Hard Light Productions Forums

Hosted Projects - FS2 Required => Blue Planet => Topic started by: ssmit132 on November 01, 2008, 07:00:17 am

Title: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: ssmit132 on November 01, 2008, 07:00:17 am
(I didn't know where to put this, so I started a new topic. :nervous: )

When I think about the ending of BP, these things bug me: (Note, spoilered them in case someone who hasn't played stumbles across this.)

Spoiler:
"High Command has betrayed the principles on which the GTVA were formed. All our idealogies, discipline, moral guidance mean nothing now!"

So governments that start wars can't have "idealogies, discipline, [and] moral guidance", apparently? BETAC apparently specifies that the GTVA is the only legitimate government. And how did High Command know that Earth would be friendly? Not that I'm trying to justify High Command's decision to take Sol by force, but Earth's government could have been like Inferno's EA, or be peaceful for a while and then backstab the GTVA. Also, the GTVA does not attack innocent civilians, does that mean that they can't have that as a good point, still? And I still think that, even though the GTVA was showing military aggresion, it was the Renjian that fired first, and also suicidally - what, really, was the point in taking on a vastly powerful fleet, even if it was to stand up for themselves? I would of jumped out or surrendered, since I wouldn't want to die pointlessly. But that's just me. (I know that with some people the Renjian dealt out a fair amount of damage.)

"As do I. Earth is my home now. Humankind left our blue planet all those years ago in search of utopia among the stars. Had their gaze been directed inwards, rather than out, they would have seen the potential this blue planet holds, as well as the potential inside themselves. Years of isolation and forced introspection has changed the Earthborn. Whereas before their ancestors could claim to be human only in name, only now are they worthy to claim the title. For it is only now that they have embraced their humanity: that which makes us human, binds us together."

Erm, what? The whole reason Terrans left Earth is because they wanted to expand, and because, eventually, Earth's resources would become exhausted, meaning that the value of Earth, really, is only because it is the Terran Homeworld. What potential, technically, would it then hold? Ergo, 'utopia among the stars'.

Also, the UE are, in my opinion, not 'our own people' in the GTVA's view. 60 years of seperate development would change each faction, making them different. Consider the UE and GTVA as different countries - that is how I see it. Conflict between nations, except that these nations are in space, not on Earth.

I'm not criticizing your storytelling here, Darius, most definitely not  :nervous: , just something that's been nagging me.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Snail on November 01, 2008, 07:25:46 am
If this was like BWO and you could choose which side you fought for, I'd choose the GTVA... :nervous:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Uchuujinsan on November 01, 2008, 09:10:16 am
Quote
Spoiler:
Also, the UE are, in my opinion, not 'our own people' in the GTVA's view. 60 years of seperate development would change each faction, making them different. Consider the UE and GTVA as different countries - that is how I see it. Conflict between nations, except that these nations are in space, not on Earth.
I remember the case of east/west germany in this situation, it might be quite similar, though only ~40 years of speration. Its not like Earth and the rest of the GTVA wanted to be sperated.

Quote
Spoiler:
meaning that the value of Earth, really, is only because it is the Terran Homeworld.
Well, it had most of the population and a "perfect" ecosystem for humans, propably earth alone has more inhabitants then the rest of the GTVA together.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Darius on November 01, 2008, 09:50:59 am
Hrm. Not quite sure where you're coming from, but I'm guessing it's

Spoiler:
The fact that Sam et al switches sides at the end even though what the GTVA was doing wasn't necessarily in the wrong.

Sam's a bit pissed off that Command didn't feel the need to brief everyone on their real mission through the portal, and after having gone through so much and risked everything to save the Orestes and her ships, it turns out that they were being used for a less than noble purpose. It looks to Sam like a stab in the back, even though it probably never was to start with.

Though looking at it this way it does seem like he's throwing a temper tantrum because things didn't end out the way he wanted. :P

A lot of what you read in the final briefing is from Sam's point of view, having just met the people with whom he plans to stay with. After attaining a sort of understanding of how the universe works, he's going to get excited when he meets a society that's progressed in a similar manner. By the way, it's more the case that Earth's society's moved away from an unsustainable expansionist doctrine (which my take on the GTA was) and into a more inward-looking culture.

Hope that helps.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Molybdenum on November 01, 2008, 11:39:48 am
I like the way BP is told. The main character is actually a human being with emotions and realistic reactions. As opposed to the mute conformist robot of most other campaigns. Hell, I'd even say a lot of filmmakers should learn a lesson from BP.  :D

Being in Bei's situation I don't think anyone would take the time of reading into BETACs fine print or analyzing the EA doctrine. They would side with those that seem to be the victim. Consider also that he is emotionally shaken after the events of AoA.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: eliex on November 01, 2008, 05:06:09 pm
A clear indication of Earth's attitude is from a caption in one of Darius' screenshots.

Quote
"Do the Elders know that we're plundering GTVA supplies as though we were common pirates?"

If I were them, I'd just go fire and FIRE FASTER!!   :D

 . . . that is, if the enemy was trying to kill us, which from Earth's point of view the GTVA are.   
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on November 01, 2008, 05:38:53 pm
Sam changes during AoA. The man he was at the beginning of the campaign would've accepted that mission. The man he is at the end wouldn't, and doesn't. The same is true of his wingmates and the rest of the expeditionary force.

As for your criticism of the UEF vs. the GTVA -- it's exactly that kind of ambiguity that has me excited for War in Heaven.

Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: ssmit132 on November 01, 2008, 10:32:45 pm
Well, it had most of the population and a "perfect" ecosystem for humans, propably earth alone has more inhabitants then the rest of the GTVA together.


*facepalms* Forgot about that point.

Hrm. Not quite sure where you're coming from, but I'm guessing it's

Spoiler:
The fact that Sam et al switches sides at the end even though what the GTVA was doing wasn't necessarily in the wrong.

Sam's a bit pissed off that Command didn't feel the need to brief everyone on their real mission through the portal, and after having gone through so much and risked everything to save the Orestes and her ships, it turns out that they were being used for a less than noble purpose. It looks to Sam like a stab in the back, even though it probably never was to start with.

Though looking at it this way it does seem like he's throwing a temper tantrum because things didn't end out the way he wanted. :P

A lot of what you read in the final briefing is from Sam's point of view, having just met the people with whom he plans to stay with. After attaining a sort of understanding of how the universe works, he's going to get excited when he meets a society that's progressed in a similar manner. By the way, it's more the case that Earth's society's moved away from an unsustainable expansionist doctrine (which my take on the GTA was) and into a more inward-looking culture.

Hope that helps.

That clears it up a bit. Thanks, Darius :yes: . Though I understood Sam's reason for defecting, and that he'd just been through a hell of a lot, I did think he overreacted.

Being in Bei's situation I don't think anyone would take the time of reading into BETACs fine print or analyzing the EA doctrine. They would side with those that seem to be the victim. Consider also that he is emotionally shaken after the events of AoA.

 :yes: . The other reason I felt more integrated into the story was that Sam shares my first name  :lol: . It made the Nebula mission with the 'hallucinations' a bit creepy.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Angelus on November 03, 2008, 09:12:25 am
:yes: . The other reason I felt more integrated into the story was that Sam shares my first name  :lol: . It made the Nebula mission with the 'hallucinations' a bit creepy.

Yeah, that was really creepy. I really enjoyed playing BP, and the ending was a little surprise, but very...human.

The nebula mission is in my top ten list of the best missions from ALL FSO games/ mods.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on November 03, 2008, 09:29:03 am
The nebula mission? It was great, but weren't there others that were even greater?
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Angelus on November 03, 2008, 02:36:46 pm
Im not saying that the other missions are not great.
The storyline  of this entire campaign is really great, and well done.  :yes:

While playing this mission, i had this "creepy" feeling, i also like missions in the nebula. That's why this mission is in the top ten list.

Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: terran_emperor on November 03, 2008, 03:15:37 pm
The missions that really creeped me out were

*The mission where you first encounter the sanctuary's fighters

*Those two missions where you are tracking the vishnans.

My reason - they are solo missions. IMHO there is nothing creepier than being on your own in uncharted territory. The backgrounds add something to the effect. Snipes' line from "in the lion's den" summed up a lot of what i was thinking - "Where the HELL are we?


My two favourite missions though are the second to last, and that one where you are escorting your fleet through that knossos (where that ravana jumps n right behind your last ship)
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on November 03, 2008, 04:42:07 pm
That would be, respectively, 'Universal Truth' (second-to-last) and 'Forced Entry' (the Knossos mission.)

The mission names are so cool that I feel cool just typing about them.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Titan on November 03, 2008, 05:03:10 pm
what one is the neb one? i need to replay it.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: terran_emperor on November 03, 2008, 05:20:56 pm
That would be, respectively, 'Universal Truth' (second-to-last) and 'Forced Entry' (the Knossos mission.)

The mission names are so cool that I feel cool just typing about them.

Thanks...I couldnt remember the names
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: eliex on November 03, 2008, 09:20:05 pm
what one is the neb one? i need to replay it.

"Finding Sanctuary" I believe.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on November 03, 2008, 09:34:18 pm
Dammit, guys, you post so quickly. :D

I like the way BP is told. The main character is actually a human being with emotions and realistic reactions. As opposed to the mute conformist robot of most other campaigns. Hell, I'd even say a lot of filmmakers should learn a lesson from BP.  :D

Being in Bei's situation I don't think anyone would take the time of reading into BETACs fine print or analyzing the EA doctrine. They would side with those that seem to be the victim. Consider also that he is emotionally shaken after the events of AoA.

I agree. After flying one of the hardest and most epic FS2 campaigns ever, learning that alternate Earth was destroyed, finding the Sanctuary and the Terrans from the other dimension, meeting the Vishnans and squeezing through the gap between two ancient races before travelling across one system, I found myself identifying with Samuel, as well as his viewpoints.

The missions that really creeped me out were

*The mission where you first encounter the sanctuary's fighters

*Those two missions where you are tracking the vishnans.

My reason - they are solo missions. IMHO there is nothing creepier than being on your own in uncharted territory. The backgrounds add something to the effect. Snipes' line from "in the lion's den" summed up a lot of what i was thinking - "Where the HELL are we?


My two favourite missions though are the second to last, and that one where you are escorting your fleet through that knossos (where that ravana jumps n right behind your last ship)

Creepy? Yeah, I've got a few too.

Spoiler:
1. When Samuel's Pegasus gets disabled while chasing the Vishnans and getting surrounded by Preachers.
2. When the music in "Forced Entry" changes from Razorback to The 2ND Reality and the SD Abel jumps in right behind the Temeraire.
3. The Vishnan voices and beam sounds.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: eliex on November 03, 2008, 11:09:11 pm
Spoiler:
1. When Samuel's Pegasus gets disabled while chasing the Vishnans and getting surrounded by Preachers.
I actually flinched when the Preachers appeared.  :nervous:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on November 04, 2008, 01:19:43 am
It's easy to see why... :nod:

That mission gives me a sense of helplessness.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: -Norbert- on November 04, 2008, 02:13:44 pm
Quote
Spoiler:
Sam's a bit pissed off that Command didn't feel the need to brief everyone on their real mission through the portal, and after having gone through so much and risked everything to save the Orestes and her ships, it turns out that they were being used for a less than noble purpose. It looks to Sam like a stab in the back, even though it probably never was to start with.

Though looking at it this way it does seem like he's throwing a temper tantrum because things didn't end out the way he wanted.

Spoiler:
And his father?
Admiral Bai knew strait from the get go what the mission was about and still he defected after being changed by the events of AoA.
Since he's an admiral he's very likely to know all the background details and reasons for the attack on the UEF. If he knew it to be justified, he wouldn't have defected to the UEF - resigned maybe, but not defected....
And when the highest ranking member of the expedition force changes sides, it's hardly surprising that many others will follow, including the son, who just a little earlier had a reconciliation with the father.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on November 04, 2008, 03:13:41 pm
His journey into the alternative universe, and his reconciliation with his son, would, I imagine, very much change the elder Bei's perspective on his orders.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on November 05, 2008, 11:46:18 pm
E, Norbert. His family name's [size=9]Bei[/size].
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: terran_emperor on November 06, 2008, 02:04:47 am
Just out of curiosity, how do people pronounce his name?

I pronounce it "bay"...
Cos in chinese, "ei" is pronounced "ay"
Mei => May
Fei => Fay
Wei => Way
By that logic
Bei => Bay
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Jeff Vader on November 06, 2008, 02:21:02 am
Well, yes, in your English terms, I'd pronounce it "bay". IT immediately struck my mind as such, and we Finns would also pronounce it like that in any case.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on November 06, 2008, 07:04:35 am
That's how "Bei" is pronounced, yes. I (still) know a bit of Chinese from secondary school, so I know. And so does Stormkeeper, for that matter. :nervous:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Colonol Dekker on November 06, 2008, 07:07:41 am
Phonetically in english thats BAY as well, as in Reign or Sleigh :D
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on November 06, 2008, 07:16:30 am
True. :nod:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: foolfromhell on January 01, 2009, 10:40:53 am
Spoiler:
Well, BETAC might signify the GTVA as the only legitimate authority, but

A. BETAC was signed after the Sol Node collapsed. That's like the USA passing a law saying the USA is the only legitimate government in North America. Hundreds of years after Mexico and Canada were formed.

B. Even if Earth was part of GTVA when they signed BETAC, the collapse of Sol Node has unique circumstances. Under BETAC, they would need to follow the GTVA security council, to whom they would have no access to. If they were bound to BETAC still, they would not legally be able to form a government.

C. The UE ship was probably given orders to investigate the jump node and to not accept unification yet. They were probably instructed to tell the GTVA Earth is sovereign for now.

