Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: an0n on April 17, 2004, 12:38:12 pm
-
....is one of those strange people who look better on TV than they do in staged photos.
And she is abso-friggin-loutely stunning.
Carry on.
*goes back to watching Stars In Their Eyes: Kids*
-
First time I hear about that chick.
"checks on google"
Yeah, not bad, but as usual, I've seen better during my dayly walks...
People watch too much TV and not enough around them ( tho, granted, being lost in the middle of Redneck's World like An0n is doesn't help :p ).
-
All the pictures of her on the internet are ****ty. They're from her "Whee, I'm a kids TV presenter" period.
Now she's doing things like Star In Their Eyes she tarts up more.
And she looks soooo much better when she's moving.
-
Originally posted by an0n
.
*goes back to watching Stars In Their Eyes: Kids*
No...just no.
-
mmh...
"stares at pics"
That's definitively not shots from emissions for kids.
-
I had to. My non-addict sister was watching it and she bites.
It's very suspicious that ITV put Cat Deeley on a program right before Ant and Dec's program comes on. Methinks they're still trying to cash in on the SM:TV formula.
-
She's got nothing on Natasha Henstridge for that oddity. She looks gorgeous moving (see Species for an example) but I haven't seen a single picture of her that would make me look at her twice.
Something of a drawback in a model I'd say.
-
*yawn* another media skank. At least pick someone with some curves and a decent face, an0n.
-
Thou shalt not speak ill of Cat Deeley lest thy testicals be removed and the host get medieval on thine ass.
-
Originally posted by mikhael
*yawn* another media skank. At least pick someone with some curves and a decent face, an0n.
(http://www.bsy.dsl.pipex.com/cat/graphics/cat8.jpg)
:wtf:
:wtf:
decent face are you kidding? she just needs ****in boobz
-
Meh:blah:
Girls prettier than that pass me on the sidewalk on the way to class.
-
Nah. She also needs some reconstructive surgery on Extreme Makeover. Her eyese are too far apart, her hair is nasty, she's got a bulbous nose, someone didn't know the meaning of 'restraint' when they were plucking her eyebrows and she's got puffed up lips. No shape at all. Then there's her body--or lack thereof. She's got man-hips (IE nearly none) and she's got nearly no differentiation between her ribcage, her waist and her hips. Don't get me started on her no-muscle-tone legs, or the fake ass tan.
Sorry. That's a media skank. Get a hot chick up in here.
-
Is it just me, or is her nose crooked?
-
Originally posted by mikhael
Sorry. That's a media skank. Get a hot chick up in here.
get us one :D
-
Originally posted by Drew
get us one :D
People, including Mikhael, seemed to have a rather high opinion of this women in the "Hottest Female on the Planet" thread:
(http://www.netjin.com/gallery/anzai/anzai03.jpg)
-
mik, I get the distinct impression you've done this before...
:wtf: :wtf:
-
I'm afraid I'm not following, Rictor?
GW, that's a hot hot girl indeed. :)
-
You analyzed that chick in much the same way an antique dealer would size up an old table. Which brings many interesting questions to mind...
Its like, you know how some game magazine review games out of 5 stars. And some rate it out of 100%, with detailed notes and reviewer commentary...
-
Ah. I'm just VERY finicky.
And you're right: I do it all the time. My wife and I discuss people we see all the time.
-
Originally posted by mikhael
Nah. She also needs some reconstructive surgery on Extreme Makeover. Her eyese are too far apart, her hair is nasty, she's got a bulbous nose, someone didn't know the meaning of 'restraint' when they were plucking her eyebrows and she's got puffed up lips. No shape at all. Then there's her body--or lack thereof. She's got man-hips (IE nearly none) and she's got nearly no differentiation between her ribcage, her waist and her hips. Don't get me started on her no-muscle-tone legs, or the fake ass tan.
Remember that the picture you're seeing was from one of the FHM/Maxim style magazines and has therefore been heavily photoshopped to fit some tards definition of attractive.
She is indeed much better looking on TV.
-
Originally posted by karajorma
Remember that the picture you're seeing was from one of the FHM/Maxim style magazines and has therefore been heavily photoshopped to fit some tards definition of attractive.
She is indeed much better looking on TV.
As long as she keeps her mouth closed, god damn brummies.
-
Out of two I'd give her one. ;)