, by the way: humans are a part of the natural world. We're not seperate from it. You are, no matter what you might think or believe, just an animal, albeit an advanced and complex one. To believe that, somehow, that animal behavior has no bearing or relation to human behavior is the worst of hubris.
-
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Trashman, do you have some kind of general policy against actually having a clue what you're talking about?
I very well do....The are no gay animals....
I don't know what Documentary channels you're watching (maby gay channel?)...
I've seen 10000000000 wildlife shows (my father is bsessed with it) and NEVER seen anything like it, I've read 100000 of books and NEVER read anything about it....
I wonder who observed such thing in the wild?????
Wolves may sniff at eachothers behinds and privates, but does not qualify as anal sex....
But then again you might allso belive in Santa....
-
there are gay animals, I've seen them
-
Originally posted by Bobboau
there are gay animals, I've seen them
Yeah right....I belive you...really I do...
Look...there's Santa!;7
EDIT: You can forget trying to convince me otherwise. Nothing you write or any pictures you post wont convince me otherwise...
I don't trust internet pictures ... I generaly don't trust anyone...
-
ok, so if I bring a pare of gay animals over to your house would you beleve me?
so basicly you refuse to accept any thing other than your own perception of reality?
must be blissful...
Look...there's Jesus! ;7
-
I suppose Trashman doesn't believe in Neptune, or the Oort Cloud, either.
-
such sinful words mik, you know very well that the all crystal spheares are simply rotateing about the earth in a serese of complex Epicycles, and the Earth is flat and has five sides, that all places in the Universe named Springfield are merely links in higher-dimensional space to one place. Gravity is a lie invented by the purveyors of the inherently false spherical Earth theory. The theory of gravity has never been proven. There is no gravity, only inertia. The Earth moves through space like a giant elevator. We do not fall off because we are kept down by inertia. The Earth has inertia.
-
What does it matter if there are gay animals?
If you believe that humans have "evolved" past the level of animals, or if you just believe that humans are "better" than animals, you can't pick and choose, you have to take the whole deal. If you believe that humans are significantly different than animals, the you can't very well rag on homosexuality.
-
Why are there gay animals, is what i'm interested in.
Because obviously it serves no reproductive purpose, so is the brain chemistry simply random chance, or is there something else which drives it? (emotions?)
Of course, this isn't neccessarilly a good thing. Soon as someone finds a biological reason, some nutcase will inevitably try and develop a 'cure' (possibly involving a lobotomy).
-
Originally posted by Bobboau
such sinful words mik, you know very well that the all crystal spheares are simply rotateing about the earth in a serese of complex Epicycles, and the Earth is flat and has five sides, that all places in the Universe named Springfield are merely links in higher-dimensional space to one place. Gravity is a lie invented by the purveyors of the inherently false spherical Earth theory. The theory of gravity has never been proven. There is no gravity, only inertia. The Earth moves through space like a giant elevator. We do not fall off because we are kept down by inertia. The Earth has inertia.
[color=66ff00]I see the light!
Amen brutha!
[/color]
-
i read somewhere about some species of deer, where the '"gays" would be as submissive as possible, untill the other males are out fighting, and then they mount all the females ASAP.
-
http://www.nmr.nl/deins815.htm
:wtf: :lol:
Ducks are quite gay, so to speak. In spring many male ducks and other waterfowl rape each other quite vigorously, females and males alike. Though they do not mate for life, nor are the homosexual acts anything else than simply too much libido and an attempt to secure own territories and harems, a large deal of larger birds do have homosexual relationships.
-
perhaps the circumstances that lead to gay animals is due to some odd settup of genes, were /*pulling theory out of ass*/ some component of female sexuality remains domonent even in males, and/or the reverse true with females. a domonent sexuality gene would not harm and in fact might help the gender for wich it is ascribed to, but in the case were it gets passed on to the wrong gender you have gayety. I actualy am suprized by the percentage presented there, I had assumed that humans had an abnormaly high homosexuality rate due to many thosands of years of gays being forced to maintain a heterosexual life in order to avoid being stoned to death while being burned at a steak they were nailed to. it is posable though that the studdy of domesticated animals may also be erroneus due to the domestication process, were humans decide wich animals will mate.
-
There you go Trashman. A picture of a gay duck. Still think it never happens in nature?
-
he already said he won't listen to none of them damned dirty fake internet pictures
-
I suppose a link to the peer review journal (http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/145/2/478) that the original story came from means nothing to him either.
-
All part of that damned international gay conspiracy.
They killed Jimmy Hoffa, you know. He said that sometimes gays don't shower as often as straights, boom, offed him.
-
God hates Internet.
-
There are no gay animals......
At least not gay animals in the human gay term....
a) Internet is the greatest source of lies in the whole world.. Pictures and indentities can be faked easily
(Hell, as far as I know you (the one who reads this) might be a 9 year old prickled-faced kid who pees in bed, or a 30 year old student that is on the first year 8th time in a row...
As far as you know I might be too...)
b) Animals often behave strange. It's not uncommon for them to stand in such poses as I stated before...to put it bluntly: there is no penetration.... no real humpi'n.....
c)Blah....
-
Trash, shut up. No, really, shut up. We get it- you're an ignorant, arrogant twat and a wilfully negative return on the intellect of the human race. You don't need to repeat yourself.
Really, there's no reason for you to post in these threads at all, as even you seem to recognize there's nothing at all worth reading in them, and so far your pathetic attempts at attention whoring have proven terribly inefficient- half the spammers here manage to get everyone's notice far more effectively with far less effort than you put into your mindless drivel. And it's just plain sad. Just run along, talk to your mommy about how you don't need no educashun 'cause you were born knowing everything if you really need to annoy someone.
-
There is a species of Chimpanzee, I can't remember the name and I haven't read the whole thread, so it may have been mentioned before, that are REALLY up for it, Gay, Straight, Paedophile, it's their way of bonding and it really doesn't matter who it is between. I think also they have the closest yet genetic match to humans, I'll see what I can find out.....
http://www.geocities.com/willc7/bonobos.html
That was it, the Bonobo monkey :)
-
Teehee, Bonobo. You just know they are dirty.
-
little ****ers:lol:, if I recal corectly the only sexual act they don't do is mother-son incest.
-
And Moses (Charlton Heston) said unto the viewing audience, "Those Dam Dirty APES!"
Seriously... I think I saw animal planet like over 10 years ago and they mentioned something around 65 species of animals that displayed homosexual behaviours so guess what? GET OVER IT!
I would like to get a glimpse of the future where we could clearly communicate with our primate brothers and access their racial memories over the last few million years. Can you see trying to explain how god says homosexuality is bad?
Catholic Scientist "Look bubbles, that kind of sex is immoral, it says so in the 356th revision of the bible."
Bubbles the Gay chimp "Look Hooman, my male ancestors were doing the nasty long before your evolutionary branch appeared, so who do you think you are telling us what he can and can't do casue of a book with funny scribbles and almost no good pictures written by one of YOUR uptight and sexually insecure males?
Oh and BTW, do you have any $ so I can spend it at the GAY BAR , GAY BAR!" :lol:
-
Well that was...odd.
-
Bonobo's aren't kept in zoos, because they just hump eachother all day long. That could, however, be quite educative for little children.
"Daddy, what are those two apes doing?"
"THEY'RE GAY-****ING, SON."
-
The Discovery channel song is one of my favs..
"You and me baby aint nothing but mammals, so lets do it like they do on the Discovery channel (getting horney now!)" :lol:
-
Originally posted by Stryke 9
ignorant, arrogant twat and a wilfully negative return on the intellect of the human race.
Pleased to meet you, my name is Toni...:D
Originally posted by Stryke 9
Really, there's no reason for you to post in these threads at all, as even you seem to recognize there's nothing at all worth reading in them, and so far your pathetic attempts at attention whoring have proven terribly inefficient- half the spammers here manage to get everyone's notice far more effectively with far less effort than you put into your mindless drivel. And it's just plain sad. Just run along, talk to your mommy about how you don't need no educashun 'cause you were born knowing everything if you really need to annoy someone.
The reason I post in these threads is couase I'm bored (like most people). I'm not looking for attention - I don't need nobodys attention. And yes, in most cases there is nothing worht reading..
I don't pretend to know everything...hell, there are kazillion thing I know nothing about (like sports...really I don't know COMPLETELY, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about sports {except several of the very best drivers/tennis/basketball players}).
But there are thing I know far more then you think. You call me stubborn? Well my boy, there are two sides to each storyy and you're just as stubborn as I am when it comes to that, so shove it!:drevil:
-
Originally posted by Sandwich
If wives started eating their husbands before sex, would you all of a sudden label it as "natural", just because the preying mantis does so?
Continue thinking along such lines, as unfortunately I don't have time to compose a more complete reply - gotta go to work.
Actually if the human race did have husband-eating tendencies built into it we would see it as natural. Don't forget that all of history would have been different, the moral standards you're applying now wouldn't have been created, etc etc.
Of course the human civilization probably wouldn't exist either, since this behaviour is somewhat self-destructive outside a purely reproductive context.
-
Of course, some would argue that women do tend to bite their husbands' heads off.