Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: aldo_14 on September 30, 2005, 10:30:02 am

Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: aldo_14 on September 30, 2005, 10:30:02 am: Bollocks;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4293978.stm
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: karajorma on September 30, 2005, 10:52:25 am: No wonder old folk always go on about the golden days. :D
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: aldo_14 on September 30, 2005, 11:16:34 am: edit; curse you bbc and your stupid realmedia streaming pish!
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: karajorma on September 30, 2005, 12:01:06 pm: Just use real alternative.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: aldo_14 on September 30, 2005, 12:07:18 pm: Nah, the link wouldn't paste right. It sort of loses the amusement value if people know what to expect, too..... :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/scotland/tv/chewinthefat/jack_and_victor/singalong.shtml
(2nd last)
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: Ford Prefect on September 30, 2005, 12:25:21 pm: We exist to eat, fight, and screw. Every ounce of pressure you apply to try and constrain it is another inch added to society's boner.

In short, you can color me unsurprised. (In "short".... heh heh.)
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: vyper on September 30, 2005, 12:34:05 pm: :lol: Sigged.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: Flipside on September 30, 2005, 07:02:38 pm: LOL No-one who has watched Woodstock can believe that any generation is more 'sexual' than another, it's like every generation believing they invented canabis ;)
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: Mongoose on September 30, 2005, 08:46:35 pm: In the immortal words of Tucker, "Bow-chicka-bow-wow!" :p
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: WMCoolmon on September 30, 2005, 08:52:47 pm: I knew a guy who said that long before Tucker.

Tucker is such a copycat.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: Flaser on September 30, 2005, 09:32:19 pm: That's why we love 'im.
BTW copycat ==genius. Sample no.1: W. Shakespeare.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: BlackDove on September 30, 2005, 10:24:49 pm: Wow. People have been having sex like bunnies and experimenting with same-sex partners to satisfy their primal urges. Surprise to me.

Here I thought the Earth's population was rapidly increasing because of the mass stork invasion.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: karajorma on October 01, 2005, 03:47:28 am: The fact that people did things like this in the past isn't new. What is knew is that you now have actual evidence to rub in the face of someone who claims that people were more moral 60 years ago.

People aren't having sex more or any of the crap that that sort of person implies. They're simply being more open about it.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: vyper on October 01, 2005, 06:50:11 am: It's funny, I brought this up at the dinner table last night and the only thing anyone wasn't comfortable with was the report's insights into homosexuality (both male and female).
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: IceFire on October 01, 2005, 09:32:12 am: Quote
Originally posted by BlackDove
Wow. People have been having sex like bunnies and experimenting with same-sex partners to satisfy their primal urges. Surprise to me.

Here I thought the Earth's population was rapidly increasing because of the mass stork invasion.

Well played sir...well played.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: TrashMan on October 01, 2005, 12:10:17 pm: Life more morla 0 years ago?

Yes and no.. Is some ways yes, in others no.

Doesn't matter anyway.
Title: So life was more 'moral' 60 years ago?
Post by: IceFire on October 01, 2005, 12:33:12 pm: The same **** has and will always be going on...it just depends on how closed the door is or if the curtains are drawn.