Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: übermetroid on March 13, 2007, 07:43:28 pm
-
The traditional theory of beauty says that for every man who chases the voluptuous type, such as Jordan or Marilyn Monroe, there is another who prefers to woo a waif such as Twiggy or Kate Moss.
But this and the idea that beauty is subjective and ever-changing has been overturned by Prof Devendra Singh and his daughter Adrian Singh.
advertisement
The psychologists from the University of Texas today publish research showing that lovestruck men have only one thing on their minds: a woman's WHR - waist-hip ratio, calculated by dividing waist circumference by that of the hips.
Jordan and Twiggy have something in common: both have waists that are noticeably narrower than their hips and Prof Singh has found evidence this "belle curve" is ingrained in the male brain in his studies of Playboy centrefolds, the ancient Egyptians and tests on men from Africa to the Azores.
Check the source for the full atricle.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/10/nfigure10.xml
Oh yea... I found this when I was looking at this
http://www.whatboyswant.com/readnews/3072 posted by Kanzen :D
-
C'mon, who WOULDN'T take a curvy gal over a stick-thin boy-woman any day? This is just common sense :)
-
hips = win
-
Scientific proof that my wife is dead sexy.
-
But this and the idea that beauty is subjective and ever-changing has been overturned by Prof Devendra Singh and his daughter Adrian Singh.
Maybe they're just fat and wanted to come up with some sciency-sounding justification for it. "Damn, I can't fit in to my jeans any more - I'm dead sexxay!"
-
Wrong way of the hourglass I think.
-
and they did research on something that most men already know. yet another waste of scientiffic resources.
-
and they did research on something that most men already know. yet another waste of scientiffic resources.
QFT.
Now, if they'd do research on what women want...
-
Now, if they'd do research on what women want...
You wouldn't live long enough to see that research come into conclusion
:nervous:
-
Unless you hired only female researchers. In which case you'd get an instant answer but it would be wrong. :p
-
So this research means if two fat birds stood next to each other, I'd fancy the space in between 'em??
:drevil: :lol:
-
Wow. This guy got paid to pore over Playboy centrefolds all day long?
-
Wow. This guy got paid to pore over Playboy centrefolds all day long?
If it was Real Proper Science, he'd also have to pore over a control group of Fat & Flabby Housewives.
-
Now, if they'd do research on what women want...
Here's a hint. What they say they want often has little to do with what they actually want. Observe what they do, not what they say.
-
Now, if they'd do research on what women want...
Here's a hint. What they say they want often has little to do with what they actually want. Observe what they do, not what they say.
See...thats the research we want to see. Observe the women...try and figure out what makes them tick. That'd be useful!
-
Round hips sink ships!
-
Now, if they'd do research on what women want...
Here's a hint. What they say they want often has little to do with what they actually want. Observe what they do, not what they say.
See...thats the research we want to see. Observe the women...try and figure out what makes them tick. That'd be useful!
If you ACTUALLY come up with some solid conclusions from that, I will build a 20 ft high gold statue in your honor.
-
Wasn't this proven like decades ago? :confused:
-
Yes, but it wasn't proved with SCIENCE.
-
Total BS.. its all about cup size.
-
Total BS.. its all about cup size.
Ah, does that mean your dream woman is (was (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/667728.stm)) Lolo Ferrari?
-
Here's a hint. What they say they want often has little to do with what they actually want. Observe what they do, not what they say.
See...thats the research we want to see. Observe the women...try and figure out what makes them tick. That'd be useful!
Most women (and men) are complicated (in different ways). However, some of us are less complicated than the rest of the group and I think it's really up to who you're going out with (for example Paris Hilton or Marie Curie, if they exist at the same period of time) :P
-
Here's a hint. What they say they want often has little to do with what they actually want. Observe what they do, not what they say.
See...thats the research we want to see. Observe the women...try and figure out what makes them tick. That'd be useful!
Most women (and men) are complicated (in different ways). However, some of us are less complicated than the rest of the group and I think it's really up to who you're going out with (for example Paris Hilton or Marie Curie, if they exist at the same period of time) :P
There's one constant, though - everyone wants to be with someone who makes them happy :)
-
i see dead people
uhmm... :rolleyes:
-
O rly?
-
Im talking natural, not silicone-enhanced here. Nothing below a C.
-
Im talking natural, not silicone-enhanced here. Nothing below a C.
As a wise man once said, "Anything bigger than a handful is just a waste."
-
O rly?
you completely missed the necrophilia reference
-
As a wise man once said, "Anything bigger than a handful is just a waste."
Yeah i guess that about sums it up :nod:
-
Not if you can get your mouth on it at the same time. :p
-
I am not the biggest fan of hourglass... I generally like girls a bit shorter than I am (not too short, I'm 6'1"). I'd actually rather have a more petite-proportioned girl.
-
O rly?
you completely missed the necrophilia reference
Actually, I was just saying that to the topic title, I didn't read any posts then.
I laughed like hell when I did read the posts though :P
-
heh, my bad