Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => Gaming Discussion => Topic started by: Metius on December 11, 2006, 05:49:25 pm

Title: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Metius on December 11, 2006, 05:49:25 pm
In addition to the poll, I'm going to roll this out in one of those face-off type things.

Overall Size:

Covenant - Massive fleets, numbering in the thousands

Empire - Dozens of ships, millions of fightercraft

Winner - Close, but I think the Covenant get this one

Years in Existence:

Covenant- Eons upon eons of history

Empire - Two whole decades

Winner - Uhh...Covenant I think

Best Space Machine:

Covenant - Giant cruisers, a fleet of millions, and a massive city

Empire - The Death Star

Winner - Empire.  Come, on, seriously.

Ground Vehicles:

Covenant - Wraith tanks, Banshees, Ghosts, and Scarabs

Empire - AT-STs, AT-PTs, and the Mighty AT-ATs

Winner - Empire.  Just cause AT-ATs are sweet.

Infantry Units:

Covenant - Grunts, Jackals, Drones, Elites, Hunters, and Brutes

Empire - Stormtroopers.  LOTS of Stormtroopers

Winner - Covenant, Stormtroopers die too easily.

Biggest Blunder:

Covenant- Can't kill a singular super-soldier who destroys their sacred ring

Empire - Built a thermal exhaust port that would convienintly destroy their best weapon

Winner - Tie.  They're both retarded in that sense.

Evil Leader:

Covenant - Prophet of Truth; betrayed the Elites to fulfill the Great Journey

Empire - Emperor Palpatine; exterminated all of the Jedi to maintain power.

Winner - Empire.  We all know the Emperor would kill you for no reason. Plus he's got lightning.

Coolest Warrior:

Covenant - The Arbiter; a Covenant holy warrior, kill the Brutes.

Empire - Darth Vader; Lord of the Sith, chokes people.

Winner - Empire.  Darth will always win.

And the winner, with 4 to 3, is the Galactic Empire!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Kaboodles on December 11, 2006, 11:07:59 pm
Ugh...

I remember someone linking to a thread in the Gamespot forums about Shivans vs Covenant.  It was generally agreed that arguments like these are rather pointless.

In any case, your arguments are rather silly.  You can't fault the Covenant for not being able to kill MC.  He's just that badass.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: NGTM-1R on December 11, 2006, 11:32:02 pm
Well, from a purely practical standpoint, most Imperial ships outmass their Covenant equivalents by a good margin, which means they'll take a bit to kill. I'd have to get out my copy of Fall of Reach to get a feel for Covenant engagement ranges, but IIRC they are comfortable at much greater ranges.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Kaboodles on December 11, 2006, 11:39:58 pm
Well you could always take out the shield generators and crash a small fighter into the bridge.  :D
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Taristin on December 12, 2006, 01:31:59 am
Giving wins to the empire just because is lame :p
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: aldo_14 on December 12, 2006, 02:53:01 am
Ah, but who would win in a fight between the Reavers from Serenity/Firefly and a small mutant avocado armed with a knife?

Hmmm?

HMMMMMMMM?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: redsniper on December 12, 2006, 02:53:58 am
Giving wins to the empire just because is lame :p
Oh come on, we all know that the Empire is one of the most awesome organizations of any sci-fi universe. The main reason that Tie Fighter is so great is the fact that you get to fight for them. ;7
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 12, 2006, 03:10:29 am
In addition to the poll, I'm going to roll this out in one of those face-off type things.

Overall Size:

Covenant - Massive fleets, numbering in the thousands

Empire - Dozens of ships, millions of fightercraft

Winner - Close, but I think the Covenant get this one


Actually, Galactic Empire at its peak of power ruled an entire galaxy. The Covenant would have to rule several galaxies to beat them. I think the Galactic Empire takes this one.


Quote
Years in Existence:

Covenant- Eons upon eons of history

Empire - Two whole decades

Winner - Uhh...Covenant I think


The Covenant's history is not that long AFAIK, and the Empire was a direct descendant of the Galactic Republic, which ruled (tens of) thousands of years.

Also, does this mean the age of civilization or the age of the state? The covenant civilization/culture is about as old as the Covenant itself, but the parts of the Covenant can obviously have longer histories. Empire, on the other hand, is based on much longer-lasting Galactic civilization.

The question is, does it have any importance to end result which one is older? Japan's civilization was old enough, yet they could offer no remarkable resistance when captain Perry and US Navy arrived. Same applies to China. Meh.


Quote
Best Space Machine:

Covenant - Giant cruisers, a fleet of millions, and a massive city

Empire - The Death Star

Winner - Empire.  Come, on, seriously.

Spoiler/speculation for the Halo trailer:

Spoiler:
Well, if you don't count that the Covenant apparently have invaded Earth and have control over the Ark, which can apparently remotely detonate all the Halos left in the Milky Way, which basically means they are able to destroy all sentient life in the galaxy, the contest gets much closer. Although the Covenant might not have a clear idea what the thing does.


Quote
Ground Vehicles:

Covenant - Wraith tanks, Banshees, Ghosts, and Scarabs

Empire - AT-STs, AT-PTs, and the Mighty AT-ATs

Winner - Empire.  Just cause AT-ATs are sweet.


Well, yeah. As a walking giant tank the Scarab is effectively better than AT-AT, but AT-AT is somewhat cooler, even if AT-AT can be taken down by steel wire and Scarab apparently can not.

Ghosts and scout speeders are roughly equivalent. Scout speeder wins.

Wraith and Banshee don't seem to have a direct equivalent in Imp army (meaning we haven't seen them) but anyway, I wouldn't count the Banshee as a ground device anyway. It's more of a light ground attack/air support helicopter or plane.


Quote
Infantry Units:

Covenant - Grunts, Jackals, Drones, Elites, Hunters, and Brutes

Empire - Stormtroopers.  LOTS of Stormtroopers

Winner - Covenant, Stormtroopers die too easily.


Actually they don't, it's just the Stormtrooper effect, which by the way affects the covenant almost as badly, as shown in the next paragraph (blunders). Stormtroopers are in fact an elite group within the army as far as I know. The brunt of the raw military force of the Empire are Imperial Army Troopers. Then there are Imperial Navy Troopers, but they are not part of infantry forces.

But they do have lots and lots of them. Empire wins, galactic scale gives them a lot of recruiting material.


Quote
Biggest Blunder:

Covenant- Can't kill a singular super-soldier who destroys their sacred ring

Empire - Built a thermal exhaust port that would convienintly destroy their best weapon

Winner - Tie.  They're both retarded in that sense.


QFT.


Quote
Evil Leader:

Covenant - Prophet of Truth; betrayed the Elites to fulfill the Great Journey

Empire - Emperor Palpatine; exterminated all of the Jedi to maintain power.

Winner - Empire.  We all know the Emperor would kill you for no reason. Plus he's got lightning.

QFT. Unlimited Power! Which the Prophet of Truth does not possess...

Quote
Coolest Warrior:

Covenant - The Arbiter; a Covenant holy warrior, kill the Brutes.

Empire - Darth Vader; Lord of the Sith, chokes people.

Winner - Empire.  Darth will always win.


QFT.

Quote
And the winner, with 4 to 3, is the Galactic Empire!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.


In a military clash, there would be no contest. Empire would own the Covenant. However, in stability the Covenant takes the first place, even if the treason of Truth did cause a civil war within the Covenant. The Empire was short-lived and collapsed when its leaders perished, allowing the New Republic to take their place. Anyway, military-wise the Old Republic, Galactic Empire and New Republic form some kind of a contiuum. I think the military power of that combined history peaked in the Clone Wars at the time of the six movies. Sith Wars probablt caused even more military action.

Mixing universes is fun and pointless.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: aldo_14 on December 12, 2006, 03:19:59 am
I wouldn't want a super-soldier to destroy my sacred ring.  At the very least I'd demand vaseline.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: CmdKewin on December 12, 2006, 03:54:54 am
Let me make a few corrections...

Quote
Overall Size:

Covenant - Massive fleets, numbering in the thousands

Empire - Dozens of ships, millions of fightercraft

Winner - Close, but I think the Covenant get this one

The Empire has a fleet of 25000 Star Destroyers. That's in Canon universe. Add to that a indefinite number of support crafts, fighters, transport barges, navigation buoys, ecc.... You get the idea. That's far from the "dozens of ships". By VERY far.

Quote
Years in Existence:

Covenant- Eons upon eons of history

Empire - Two whole decades

Winner - Uhh...Covenant I think

Yes, true. Although the Star Wars Galaxy has been around for a long time too. Plus, as time passes, vast empires tend to become opulent, corrupt and generally decadent: that has happened in our history many many times. Plus, if you remember correctly, that's the very reason why the Empire was born in the first place. So, I'd say, in general, a "younger" organization is by far better: you can react faster and don't have the burden of a too spread out burocracy.

Quote
Best Space Machine:

Covenant - Giant cruisers, a fleet of millions, and a massive city

Empire - The Death Star

Winner - Empire.  Come, on, seriously.

And then, they could build TWO of them.

Quote
Ground Vehicles:

Covenant - Wraith tanks, Banshees, Ghosts, and Scarabs

Empire - AT-STs, AT-PTs, and the Mighty AT-ATs

Winner - Empire.  Just cause AT-ATs are sweet.

That's the only thing i don't like about SW. Yes, AT-ATs are a sight to fear on a battlefield (and in that they suit Moff Tarkin's Terror Doctrine). But still, blasting away a planet's resistance from orbit is far more efficient. The only reason the Empire used AT-AT in the Battle of Hoth was because Darth Vader wanted to capture prisoners. Otherwise, they would have been blasted long before that.

Quote
Infantry Units:

Covenant - Grunts, Jackals, Drones, Elites, Hunters, and Brutes

Empire - Stormtroopers.  LOTS of Stormtroopers

Winner - Covenant, Stormtroopers die too easily.

Unless you can clone them = pretty much infinite "supply".  And, last time I checked, the Stormtroopers where the elite among infantry. So, the majority of the engagements where dealt with by Marine Infantry, not by Stormtroopers.

Quote
Biggest Blunder:

Covenant- Can't kill a singular super-soldier who destroys their sacred ring

Empire - Built a thermal exhaust port that would convienintly destroy their best weapon

Winner - Tie.  They're both retarded in that sense.

Oh well. That's because you need a story and some sort of gameplayability... Immagine Halo if the Covenant overwhelmed you 10000000/1. That wouldn't be fun, would it?
And, btw, there's one small difference. At the end of "The Empire Strikes Back", the Empire is actually WINNING against the Rebels. They are scattered off and hiding. A whole year passes before they can get back to action (in the Novelization of ROTJ, the actual time is six months, but I think we can agree that the dates we see in the movies count here). There's no such thing in Halo, at least, that I can remember. Master Chief is always on the Edge, never backing.

Quote
Evil Leader:

Covenant - Prophet of Truth; betrayed the Elites to fulfill the Great Journey

Empire - Emperor Palpatine; exterminated all of the Jedi to maintain power.

Winner - Empire.  We all know the Emperor would kill you for no reason. Plus he's got lightning.

Uhm. If you say so :)

Quote
Coolest Warrior:

Covenant - The Arbiter; a Covenant holy warrior, kill the Brutes.

Empire - Darth Vader; Lord of the Sith, chokes people.

Winner - Empire.  Darth will always win.

Oooooh yes :D

Quote
And the winner, with 4 to 3, is the Galactic Empire!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.

So, I'd probably say the Covenant have NO chance. Not even in a long term attrition war.

Quote
In a military clash, there would be no contest. Empire would own the Covenant. However, in stability the Covenant takes the first place, even if the treason of Truth did cause a civil war within the Covenant. The Empire was short-lived and collapsed when its leaders perished, allowing the New Republic to take their place. Anyway, military-wise the Old Republic, Galactic Empire and New Republic form some kind of a contiuum. I think the military power of that combined history peaked in the Clone Wars at the time of the six movies. Sith Wars probablt caused even more military action.
Yes, you are correct. In a such vast galaxy, empires, political organizations, corporations, nations, planets, cultures, races can come an go in the blink of an eye, without the rest even noticing. In fact, there are places where the Empire (or of the Old Republic, for that matter) is not known of (the nebula beyond Nar Shadda, as an example). The only constant in SW is, no matter how far and remote, there's always someone wagin war on some other one. An external threat would do nothing else than bring together the biggest factions so that they can repel the common foe and go back to their fighting.

Quote
Mixing universes is fun and pointless.
We all are a little bit "nerdish" around here... so who cares? :D
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Mefustae on December 12, 2006, 04:43:40 am
And then, they could build TWO of them.
Since we're including the Expanded Universe, make that three Death Stars [not including the Darksaber] plus dozens of smaller superlaser-carrying vessels. Not to mention a wide variety of Tarkin-inspired superweapons ranging from the World Devastators to the Sun Crusher, and lets not forget our old friend the Galaxy Gun; with the power to destroy a planet anywhere in the Galaxy without even having to go within 10,000 lightyears of it. The Covenant tactician who thought up "glassing" would have wet dreams about these weapons, and the Empire already has them, so it's pretty game-set-match if you ask me.

In a word; the Covenant's ****ed.

Now, let's move on from silly comparisons that don't make sense.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Quest_techie on December 12, 2006, 06:40:14 am
Let me make a few corrections...

Quote
Overall Size:

Covenant - Massive fleets, numbering in the thousands

Empire - Dozens of ships, millions of fightercraft

Winner - Close, but I think the Covenant get this one

The Empire has a fleet of 25000 Star Destroyers. That's in Canon universe. Add to that a indefinite number of support crafts, fighters, transport barges, navigation buoys, ecc.... You get the idea. That's far from the "dozens of ships". By VERY far.

Quote
Years in Existence:

Covenant- Eons upon eons of history

Empire - Two whole decades

Winner - Uhh...Covenant I think

Yes, true. Although the Star Wars Galaxy has been around for a long time too. Plus, as time passes, vast empires tend to become opulent, corrupt and generally decadent: that has happened in our history many many times. Plus, if you remember correctly, that's the very reason why the Empire was born in the first place. So, I'd say, in general, a "younger" organization is by far better: you can react faster and don't have the burden of a too spread out burocracy.

Quote
Best Space Machine:

Covenant - Giant cruisers, a fleet of millions, and a massive city

Empire - The Death Star

Winner - Empire.  Come, on, seriously.

And then, they could build TWO of them.

Quote
Ground Vehicles:

Covenant - Wraith tanks, Banshees, Ghosts, and Scarabs

Empire - AT-STs, AT-PTs, and the Mighty AT-ATs

Winner - Empire.  Just cause AT-ATs are sweet.

That's the only thing i don't like about SW. Yes, AT-ATs are a sight to fear on a battlefield (and in that they suit Moff Tarkin's Terror Doctrine). But still, blasting away a planet's resistance from orbit is far more efficient. The only reason the Empire used AT-AT in the Battle of Hoth was because Darth Vader wanted to capture prisoners. Otherwise, they would have been blasted long before that.

Quote
Infantry Units:

Covenant - Grunts, Jackals, Drones, Elites, Hunters, and Brutes

Empire - Stormtroopers.  LOTS of Stormtroopers

Winner - Covenant, Stormtroopers die too easily.

Unless you can clone them = pretty much infinite "supply".  And, last time I checked, the Stormtroopers where the elite among infantry. So, the majority of the engagements where dealt with by Marine Infantry, not by Stormtroopers.

Quote
Biggest Blunder:

Covenant- Can't kill a singular super-soldier who destroys their sacred ring

Empire - Built a thermal exhaust port that would convienintly destroy their best weapon

Winner - Tie.  They're both retarded in that sense.

Oh well. That's because you need a story and some sort of gameplayability... Immagine Halo if the Covenant overwhelmed you 10000000/1. That wouldn't be fun, would it?
And, btw, there's one small difference. At the end of "The Empire Strikes Back", the Empire is actually WINNING against the Rebels. They are scattered off and hiding. A whole year passes before they can get back to action (in the Novelization of ROTJ, the actual time is six months, but I think we can agree that the dates we see in the movies count here). There's no such thing in Halo, at least, that I can remember. Master Chief is always on the Edge, never backing.

Quote
Evil Leader:

Covenant - Prophet of Truth; betrayed the Elites to fulfill the Great Journey

Empire - Emperor Palpatine; exterminated all of the Jedi to maintain power.

Winner - Empire.  We all know the Emperor would kill you for no reason. Plus he's got lightning.

Uhm. If you say so :)

Quote
Coolest Warrior:

Covenant - The Arbiter; a Covenant holy warrior, kill the Brutes.

Empire - Darth Vader; Lord of the Sith, chokes people.

Winner - Empire.  Darth will always win.

Oooooh yes :D

Quote
And the winner, with 4 to 3, is the Galactic Empire!

What do you think?  Please share your thoughts.

So, I'd probably say the Covenant have NO chance. Not even in a long term attrition war.

Quote
In a military clash, there would be no contest. Empire would own the Covenant. However, in stability the Covenant takes the first place, even if the treason of Truth did cause a civil war within the Covenant. The Empire was short-lived and collapsed when its leaders perished, allowing the New Republic to take their place. Anyway, military-wise the Old Republic, Galactic Empire and New Republic form some kind of a contiuum. I think the military power of that combined history peaked in the Clone Wars at the time of the six movies. Sith Wars probablt caused even more military action.
Yes, you are correct. In a such vast galaxy, empires, political organizations, corporations, nations, planets, cultures, races can come an go in the blink of an eye, without the rest even noticing. In fact, there are places where the Empire (or of the Old Republic, for that matter) is not known of (the nebula beyond Nar Shadda, as an example). The only constant in SW is, no matter how far and remote, there's always someone wagin war on some other one. An external threat would do nothing else than bring together the biggest factions so that they can repel the common foe and go back to their fighting.

Quote
Mixing universes is fun and pointless.
We all are a little bit "nerdish" around here... so who cares? :D



I dunno 2083 and a third dozen, says dozens to me.... lots and lots of dozens <this IS a joke>

the borg would beat both anyhow, and of course all would be defeated by 8472, it'd take a few smashed up cubes to adapt, but once that was over and done with

jeez, I would love to see the deathstar assimilated.... borg sphere..... many x l
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: CmdKewin on December 12, 2006, 07:55:44 am
I dunno 2083 and a third dozen, says dozens to me.... lots and lots of dozens <this IS a joke>

the borg would beat both anyhow, and of course all would be defeated by 8472, it'd take a few smashed up cubes to adapt, but once that was over and done with

jeez, I would love to see the deathstar assimilated.... borg sphere..... many x l


I knew somebody was going to bring them up... let's stop it right now. :) You don't want to get me started on the whys and why nots the Borg too don't stand a chance against the Empire.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: aldo_14 on December 12, 2006, 08:17:29 am
None of them could stand against the Krikkit Empire, anyways.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Metius on December 12, 2006, 01:48:51 pm
Thanks for your opinion guys.  It's all in good fun and you make some interesting points.  However, we all know that the Shivan Juggernaut fleet would toast them both. ;7
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: redsniper on December 12, 2006, 01:55:48 pm
I don't know, the Shivans need a whole juggernaut fleet in order to nuke a star, and IIRC a single Krikkit robot can do the same thing with just a cricket bat and ball. :p
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Quest_techie on December 12, 2006, 04:41:11 pm
I dunno 2083 and a third dozen, says dozens to me.... lots and lots of dozens <this IS a joke>

the borg would beat both anyhow, and of course all would be defeated by 8472, it'd take a few smashed up cubes to adapt, but once that was over and done with

jeez, I would love to see the deathstar assimilated.... borg sphere..... many x l


I knew somebody was going to bring them up... let's stop it right now. :) You don't want to get me started on the whys and why nots the Borg too don't stand a chance against the Empire.




borg win because they'd get so damn many new drones, the empires throwaway soldier strategy would totally fail in that sort of war
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Dark Hunter on December 12, 2006, 05:22:55 pm
Meh. The Chozo would beat everyone else... including the Krikkets. The hard part about that is actually getting the Chozo to fight... the most blatantly invincible alien race ever conceived and they happen to be pacific... go figure. :doubt:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Mr. Vega on December 12, 2006, 06:02:50 pm
Taking after Spacebattles, are we?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: karajorma on December 12, 2006, 06:03:30 pm
Damn. Where is that move thread to spacebattles.com button when you need it. :p


EDIT : Evidentially I'm just that tiny bit too slow today :)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: S-99 on December 13, 2006, 07:14:00 am
Hmm the universe vs. universe thingy again. It is pointless to actually talk about such things, but the Covenant and the Empire have more in common than Shivans, plus people will debate this **** anyway for the sake of it. Covenant has plasma weapons, Empire has lasers on an extremely destructive level, both have electro dynamic shielding, both have super-luminal modes of travel to get them anywhere they need in a galaxy very fast that doesn't require jump nodes.
With all of these commonalities why not debate it. After that like the covenant, the empire also has specialized troops for snow, jungle, flying ships, operating other war machines.
When it comes to land attack, the empire has much better land vehicles. I don't really recall anything the covenant had for land assault besides a ship in orbit to really compare to the size of anything in the empires AT vehicles.
Then there comes plasma weapons that the covenant has. Would plasma weaponry overwhelm the empire?
Maybe and maybe not, the lasers in star wars are depicted as very destructive, reliable, and just plain damn powerful. The covenants plasma weapons are depicted in pretty much a similar sense (except for destroying planets..for the moment i think this can be let go).
Then there's the covenants plasma blades, very equal in performance to a lightsaber (does everyone have to rip ideas from star wars to make a new sci fi universe).
The empires dark jedi have a mastery of the much more powerful side of the force. Likely said, Darth vader i don't think could be countered by anything the covenant had to offer, not to mention all of the other powerful dark jedi and sith that exist within the empire. After that is storm troopers. Storm troopers are effective, they work anywhere, and they work great, but they were mainly developed as a measure of superiority over droids and meant to counter droids. After that storm troopers remain a good universal army to protect or counter anything, but the clones usually go into battle seeking and following orders only (that's all they were meant to do really...like i said they clones are superior to droids and were a great way to counter them in the clone wars). Pretty much what is superior to a clone soldier is a battle hardened actual individual, that is what the covenant has over storm troopers.
Another thing to consider is storm trooper effectiveness. Storm troopers are very powerful when recieving orders from someone who has a mastery in the force. Storm troopers get even more effective when you have a jedi or dark jedi fighting beside them. If you integrated force masterers into the storm trooper population per every so amount of storm troopers that would be great.
The covenant still has armies of battle hardened or at least eager to fight troops with a wrath, after that covenant troops do come equipped with personal shielding or at least a shield of some kind, storm troopers just have armor that can be pierced with a laser blast. Another thing is i don't really see a covenant hand held plasma blaster being anymore powerful than a storm trooper blaster. Covenant  have sticky grenades which would have an interesting advantage, but empire has grenades also (those thermal ones) which aren't sticky, but still a ballistics quality to the empire anyway.
Another thing is that the empire can keep pumping out clones like nothing. The covenant has tons and tons of troops itself, but those troops aren't clones, they are troops enough to at least be able to think for themselves, and then something in the works of a civil war could happen because someone had a difference of opinion or believed in something else.
The empire on the other hand wouldn't suffer that with storm troopers, storm troopers die, mass clone more of them is what that means, and as many as you wish.
Maybe the empire could possibly annoy, or even make the covenant get tired after a bit storm troopers, that's if the empire had ridiculous nonstop stormtrooper onslaughts. Then again, the covenant has enough of an edge to overtake in swift speed.

There's really only two aspects that make the empire better, which is all of their war machines(things from land vehicles to all of the different varieties of ties to the deathstar) and dark jedi/sith(covenant couldn't overpower the force).
With all of this review, i would say that the empire is technologically superior, but given the ineffectiveness of storm troopers (besides overwhelming an enemy) i'd say the empire better start training more dark jedi, use scare tactics with the death star, and somehow make storm troopers better.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Wobble73 on December 13, 2006, 08:27:28 am
But wasn't the point of the Dark Side of the Force, was there could only be two of them, a master and a student?

The emperor and Darth Vader? The death of Darth Maul left a vacancy for Anakin to become Darth Vader. Or I am completely way off track with that?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 13, 2006, 01:25:06 pm
That had nothing to do with the Dark side of the Force. It was a method in which the Sith lords decided to organize themselves to be more functional after their defeat to the Jedi... Before that, the Sith used to be a larger group, but the problem with that was that much of their time and efforts were tied in attempts to rise in the hierarchy (usually via backstabbing) and efforts to not be backstabbed (usually by pre-emptive backstabbing). So, they couldn't get much done because of continuous internal struggle and stuff like that. After they were defeated for mainly this reason in Sith wars, they decided to ensure the survival of the Sith order by hiding themselves - limiting the number of the Sith order members to two at a time.

By the way, even as the Sith lords were just the master and the apprentice for a long time, for example Emperor Palpatine had multiple spies who were strong in Force and even somewhat trained in the use it. Most of them were given the unofficial rank of "Emperor's Hand" and many/most of them believed that they were the only one with this rank, because Palpatine didn't want his Hands starting the internal struggle that limited the effectiveness of the old time Sith lords. Mara Jade must be the most known of these Emperor's Hands.

Read Thrawn trilogy by Timothy Zahn. Most of the other post-Empire SW books are... well, not complete trash but compared to Thrawn trilogy they suck. Zahn's Thrawn trilogy is nice piece of reading even if you're not into Star Wars, in my opinion.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Metius on December 13, 2006, 02:04:51 pm
The covenant has tons and tons of troops itself, but those troops aren't clones, they are troops enough to at least be able to think for themselves, and then something in the works of a civil war could happen because someone had a difference of opinion or believed in something else.
I can tell that you don't understand a lot about Halo and the Covenant from the way you wrote that.  The Covenant did have a civil war, and yeah, it was partly because of a difference in opinion.  However, it stands that you would probably need five or more Stormtroopers to take down a single Elite. :doubt:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 13, 2006, 02:21:34 pm
Yeah, probably. In hand-to hand-combat. However, why on earth [pun not intended] would the Empire engage in hand-to-hand combat when they can blast the Covenant to kingdom come from space even without Death Stars? Turbo-laser barrage FTW.

If the Empire wanted to capture/recapture a Covenant-controlled planet, then ground forces would obviously be involved, but I don't see the Empire willing to do that. They've got enough planets anyway, and they don't much care of civilian casuaties - after all, they destroy peaceful planets as an example and demonstration to every rebel-sympathetic world out there...

Even in the case of the Empire having to take back/invade Covenant-controlled planet, they would easily aquire air superiority with their vast fleet of space fighters, bombers and stuff. What do the Covenant have? Dropships and Banshees? Something unforeseen? Unless they can fastly construct huge amount of fightercraft to repel the masses of TIE-craft, Assault Gunboats and other common spacecraft used by the Empire, it would be really difficult for the covenant to operate.

Hand weapon-wise the Covenant weapons seem to be relatively similar in effect to SW blasters. In evenly numbered ground combat a Stormtrooper unit probably would lose to a Covenant force with standard distribution of Grunts, Elites, Jackals and Hunters. But when you add the huge Imperial fleet to the equation, the Covenant is screwed. They wouldn't have a chance, except for resorting to guerilla tactics like the Rebels did, doing hit-and-run attacks, intercepting convoys, spying the Empire to find flaws in their Death star plans and destroy the Empire that way... Oh wait. :lol:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: S-99 on December 13, 2006, 06:43:43 pm
The covenant has tons and tons of troops itself, but those troops aren't clones, they are troops enough to at least be able to think for themselves, and then something in the works of a civil war could happen because someone had a difference of opinion or believed in something else.
I can tell that you don't understand a lot about Halo and the Covenant from the way you wrote that.  The Covenant did have a civil war, and yeah, it was partly because of a difference in opinion.  However, it stands that you would probably need five or more Stormtroopers to take down a single Elite. :doubt:

No **** metius.
In fact i believe my only real interpretation was that storm troopers are a disposable army, compared to the  power and strength of covenant troops. Elites have more weapons equipped than a storm trooper does anyway.
Other than that, it seems you understood my fact that storm troopers will never themselves start a rebellion. Covenant troops on the other hand are smarter than them, have a higher capacity, and an imagination. Especially with events that take place in halo 2 when the elites were demoted by the head covenant aliens, one elite namely half your character for the game pretty much rebelled. My whole point is that covenant troops have the higher capacity to actually decide for themselves and even rebel.
 
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: BS403 on December 13, 2006, 09:14:44 pm
Meh. The Chozo would beat everyone else... including the Krikkets. The hard part about that is actually getting the Chozo to fight... the most blatantly invincible alien race ever conceived and they happen to be pacific... go figure. :doubt:
The Magog would own all.  They have an indestructable world ship with a trillion magog, several planets link together, and a star in the middle. Plus the Abyss stopping anything from destroying it. Now what could beat that?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 14, 2006, 02:27:15 am
(...) Now what could beat that?

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! Iä! Iä! Chthulhu fhtagn...

 :lol:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Quest_techie on December 14, 2006, 02:42:09 am
Meh. The Chozo would beat everyone else... including the Krikkets. The hard part about that is actually getting the Chozo to fight... the most blatantly invincible alien race ever conceived and they happen to be pacific... go figure. :doubt:
The Magog would own all.  They have an indestructable world ship with a trillion magog, several planets link together, and a star in the middle. Plus the Abyss stopping anything from destroying it. Now what could beat that?

again, borg, magog try to plant their progeny, nanoprobes eat them, assimilate the magog, a trillion new borg and a borg worldship waiting to assimilate more


I'm sorry, the only thing I can conceive that would beat the borg is jedi, and that's because their super small numbers, weapon that ignores or at least mitigates effects of force fields, and their stealth nonviolent tactics but failing that if a jedi got assimilated..... jesus
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Mefustae on December 14, 2006, 02:43:52 am
Q Continuum pwns all.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: CmdKewin on December 14, 2006, 05:25:55 am
Umpf.

From a purely strategical point of view, the Star Trek Universe won't stand a chance, in any shape or form. That includes Borgs and Species 8472. Modern Warfare mostly relies on one thing: mobilty. Now, if there's one thing that ST has always been struggling with his speed. Not even the Borg Transwarp conduits are fast enough: when it takes you several weeks to get from one quadrant to the next you'll lose if your enemy is able to get to the same place in a matter of hours. The Empire would simply have to get there, and the'll have all the time to prepare themselves for any attacker coming into the system.

Now the Q continuum is something entirely different: being "unbound", they can be anywhere instantly. But then, they won't probably be interested in a "puny mortals war". At least, an entire NEW galaxy to explore and to harrass IS fun :) Why spoil everything so fast? 
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Getter Robo G on December 14, 2006, 08:54:09 am

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! Iä! Iä! Chthulhu fhtagn...

 :lol:


I dare you to say that 3 times fast...  :p


But still leave daddy out of it!  ;)


Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 14, 2006, 10:13:26 am
I dare you to say that 3 times fast...  :p

But still leave daddy out of it!  ;)


It's not that hard to say. :nervous:

<btw you got those quotes a bit mixed up...> :D
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Polpolion on December 14, 2006, 04:19:41 pm
My money is on the Empire. Mostly because I know very little about the Covenant.

Out of curiosity, has anyone ever heard of the Eclipse Star Destroyer?

Well, I don't expect you too. All it is is a 17.5km long warship, with a super laser mount at the front, carried 696 fighter/bomber craft, over one thousand turrets, and 150,000 infantry men (crew = 700,000).

C'mon, this ship could kill anything. Besides Force storms.

:p
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Herra Tohtori on December 14, 2006, 04:38:37 pm
It may be able to destroy planets, but Eternal Cthulhu cannot die. :nod:

Besides, Cthulhu is probably even physically larger than the Eclipse. He is a Great Old One, the Sleeping God, Master of R'lyeh. And he'll likely have a bunch of other deities along with him when he eternally devours the poor people who dare oppose him. Ya'know, beings like Azathoth, Nyarlathotep, Tsathoggua, Yog-Sothoth, You-Tube, Shub-Niggurath, Glaaki, Google, Gol-goroth, Hastur etc. etc ad infinitum.

 :p
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 25, 2007, 03:00:42 pm
I apologize for bring up an old topic up, but its better I dont clog this place up with a topic like this again.  Anyways, disclaimer out of the way, the Empire wins, because of their better Warships(C'mon, you think anything in the Covvie arsenal can take down the Executor...Oh ****, not the fighters!), and better ground armor.  Oh, and the Dark Troopers.  So, there ya go, anybody what to ask me about this post, and i'll go in specifics. :)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: diceman111 on March 25, 2007, 03:08:09 pm
I think this is a matter of good guy /Bad guy physics since in Episodes II and III the clone warrirors hit everything and would thereby win but if you go by Episodes IV V and VI then they cant hit a wall from 2cm away and would definetly loose
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: NGTM-1R on March 25, 2007, 03:19:48 pm
I apologize for bring up an old topic up, but its better I dont clog this place up with a topic like this again.  Anyways, disclaimer out of the way, the Empire wins, because of their better Warships(C'mon, you think anything in the Covvie arsenal can take down the Executor...Oh ****, not the fighters!), and better ground armor.  Oh, and the Dark Troopers.  So, there ya go, anybody what to ask me about this post, and i'll go in specifics. :)

Straight up? Covenant cruiser can take down the Executor. :p Engagement ranges, son, engagement ranges. The Executor isn't effective out to 150km.

Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 25, 2007, 03:42:27 pm
I apologize for bring up an old topic up, but its better I dont clog this place up with a topic like this again.  Anyways, disclaimer out of the way, the Empire wins, because of their better Warships(C'mon, you think anything in the Covvie arsenal can take down the Executor...Oh ****, not the fighters!), and better ground armor.  Oh, and the Dark Troopers.  So, there ya go, anybody what to ask me about this post, and i'll go in specifics. :)

Straight up? Covenant cruiser can take down the Executor. :p Engagement ranges, son, engagement ranges. The Executor isn't effective out to 150km.


\
So THATS why the Executor is over gunned :P(500TLs and Ion guns FTW)  Dosent Matter, because the Eclipse pwns both anyway :P
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Snail on March 25, 2007, 03:49:04 pm
Covenant are cool. They control the Halos which are far more powerful than the Death Star, the Death Star II, the Galaxy Gun, the World Devastators OR the Sun Crusher.

The Empire sucks. Come on, those 'elite troops' Palpatine sends down to the shield generator in ROTJ are defeated by primitives who throw rocks and stones. :doubt:

Oh, and a few Elites could probably kill every Stormtrooper on the Death Star (I mean how can a smuggler, a desert rat, an old guy, a princess and two droids stand up to 1,000,000 stormtroopers? Huh?).
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 25, 2007, 04:13:00 pm
Covenant are cool. They control the Halos which are far more powerful than the Death Star, the Death Star II, the Galaxy Gun, the World Devastators OR the Sun Crusher.

The Empire sucks. Come on, those 'elite troops' Palpatine sends down to the shield generator in ROTJ are defeated by primitives who throw rocks and stones. :doubt:

Oh, and a few Elites could probably kill every Stormtrooper on the Death Star (I mean how can a smuggler, a desert rat, an old guy, a princess and two droids stand up to 1,000,000 stormtroopers? Huh?).
Dark Troopers, son.  Let's see:
12 of the Phase two-ers slaughtered an ENTIRE rebel base.  A SINGLE DTP.2 nearly killed the entile of a Mon Calmari crusier. Phase threes are walking tanks.  In short, the Dark Troopers actually restored my faith in Imperial ground forces.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: brozozo on March 25, 2007, 04:56:52 pm
Too bad Kyle Katarn had something to say about that.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 25, 2007, 06:17:27 pm
Too bad Kyle Katarn had something to say about that.
D'oh!  I forgot about that![inpresonation=Vader] NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
But, seriously, Dark Troopers probley still could utterly whoop the asses of most of the Covenate army(I want to see a duel between Phase III's and HUnters ;)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Sarafan on March 25, 2007, 06:57:28 pm
I didnt even read all this but whatever :P, the Empire wins for sure, the Covenant are not even ''evil'' IMO.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Flipside on March 25, 2007, 07:07:29 pm
I'm still fighting the urge to add Snuffleupagus ;)

Seriously though, it's hard to say, if you put the whole 'tech-blurb' to one side, the Covenant excel at groud assault, the Empire rely far more heavily on space-based systems.

Thing is, if you look at the Empire as having been beaten by 'An old guy, 2 droids a kid and a smuggler', then you are looking at it as a movie, in which case you could say that the Covenant can be beaten by a 14 year kid who wouldn't even have to stand up to do it, after all, it's a computer game.

In 'reality' the Clone Troopers were far more dangerous than depicted, mainly because they were totally loyal, that was how they were designed. Just as the Covenant of the Cutscenes in Halo are 'different' from the ones you face in-game :)

It's all really academic anyway, two totally different universes and all, but still interesting to think about ;)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 25, 2007, 07:33:02 pm
I'm still fighting the urge to add Snuffleupagus ;)

Seriously though, it's hard to say, if you put the whole 'tech-blurb' to one side, the Covenant excel at groud assault, the Empire rely far more heavily on space-based systems.

Thing is, if you look at the Empire as having been beaten by 'An old guy, 2 droids a kid and a smuggler', then you are looking at it as a movie, in which case you could say that the Covenant can be beaten by a 14 year kid who wouldn't even have to stand up to do it, after all, it's a computer game.

In 'reality' the Clone Troopers were far more dangerous than depicted, mainly because they were totally loyal, that was how they were designed. Just as the Covenant of the Cutscenes in Halo are 'different' from the ones you face in-game :)

It's all really academic anyway, two totally different universes and all, but still interesting to think about ;)
Indeed :D
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Polpolion on March 25, 2007, 08:09:08 pm
Wow, this got bumped and not one person complained until now?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Deepblue on March 25, 2007, 11:33:22 pm
The Covenant certainly has far more inspired ship design.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: BS403 on March 25, 2007, 11:56:52 pm
...You-Tube, ...
LOL :lol:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: redsniper on March 26, 2007, 12:10:53 am
The Covenant certainly has far more inspired ship design.
Because Star Destroyers were soooooo old hat in 1977. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: NGTM-1R on March 26, 2007, 02:44:27 pm
The Covenant certainly has far more inspired ship design.

Conversely, an Imperial Star Destroyer has a far more rational design, particularly if given an assault role.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Flipside on March 26, 2007, 03:36:25 pm
I actually like the 'function over form' design of Star Destroyers to be honest, those sloped sides give the widest possible firing arc for the entire front hemisphere guns, at the cost of making it a large, poorly defended target from the back. There was never a moments doubt what this ship was designed to do ;)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 26, 2007, 04:09:42 pm
The Covenant certainly has far more inspired ship design.
And yet , arent really anygood against an enemy with ADVANCED weapons. NEXT!
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 26, 2007, 04:10:28 pm
I actually like the 'function over form' design of Star Destroyers to be honest, those sloped sides give the widest possible firing arc for the entire front hemisphere guns, at the cost of making it a large, poorly defended target from the back. There was never a moments doubt what this ship was designed to do ;)
Imperial classes still IMO look better than Covnate ships
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: JGZinv on March 26, 2007, 04:27:53 pm
Ah being an old SW junkie I'll make thee comments...

1. The clone troopers as seen in Ep 1-3 (evil razzlefrazzin GL)
did have independent minds of their own and sought to have
some individualistic character to themselves. My evidence?
Thrawn Trilogy and the other books containing sleeper cells
of clone troopers.

2. A lot of this would have to depend on what point of the Empire's
timeline you are picking as the point they would go up against the Covanent...
At one time, yes, they did have multiple SSD command ships as well as numerous
other defense platforms, 3 Dstars (creation ability), the other Sun Crusher-esque ships.
The Eye of Palpatine, and numerous smaller vessels, not to mention alien plagues meant
to wipe out entire races.

But - most of this was not ready all at once, it was built in secret over time. Plus you have to factor
in that the Rebel Alliance did break them apart with the simple loss of Palpatine. Then spent the next
10 years cleaning up the warlords and portions of the Imperial Remnant before the truce. The Galactic
Alliance did have a sizable navy at the start of the NJO, including new Calamari Cruisers that could
rival SSD's due to the upgrades (if I remember that right). They also had at minimum, 3 captured SSDs...
The Guardian, Lusankya, and one other - which I'm thinking was part of the Black Fleet or something.
Might have to check the technical commentaries at the Force.net and the Wiki...

3. As to ground forces, I'd be willing to say the Covenant would likely win on the ground in
hand to hand or because of their walker units. The hand to hand though you'd just end up with
more stormtroopers dead per 1 elite. However, what's the Empire known to do... much less the Sith
before them? Bombard a planet from space until it's no longer inhabitable... But to invade a planet, you have
to control the space around it - otherwise you will be slowly cut off from support and eliminated. The same goes
for supply routes/hyperspace routes and planetary trade/manufacturing.

But there's my EU ten cents worth on the matter...
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 26, 2007, 04:54:23 pm
Ah being an old SW junkie I'll make thee comments...

1. The clone troopers as seen in Ep 1-3 (evil razzlefrazzin GL)
did have independent minds of their own and sought to have
some individualistic character to themselves. My evidence?
Thrawn Trilogy and the other books containing sleeper cells
of clone troopers.

2. A lot of this would have to depend on what point of the Empire's
timeline you are picking as the point they would go up against the Covanent...
At one time, yes, they did have multiple SSD command ships as well as numerous
other defense platforms, 3 Dstars (creation ability), the other Sun Crusher-esque ships.
The Eye of Palpatine, and numerous smaller vessels, not to mention alien plagues meant
to wipe out entire races.

But - most of this was not ready all at once, it was built in secret over time. Plus you have to factor
in that the Rebel Alliance did break them apart with the simple loss of Palpatine. Then spent the next
10 years cleaning up the warlords and portions of the Imperial Remnant before the truce. The Galactic
Alliance did have a sizable navy at the start of the NJO, including new Calamari Cruisers that could
rival SSD's due to the upgrades (if I remember that right). They also had at minimum, 3 captured SSDs...
The Guardian, Lusankya, and one other - which I'm thinking was part of the Black Fleet or something.
Might have to check the technical commentaries at the Force.net and the Wiki...

3. As to ground forces, I'd be willing to say the Covenant would likely win on the ground in
hand to hand or because of their walker units. The hand to hand though you'd just end up with
more stormtroopers dead per 1 elite. However, what's the Empire known to do... much less the Sith
before them? Bombard a planet from space until it's no longer inhabitable... But to invade a planet, you have
to control the space around it - otherwise you will be slowly cut off from support and eliminated. The same goes
for supply routes/hyperspace routes and planetary trade/manufacturing.

But there's my EU ten cents worth on the matter...
This debate should take place at the height of both powers, well... power. Which should be Halo 1 and ROtJ, respectivly  BTW, that was a really good post, there. :)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: brozozo on March 26, 2007, 09:17:51 pm
I apologize for bring up an old topic up, but its better I dont clog this place up with a topic like this again.  Anyways, disclaimer out of the way, the Empire wins, because of their better Warships(C'mon, you think anything in the Covvie arsenal can take down the Executor...Oh ****, not the fighters!), and better ground armor.  Oh, and the Dark Troopers.  So, there ya go, anybody what to ask me about this post, and i'll go in specifics. :)

Straight up? Covenant cruiser can take down the Executor. :p Engagement ranges, son, engagement ranges. The Executor isn't effective out to 150km.



I don't have any figures in front of me, but who (or what) says turbolasers don't have that kind of range? They use them for planetary bombardment, and that isn't exactly a short stroll from the gun deck to the poor bastards on the ground.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Flipside on March 26, 2007, 09:57:13 pm
Quote
Straight up? Covenant cruiser can take down the Executor. Engagement ranges, son, engagement ranges. The Executor isn't effective out to 150km.

I think they are slightly less than 150km, but I'm not sure, I do know the Rebels had an Ion cannon that certainly seemed to have no problem with vast ranges. but it's not unknown for Assault Gunboats and other Hyperdrive ships to make a H-Jump that precise, And even Lambda shuttles can be pretty nasty if they manage to get the torps away.

You'll always be left with unknowns though, like what effect would an Ion cannon have on Covenant shields? For things like that, you'll always be left in the realm of guessing. ;)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: JGZinv on March 27, 2007, 01:51:30 am
Thank you DT, my bookshelves of material tend to be useful once every 7 years.

*coughsomeonecoughmakeacoughcovanenthack
shipsputterandwheezeblastitcroakwithaioncannon*

Wow what was that?  :D

Now as to turbolaser education and all other things that go boom
in the night of space...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbolaser

http://www.theforce.net/swtc/index.html

http://www.theforce.net/swtc/power.html

SSD's (although the SWTC is a far more involved read)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Star_Destroyer

Move over Executor and Eclipse... here's the Pellaeon.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Pellaeon-class_Star_Destroyer

Comparisons and listings of the Empire's ships:
http://www.theforce.net/swtc/warships.html

Turoblaser Commentaries (and Ion Cannons too ^_^)
http://www.stardestroyer.net/tlc/

Can anyone come up with facts and figures on the Covanent besides this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_%28Halo%29
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: TrashMan on March 27, 2007, 06:27:16 am
Stormtroopers rule!

Especially the Republic Commandos ;7 Master Chief? Meh - they would eat him for breakfest
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: diceman111 on March 27, 2007, 11:22:24 am
Stormtroopers rule!

Especially the Republic Commandos ;7 Master Chief? Meh - they would eat him for breakfest


Yepp espically 4 special Republic Commandos (well 3 anyway)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Janos on March 28, 2007, 03:42:46 pm
Empire has turbolaser batteries of 200 gigatons.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Scooby_Doo on March 28, 2007, 06:00:07 pm
Hahahah now try Empire vs Timewar daleks :eek2:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 30, 2007, 05:56:26 pm
Empire has turbolaser batteries of 200 gigatons.

...And those are just medium batteries, too.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: NGTM-1R on March 31, 2007, 06:11:38 am
You've been reading Stardestroyer.net again, that argument's been conclusively fried here before. (Hell, the article sd.net quotes for support says something different itself.)

Star Destroyer main battery broadside power output is in the kiloton range. How do we know this?

Watch Empire Strikes Back. Asteroids. 'Nuff said. Given the movies the engagement range is pathetically short, only a few dozen kilometers at best. The only other sources, the games and books, seem to agree with this in general. While they have proved able to strike from orbit effectively, this does not require a range much in excess of, say, 100km.

The Covenant have ships capable of engaging at ranges of 350 kilometers on in. Ref. Fall of Reach, among others. There was another ship capable of much more distant engagment ranges mentioned in the same book. (It's worthwhile to remember that as far as canoncity values goes, the Extended Universe for SW loses out to the movies while the books stand equal to the games in regards to Halo. Bungie are greater canon-nazis then any other creator group ever, and I must admit an admiration for that.)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: TrashMan on March 31, 2007, 10:36:29 am
Couldn't Star Desytroyers just jump in close to the Covenanat ships? That negates any range advantage whatsoever.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 31, 2007, 10:56:01 am
Couldn't Star Desytroyers just jump in close to the Covenanat ships? That negates any range advantage whatsoever.
Pretty much.  Also, ngtm1r, the 200 GT weapons come from the AOTC:ICS for the Acclamator, a ****ing trasport.  Given the fact that a Imperial class Star Destroyer has 60 of those batteries, and its a ship that appears 23 years in the future, isent safe to say that a ISD has way more firepower than a simple transport.  And besides, it was an asteroid field, engage ment ranges will be borked royally
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 31, 2007, 10:57:06 am
Quote
Straight up? Covenant cruiser can take down the Executor. Engagement ranges, son, engagement ranges. The Executor isn't effective out to 150km.

I think they are slightly less than 150km, but I'm not sure, I do know the Rebels had an Ion cannon that certainly seemed to have no problem with vast ranges. but it's not unknown for Assault Gunboats and other Hyperdrive ships to make a H-Jump that precise, And even Lambda shuttles can be pretty nasty if they manage to get the torps away.

You'll always be left with unknowns though, like what effect would an Ion cannon have on Covenant shields? For things like that, you'll always be left in the realm of guessing. ;)
But would that giant-ass Ion cannon do **** to a super star destroyer?  Or at least less of an effect?
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 31, 2007, 10:59:52 am
You've been reading Stardestroyer.net again, that argument's been conclusively fried here before. (Hell, the article sd.net quotes for support says something different itself.)

Star Destroyer main battery broadside power output is in the kiloton range. How do we know this?

Watch Empire Strikes Back. Asteroids. 'Nuff said. Given the movies the engagement range is pathetically short, only a few dozen kilometers at best. The only other sources, the games and books, seem to agree with this in general. While they have proved able to strike from orbit effectively, this does not require a range much in excess of, say, 100km.

The Covenant have ships capable of engaging at ranges of 350 kilometers on in. Ref. Fall of Reach, among others. There was another ship capable of much more distant engagment ranges mentioned in the same book. (It's worthwhile to remember that as far as canoncity values goes, the Extended Universe for SW loses out to the movies while the books stand equal to the games in regards to Halo. Bungie are greater canon-nazis then any other creator group ever, and I must admit an admiration for that.)

Canon Nazis my ass, they cant even make realistic guns.  (literaly, I should be able to spray BLAKE, my name into a wall from two warthogs away, with the SMG, but can you?  No, more-than likely not.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on March 31, 2007, 06:25:45 pm
 :bump:
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Ace Pace on April 02, 2007, 05:32:44 am


*delurks*

Star Destroyer main battery broadside power output is in the kiloton range. How do we know this?

We know otherwise, AOTC: ICS. Or simple calculations by Saxton.

Quote
Watch Empire Strikes Back. Asteroids. 'Nuff said. Given the movies the engagement range is pathetically short, only a few dozen kilometers at best.

 The only other sources, the games and books, seem to agree with this in general. While they have proved able to strike from orbit effectively, this does not require a range much in excess of, say, 100km.

The EU NJO series says otherwise, both SBS and Destinys ways have combat forces engaging at insane ranges.

Quote
The Covenant have ships capable of engaging at ranges of 350 kilometers on in. Ref. Fall of Reach, among others. There was another ship capable of much more distant engagment ranges mentioned in the same book. (It's worthwhile to remember that as far as canoncity values goes, the Extended Universe for SW loses out to the movies while the books stand equal to the games in regards to Halo. Bungie are greater canon-nazis then any other creator group ever, and I must admit an admiration for that.)


Ah, but the movies only stand superior to the books when the books are in contradiction, the books are free to offer their own viewpoints and add to the verse. In this case specifically, if the books says ranges can be as far as they want, ASLONG as the movies do not say 'our max range is 55 meters' they do not contradict each other.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Ulala on April 03, 2007, 12:18:24 am
You forgot to re-lurk.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Flipside on April 03, 2007, 12:33:29 am
Considering the only Space combat we saw in the Star Wars film was, the Death Star, which was almost a planetary attack, the evacuation of Hoth, which took place while an attack was going on, and the BoE, in which the Rebel fleet had to reverse course and head towards the Star Destroyers which had warped in. Problem is, none of these engagements really gave a chance to show the range of the weapons.

The XWing games etc put a Turbolaser at something like 65km or so iirc, which is ridiculously short-range, any ship trying to do orbital bombardment from that height would probably do more damage by hitting the ground, I suspect that was more about making the game playable than 'canon' ;)
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: brandx0 on April 03, 2007, 05:12:56 am
I really don't think the X-Wing games should be used as any kind of reference.  Just play a mission in any of the X-Wing games and then watch a battle scene from any of the movies.  Not too much in common at all...
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: ChronoReverse on April 03, 2007, 09:38:25 am
While they have proved able to strike from orbit effectively, this does not require a range much in excess of, say, 100km.

Quote
A circular geosynchronous orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator has a radius of approximately 42,164 km (from the center of the Earth) or approximately 35,786 km (22,236 statute miles) above mean sea level.

Quote
Given the rapid orbital decay of objects below approximately 200 km, the commonly accepted definition for Low Earth Orbit is between 200 - 2000 km (124 - 1240 miles)[1][2] above the Earth's surface.

Now assuming their ships are capable of holding a position and then blasting a target (say a city), 150km range seems rather tiny.
Title: Re: The Covenant versus the Galactic Empire
Post by: Desert Tyrant on April 06, 2007, 03:15:47 pm


*delurks*

Star Destroyer main battery broadside power output is in the kiloton range. How do we know this?

We know otherwise, AOTC: ICS. Or simple calculations by Saxton.

Quote
Watch Empire Strikes Back. Asteroids. 'Nuff said. Given the movies the engagement range is pathetically short, only a few dozen kilometers at best.

 The only other sources, the games and books, seem to agree with this in general. While they have proved able to strike from orbit effectively, this does not require a range much in excess of, say, 100km.

The EU NJO series says otherwise, both SBS and Destinys ways have combat forces engaging at insane ranges.

Quote
The Covenant have ships capable of engaging at ranges of 350 kilometers on in. Ref. Fall of Reach, among others. There was another ship capable of much more distant engagment ranges mentioned in the same book. (It's worthwhile to remember that as far as canoncity values goes, the Extended Universe for SW loses out to the movies while the books stand equal to the games in regards to Halo. Bungie are greater canon-nazis then any other creator group ever, and I must admit an admiration for that.)


Ah, but the movies only stand superior to the books when the books are in contradiction, the books are free to offer their own viewpoints and add to the verse. In this case specifically, if the books says ranges can be as far as they want, ASLONG as the movies do not say 'our max range is 55 meters' they do not contradict each other.
****in-A thanks for that post