Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Liberator on June 15, 2004, 12:04:38 am
-
I am a Knower of How.
We've all played NWN: HotU and are familiar with the concept of Knowers. Beings gifted with ultimate knowledge in very specific areas.
Now I don't claim to posses ultimate knowledge of How, but my knowledge base skews heavily in this direction.
Knowers of How tend to be Technicians and Mechanics as they understand how things work but, tend to get lost and feel stupid when they can't really get much of a grasp on the Why of things.
Knowers of Why tend to be Theoretical "X" or Administrators because they know why things work, but get lost when a Knower of How tries to explain how a thing works.
So look at yourself and tell us whether you are a knower of How or a knower of Why.
*edit*
This explains my lack of aptitude with mathematics. Mathematics is the science of Why.
-
..... both.
-
I'm a how, I know how things work, and my constant quest in life is to know the why... without the why, I am lost an unable to function. If someone doesn't tell me why something is, the how is useless and/or pointless.
-
You'll know you're a How if the Why is unimportant or incomprehensible to you.
-
NWN???
bit of both for myself. I know some fair bit of how, and a fair bit of why, but thats it for both :p
-
A bit more of why then how... :nervous:
-
Originally posted by Knight Templar
..... both.
I'm inclined to agree, I can tell you how some things work - and I can also tell you why. But it depends on the specific area.
-
42
-
Originally posted by Liberator
I had an epiphany today...
Did it hurt?
-
yeah, especially when it went through the tight part.
-
I'm inclined to agree with Lib to a degree here, most people I have encountered have been thinkers or doers, thinkers can build 3D games in their heads, doers can put together the computer so you can play it ;)
Of course, the two lines blur, I now think nothing of slapping a processor into a motherboard, even when it makes that scary grinding noise as you crank the magic lever, most people who design cars are often pretty good drivers etc.
This is why Rennaisance Men are so hard to come by, they are thinkers and doers.
-
I'm both, but I'm lazy, as well, so.. err... I forget what's going on here...
-
Where.
-
When.
:nervous:
-
Originally posted by Styxx
Did it hurt?
My thoughts exactly.
-
Don't worry, it's the genes.
-
I'll have to say both, to an extent.
Why and how can often be used interchangably.
How is blood pumped around the body? - By the heart
Why is blood pumped around the body? - Because the heart does it.
Ok, bad example, but you get my point. I hope.
-
How do Atoms work?? - there the make-up of everyhting
Why do Atoms work?? -
Now do you see, Petrarch?
-
Well I didn't say in all cases, did I?
-
For the atoms problem, you can cheat and just say 'the laws of physics' - they govern the how and the why :)
-
IIRC, Laws of physics doesn't explain the force that holds the Protons and Neutrons together...
-
Ah, yes, you're quite right. I should have said "because of quantum"
-
leap?
-
And it all boils down to Fractals, which is handy if you're in the T-Shirt business ;)
-
Originally posted by ShadowDrakken
I'm a how, I know how things work, and my constant quest in life is to know the why... without the why, I am lost an unable to function. If someone doesn't tell me why something is, the how is useless and/or pointless.
My feelings exactly.
-
My point is that people are predisposed to knowing either the How or the Why and have to work much harder to learn the other than someone who is predisposed to it.
-
Banana!
No I think it's both for me too
-
you could drown an ant in the depth of that lake
*rolleyes*
Infact your conclusions are all wrong - I am living contradiction. I know both HOW and WHY
-
Explain
-
All bow to master Kazan, please, show us the errors of our ways oh magnificent one.
-
Kaz, unless you're some kind of droid(and I still haven't made up my mind), you are predisposed toward one or the other. It takes years to equalize between the two and you always learn one before the other.
-
Liberator: provide reference materials proving that you must be predisposed tword being one or the other or don't try to assert that.
I am predisposed tword neither.
-
Kazan is a Vulcan :D
-
Originally posted by Kazan
Liberator: provide reference materials proving that you must be predisposed tword being one or the other or don't try to assert that.
I am predisposed tword neither.
You could start an argument in an empty house, couldn;t you Kaz?
-
aldo_14: no i couldn't, because in an empty house nobody is there to make assertions without backing
-
Originally posted by Kazan
aldo_14: no i couldn't, because in an empty house nobody is there to make assertions without backing
See - you're doing it again. you'd probably have a go at the mold for being incorrect in its simple existentialist worldview, or something.
now, try not to argue your way out of that one.
:p
-
I do not argue with things that are not sentient
-
Bet you'd love to try it though.
-
Originally posted by Kazan
I do not argue with things that are not sentient
Yet, you call them names... I didn't expect that from you, it doesn't fit the character you claim to be
-
Originally posted by Kazan
I do not argue with things that are not sentient
you argue with Lib.
-
Well, for things like computers, I always find how is easier than why, I can figure out how to use a program quite easily, but I wouldn't be able to read the source code, learning computer languages is hard work for me, but that doesn't stop me trying :)
Electronics, strangely enough, is another matter, I know about electron flow and magnetic fields in a 'behaviour' kind of way, but if someone gave me a field strength, a resistance, a current etc and asked me to figure out the ampage required for it, I wouldn't have a clue, I know why, but I don't know how.
It all depends on how you visualise things I suppose. :)
-
Kazaan isn't Vulcan. He somehow manages to be too pompous.
-
confidence is not pompousness
-
And more arrogant.
:D
-
Arrogance is being confident you can do things which you cannot.
Be careful whom you accuse of arrogance!
-
yo mama!
-
You take it like it's a bad thing, Kazzy.
-
Originally posted by Kazan
Arrogance is being confident you can do things which you cannot.
Be careful whom you accuse of arrogance!
No it isn't.
arrogance
n : overbearing pride evidenced by a superior manner toward inferiors [syn: haughtiness, lordliness
-
01010: I was being more precise. So say someone is arrogant, merely because they have great confidence that they have earned the right to have is pathetic
-
Now now children :rolleyes:
-
Forget the Kazan University Dictionary's definition of arrogance - I think 'full of himself' is more appropriate :)
-
The difference between arrogance and self-confidence is measured in how much of a twat the person is.
-
What part of my thinly veiled attempt to get people to move on did you not understand?
No matter, end of topic. Congratulations.