Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: TrashMan on October 03, 2005, 04:24:49 pm

Title: bored..so rate
Post by: TrashMan on October 03, 2005, 04:24:49 pm
Signature..yeah (http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/7483/paladinbanner0ky.jpg)

I?m bored as hell. so something completely stupid. You like this signature pic?

b.t.w. - a cookie to whomever knows what's written on it!
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: mikhael on October 03, 2005, 04:47:37 pm
too big. and its got pictures.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: aldo_14 on October 03, 2005, 04:48:21 pm
Ir's a bit square.  Why don't you shift the bottom half to be the right half?

TBH, I'm not a fan of sig images.  I don't really see the point.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: mikhael on October 03, 2005, 05:10:22 pm
Its like the forum equivalent of a tricked out car. Pure genatalia substitute.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Flipside on October 03, 2005, 05:19:09 pm
Hmmmm... must admit, I've always been silently glad that the admin here didn't allow siggy pics, they end up taking more room than the posts.

That said, from an artisitic point of view, I'll agree it's a bit square, looks sort of like an RPG 'select your character' screen, but nice images anyway :)
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Solatar on October 03, 2005, 06:00:47 pm
I'd make it a bit more flat.

And I'm really glad we don't have sig images or avatars here...it just looks cleaner.
Title: Re: bored..so rate
Post by: achtung on October 03, 2005, 06:43:36 pm
Quote
Originally posted by TrashMan
b.t.w. - a cookie to whomever knows what's written on it!


What kind of cookie and will you pay shipping and handling?

Seriously though siggys need to be more like banners.

Or use an image like this one I use in other forums.
(http://pjrpg.com/pictures/bugsshotfinaly.gif)
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Martinus on October 03, 2005, 07:25:19 pm
[color=66ff00]Who was it that ranted about sigs being akin to a digital penis? (ZB?)
I agree wholeheartedly.

Ruins the browsing experience for 56K'ers and draws attention away from the actual information in the post.
[/color]
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Unknown Target on October 03, 2005, 07:30:56 pm
It's nice, but a bit square - stretch it horizontal and mesh the pics together :)

And anyway, I agree - no sig images means more post, less pictures. It's annoying to sit through 40 different sigs telling about how cool, deadly, or assassin like a person is.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Ford Prefect on October 03, 2005, 07:33:22 pm
Quote
And anyway, I agree - no sig images means more post, less pictures. It's annoying to sit through 40 different sigs telling about how cool, deadly, or assassin like a person is.

:lol: If it weren't a complete logical fallacy, I would suggest that someone add that to their sig.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Descenterace on October 04, 2005, 04:08:56 am
Done.

[Logical fallacies are our strong point. --RandomDescenter]
Title: Re: bored..so rate
Post by: ZylonBane on October 04, 2005, 10:19:33 am
Quote
b.t.w. - a cookie to whomever knows what's written on it!
It says, "All hail the morons, who use images for sigs."
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: BlackDove on October 04, 2005, 10:24:24 am
I'm with Zylon on this one. I think that's what's written too.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: CP5670 on October 04, 2005, 10:28:15 am
I hate signature images too. It's a good thing none of the forums I visit allow them. I personally don't bother with signatures at all in many cases.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: kode on October 04, 2005, 10:46:51 am
multi-line signatures are stupid too.

yes, I'm partly ironic.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: FireCrack on October 04, 2005, 10:49:57 am
I wish we had "proper" avatars though, it makes identifying who posted waht so much easier, ofcourse most of the more important posters have a somwhat uniqe combination of project avatars...
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: aldo_14 on October 04, 2005, 10:55:50 am
But it would give the admins nightmares trying to filter out the porn.  Especially if someone hosted their avatar at, say, penguinbomb.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: CP5670 on October 04, 2005, 11:02:16 am
I wouldn't mind seeing those either as long as they are kept small enough (64x64 static image). They do help in identifying posters at a quick glance while scrolling through a page. All the other forums I've seen either allow custom ones or have a large list of predefined ones to choose from. (well, except for the VBB, but that was years ago)
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: ZylonBane on October 04, 2005, 12:39:14 pm
I've said it before, and I'm saying it again-- this site (http://www.shag.com/gallery.html) could provide the coolest avatars ever.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: mikhael on October 04, 2005, 01:47:18 pm
I agree with ZB. Those would make great avatars.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: BlackDove on October 04, 2005, 01:54:24 pm
I can dig it.
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: Ashrak on October 04, 2005, 01:59:43 pm
its ****ing ugly tbh :p
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: TrashMan on October 04, 2005, 05:35:01 pm
Actually, I use the thumbnail in my siggy on the Tolkien forums :D

but I do agree that huge signatures can realyl bug.. compared to some others i've seen, this one is very small :lol:
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: StratComm on October 04, 2005, 05:36:20 pm
To tall.  Much too tall.  They should be about the proportions of a banner ad.
Title: Re: bored..so rate
Post by: Sapphire on October 05, 2005, 09:02:21 am
Quote
Originally posted by TrashMan
Title: bored..so rate
Post by: TrashMan on October 05, 2005, 05:11:16 pm
Looks like no one here nows Quenya or Sindarin.... sigh :(

*confidentially, I only have some VERY basic knowledge..my fanatical roomamte translated that*