Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: SKYNET-011 on March 20, 2005, 05:01:09 pm

Title: Interesting
Post by: SKYNET-011 on March 20, 2005, 05:01:09 pm

http://www.rense.com/general63/sense.htm

Title: Interesting
Post by: Rictor on March 20, 2005, 05:07:08 pm

Oddly enough, I just read this a day or two ago, on the New Scientist website.

Wierd stuff.

Title: Interesting
Post by: Bobboau on March 20, 2005, 05:10:36 pm

I just saw this on warpstorm like a hour ago (there link was better though)

Title: Interesting
Post by: karajorma on March 21, 2005, 04:09:10 am

The Madeleine Ennis Homeopathy paper was proved to be scientifically flawed. When a double blind test was carried out the results were no better than random.

After that idot Jacques Benveniste ruined his career by publishing his "memory of water" paper and was completely discredited by a double blind test she really should have known better.

Here's (http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/homeopathy.shtml) an interesting little article on the work James Randi did to prove both tests wrong.