Originally posted by JoeLo
If you believe in the rapture (which I sort of do) then think about all the diasters. Hurricanes, tidal waves, earthquakes. Listen to this on June sixth the date will be 06\06\06 this is to signfy the coming of the anti-christ. If the rapture is real it will happen next year.
Originally posted by Scuddie
No we don't.
Originally posted by BlackDove
God willing.
Originally posted by Goober5000
Jokes and relevant discussion are okay, but no flaming or this thread gets locked.
Ace: The "prophetic calendar" refers to God's timeline for prophesized events, which is independent of any calendar used by man.
My tentative opinion is that the 2000 year mark on that calendar may have something to do with Hosea 6:2 "After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight" if you use the 1 day = 1000 years formula. But it's only a thought experiment, so I'm not going to rely on it for any predictions. :)
Originally posted by Goober5000
I'm of the tentative opinion that the prophetic calendar is actually centered around Christ's death, not his birth. Thus we're actually in the mid-to-late 1970s.
At the same time, "no man knows the hour..." so date-setting is not only speculative, it's counterproductive.
Nevertheless, signs in the Earth and in the heavens are good things to keep track of. :)
Originally posted by Grey Wolf"In the Red Corner, the Son of the Lord God and the Saviour of all Mankind... JESUS!!!" *Clapping*
I propose a Divine Deathmatch, done the same way as Celebrity Deathmatch was.
Originally posted by JoeLo
If you believe in the rapture (which I sort of do) then think about all the diasters. Hurricanes, tidal waves, earthquakes. Listen to this on June sixth the date will be 06\06\06 this is to signfy the coming of the anti-christ. If the rapture is real it will happen next year.
Originally posted by Sandwich
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00073BM8O/102-6003871-1214524?v=glance&n=283155&s=books&v=glance
Yeah. I think this guy even had a sequel, "89 reasons...", for the very next year. Can't find it though.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf
I propose a Divine Deathmatch, done the same way as Celebrity Deathmatch was.
Just picture a claymation fight between Odin and Hades!
Originally posted by Kosh
I was reading somewhere that fully 1/3rd of Americans welcome the apocalypse. I am not sure how accurate that is, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was true.
Originally posted by aldo_14
.... looking like a bit of a tit...
Originally posted by karajorma
I'll bet he's doing a roaring trade with a book on reasons why the world will end 17 years ago :D
Originally posted by aldo_14More along the lines of 1/4 to 1/3 of those eligible to vote, which excludes minors and felons.
Can't be true. At least 50% voted for it.
Originally posted by Sapphire
Doest thou never tirest of feeding of the blood of the unsuspecting?
Okay...you guys have shown your aversion to the religious musings of a 14 year old. I'm sure he's learned his lesson.
Originally posted by Goober5000
I'm of the tentative opinion that the prophetic calendar is actually centered around Christ's death, not his birth. Thus we're actually in the mid-to-late 1970s.
Originally posted by vyper
So the rapture has already happened in Scotland then? :ick:
Originally posted by Sapphire:lol:
Ummm....love you guys! :nervous: Want an apple?? :devil:
Originally posted by Ford Prefect
(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b319/Mistah_Kurtz/wonka_flame.jpg)
Originally posted by CaptJosh
I don't buy the aforementioned mistranslation theory on the number of the beast. And I'll tell you why.
It said that all would have to have the mark on their right hand or in their forehead, the exact word translating to the traditional Hindi location of the "third eye".
Now, something I read about several years ago in Popular Science was an ID chip that could be implanted in either of those locations, from where it would be able to derive the most power thermovoltaicly.
These chips have been suggested for convicts, because they can be read from a distance and so would virtually eliminate the need for headcounts in prison. As they use body heat for a power source, if they're cut out, they fail to broadcast their locator signal that is the id number of the chip. Said ID is a UIN consisting of three tiers of six digits each. Six, six, six.
Similar chips are already being used by rich people to tag their pets.
Originally posted by aldo_14
The 616 value comes from the oldest known copy of the New Testament (or precisely, a scrap of it), and the direct translation of the Greek numerals. So it's pretty definitive.
EDIT; it was only recently scanned, hence the newness of this information. Albeit 'rumour' is definately the wrong way to describe it.
Originally posted by Kosh
I will be truthful: I don't believe in this "Rapture". These kinds of religions were an invention of man that has been distorted to supress science and women.
Kosh, you don't quite get the concept of the "religion as a social contract" idea. It's not designed to promote anything. It's designed to provide an explanation for phenomena and provide a basis for morality that helps the community.
Originally posted by Mefustae
"In the Red Corner, the Son of the Lord God and the Saviour of all Mankind... JESUS!!!" *Clapping*
"And in these two corners, son of the Gods Odin and Jord, Lord of creator of Thunder, and arguably the most powerful God of the Norse Pantheon... THOR!!!" *Unbridled Applause*
*Ding Ding*
Originally posted by Kosh
Actually I never read it.
Originally posted by Unknown Target
Religion, if an individual chooses to follow it, should provide a basis of hope, but not become an impedent to progress. That's my opinion, anyway.
Originally posted by KoshWell then, how come historically Christian nations are among the most advanced in the world?
In theory, that is what it is supposed to be, I think. In reality, the Christian church held Europe back for centuries.
Originally posted by Goober5000
Well then, how come historically Christian nations are among the most advanced in the world?
Originally posted by Solatar
The Church held back Europe for a very long time in the Middle Ages, but that is arguable as the main cause. A lot of the problems that people attribute to the Church could also be blamed on the Plague, War (100's Years War comes to mind), "Little Ice Age", etc.
Of course then you had Pope Alexander I (think it's the first...) and the likes who were extremely corrupt.
I'd be interested to know where you're getting your information, because you're grossly misinformed.
Originally posted by Goober5000
I'd be interested to know where you're getting your information, because you're grossly misinformed.
Yes, there are many strikes against Christianity throughout history: the Inquisition, the Crusades, etc. But these are all on account of church leaders abusing their positions. Lots of people in leadership or governing positions become corrupt; the church is no exception to this.
Rank-and-file Christians brought many accomplishments to Europe. Look how many universities and hospitals had Christian charters. Look at the great artists of the Rennaissance. And slavery was universally accepted until one Christian, William Wilberforce, drove the movement to outlaw it.
Originally posted by Goober5000
I'd be interested to know where you're getting your information, because you're grossly misinformed.
Yes, there are many strikes against Christianity throughout history: the Inquisition, the Crusades, etc. But these are all on account of church leaders abusing their positions. Lots of people in leadership or governing positions become corrupt; the church is no exception to this.
Rank-and-file Christians brought many accomplishments to Europe. Look how many universities and hospitals had Christian charters. Look at the great artists of the Rennaissance. And slavery was universally accepted until one Christian, William Wilberforce, drove the movement to outlaw it.
Originally posted by AceIncorrect. It was Ferdinand of Aragon.
(such as the Jews, guess where they went after being kicked out of Spain by Isabella in 1492?)
Originally posted by Sapphire
whats the sense of arguing about it? Its just counterproductive to the cohesiveness of this community.
Originally posted by karajorma
As long as everyone stays civil you can actually learn a lot from threads like this.
Ace's post for instance had lots of stuff I didn't know in it. :)
I learned a long time ago that your average HLPer will ignore you if you ask for a favour but would walk through fire and ice to prove you wrong :D
Originally posted by vyper
I think there's a cream for that.
Originally posted by aldo_14
No, that is a cream.
Originally posted by Sapphire
I find it interesting that the wrongdoings of the church mentioned here are those of the Catholic Church and its offspring. Hmmmm.
Remember that being a member of a church, doing things in the name of God, and thumping bibles no more makes you a true Christian than playing FreeSpace makes you a true Modder. Either you believe or you don't... whats the sense of arguing about it? Its just counterproductive to the cohesiveness of this community.
Originally posted by Grey Wolf
Incorrect. It was Ferdinand of Aragon.
Originally posted by Goober5000
The problem it that I don't have time at the moment to conduct very thorough research on the historical contributions of Christianity.
I do have plenty of first-hand evidence of people doing stuff strictly and uniquely because of their Christian faith. Whether its accepted depends on a person's legal standards. :)
1) A friend who went on a short-term missionary trip to India was directly involved in the healing of a deaf man
2) My youth pastor experienced a whole slew of events when he went to ministry school; including having truckloads of food delivered to his apartment when he and his friends had no food at all, plus witnessing his friend healed from a football injury that left him unable to walk without pain for several years
3) Sandwich lives in a country whose inhabitants had been scattered across the Earth and reformed without losing their national or cultural identity - all of this predicted in advance.
4) Not to mention watching many of my friends have their lives dramatically changed over the course of their college careers because of their membership in the campus Christian group.
You can consider me a secondary source on the first two and a primary source on the second two (since Israel exists independent of whether Sandwich lives there or not :p). I haven't yet had the privilege of first-hand observation of a miraculous event, but I hope that will eventually be the case. :)
EDIT: re archaeology - Do note that archaeology has proven a great many historical facts in the Bible and disproven none. ;)
Originally posted by Goober5000
EDIT: re archaeology - Do note that archaeology has proven a great many historical facts in the Bible and disproven none. ;)
The Bible contains anachronisms. Details attributed to one era actually apply to a much later era. For example, camels, mentioned in Genesis 24:10, were not widely used until after 1000 B.C.E. (Finkelstein and Silberman 2001).
The Exodus, which should have been a major event, does not appear in Egyptian records. There are no traces in the Sinai that one would expect from forty years of wandering of more than half a million people. And other archaeological evidence contradicts it, showing instead that the Hebrews were a native people (Finkelstein and Silberman 2001; Lazare 2002).
There is no evidence that the kingdoms of David and Solomon were nearly as powerful as the Bible indicates; they may not have existed at all (Finkelstein and Silberman 2001; Lazare 2002).