Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Wild Fragaria on November 13, 2006, 03:50:46 pm
-
Now what do you have to say about stem cell research :)
Nature News Published online: 10 November 2006; | doi:10.1038/news061106-17
Embryonic stem cells, the controversial and versatile cells that seem able to do just about anything, have now expanded their repertoire into cancer prevention. A vaccine made from these cells shields mice against developing lung cancer under conditions thought to mimic the effects of smoking.
Safety concerns about injecting stem cells into humans mean that regulatory agencies are unlikely to approve human tests of the vaccine, says lead researcher John Eaton at the University of Louisville in Kentucky.
Nevertheless, he thinks the vaccine is worth testing in people at high risk of developing cancer, such as heavy smokers or people with certain genetic mutations.
Other researchers are more cautious. Cancer vaccines, particularly vaccines made from cells, are notoriously more effective in mice than people, says Jeffrey Weber, an immunotherapist at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. "The idea is interesting, but the execution may be impossible," he says.
But both Weber and Eaton agree that the finding could lead to new ways to prevent or treat cancer.
Eaton's approach was inspired by the similarities between embryos, embryonic stem cells and tumours. "Embryos and tumours both grow as balls, they derive nutrients from the host, and they both express peculiar proteins - some of them in common," he says.
These shared proteins made Eaton think that a vaccine prompting an immune response to embryonic stem cells would also trigger an attack against tumours.
He and his colleagues injected mice with stem cells and gave the mice a booster shot ten days later. The researchers then transplanted lung cancer cells under the animals' skin — a standard animal model for the disease.
The stem-cell injection protected 20 out of 25 mice from developing tumours, whereas tumours grew in all unvaccinated mice.
"We were absolutely shocked," Eaton says.
Even more effective was a mixture of stem cells and cells engineered to make a molecule that stimulates the immune system. None of the mice given this vaccine developed tumours when implanted with cancer cells.
Eight of nine animals given this treatment were also protected from lung cancer induced by chemicals thought to mimic the effects of cigarette smoke.
Eaton is now testing his approach against other types of cancer. The findings were reported on 8 November at a meeting in Prague on 'Molecular targets and cancer therapeutics', sponsored by a consortium of cancer-research organizations from Europe and the United States.
Although the mice seemed to suffer no ill effects from the vaccine, Eaton admits that injecting live stem cells into people raises safety issues — such as whether the vaccine would make the body attack its own stem cells.
Eaton's team is now looking for the molecules on the embryonic stem cells that give the vaccine its tumour-killing power. That could potentially lead to more effective cancer vaccines with specific components.
The researchers have already discovered one such protein — found mainly in embryos, placentas and tumours. As yet, Eaton is unwilling to say much about it, except: "It's weird."
Looking for such molecules holds more promise than injecting stem cells themselves, says Weber.
-
Wow. Very BSG.........
-
Interesting stuff, especially about the possibility of the body rejecting its own stem cells with a pure-cell injection. It's a pity that there's so much public misunderstanding about Embryonic Stem-Cells.
I remember about 10 years ago, Orchids were believed to be the key to a lot of vaccines, but the rainforest was being so quickly devasted that it was thought hundreds of potentially beneficial plants had been destroyed. It's kind of odd how good humanity is at finding ways to cripple itself.
-
As yet, Eaton is unwilling to say much about it, except: "It's weird."
The 2 most exciting words in science? :)
-
Wierd Science is certainly the best kind ;)
Seriously though, I'm intriuged to find out about a molecule that, with todays' knowledge of Biology and Chemistry is still considered 'wierd', that must be one hell of a molecule :)
-
Weird Science leads to innovation...
Or bad problems, but I'm on optimistic person, so I'll just stick to innovation. :p
I'm also glad to see something good coming out of my home state. :D
-
(http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/1083/weirdscience24de.jpg)
Now that's Wierd Science ;)
-
Now what do you have to say about stem cell research :)
I have to say that any beneficial results will be suppressed for a long long time, just like they always have been.
-
Wow. Very BSG.........
/me puts on Bear McCreary [Battlestar Galactica - Season Two] - Baltar's Dream
-
[HOMER] Stem Cells, Is there anything they can't do............ ;7 [/HOMER]
-
[HOMER] Stem Cells, Is there anything they can't do............ ;7 [/HOMER]
Damn it. Beaten to that post by eighteen clear minutes.
-
I dont think i saw it simpsons, but it seemed a Homer thing to say,........
Any way :yes: :yes: to science, :no: :no: to jiggery pokery.
-
I dont think i saw it simpsons, but it seemed a Homer thing to say,........
Oh come on. You know that's a Homer quote :).
-
I was thinking of South Park at the time, Honest to :v: i can't remember him saying it :nod: