Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: adwight on June 14, 2004, 09:40:20 pm
-
I just saw the movie, it was loads better than the previous two. What did you guys think of it if you saw it. If you haven't seen it, you should go, its good.
-
I can't be bothered watching kiddie movies right now. I'll wait until it's on DVD.
-
It sorta bugged me how it tried to be very artistic. I enjoyed it immensely at some points, but others (once again) completely ruined my image of how things are.
And once again I point you to...Harry Potter and the POA in Fifteen Minutes (http://www.livejournal.com/community/m15m/2237.html)
-
They exaggerated the whole thing about Harry Potter and "My father saved me." thing. It was like they were trying to get the point across to a complete retard.
Oh, and Hermoine's boob size changes during the course of the movie. If you pay attention it's rather humorous. The next movie is gonna be better in that category too. Hahha... woo.
-
....... she's thirteen. :wtf:
****ing perv-ass.
-
god damn man.
yeah unfortunately i wasn't paying attention to a 13 year old's boob size during the movie
-
I thought it was pretty good. I think they tried to add a little bit of a "Stephen King" feel to it though, which was good. Somehow they managed to have the dementors "scary" enough so that they were kinda cool, but not scary enough to get them a pg-13 rating. Thought it was good considering it was Harry Potter.:)
And whenever a scene with Hermione appeared, my eyes didn't exactly flash to her chest...
-
about the PG-13 rating you mentioned, i saw a movie yesterday called "Hart's War" with Bruce Willis. R-Rated, but the only thing that was "violent" was near the beginning when the guy gets shot in the head, and his brains splatter onto colin farrell. other than that, there was no sex, hardly any language, and brief violence. just goes to show you can't judge how "bad" a movie's going to be by the rating :/
-
It's just a discontinuity - the stuff about the actors growing was well publicized, as were physical changes during the movie - it's not like he's downloading kiddy porn or something.
I haven't seen it for the record, and don't plan to.
-
The first two were better.
This one doesn't make much sense, if you havent read the book. They simple f*cked up some scenes, and took out the essential parts to understanding the plot :rolleyes:
It's still not bad, but in this way worse than the first two. I felt a bit disappointed overall.
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
****ing perv-ass.
Hey dude, you try to not pay attention when you've got a friend that's into that @(^! and told you how it would be strange.
Oh, and I forgot to add the ending sucked. It would have been better if they just ended the movie with Hermoine giving Harry the feather. Instead they had to do some cheesy "whee fly" scene. :doubt:
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
....... she's thirteen. :wtf:
****ing perv-ass.
He's 17... mmh yeah, that's a bit too much of a difference I guess :p
-
She's 14, he's 17. i guess it's not that bad after all ;)
-
So what's the beef I see on the news and stuff about he's too old or something? Is he supposed to be portrayed as a really young boy or something? In the books, didn't he get old or were they all from the same year?
-
They're all in the same year.
-
I wasn't either, learn to read :D
-
:wtf:
What?
-
Que? Oh, u responded when I had typed, silly me.
Anyway, that still doesn't answer my question. All I see in the news and stuff is that he looks really old and shouldn't be harry potter anymore.
I was asking if in the books harry potter matured or got older, or if it was all written in the same year.
-
yeah. it wasn't a bad movie.
-
That's common sense. Each movie is the next year at Hogwarts, so naturally, he should age. But, the movies take more than a year to make. The actors are aging more than the characters should. So, suffice to say, eventually we'll have an 18 year old playing a 15 year old. Which doesn't add up at all. And, like I said before, a full breasted woman playing a 14 year old girl doesn't add up either. :p Nurr.
-
well i don't think she's "full-breasted" .......... she is only 14
but then again, as i said, i wouldn't really know, i haven't paid much attention to her chest...
-
I am referring to the future, when she IS full-breasted. :p
-
oh :wtf:
to each his own i guess
-
Magic boobs? :shaking:
-
They don't get wands for nothing you know...
-
:lol:
-
Despite that idea being really cool, maybe we should just drop the whole idea. Full-breasted really shouldn't be thrown around here... she's still only 13.
-
I gonna go check this movie someday
-
That Herm... whatever, the girl. Will be a DOLL when she is older.
Originally posted by Stealth
She's 14, he's 17. i guess it's not that bad after all ;)
Not at all...
An example of something bad is my Uncle was getting his drivers license when my Aunt was born... (http://www.cross-x.com/UBB//puke.gif)
-
Is 14 to 17 not weird in Australia? He would be a Cradlerobber and she would be a slut. Unless the physical appearance wasn't so different.
-
:wtf:
3 years?
-
Yeah but it's 3 years when she's still young. If she was 16 and he was 19, maybe.
-
I think I understand what Knight Templar is trying to say... 14 is a bit young for a more "serious relationship" than those that 14 year old have... :nervous:
-
Well it really depends on the customs of your country. There are countries where it's fine for a 15 or 16 year old girl to go out with 30 year olds, so long as he's a professional.
-
Originally posted by J3Vr6
If she was 16 and he was 19, maybe.
That would be illegal :p
it's probably better if he was 17 and she was 14, regardless of how sick that sounds, but it's legal *shrugs* :shaking:
-
I was being ironical.
-
J3Vr6:
bah, I don't see 14 as young, but thats because I'm almost 16.
Ya I get what your saying... though it doesn't matter, he's still a good guy and surely he wouldn't do anything like that. :p
-
I'm actually not sure if it's illegal or not. A friend of mine was telling me about the law the other day...mainly because, at sixteen, she's rather keen on a certain 19-year-old Navy SEAL in training. And so she knows by heart exactly what she can and can't do.
I'm pretty sure that it's legal.
-
Originally posted by Stealth
That would be illegal :p
it's probably better if he was 17 and she was 14, regardless of how sick that sounds, but it's legal *shrugs* :shaking:
That's actually not illegal in Florida. I think 19 is the legal age for a 16 year old girl to date, or up to 23... I know it's either 19 or 23 that's the limit to not be statutory.
-
well personally, 14 i think is just that age that's too young for anyone over 16... but sure she's cute... give her 5 years or so, and then it'll be fine :yes:
until then, however, i don't look at her boobs every time she appears in a scene ;)
-
Originally posted by J3Vr6
Well it really depends on the customs of your country. There are countries where it's fine for a 15 or 16 year old girl to go out with 30 year olds, so long as he's a professional.
Just look at the medieval times, 17 to 20 year olds would marry 12 to 13 year olds..
-
But we aren't talking medieval times, we were having a discussion on current dating customs :)
But yes. In the past the dating age was significantly younger, primarily because the death age was a lot younger too.
-
Originally posted by Stealth
well personally, 14 i think is just that age that's too young for anyone over 16... but sure she's cute... give her 5 years or so, and then it'll be fine :yes:
until then, however, i don't look at her boobs every time she appears in a scene ;)
I'm sure that's exactly what DragonClaw was talking about...
:)
-
Originally posted by J3Vr6
But we aren't talking medieval times, we were having a discussion on current dating customs :)
But yes. In the past the dating age was significantly younger, primarily because the death age was a lot younger too.
I would like to talk about todays customs. Who decides what's right and what's wrong?
This does not mean I think that it's ok to look at a fourteen year old and have impure thoughts, but that's human nature BTW.
When it comes to it, I actually thinks it's wrong. But that will not change the way I look at that person looking at her boobs on Harry Potter. :)
-
Originally posted by J3Vr6
Well it really depends on the customs of your country. There are countries where it's fine for a 15 or 16 year old girl to go out with 30 year olds, so long as he's a professional.
Around here the age of consent is 13. So there.
-
Originally posted by DragonClaw
That's common sense. Each movie is the next year at Hogwarts, so naturally, he should age. But, the movies take more than a year to make. The actors are aging more than the characters should. So, suffice to say, eventually we'll have an 18 year old playing a 15 year old. Which doesn't add up at all. And, like I said before, a full breasted woman playing a 14 year old girl doesn't add up either. :p Nurr.
depends on the girl, doesn't it? Now if I only had my scanner...
-
Originally posted by Stunaep
Now if I only had my scanner...
