Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Grey Wolf on December 13, 2004, 06:19:02 pm

Title: Swords
Post by: Grey Wolf on December 13, 2004, 06:19:02 pm
Post what type of sword (or other non-modern weapon) you would get if you had the money.

This Iaito is rather nice:
(http://www.bugeivideo.com/foto/basic_blade_650.jpeg)

But so is this longsword....
(http://store.swordforum.com/angustrim/big/pictures/eks.jpg)
Title: Swords
Post by: Corsair on December 13, 2004, 06:35:26 pm
I like the Iaito...

Aragorn's elven knife isn't bad either.
(http://www.by-the-sword.com/acatalog/images/uc1371WGNB.jpg)

Scimitars are always badass too.
(http://store1.yimg.com/I/swblades_1822_6405915)
Title: Swords
Post by: Kosh on December 13, 2004, 06:38:34 pm
The Hanwei.

http://www.weaponmasters.com/?ID=909700e5e8c7a804f56dc3ad40164263&SORT=PRICE_UP&ITEM=PC-2005


That or the Katana. I actually held one of those once. It was amazingly light weight.
Title: Swords
Post by: Aspa on December 13, 2004, 06:44:49 pm
(http://www.etrex.com/showroom/agriculture/chainsaws/dynamac-dy51.jpg)

;)
Title: Swords
Post by: varus on December 13, 2004, 06:54:20 pm
I'll generally take any weapon, except for Japanese swords - they are nice, and light, but the actual damage potential of them stinks compared to other weapons.  A katana slash probably would not even be able to cut through a thin mail shirt.  

I've got a bit of a collection - A replica High Middle Ages longsword, a replica late-Roman short sword, an actual World War II-issue Nepalese Khukri, and a half dozen daggers and large knives.  But my personal favorite item I own is this

(http://www.museumreplicas.com/imagelib/0600118_D_000.jpg)

Not a very light or 'elegant' weapon but still fun.  If you can get used to controlling the weight.  It is a bit hard to stop a swing of this thing at first.  But doubly dangerous - it can function as a sledgehammer, or the spike can be rammed through a six inch or so piece of wood or a thin piece of metal.
Title: Swords
Post by: Grey Wolf on December 13, 2004, 06:58:02 pm
Katana aren't designed to cut armor. They're designed to cut flesh, and have no equals in that arena.
Title: Swords
Post by: ChronoReverse on December 13, 2004, 07:08:48 pm
(http://store1.yimg.com/I/greatsword_1816_34350147)(http://www.cbswords.com/images/claymore.jpg)

If I get a sword, I want a Scottish Claymore.  42 inches of steel blade.  With a grip large enough that you could get a good powerful swing :nod:
Title: Swords
Post by: phreak on December 13, 2004, 07:28:01 pm
those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't

(http://www.arms.ru/tank/fotos/abr_1a.jpg)
Title: Swords
Post by: Grey Wolf on December 13, 2004, 07:31:56 pm
You realize that any tank, even a Panzer, is still considered a modern weapon, correct?
Title: Swords
Post by: phreak on December 13, 2004, 07:41:30 pm
would a flint-lock pistol be a modern-weapon?
Title: Swords
Post by: ChronoReverse on December 13, 2004, 07:45:53 pm
A flint-lock pistol has so little accurate range it's not even funny...


If not a sword, the English Longbow or a Mongol Composite bow would be quite a weapon too (too bad there'd be no way for be to pull a real one without extensive training).
Title: Swords
Post by: Turnsky on December 13, 2004, 08:16:22 pm
Quote
Originally posted by PhReAk
those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't

(http://www.arms.ru/tank/fotos/abr_1a.jpg)


its "those who live by the sword get shot by those who live by the gun"
Title: Swords
Post by: an0n on December 13, 2004, 08:19:41 pm
A Medieval War-Hammer (the thing varus posted), or a pair of these:

(http://www.needlesports.com/acatalog/campxla210axe.jpg)

Or maybe a proper War-Hammer, like the thing the Germanic Chief had at the beginning of Gladiator.
Title: Swords
Post by: mrfun on December 13, 2004, 09:11:48 pm
An antique chinese jian- those things are just gorgeous when they're polished up right.

