Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: BloodEagle on July 03, 2008, 09:41:57 pm

Title: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: BloodEagle on July 03, 2008, 09:41:57 pm
In terms of SMS messaging.  :eek2:

Link (http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/01/atts-text-messages-cost-1310-per-megabyte/).

That's one Hell of a markup.  :D
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: FUBAR-BDHR on July 03, 2008, 10:06:51 pm
Text messaging is one of the most idiotic things ever invented.  You already have the phone in your hand why not just call them and say what you want for free?

I'm just waiting for all the new medical conditions and lawsuits that follow from years of text messaging. 
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: DeepSpace9er on July 04, 2008, 08:04:15 am
Its more convenient to send a message than talk sometimes, and be able to read it at a convenient time. Sometimes you are in a place (like work) where talking would be too obvious, or in a meeting and cant take a phone call but you can take a text and read it when the meeting is over. Sometimes having both parties being able to talk at the same time isnt possible, so then a text makes sense.

Agreed they do way overcharge you for texts, especially people with data plans anyway. But im on a family plan that gives us all unlimited texts for $20 extra a month
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: castor on July 04, 2008, 08:46:39 am
That calculation is a bit off (well it was more or less a joke anyway), as you are paying for the service rather than for the transferred data.
 
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: Stealth on July 05, 2008, 06:25:34 pm
Text messaging is one of the most idiotic things ever invented.  You already have the phone in your hand why not just call them and say what you want for free?

I'm just waiting for all the new medical conditions and lawsuits that follow from years of text messaging. 

I got into a debate with someone on this a few years ago, when text messaging was just starting to get popular :)

Things you can do with a text message a lot easier than a phone call
A) Confirm an appointment (say, lunch) with multiple people.
Case and point: It's a lot easier to text "Hey, are we still on for lunch?" to 8 people, than to call each one.
B) Break up with your girlfriend/boyfriend
Case and point: "I'm sorry, this just isn't working out..."... it's that easy :D
C) Send an invitation to people
Case and point:Hey ya'll, we're going to see Incredible Hulk tonight @ 8:00PM at AMC16.  Let me know if you want to come!
D) It's just quicker most of the time...
Case and point: Even though people will argue "why not just pick up the phone", I can send a text message to someone saying "Hey, are you still going tonight?" a LOT quicker than calling them :)
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: Polpolion on July 05, 2008, 08:13:21 pm
Text messaging is one of the most idiotic things ever invented.  You already have the phone in your hand why not just call them and say what you want for free?

I'm just waiting for all the new medical conditions and lawsuits that follow from years of text messaging. 

I got into a debate with someone on this a few years ago, when text messaging was just starting to get popular :)

Things you can do with a text message a lot easier than a phone call
A) Confirm an appointment (say, lunch) with multiple people.
Case and point: It's a lot easier to text "Hey, are we still on for lunch?" to 8 people, than to call each one.
B) Break up with your girlfriend/boyfriend
Case and point: "I'm sorry, this just isn't working out..."... it's that easy :D
C) Send an invitation to people
Case and point:Hey ya'll, we're going to see Incredible Hulk tonight @ 8:00PM at AMC16.  Let me know if you want to come!
D) It's just quicker most of the time...
Case and point: Even though people will argue "why not just pick up the phone", I can send a text message to someone saying "Hey, are you still going tonight?" a LOT quicker than calling them :)

I disagree; Actual speech is generally better.

A) Redundant with C. Just a means of communicating with mulitple people. In this case, you're not actually talking with them, and is entirely unsimilar to any kinds of conventional conversation. But you are correct, it's more effective.  :blah:

B) Fine I guess, albiet potentially problematic in the future -  moreso than would be if actual conversation had taken place.

C) See A.

D) Invalid argument. Some people are much quicker actually talking, rather than text messaging. Coincedentally, those are the people who don't text. Anyway, you're essentially just restating your point here, and it's too debateable. Course, that doesn't necisserily mean that talking is better.  :p

You see, most normal people (that I know, at least) don't have cell phones purely to confirm appointments with peoples, or invite peoples, or break up with a person. Most people that I know have phones to actually communicate with people, which is largely ineffective on a 9-button phone with a 26 letter alphabet (not to mention capitols and punctuation). The situations you listed are somewhat numerous in type, but they make up such a small percentage of actual phone usage, that compared to the part of usage that it is useful to talk, is almost ridiculous. If people want to text people, get a pocket computer with wi-fi and AIM, and for that matter a full keyboard.  :)
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: Stealth on July 06, 2008, 12:42:15 am
Text messaging is one of the most idiotic things ever invented.  You already have the phone in your hand why not just call them and say what you want for free?

I'm just waiting for all the new medical conditions and lawsuits that follow from years of text messaging. 

I got into a debate with someone on this a few years ago, when text messaging was just starting to get popular :)

Things you can do with a text message a lot easier than a phone call
A) Confirm an appointment (say, lunch) with multiple people.
Case and point: It's a lot easier to text "Hey, are we still on for lunch?" to 8 people, than to call each one.
B) Break up with your girlfriend/boyfriend
Case and point: "I'm sorry, this just isn't working out..."... it's that easy :D
C) Send an invitation to people
Case and point:Hey ya'll, we're going to see Incredible Hulk tonight @ 8:00PM at AMC16.  Let me know if you want to come!
D) It's just quicker most of the time...
Case and point: Even though people will argue "why not just pick up the phone", I can send a text message to someone saying "Hey, are you still going tonight?" a LOT quicker than calling them :)

I disagree; Actual speech is generally better.

A) Redundant with C. Just a means of communicating with mulitple people. In this case, you're not actually talking with them, and is entirely unsimilar to any kinds of conventional conversation. But you are correct, it's more effective.  :blah:

B) Fine I guess, albiet potentially problematic in the future -  moreso than would be if actual conversation had taken place.

C) See A.

D) Invalid argument. Some people are much quicker actually talking, rather than text messaging. Coincedentally, those are the people who don't text. Anyway, you're essentially just restating your point here, and it's too debateable. Course, that doesn't necisserily mean that talking is better.  :p

You see, most normal people (that I know, at least) don't have cell phones purely to confirm appointments with peoples, or invite peoples, or break up with a person. Most people that I know have phones to actually communicate with people, which is largely ineffective on a 9-button phone with a 26 letter alphabet (not to mention capitols and punctuation). The situations you listed are somewhat numerous in type, but they make up such a small percentage of actual phone usage, that compared to the part of usage that it is useful to talk, is almost ridiculous. If people want to text people, get a pocket computer with wi-fi and AIM, and for that matter a full keyboard.  :)

that depends.  90% of what i use my phone for, is to confirm appointments, and just stay in touch with people, and thus for me, and the people i communicate with, it's easier to do so via text messaging :)

to each his own i guess :)
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: Black Wolf on July 06, 2008, 03:41:36 am
Try calling to find your mates in a busy nightclub or pub and see how far you get.

"What?"
"I Can't Hear You! I'm at the Bar!"
"What?!?"
"I'M AT THE BAR!"
"Just text me."
Hang up.
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: lenard27 on July 07, 2008, 11:39:35 pm
Try calling to find your mates in a busy nightclub or pub and see how far you get.

"What?"
"I Can't Hear You! I'm at the Bar!"
"What?!?"
"I'M AT THE BAR!"
"Just text me."
Hang up.

Haha yeah I've been in those situations. Anywhere loud it's way more convenient to use a text message.
Not to mention texts are more convenient in meetings, during classes, and anywhere it's generally unacceptable to use a phone.
Generally, I think a text is more convenient when the reply requires about a sentence or less. If it's any longer it's usually easier to call somebody.
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: Stealth on July 08, 2008, 10:32:44 am
agreed!

or sometimes you prefer not to speak to someone on the phone, and text messages are handy for those situations too :)
Title: Re: AT&T Charges $1310/MB...
Post by: S-99 on July 10, 2008, 07:28:57 pm
Text and vibrate is revolutionary for deaf people :yes: