Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: Sandwich on February 15, 2007, 05:38:47 pm
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc&eurl=
:wakka:
-
Im willing to bet they didnt even bother to configure it, or someone else did/did it poorly. But it makes for good video indeed.
-
That Was Easy.txt :lol:
That's pretty amazing!
I agree. An amazing failure. I'm sticking with XP's voice recog software.
-
To be fair, that guy had ****ty diction. Still hilarious, though.
-
it doesn't seem to handle capital letters very well, but other than that it's realy not that bad.
"that was easy.txt"
:lol:
-
It would of been a hell of a lot easier if it wasn't code.
-
It would of been a hell of a lot easier if it wasn't code.
Yes, because why would anyone ever want speech recognition for doing work? Why, speech recognition is only ever intended to be used when talking to insane supercomputers on missions to Jupiter....
-
It would of been a hell of a lot easier if it wasn't code.
Yes, because why would anyone ever want speech recognition for doing work? Why, speech recognition is only ever intended to be used when talking to insane supercomputers on missions to Jupiter....
You're scaring me... Dave...
-
Whilst there are obvious advantages from the accessibility point of view, I have never encountered a speech recognition system that was faster than just bloody typing ;)
-
Yes comma capital I agree with you comma Phillipsnake delete Film side delete delete Flick delete Flip full stop capital eye open square parentheses bee close square parentheses always open square parentheses slash delete slash b close square parentheses type ma seldom delete delete myself full stop
-
I've never bothered with voice recognition because I know that anything from me would start out as unintelligible garbage interspersed with deletes and backspaces before rapidly turning into a obscene and vitriolic attack on Microsoft.
So much like any other comments from me then. :p
-
The Speech package in XP sucks horribly to the new Speech package in Vista. I tried dictating a paper I was going to write in XP and ended up wasting more time, trying to make it recognize my speech and such. In Vista, when you actually DO the tutorial, it's worlds apart from XP's engine, meaning that it WORKS.
-
The Speech package in XP sucks horribly to the new Speech package in Vista. I tried dictating a paper I was going to write in XP and ended up wasting more time, trying to make it recognize my speech and such. In Vista, when you actually DO the tutorial, it's worlds apart from XP's engine, meaning that it WORKS.
So basically, it's up to the level DragonSpeak and IBM's ViaVoice were about 10 years ago? Nice. :doubt:
-
The Speech package in XP sucks horribly to the new Speech package in Vista. I tried dictating a paper I was going to write in XP and ended up wasting more time, trying to make it recognize my speech and such. In Vista, when you actually DO the tutorial, it's worlds apart from XP's engine, meaning that it WORKS.
So basically, it's up to the level DragonSpeak and IBM's ViaVoice were about 10 years ago? Nice. :doubt:
QFT.
IBM's ViaVoice 98 ruled.
-
This made my stomach hurt I laughed so much. :lol: