Originally posted by Admiral Nelson
It looks beautiful... I hope Lightspeed/ Da Brain can provide nice new textures! :)
BTW, the antennae have been removed in recent works.
Originally posted by Raptor
Ouch, a guy drops out for a while, and this is what he find when he returns:eek2:
Keep it up, everyone!:yes:
Originally posted by Black Wolf
Aha! I knew he couldn't hide for long!
Err, while we're on the HTL subject, what's the Aeolus' status? And, err, the triton turrets?
Originally posted by Raptor
Aeolus: Well, I released the hull mesh I created for someone with better UVing and texturing skills to work on, as I'm not too hot on those areas...:nervous:
Originally posted by Jetmech Jr.
I'm Pretty sure it was just a Terran ship...
Originally posted by Bobboau
you do need to work on your greebleing techniqe, don't just extrude exsisting polys cut exsisting polies into parts that obscure them.
Originally posted by Black Wolf
:blah:
Yes.
Yes I did. I missed the Deimos to. And the Herc.
Originally posted by Beowulf
I don't get it. You haven't kept the figure of the hectate, just sunk and beveled a few surfaces.
Originally posted by Bobboau
well then I guess that leaves the feild open for other people to take a crack at it then...
Originally posted by Bobboau
well then I guess that leaves the feild open for other people to take a crack at it then...
Originally posted by Grimloq
i probably have a backup, just i usually put them in subsubsubsubsub directories and give them cryptic names... but ill look for it :p
Originally posted by Grimloq
...is that a threat, a poor reference to that baseball movie , or a question?
Originally posted by Singh
he means taht if you release it, people will actually be bothered to mkae the textures for it.
Originally posted by Grimloq
lol
while im here, would someone mess with the hecate main texture? that ugly crap-colored one? it looks like dirt, and im sure thats not the effect that :V: was going for. just if someone had some free time *cough*lighty*cough*
Originally posted by Raa
Nobody reads! This mesh was lost! He said it himself! But even before he said that, he said THE ANTENNA WAS REMOVED! Why doesn't anybody read anymore?! This is the frikkin' internet! You have to read everything!
Originally posted by TopAce
Hey, nobody wants to read around 100 posts!
Originally posted by Raa
This is the frikkin' internet! You have to read everything!
Originally posted by Cobra
Look who's talking. Why should we read your 5000 posts?
Originally posted by Ulala
I kinda liked the front antenna, gave the Hecate a little brother to the Colossus look. Meh... :blah:
Originally posted by JR2000Z
Same but that's changing too much.
Originally posted by Cobra
Hey, no spamming threads!
Origionally posted by Grimloq
uhm, i have some incredably useful programs for makin animations...
Originally posted by Black Wolf
Now who's spamming threads? Keep it on topic please.
Originally posted by Grimloq
if its only 2 years after capella supernova, there shouldnt be 'lots of MODs', as there wouldnt be enough time to develop them :)
what is the actual plotline? is it just the choice, and then the consequences?
sounds actually decent nonetheless!
Originally posted by Lightspeed
- Front of the model (connection between the two "wings", the little boxes on the sides, the front details, basically I disagree with the altered layout of this new version)
- The "neck" needs to be fixed to what it was
- The little recessed part behind its "neck" should be changed back to the polygonal shape from its current "vampire teeth" look(!)
- The front of the engine blocks is completely messed up. It IS a four sided face, just as in your (great) first version. It's no weird hexagon.
- Connection to the wings was better
- Antennae and surface detail were better
- Add the little blocks sticking out from the engine's sides again.
Originally posted by Raa
Just don't forget that it's half Vsaudan.
Funny how the Vasudan ships show little to no Terran influence, but the Terran ships show heavy Vasudan influence. :p
Originally posted by Grimloq
AAKK! *mom walks in when grimloq is supposed to be writing an essay and is actually chatting at forums :shaking: *
Originally posted by WeatherOp
Man Grim, If you keep this up FS2 will be a different game:) . I want to see you Make the Ravana look good too.
Originally posted by aldo_14
I dunno, though; they use a lot more overlapping 'scales' for the hull than in FS1, don't they? Particulalry the Hatshepsut vs the Typhon.
Albeit, I thought the FS1 vasudan fighters tended to look more Terran than the FS2 ones......
Originally posted by Grimloq
BTW, since im notorious (not here, but eveyrhwere else :p )for making ships very high poly, ill prolly make a 'LOD#2' type of hecate for us low-end compy users :p fear not a 8000 poly monster :)
Originally posted by Grimloq
AAKK! *mom walks in when grimloq is supposed to be writing an essay and is actually chatting at forums :shaking: *
Originally posted by Cobra
If that actually happened, do homeschool. I joined homeschool and I haven't had to do essays, just a lot of bookwork.
Originally posted by FireCrack
Why does everyone seem to be homeschooled?
Originally posted by Cobra
Hey, Grimloq, can I use the Hecate thingy in Pathways after you've finished it?
Originally posted by redmenace
In the words of Peter Griffin, that is "freakin sweet"
Originally posted by Cobra
No SCP Freespace version! Boo-yeah!
Originally posted by Trivial Psychic
Grim, I saw in Bob's feature post that you are considering a door ani for the fighterbay. I wanted to ask you if you were considering adding some destroyable, non-targettable submodels. After all, this is a cutting edge feature, and probably the closest thing that FSO will get to geomoding. Its inclusion on this model could go a long way to inspiring other talented moders to do the same. Granted, it would require a re-work of the table entry to support said features, but that's hardly a problem if its included in the FSO mediaVP.
Originally posted by redmenace
eh dump the celeron and buy a real processor. try an XP or PIV no 64bit, it is not worth it right now.
Originally posted by Cobra
Couldn't afford anything else...
Originally posted by Cobra
Couldn't afford anything else...
Originally posted by Cobra
Thanks, but I HUMONGOUSLY screwed up in adding a mod. Now, why did the admins close my thread? I needed it.
Originally posted by Ulala
*begs for some good texturing*
Originally posted by Liberator
The 1800+ operates at 1533 mhz and you got supremely ripped off paying $600 for it.
Originally posted by Grimloq
*cant contain himself*
you didnt take a deal where the monitor was only 20$ more expensive than the rest of the computer?!??!?! MONITORS ARE USUALLY 300!!!!! GAH!!!
Originally posted by Raa
AMD 64-bit >> Intel P4 > AMD Athlon XP >>>>>> AMD Duron & Intel Celeron
Greatest -> Worst
Originally posted by Lightspeed
More like this :)
Oh, and Cobra... Anyone who measures performance in MHz core speed is either a fool, or just totally uninformed. :D
Originally posted by Lightspeed
Oh, and Cobra... Anyone who measures performance in MHz core speed is either a fool, or just totally uninformed. :D
Originally posted by Raa
My Athlon XP 2800+ performs better than my parents P4 2.24Ghz Northwood chip. Granted, they don't have hyperthreading, but my chip is much quicker than theirs.
Originally posted by Raa
My Athlon XP 2800+ performs better than my parents P4 2.24Ghz Northwood chip. Granted, they don't have hyperthreading, but my chip is much quicker than theirs.
Originally posted by aldo_14
Hyperthreading is ****ing pointless anyways, unless you write code specifically for it.... if not, you're just as likely to lose performance (deadlocking / desynchronized threading being a primary reason IIRC; you need to write code to balance the work evenly between threads or you end up waiting on the slowest one anyways).
EDIT; and on the subject of HT;
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2003q4/cpu2000-20030922-02524.html
http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030422-02134.html
Former is a P4 at 3.06GHz
Latter is a same speed, non-HT p4 with half the RAM, same motherboard, HD, etc.
P4 3.06GHz (HT) 512MB RAM;
SPECint2000 = 1098, SPECint_base2000 = 1088
P4 3.06GHz, (non-HT) 256MB RAM;
SPECint2000 =1210, SPECint_base2000 = 1167
NB: this is just 1 benchmark, natch.
Originally posted by ChronoReverse
Actually Simutaneous Multi-Threading (SMT) is a technology that is in fact quite useful. It's just not nearly as useful on a desktop where response time is the most important. However, it does give a different feel when you're using a SMT-capable cpu.
Frankly, the only reason why I write-off HT is because of the way Intel tries to hype it up.
Originally posted by Psychoo
How's the progress? Is there any approx. date of release?