Hard Light Productions Forums
General FreeSpace => FreeSpace Discussion => Topic started by: Colonol Dekker on May 18, 2006, 05:12:48 am
-
Simple enough topic, VIews please, I personally would back confed all the way.....
for a start their fighters have wheels to land with. :nod:
-
My money is on the great space-god Flipeerptreoitertsfithopointlessarguementsithonothoimomalley.
-
Ok, point taken, but sometimes people like to ramble, Pointless argument anommaly :lol:, (i like it)
No serious takers?
Then hows about Arsenal getting whooped by Barcelona? No Football fans,? Then what do you suppose FS2 peeps play in the year 2XXX ?
-
Nah, BOCA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BOCA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Simple enough topic, VIews please, I personally would back confed all the way.....
for a start their fighters have wheels to land with. :nod:
you do realize that FS fighters most likely operate like a Harrier, right?
-
No they're launched by the crane thing in the hangerbay... except for the larger bombers of course, which are parked on the floor.
-
The GTVA would win because it has one decisive advantage over the Confederation: beam cannons. Confed capital ships are far built around the expectation that their shields will protect them, and a single salvo from an Orion would probably shred a Midway-class carrier (especially due to the idiotically-positioned exposed bridge). If the Confeds can dig up some flashpacks or figure out how to fire the Midway's plasma cannon without blowing themselves up, they might stand a chance. GTVA capital ships also have much better anti-fighter weaponry.
-
Wich confederation is this?
-
Wing Commander probably since Midway was mentioned earlier, that's just an educated guess though.
-
Ah, then the confed is screwed beyond all beleif...
-
Whoa........ Wheres the SAGA team, they should be defending the true "Terran fleet" (methingss i've gone a little Black Lance) :wtf:
At least confed have working cloaks :p (in a canon sense)
-
well, i theorise that some GTVA fighters have landing skids of some sort, the ones with spikes and whatnot, saids spikes would fold upwards as the skids extend, etc, etc. the rest would use the arrestor hookup system the we know have been used.
-
I suppose thats a good enough assumption, :nod: But i gottta say confed style magnum launches (the ability to launch all fighters quickly not midway tubes), would be more effective in a CQF (close quarter firefight) between capships / carriers.
On the minus side, Intra system jumps beats the snot out of autopilot...
-
the rest would use the arrestor hookup system the we know have been used
Did you mean like the arrestor cables that can be found on nowadays carriers? When were they used in the FS series?
-
In the main hall, The hook that picks up the fighter in the background, ALthough in retrospect, we never see them pick up fighters that are actually landing (ie mid air- grab) They might just be used to retrieve fighters from storage racks/holding bays for pre flight prep. :confused:
-
But in the Psamtik main hall in the background you can see an elevator on which there is a Serapis (I think) that takes off like an airplane from a carrier, without the use of any hook. Same for the landing: a Tauret lands like an airplane, without any hook.
-
the rest would use the arrestor hookup system the we know have been used
Did you mean like the arrestor cables that can be found on nowadays carriers? When were they used in the FS series?
So thats what all those wired polls coming out of the bottom of fighters are for!
-
err when are these hooks used exactly? I would imagine they actualy have the option of landing like a harier! And also the abilati to skid land theyr way into the hangars.
-
The crane things in the mainhall. Think about this, GTVA fighters don't have a reverse, so how would they land front forwards?
-
The crane things in the mainhall. Think about this, GTVA fighters don't have a reverse, so how would they land front forwards?
They can stop dead, hover, and turn 360 degrees.
-
I know with terran fighters have that bottom fin on them, except for bombers. Bombers land differently than standard fighters do, for terrans. Vasudan craft really do land differently, as you can tell from the psamtik mainhall. Vasudan fighters all take off like standard airplanes, except for pretty much no runway, they just take off. Vasudan fighter tend to land in the same fashion. No ones seen a terran fighter land, except for going into an orion fighter bay.
One thing that came across my head that would be cool, is if you could actually be deployed from an actual capital ship, or be deployed from a capship, and then warp to your destination. Like get all of that in 3d and part of the mission brief and giving your ship the loadout, then push commit, and you get launched from the capship. That would be kickass :D
Probably on no ones time watch though :lol:
-
So... how lands a terran fighter? Especially a fighter like the Hercules II, with that long fin under the fuselage? And also: what is the use of that long fin?
-
what is the use of that long fin?
What is the use of the other weird spikes you can find in almost every other scifi space ship? You should know better than to ask questions like that. :p
-
So... how lands a terran fighter? Especially a fighter like the Hercules II, with that long fin under the fuselage? And also: what is the use of that long fin?
IIRC, its' bottom tip is its sensor subsystem. Id imagine maby a unsealed hanger deck or a specially designed landing pad: ______
| ( ) |
-- --
Meh, you get the point.
(The design didnt show right after i posted it. Hit the quote button on my post and view it in its correct form if you wish to see it w\o error.)
-
Wow, I'm out of it. Filtered post for my dignity.
-
I would assume, that possibly the sensor fin is probably motorized to the point that it can pull a drag queen maneuver and tuck under the fighter when it gets back on board a capship
-
I would assume, that possibly the sensor fin is probably motorized to the point that it can pull a drag queen maneuver and tuck under the fighter when it gets back on board a capship
that's what i mean, it wouldn't take that much of a stretch in technology to pull it off
-
kicks the **** out of the need for a special landing platform too :lol:
-
Or they could just have a multipurpose landing platform for taking in different ships.
-
Since GTVA had this pilot exchange program going on during FS2 including Alpha 1 assigned to Psamtik, they must have their fighter bays suitable for both terran and vasudan fighters. At least Hecate and Hatshepsut destroyers can house all GTVA fighters if not older destroyers.
-
Since GTVA had this pilot exchange program going on during FS2 including Alpha 1 assigned to Psamtik, they must have their fighter bays suitable for both terran and vasudan fighters. At least Hecate and Hatshepsut destroyers can house all GTVA fighters if not older destroyers.
Maybe the insides of a Hatshepsut are all squidgy.
-
well from what we can see there is a mlti pourpose platform that kind of sustains the ships entering the destroyer frum the sides to alow any othe fin or whatever it is to pretrude as it is shown during flight. this is regarding the herculesmkII.
Also the vasudans seem to have some sort of energy field supporting they vessels this would greately improve the speedines with wich they are able to park ships.
I think.
-
All FS ships are capable of anti-gravity. I think Adam Pletcher confirmed the tech level included that in the FS mailing list or similar.
-
uhmm then why do they even need specialized landing pads or even landing pads or some sort of grapling hook to help bring ships in?
I mean they could have some sort of inertial sistem mounted in the hangar bay to well stop the thing in its tracks!
-
uhmm then why do they even need specialized landing pads or even landing pads or some sort of grapling hook to help bring ships in?
I mean they could have some sort of inertial sistem mounted in the hangar bay to well stop the thing in its tracks!
Who said they needed specialized landing pads or grappling hooks?
-
errr.....nevermind..point taken.
-
On the subject of launching,.. In the first Nebular mission (as in it took part in a nebula) The hercs launched from the aquitaines wing-flap-protuberance-thing, Which is quite far from the Hecates hangar, Any views on this?
-
On the subject of launching,.. In the first Nebular mission (as in it took part in a nebula) The hercs launched from the aquitaines wing-flap-protuberance-thing, Which is quite far from the Hecates hangar, Any views on this?
Probably either had them docked temporarily in order to have a mass-scramble, or for some reason elected to get all the ships out and preflight-checked in the nebula (perhaps to check sensors, etc, worked in the soup) before launching the wings proper.
That, and someone at V no doubt noticed it was much cooler to show fighters 'lifting off' from there than just starting out of the rather crap Hecate launchbay.
-
Point :D With regards to anti grav hangar rams/catch system hypothesised earlier, Why has the orion got a runway? possibly for transports?
-
Point :D With regards to anti grav hangar rams/catch system hypothesised earlier, Why has the orion got a runway? possibly for transports?
Do we actually know for sure it's a runway? Could be simply open space to bolt fighters onto; perhaps for scrambling, ala the Hecate, when jumping into attack an enemy blockade.
-
Oh believe me, the orion has a runway. it seems logical for the orion. I mean you should watch how ships take off from the orion. More importantly, you should watch how ships go back into the orion. They just follow the runway since it even has a lit up strip for ships to find and follow.