:shaking: :shaking:
-
Might we return to discussing Harry Potter? This side discussion is just disturbing :p
-
http://www.bash.org/?111338
:nervous: http://www.bash.org/?50793 :nervous:
Can anyone give a short excert of the book so some of us who haven't read the book and haven't seen the movie are to expect of this?
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
....... she's thirteen. :wtf:
****ing perv-ass.
She's actually 15, and is going to turn into an beautiful woman.
-
14 = Just crawling out of the thick of Puberty
17 = If he's into 14 year old girls, he's probably ****ed quite a bit.
Or, let me put it thsi way.
14 = Just getting into High School
17 = Junior or Senior.
And why has no one laughed at this yet?
Originally posted by Nico
I was being ironical.
-
adwight: i thought she was 14.
-
To tell you the truth, it seems rather common for high school seniors to date freshmen and sophomores, at least in my school.
-
That movie in 15 minutes was hilarious, made my day. :lol:
I thought she was 15, or it must have been one of the the actors, cause they were talking about it on ET.
-
When I was a senior, I dated a sophomore. But she had turned 16 at the time. I was 17. That's not wierd. A senior with a freshman I would think wierd, but then again, times have changed since I was in highschool 10 years ago.
When I was 25 I dated an 18 yr old, that's probably the youngest I had ever dated. And I'll tell you right now, I don't think I'd ever do it again. There was such a huuge gap between priorities and maturity. It felt I was going out with a friggin high school girl. Definitely wasn't worth my time.
My girl, which I've been with for almost 2 years now, is 23 while I'm 28. The older you get, differences in ages matter less and less. It's just that when you're younger, like in highschool, those difference seem huge b/c of the differences in maturity.
-
Ow, man... I can see none of you have ever lived in Holland :p If we'd make a fuss about every 14 yo girl dating (*cough*) a 17 yo boy we'd do nothing else :p
14 is dating age and sexual exploration :p Got a problem with that? Go and join the priesthood or something cuz times are changing :p
-
Originally posted by jdjtcagle
Just look at the medieval times, 17 to 20 year olds would marry 12 to 13 year olds..
They were also dying at 30 :p
KT: three years is no difference to me, or, to be exact, around that age, 1 year is already such a difference ( teens change a lot then - back in college... her... your secondary school- I had a friend who was dating a girl two years older than him. Man was that funny to look at, her being two heads taller than him :p ) than it doesn't matter much if you add 1 or 2 to the equation.
Man, I'm 23, I'm not gonna diss a 20 years old chick just coz she's 3 years younger :doubt:
If you feel like laughing at that, well, go ahead.
-
Considering that my mother is 11 years younger than my dad, I see nothing wrong with that, venom. :p
-
This is funny listening to you guys argue about dating ages. My neighbor his 12 years older than his wife, and they seem to have no problem.
-
Venom: Context. Context. Context.
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
Venom: Context. Context. Context.
yes, but it is wrong applying yours to somebody's else.
-
This thread hijack is just disturbing.
In fact, it is almost as disturbing as my thread on other board that turned from discussion about bad grammar on internet to a discussion about lesbian sex. Don't ask how.
As for myself... the movie wasn't bad, but serious lack of cyborg robot zombies killed it for me.
-
Originally posted by Hollewanderer
As for myself... the movie wasn't bad, but serious lack of cyborg robot zombies killed it for me.
:wtf:
-
Originally posted by Corsair
:wtf:
Oh, don't worry. I am just a little bit insane right now, and I have watched Invader Zim recently. Suffice to say, the episode involved cyber robot zombies. And it was sweet. So, in my insanity, I switched my obsession from rubber duckys to cyber robot zombies.
Therefore, as the PoA did not involve cyber robot zombies, it can not be as cool as something involving cyber robot zombies, because it did not involve cyber robot zombies. It does not matter that cyber robot zombies had no place at all in the movie, as they are cyber robot zombies, and therefore too cool to not be included in anything even remotely resembling a proper movie.
-
Originally posted by Nico
yes, but it is wrong applying yours to somebody's else.
So don't do it?