Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => Arts & Talents => Topic started by: Colonol Dekker on May 23, 2006, 06:29:15 am

Title: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Colonol Dekker on May 23, 2006, 06:29:15 am
 :snipe:

Using the new FS2 build i want to cut and past a montage/machinima style sci fi series. Most of the preview/mod teasers i see use DivX, is that video capture software or just the encoder they use, Also where could i get an ogg encoder for soundtrack overlay in post production?
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Cobra on May 24, 2006, 09:27:43 am
DivX is the encoder. People use FRAPS or GameCam for their videos, but I don't recommend FRAPS unless you have a very high-end computer. :)
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Colonol Dekker on May 24, 2006, 09:35:51 am
Gamecam, cool. Many thanks cobra
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: pecenipicek on May 28, 2006, 06:10:38 pm
why should anyone use DivX? it sucks donkey balls compared to XviD.

XviD was in my use much much more.. should i say, free space savvy? :p
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Cobra on May 28, 2006, 07:11:17 pm
you freaking idiot, DivX uses XviD.

[EDIT] Unless I read something wrong somewhere.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Taristin on May 28, 2006, 08:06:31 pm
you freaking idiot, DivX uses XviD.

[EDIT] Unless I read something wrong somewhere.

You did. XVid is open source, DivX isn't.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Mars on May 28, 2006, 09:05:25 pm
And DivX does in fact suck donkey balls.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Cobra on May 28, 2006, 11:03:03 pm
you freaking idiot, DivX uses XviD.

[EDIT] Unless I read something wrong somewhere.

You did. XVid is open source, DivX isn't.

damn it. that's the last time i let an idiot (which i now know, didn't know it at the time) tell me things like that on MSN.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: pecenipicek on May 29, 2006, 02:40:18 pm
you freaking idiot, DivX uses XviD.

[EDIT] Unless I read something wrong somewhere.
*points and laughs*
who's the idiot now? :p
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: aldo_14 on May 30, 2006, 05:30:24 am
(http://www.goenglish.com/GoEnglish_com_ThePotCallingTheKettleBlack.gif)
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Unknown Target on June 02, 2006, 11:50:14 am
I concur.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: Flaser on June 20, 2006, 07:50:33 pm
All of them - Xvid, Divx, X264, WMV_6-9 - are MPEG-4 implementations.

MPEG is a standard, MPEG-1 was video CD, MPEG-2 DVD and SVCD.
DivX 3.11, the olden pirate codec was hacked from the MS Windows Media Wideo implementation of the MPEG-4 standard. The reason was, that MS only allowed you to convert files into their own properiety format, with no backwards compatibility (you could no longer extract that data) and that their encoder reeked like unwashed monkey balls. (In my golden otaku years I had some videos in that format (WMV), and it was an experience on and onto itself....like a trip through hell tied to a vogon literary chair.)
So DivX 3.11 was pretty much a pirated piece of software used by anyone without remorse.

Xvid was an opensource implementation from the start, and fully legit.
DivX has gone legal only later on, and while initially the format was ahead of Xvid, now they have fallen behind the development curve.
Xvid is a solid implementation at least on par with DivX, though it wasn't made for hacks with no knowledge of encoding, so you actually have a pretty detailed control panel for fine tuning it. (Whereas DivX, ala MS tries to shuffle all the works under a magic carpet with bright lilly signs that makes it all the more akward to use in my experience than helpful.)

X264 codecs are the newest on the scene, and offer the best in quality and filesize, but they trade it for processing power.

WMV-9 is on par with X264 quality wise, but compared to the opensource (or closed source) formats is still hard to work with, as the format is still extremely restrictive in terms of backward compatibilty or platform idependence.
MS also never really recovered from falling behind when DivX 3.11 appeared on the scene, though their agressive marketing and indoctrination of users has made a big percentage of people use their built-in tools for encoding their video.
Title: Re: This is the only place i can ask this i assume :snipe:
Post by: neoterran on June 20, 2006, 08:48:24 pm
^^ show-off