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/lucas4unow/album?.dir=48f8

They're harder to find than good japanese swords though :sigh:
Title: Swords
Post by: Flipside on December 13, 2004, 09:26:04 pm
Personally, I'll stick with either a Katana, for non-armoured opponents, or a flail or mace for armoured ones ;)

As for Bows, the Welsh Longbow is the one you want, best bow ever made, shot by the best Bowmen who ever lived.
Title: Swords
Post by: mrfun on December 13, 2004, 09:29:03 pm
This longbow resides in my possession.  I once split a 1" wooden rod with two arrows in a row with it, very nice shooting.  Unfortunately I'm badly out of from and my arrows are all misspined from being shot too many times so I can't hit anyhting anymore.

http://www.selfbow.com/hickyew/timbercruiser.html
Title: Swords
Post by: aldo_14 on December 14, 2004, 03:56:41 am
Quote
Originally posted by ChronoReverse
[IMG]
If I get a sword, I want a Scottish Claymore.  42 inches of steel blade.  With a grip large enough that you could get a good powerful swing :nod:


Weighs an absolute ****ing ton, though......
Title: Swords
Post by: Carl on December 14, 2004, 04:05:02 am
A Gladius

(http://www.odinblades.com/Swords2k/GladiusX.jpg)

Originating from Spain, the Romans chose this for their standard foot soldier battle sword. It's short, strong & chisel tipped to pierce any armor. A thrusting weapon that can also parry devastating blows. Used by the Roman army for hundeds of years.
Title: Swords
Post by: TrashMan on December 14, 2004, 04:10:24 am
A greatsword of any kind....doesn't have to be a claymore..
Now that's a weapon for real men!:D

Knives and schimitars are for women! ;7
Title: Swords
Post by: Knight Templar on December 14, 2004, 04:11:34 am
Gladius. :yes:
Title: Swords
Post by: pyro-manic on December 14, 2004, 09:43:03 am
Chinese Dao.
Title: Swords
Post by: Unknown Target on December 14, 2004, 10:09:39 am
Viking Wolf Sword:

(http://www.weaponmasters.com/images//products/WM/WM-1729L.jpg)
Title: Swords
Post by: WeatherOp on December 14, 2004, 10:20:33 am
I want one of these.:D A guy really had one made for like $3,000.

(http://www.planetgamecube.com/media/gen001630.jpg)
Title: Swords
Post by: Tiara on December 14, 2004, 10:21:22 am
People here seem to think that a katana is inferior to medieval swords. So dead wrong. Both have their pros and cons. Assuming we have two equally trained persons with the respective weapons, there are various factors you must consider.

For one, the person wielding the katana has the advantage of speed and agility against the more sluggish sword. A real katana also usually has hit range on it's size because the wielder can more easily extend his/her full arm due to the light weight of the katana. Whereas the sword wielder has a harder time extending his arm fully and still keep full thrust force behind it.

It's a classic brute force Vs speed and agilty match-up. It can go either way.

Personally I prefer a katana.

Here, Katana Vs gun! (http://www.compfused.com/directlink/252/) The katana literally splits the bullet in half! :drevil: It went through solid baboo and stone as well...
Title: Swords
Post by: Andreas on December 14, 2004, 10:24:28 am
Sword: Epee
Guns: Flint-lock pistol
That's all a grown man needs ;7
Title: Swords
Post by: pyro-manic on December 14, 2004, 11:56:36 am
Epee? You big ponce.... :p
Title: Swords
Post by: Killfrenzy on December 14, 2004, 06:01:30 pm
Katana/Wakizashi dual wield. But that's just me! :D

Alternatively, a traditional Chinese sword like the one Xianghua fights with in Soul Calibur.

*Goes off to polish his display Katana/Wakizashi/Tanto set*
Title: Swords
Post by: mrfun on December 14, 2004, 06:09:29 pm
*conceals dissapointment*  I guess thats what a blacksmith gets for paying attention to a discussion about swords on a gamers forum.  Noone appreciates true quality swords :(

Now, instead of being intolerably rude and taking a swipe at everone I'll just tell you where to go if you're interested.  If you really like swords and want to educate yourselves about the real article, and why there's such a big difference, visit http://forums.swordforum.com  and start reading.
Title: Swords
Post by: Dark_4ce on December 15, 2004, 02:44:56 am
If I had cash I would get THIS!

http://www.weaponmasters.com/?ID=WEAPONS&SORT=PRICE_DN&ITEM=WM-1739

Though I'm happy with Narsil for now.
Title: Swords
Post by: Flaser on December 15, 2004, 09:54:16 am
Actually I have only recently learnt that most katana would be useless against armor.
The reason is not that they would break or shatter.

