Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: redmenace on November 17, 2006, 05:21:27 am

Title: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: redmenace on November 17, 2006, 05:21:27 am
Milton Friedman Dies (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111600592.html)
Friedman Debunked the Gospel of Keynes (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/16/AR2006111601779.html)

:eek2: He will be greatly missed. :(
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Nix on November 18, 2006, 02:15:54 pm
<robot chicken> Reaganomics! </robot chicken>

Yes, he will be missed though. One of history's brighter people. 
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Nuke on November 19, 2006, 04:56:48 am
nukes theory of economics:

give me all your money and submit to me as my slaves! wahahahahaha!
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: redmenace on November 19, 2006, 01:03:34 pm
<robot chicken> Reaganomics! </robot chicken>

Yes, he will be missed though. One of history's brighter people. 
Which episode was that?
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Rictor on November 19, 2006, 02:21:12 pm
Erm, let's not pine too much for the man who was the main intellectual promoter of a system which screwed the Third World good and hard for over two decades, causing untold suffering, and continues to do so to a lesser extent. Sure, his libertarian tendencies are welcome in the age when even conservatives have embraced big government, and I will give kudos to anyone who preaches government non-interference, but this is the man who once said that a corporation should be expected to have as much morality as a building.
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: redmenace on November 19, 2006, 04:38:01 pm
Well he was a realist, to some extent. Sometimes, though, depending on the progress in a country, libertarianism might not be the best. Especially in the soviet block countries. Although loosening up capitalistic restrictions is key in those said countries.
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Ford Prefect on November 19, 2006, 04:39:36 pm
I'm pretty sure I would agree with that statement. I think we have to rely on other institutions to check the fundamentally amoral nature of the private sector. We can't expect it to keep itself under control.
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: redmenace on November 19, 2006, 05:07:10 pm
The only thing you really can do is make it so damn expensive to break the law, that the risk is not worth the return. AT THE SAME TIME, laws need to be unambiguous and judges should not seek to legislate(conservative and liberal).
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Sarafan on November 19, 2006, 09:37:42 pm
Erm, let's not pine too much for the man who was the main intellectual promoter of a system which screwed the Third World good and hard for over two decades, causing untold suffering, and continues to do so to a lesser extent. Sure, his libertarian tendencies are welcome in the age when even conservatives have embraced big government, and I will give kudos to anyone who preaches government non-interference, but this is the man who once said that a corporation should be expected to have as much morality as a building.

And as a resident of the Third World, I say only god knows how much that screwed us up. :ick: :no:

The only thing you really can do is make it so damn expensive to break the law, that the risk is not worth the return. AT THE SAME TIME, laws need to be unambiguous and judges should not seek to legislate(conservative and liberal).

Now that I can agree with. :yes:
Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: Hippo on November 19, 2006, 09:54:45 pm
The only thing you really can do is make it so damn expensive to break the law, that the risk is not worth the return. AT THE SAME TIME, laws need to be unambiguous and judges should not seek to legislate(conservative and liberal).



 :nod:

Title: Re: Milton Friedman: 1912-2006
Post by: redmenace on November 20, 2006, 02:58:46 am
That bit of wisdom came from a libertarian economist from GMU.