Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: aldo_14 on September 17, 2004, 07:21:29 am
-
Er.....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/3662074.stm
-
:wtf:
-
When will they realise that you can't modernise religion? :)
-
When will they realize that religion cannot exist in a modern society
(yes that's right: our society isn't modern!)
-
Does every thread you people make involve religion-bashing? :rolleyes:
That's one of the weirder ideas for a reality show I've seen. Personally, I don't think the term "idol" in the title of the show is a very good choice :p.
-
mongoose: religion is self-bashing
-
:lol: ****ing hell..
you just can't modernise something that's been around for about 2000 years give or take a century. :p
and kazan has a point there, too.. most people wouldn't "bash" religion if said religion didn't provide people with the ammunition as much.. that said, everybody has to make fun of /something/ i mean, what next? "Queer eye for the priest guy?" ;)
"praise the lord, and pass the ammunition" as they say :p
-
First you get down on your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!
Do whatever steps you want if
You have cleared them with the Pontiff.
Everybody say his own
Kyrie eleison,
Doin' the Vatican Rag.
Get in line in that processional,
Step into that small confessional.
There the guy who's got religion'll
Tell you if your sin's original.
If it is, try playin' it safer,
Drink the wine and chew the wafer,
Two, four, six, eight,
Time to transubstantiate!
So get down upon your knees,
Fiddle with your rosaries,
Bow your head with great respect,
And genuflect, genuflect, genuflect!
Make a cross on your abdomen,
When in Rome do like a Roman;
Ave Maria,
Gee, it's good to see ya.
Gettin' ecstatic an' sorta dramatic an'
Doin' the Vatican
Rag!
Tom Lehrer, The Vatican Rag
THAT's how they'll boost attendance.
-
I prefer 'Every sperm is sacred', myself..........
-
[color=66ff00]Holy crap!
Literally.
[/color]
-
Originally posted by Maeglamor
[color=66ff00]Holy crap!
[/color]
Good name for the show, that - must pass it on to C4 or whatever numptys making it.
-
Religion doesn't bash itself; it only does in your own mind, because you've trained yourselves to think it's irrelevant/delusional/archaic/whatever. I don't go around bashing atheists, but every time there's a post in this forum about something remotely religious-related, it seems there are 4 or 5 posts stating the old "religion is the opiate of the masses" line, or something like it. I respect your right to have an opinion, but please, don't go completely off-topic just for the sake of expressing it. Call it common courtesy to the people on this board who do have religious beliefs.
Back on topic...ROFL at "Holy Crap" :p
-
"trained" riight
you don't go around bashing atheists because you don't have any ammunitition
people who are delusional and won't admit their problem don't deserve 'common curteousy' - they deserve antipsychotics
-
Oh, for ****s sake, take it somewhere else all of you. This is supposed to be a comedy thread.
*grumble**grumble*
-
Shush Kazan before you say something silly.
-
because if I say something silly I'd be joining the ranks of the religious -- because climaing that things exist with no evidence to back one up is silly
-
*cough* Clangers *cough*
-
[color=66ff00]Kaz is fairly religious in his stance against religion.
*waits*
;)
[/color]
-
:ha: Non-belief is the true religion.
*joins the Church of Kazan* :D
-
Originally posted by Maeglamor
[color=66ff00]Kaz is fairly religious in his stance against religion.
*waits*
;)
[/color]
Er.... you're not going to use all that asbestos there, are you?
-
Maeglamor: har har har.. that was .... lame and unorigional
to "religiously" stick to something implies not having valid arguments and evidence to support the position
i have both for my position
-
I really don't want to keep crapping on this thread like this, but you leave me no choice. I just made a simple request, but apparently that's too much for some of you...
No ammunition, Kazan? I've got ammunition; I just don't usually go around proseltyzing. Here's a few little things, though. Firstly, over 90% of the Earth's population believes in some sort of higher power. That's a little too big to be random chance. Cultures across the world from each other, completely separated, have similar ideas about some sort of higher being. That, to me, speaks volumes. Do you actually think the vast majority of the world is crazy? Did you ever stop to think that maybe you were in the wrong, since you and the rest of your minority seem to be outweighed from all parts of the globe? Secondly, take a look at the universe around us. Science has given us a glimpse into its remarkable complexity and order; are you telling me that all of this is possible without something more behind it? Take the Big Bang, for instance; we know scientifically that something does not come from nothing. How, then, do you explain a massive explosion of matter with no apparent cause? To me, that's more proof of the existance of some higher being than disproof. Thirdly, take a look at the human mind. We're more than simple animals; we have something deeper, a consciousness that transcends genetics and physical structure. We display rationality, thought, creativity, and a wide range of emotions. Human beings have something inside them that sets them apart from all the rest of the universe, something fundamental and awe-inspiring. You can call it a soul, if you like. Are you trying to tell me that something like this could occur from a galactic roll of the dice? Do you really think that, when you die, your whole being will simply cease to exist? If so, I really pity you. As for no evidence: many of the scientific theories that you and I subscribe to have little solid evidence. Has anyone ever seen a proton or an electron? Of course not. We still take it for granted that they exist. What is real cannot be limited to our own five senses; the thought is absurd. Some things cannot be directly experienced; that's what's called "faith," a deep feeling that there is something bigger out there than what can be seen. As for no proof: how do you explain things like the one miracle leading to the canonization of Katherine Drexel? A young girl is physically incapable of hearing; the structures in her ear have absolutely no capability of transmitting sound to her brain. And yet, she suddenly can hear perfectly. The medical world is dumbfounded; by all scientific facts, she should still be deaf. And yet she isn't. How would you explain something like that?
Yeah, I'm really the one who's "silly." You claim that the religious have their heads shoved up their @$$es; I'll return the favor and say that it's the non-religious. You are incapable/refuse to open up your eyes and see the wonder that is our universe; you refuse to open your minds to the possibility that belief should not be faced on sight alone or that there is something more out there. You are blinded by your own prejudices against those who have religious faith.
That's the last I'll say about this. I will, however, request politely one more time to stop posting these attacks about religion. Do you think it really does anything for the good of this forum? I don't; in fact, it turns every thread that remotely mentions religion into the same back-and-forth that this thread has turned into. Yes, I know your views about religion, but you also have to realize that the majority of people do not share those views. It won't kill you to keep your fingers crossed and stop yourselves from whatever anti-religious statement you're about to make. Just let things be and accept the fact that religion plays a very important role in many, many people's lives. I, in turn, will accept the fact that religion plays no part in your lives. I think this is only fair to all the members of this board; if someone thinks otherwise, kindly let me know why.
-
Originally posted by Kazan
because if I say something silly I'd be joining the ranks of the religious -- because climaing that things exist with no evidence to back one up is silly
On topic: You have got to be kidding me. "He who converteth the most gets the Golden Crucifix". I love entertainment :)
Off-topic:
Right, I'm familiar with this line of thinking. "If I, the great Kazan, has not proven it, or it is not withing the sphere of what I consider 'proven', it cannot exist."
Faith doesn't require proof, that's the wonderful (and cursed) thing about it. It makes the impossible possible. Most of the 'proofs' you take for granted came into existence because someone as a matter of faith went looking for proof of 'it',whatever that may be.
-
Originally posted by Maeglamor
[color=66ff00]Kaz is fairly religious in his stance against religion.