The truth lies in the nature of the edge - it was a cutting edge sharpened like a razor. Excelent for cutting through flesh and soft material - even the light armor of samurais.
Since we don't use any true plate armor nowadays, the katana or swords of similar fashion could be the choice of sword.

The problem with a katana against a knight lies in the interaction between blade an armor: Even if the katana managed to pierce the armor, its edge would be probably blunted, flawing the weapon and it would get stuck.
Medieval swords weren't sharepened like that - they were blunt like a buttler's axe, and instead cutting they splinted, shattering the armor.

Knight's swordfight wasn't elegant or graceful - it was force against force where the knight did their best to open the other's full body can with their opener.

It wasn't until rapiers (light swords suited for a time where no whatsoever armor was used) came to be that the modern gracefull sword wielding came to be.

(http://www.gladiator.hu/jpg/armorum/copis_k.jpg)

My choice of close combat wepon, the Khopish or Falcata. It was the Macedon's sword and later thrak gladiators used it in the arena.

It is a shortsword, but nowadays I don't think close combat would take place where you have enough room to move a long blade.

It only has a single blade.

(http://www.gladiator.hu/jpg/armorum/sica_k.jpg)

Just like the Sica its blade is curced to ward the cutting edge allowing it to reah behing shields, or whatever the opponent tries to protect himself with.

It has a splitting edge just like medieval swords, and although a pure cutting blade may be suited better for current conditions I take no risk - even if I merly crush my opponents bones, I still win.
Title: Swords
Post by: Dark_4ce on December 15, 2004, 10:00:42 am
I guess a good shotgun will always do the trick in the end.
Title: Swords
Post by: Clave on December 15, 2004, 10:28:49 am
Ummm....

*re-reads topic title*

Ya, hammer the barrels flat, and grind an edge, then you may have something....
Title: Swords
Post by: Dark_4ce on December 15, 2004, 10:35:19 am
heheh. Just joking.
Title: Swords
Post by: kasperl on December 15, 2004, 10:37:18 am
I'd be going for a gladius as well. Nice and wieldable, good for brunt force, and not to bad on the wrist. Mind, if I could pick axes as well, I'd go for a medium sized axe (one hand). Good for utility work as well. OTOH, a hayfork can be rather harmfull as well.
Title: Swords
Post by: Flipside on December 15, 2004, 11:19:47 am
Curiously enough, one of the more effective weapons employed against cavalry was the boating hook, it didn't do much damage as such, but it was great at un-horsing cavalry from range.
Title: Swords
Post by: Grey Wolf on December 15, 2004, 02:50:29 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Flaser
(http://www.gladiator.hu/jpg/armorum/copis_k.jpg)

My choice of close combat wepon, the Khopish or Falcata. It was the Macedon's sword and later thrak gladiators used it in the arena.

It is a shortsword, but nowadays I don't think close combat would take place where you have enough room to move a long blade.

It only has a single blade.

(http://www.gladiator.hu/jpg/armorum/sica_k.jpg)

Just like the Sica its blade is curced to ward the cutting edge allowing it to reah behing shields, or whatever the opponent tries to protect himself with.

It has a splitting edge just like medieval swords, and although a pure cutting blade may be suited better for current conditions I take no risk - even if I merly crush my opponents bones, I still win.
Those bear a stunning resemblance to a kukri.
(http://swordforum.com/articles/ams/kukri.jpg)
Title: Swords
Post by: pyro-manic on December 17, 2004, 03:42:14 pm
Quote
Originally posted by mrfun
*conceals dissapointment*  I guess thats what a blacksmith gets for paying attention to a discussion about swords on a gamers forum.  Noone appreciates true quality swords :(

Now, instead of being intolerably rude and taking a swipe at everone I'll just tell you where to go if you're interested.  If you really like swords and want to educate yourselves about the real article, and why there's such a big difference, visit http://forums.swordforum.com  and start reading.


Thanks - I'll check it out. :)