*waits*
;)
[/color]
LOL Maeglamor you crack me up :ha:
seriously where did you get the mad props? :lol:
-
Originally posted by Mongoose
Here's a few little things, though. Firstly, over 90% of the Earth's population believes in some sort of higher power. That's a little too big to be random chance. Cultures across the world from each other, completely separated, have similar ideas about some sort of higher being. That, to me, speaks volumes. Do you actually think the vast majority of the world is crazy? Did you ever stop to think that maybe you were in the wrong, since you and the rest of your minority seem to be outweighed from all parts of the globe? Secondly, take a look at the universe around us. Science has given us a glimpse into its remarkable complexity and order; are you telling me that all of this is possible without something more behind it? Take the Big Bang, for instance; we know scientifically that something does not come from nothing. How, then, do you explain a massive explosion of matter with no apparent cause? To me, that's more proof of the existance of some higher being than disproof. Thirdly, take a look at the human mind. We're more than simple animals; we have something deeper, a consciousness that transcends genetics and physical structure. We display rationality, thought, creativity, and a wide range of emotions. Human beings have something inside them that sets them apart from all the rest of the universe, something fundamental and awe-inspiring. You can call it a soul, if you like. Are you trying to tell me that something like this could occur from a galactic roll of the dice? Do you really think that, when you die, your whole being will simply cease to exist? If so, I really pity you. As for no evidence: many of the scientific theories that you and I subscribe to have little solid evidence. Has anyone ever seen a proton or an electron? Of course not. We still take it for granted that they exist. What is real cannot be limited to our own five senses; the thought is absurd. Some things cannot be directly experienced; that's what's called "faith," a deep feeling that there is something bigger out there than what can be seen. As for no proof: how do you explain things like the one miracle leading to the canonization of Katherine Drexel? A young girl is physically incapable of hearing; the structures in her ear have absolutely no capability of transmitting sound to her brain. And yet, she suddenly can hear perfectly. The medical world is dumbfounded; by all scientific facts, she should still be deaf. And yet she isn't. How would you explain something like that?
:wtf: You do realise most of the arguments you've placed here are... flawed?
1- About 90% of the world, etc... bit, you do realise I could just also say "2000 years ago all people believed going to the moon was impossible, so if they all said so it must be right!!!111" :wtf:
2- Saying that the Big Bang doesn't make sense and then make an idea about the Universe being created by god is pure hypocrisy! (sp?) One can simply dismiss such thing by asking "What created god then?"
3- Proton and electron bit... :wtf: so why will you not stop using the computer? It obviously doesn't work... electrons are fake right? Electricity doesn't exist... we're all part of your imagination! :sigh:
4- What is real cannot be limited to our own five senses; the thought is absurd. Some things cannot be directly experienced
Correct... unfortunatly the following...
that's what's called "faith,"
is not... what is real cannot be limited to our five senses is true... that's why we've invented telescopes, microscopes, radiotelescopes, etc... And some things cannot be directly experienced is also true, and that is why we use the intruments mentioned above... faith is belief in something that you cannot prove or don't know.
5- Science isn't perfect... yet... ;7
-
Originally posted by Saturn2004
LOL Maeglamor you crack me up :ha:
seriously where did you get the mad props? :lol:
[color=66ff00]Cracks open the 'mad props closet'....
BTW Mongoose tread carefully, do a search through other religion threads and note how fervently Kazan holds to his guns, if you don't have the ability or inclination to carry your argument through then you'd better just let it slide.
I'm pretty sure you have a whole submenu in our bookmarks folder entitled 'Defence against the God squad' Kaz. :)
[/color]
-
Originally posted by Maeglamor
[color=66ff00]Cracks open the 'mad props closet'....
[/color]
You bastard, you told me that was the cleaning equipment closet.......
-
Originally posted by Mongoose
Does every thread you people make involve religion-bashing? :rolleyes:
That's one of the weirder ideas for a reality show I've seen. Personally, I don't think the term "idol" in the title of the show is a very good choice :p.
Because there is so much to bash.
-
ionia23:
YOu know NOTHING about my line of thinking - No Religious person has ever present evidence to support their position, none of them even seem to understand what evidence is
"faith" is falicious by nature - 'nough said
-----------------
Originally posted by Mongoose
I really don't want to keep crapping on this thread like this, but you leave me no choice. I just made a simple request, but apparently that's too much for some of you...
In the words of your idol: "Bring it on"!
No ammunition, Kazan? I've got ammunition; I just don't usually go around proseltyzing. Here's a few little things, though. Firstly, over 90% of the Earth's population believes in some sort of higher power.
Argumentum ad populii -- just because a lot of people believe a lie doesn't make that lie true
That's a little too big to be random chance.
yeah.. it's called the idea of a higher power is emotionally appealling - that doesn't make it true
you seem to lack basic understanding of sociology and psychology
Cultures across the world from each other, completely separated, have similar ideas about some sort of higher being.
except there is no such thing as a "Completely seperated" culture
That, to me, speaks volumes.
which means you either never took basic sociology, psychology and human history classes - or you failed them spectacularily
Do you actually think the vast majority of the world is crazy?
A) They believe in things which they cannot provide any evidence for the existance of
B) Some believe in things which they have direct counterevidence of
A and/or B therefore: they're delusional
Did you ever stop to think that maybe you were in the wrong,
Yes, and nobody has yet provided me with ANY evidence to support a position different then mine.. oh they'ved tried, but none of them seem to understand what evidence IS
since you and the rest of your minority seem to be outweighed from all parts of the globe?
just like when someone finally figured out the earth was round and he was laughed at.. or when mathemticians figured out pi was approximately 3.14 and not 3 and the religious establishment went nuts because the bible defines pi to be 3
Secondly, take a look at the universe around us. Science has given us a glimpse into its remarkable complexity and order; are you telling me that all of this is possible without something more behind it?
Completely, totally, and easily - take an intro class in physics
Take the Big Bang, for instance; we know scientifically that something does not come from nothing. How, then, do you explain a massive explosion of matter with no apparent cause?
We know that everything was in a supersingularity as we can accurately extrapolate back to about 15 to 20ns before "the big bang" -- but before that we're not yet sure
To me, that's more proof of the existance of some higher being than disproof.
you don't seem to know what proof is because it's neither proof or counterproof
Thirdly, take a look at the human mind. We're more than simple animals; we have something deeper, a consciousness that transcends genetics and physical structure.
um... no our consciousness doesn't transcend genetics, it's the result of our genetics
We display rationality, thought, creativity, and a wide range of emotions.
and then blissfully ignore it when something more emotionally appealing isn't rational
Human beings have something inside them that sets them apart from all the rest of the universe, something fundamental and awe-inspiring.
i disagree -- you're just making us "special" in your own mind to feel better about yourself
You can call it a soul, if you like.
no, you call it a soul because you like - i don't purport the existance of anything i do not have evidence for
Are you trying to tell me that something like this could occur from a galactic roll of the dice?
very easily -- infact the probabilities were vastly _IN_ _FAVOR_ of life cropping up on earth.
For you to fathom this i'd have to explain to you abiogenesis, the conditions required therefore (were exactly the same conditions present on early earth, and we've replicated it in a lab)
Do you really think that, when you die, your whole being will simply cease to exist?
yes, because i have no evidence otherwise
If so, I really pity you.
I do not need pitied for having the bravery to see passed natural tendancies tword thinking that reality is whim to my emotions
As for no evidence: many of the scientific theories that you and I subscribe to have little solid evidence.
ROTFL you must have been failing your basic science classes!
Has anyone ever seen a proton or an electron? Of course not.
Yes they have: Scanning Electron Microscope
We still take it for granted that they exist.
No we don't - we have plenty of evidence: you've just ignored it
What is real cannot be limited to our own five senses; the thought is absurd.
Our senses can be enhanced - and the thought is _NOT_ absurb
Some things cannot be directly experienced; that's what's called "faith,"
No faith is defined as belief without evidence (websters)
a deep feeling that there is something bigger out there than what can be seen.
that's what you have -- a feeling does not make it true
As for no proof: how do you explain things like the one miracle leading to the canonization of Katherine Drexel? A young girl is physically incapable of hearing; the structures in her ear have absolutely no capability of transmitting sound to her brain. And yet, she suddenly can hear perfectly. The medical world is dumbfounded; by all scientific facts, she should still be deaf. And yet she isn't. How would you explain something like that?
The human body has surprising capablility to health itself and variance to what is "normal" is great amongst our species
By the law of Large numbers 1 in a million "miracles" happen over 200 times every day in the united states alone, and over 6000 times a day globally
just because they haven't _YET_ figured it out doesn't mean a deity did it
Yeah, I'm really the one who's "silly."
Indeed - you believe in things which you have no evidence to support the existance of
You claim that the religious have their heads shoved up their @$$es; I'll return the favor and say that it's the non-religious.
I can make my claim, because I can demostrate why it's true.
You cannot make your claim, because non-religious individuals do not believe in anything that they cannot provide evidence for.
You should look up the definition of "Delusional"
You are incapable/refuse to open up your eyes and see the wonder that is our universe; you refuse to open your minds to the possibility that belief should not be faced on sight alone or that there is something more out there. You are blinded by your own prejudices against those who have religious faith.
No; you're incapable of imagining a person who is capable of putting aside their emotionalism and view the world objectively and to trust only that which they can provide evidence for.
You're incapable of imagining someone who values truth over what feels good.
I have looked at all the 'evidence' - there IS NONE for your position.
That's the last I'll say about this.
That would be best, for your own good
I will, however, request politely one more time to stop posting these attacks about religion.
And I absolutely unequivocally refuse - religion is a the largest fundamental threat to the survival of our species and i will not sit down and let us destroy it
Do you think it really does anything for the good of this forum? I don't; in fact, it turns every thread that remotely mentions religion into the same back-and-forth that this thread has turned into.
IT only turns it into a back-and-forth because YOU WON'T LISTEN, you've made up your own mind and you don't want to hear anything
If you actually presented me with ANY REAL EVIDENCE then I would back off, because you would actually have evidence and therefore by definition you wouldn't be delusional
Yes, I know your views about religion, but you also have to realize that the majority of people do not share those views.
Argumentum ad populii again
It won't kill you to keep your fingers crossed and stop yourselves from whatever anti-religious statement you're about to make.
actually it very well could, but you would never understand how (Because you would refuse to listen)
Just let things be and accept the fact that religion plays a very important role in many, many people's lives.
That doesn't make it true, nor does it make it an acceptable thing
I, in turn, will accept the fact that religion plays no part in your lives.
[size=8]Then get your peers to stop trying to force it down our throats by legislating it into the government in violation of the 1st ammendment[/size]
-
Don't see the problem, sounds funny though.
-
Whoa, i wondered how long it would take Kazan to come out of the closet on this thread. :)
-
Bets on how long this thread stays open. I take 5 more hours.
-
I take a day.
-
ooooooooohhhh.............I never knew red text could be that big. It's so [size=1000000000000]forceful [/size] and convincing
If everything was in large font red text, all the worlds ills would be cured. Well, if it was in _LARGE_ _RED_ _TEXT_, at least.
-
Kazan,
Amazing. You're supposed to be this Big Brain and yet I can get a rise out of you without even taking a deep breath. Unbelievable. Sounds like someone's got a case of the Mondays...
You miss the point, dillweed. Faith does not require proof in and of itself. You're right. I cannot prove to you the existence of God, and thereby the validity of any religion. That's kind of 'said'. I figure if Jesus couldn't pull it off, I can't either.
I don't give two hoots how many coffeehouse-intellectual Latin quips you make, you sure as hell can't DISPROVE the existence of God either. Faith requires no proof at all. Debating one versus the other really is pointless. Getting your knickerbockers in an uproar over it is even more useless.
Go have a drink.
-
**** sake boys.
-
I'm somewhat annoyed I don't have opportunity to make Father Ted jokes in this thread, now.
-
Go on....
go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, ...........AAAHHHHHH..... go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, go on, .....
-
http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Studio/1728/sounds/ecum.wav
-
Amazing... Not only has this thread gone off topic, it's gone off topic on its off topic subject.
-
ionia23: "faith" is not a get-out-of-reality free card
having no evidence in supporting the existance of something, and yet believing in that something is the definition of delusional -- 'faith' is NOT an excuse