D. You cant just go and rampage around a planet just because they were yours 60 years ago. Things change. That's quite literally like having your wife accidentally marooned on an island, and expecting things to just be peachy 60 years later when she swims back to the mainland...
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on January 01, 2009, 10:54:58 am
Maybe High Command played too much Inferno.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: -Norbert- on January 02, 2009, 04:10:53 pm
Quote
D. You cant just go and rampage around a planet just because they were yours 60 years ago.
I'd say it was the other way round. Earth was the place of government of the GTA and thus the other systems belonged to Earth, not the other way round.
If the GTVA would love law so much as to follow it to the letter, it would make more sense to join Earth and accept the elders council as their superiours than trying to take over the Sol system.

Besides I have a problem with the BETAC saying the GTVA is the only legal government. That would mean they "own" the entire universe. Didn't the BETAC specify in which systems it was the legal government?
And considering that nobody from the Sol system ever signed the BETAC (or had any chance to hear about it) it simply doesn't count there, at least if you take todays international law or any national law as example (barring the occasional communistically or dicatorialy governed country)
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on January 02, 2009, 04:17:31 pm
It was obviously GTVA High Command's cynical and paranoiac attempt to seize control of a dangerous unknown element in one fell swoop -- rather than risk drawn-out war or the potential collapse of the GTVA in the face of a massive return-to-Earth movement.

At least in my analysis.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Snail on January 02, 2009, 04:58:16 pm
Besides I have a problem with the BETAC saying the GTVA is the only legal government. That would mean they "own" the entire universe. Didn't the BETAC specify in which systems it was the legal government?
Quote from: GTVA Intel Entry
BETAC dismantled the governments of the Terran blocs and recognized the General Assembly, the Security Council, and the Vasudan Imperium as the supreme authorities of Terran-Vasudan space.
No, not the whole universe.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Droid803 on January 02, 2009, 05:21:32 pm
Well, I guess a factor in the GTVA's decision is that the GTVA ruling council doesn't want to secede even a bit of power to Sol...
Human (and possibly Vasudan) greed.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Snail on January 02, 2009, 05:28:47 pm
Well, I guess a factor in the GTVA's decision is that the GTVA ruling council doesn't want to secede even a bit of power to Sol...
Human (and possibly Vasudan) greed.
Well if you read the summary on the Wiki it kind of says that Emperor Khonsu II didn't want much to do with the Earth war... Or at least didn't share GTVA High Command's opinions on the matter.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Dark Hunter on January 02, 2009, 05:32:42 pm
I'd think the Vasudans would stay neutral in the conflict... what the Terrans do with their homeworld isn't any of their business, really. Either way it doesn't much affect the Vasudan government.

On the other hand, they might support the GTVA's decision on the grounds that Earth may not have gotten over their xenophobia regarding the Vasudans. Earth has had none of the team spirit that represents the GTVA since the end of the war. As far as anyone on Earth remembers, Vasuda is a power hostile to humans, that reluctantly teamed up with them to defeat the Shivans. The Vasudans might have feared what Earth would do when they entered the playing field again.

But, yeah, the Terran bloc of the GTVA has gotten comfy ruling Terran space, and don't want to hand that power over to Earth. Thus, they hoped to hit Earth with a surprise assault and end it quickly.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Chrisatsilph on January 02, 2009, 08:30:40 pm
Ending took me by surprise, I thought they were there to bring peace. Well that what happens when you got too much power I suppose =/.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: eliex on January 02, 2009, 08:40:12 pm
I'd think the Vasudans would stay neutral in the conflict... what the Terrans do with their homeworld isn't any of their business, really. Either way it doesn't much affect the Vasudan government.

It is certain that some Vasudan assets will take part in WiH.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: CaptJosh on January 03, 2009, 10:36:48 pm
Droid, you mean the GTVA doesn't want to CEDE any authority to earth. Secede is a totally different word.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Droid803 on January 03, 2009, 11:37:32 pm
Yep. Used the wrong word.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Tomo on March 09, 2009, 05:36:21 pm
I'm afraid I found that Journey's End spoiled the campaign as it was completely unbelievable.
A shame, because the story and gameplay right up until that moment was truly excellent.

Three things bugged me particularly:

1) It doesn't make any sense to issue an ultimatum of that kind to any single vessel.
They cannot possibly have the authority to accept - it would have to go all the way to the very top of their command structure.

The only reasoning could be that the GTVA genuinely wanted to fight another war with an almost completely unknown foe - they only have info from a couple of probes.
They could not have seen any of the 'heavy weapons' of the opponents - just the physical size of the capships.

Which is nuts - nobody chooses to start an invasion without very good intelligence.

2) The reaction of the ship doesn't compute either. The sane response (after the attack commenced) would be to run like hell, not wander into range of the blob turrets and sit there for several minutes until destroyed.

3) The vessel took *far* too long to die. It should be destroyed within seconds of opening fire - on my runthrough it took almost 3 minutes!

I'll assume that the ending was intended to set the scene for a sequel, thus the finality was required.

As I've always believed never to criticise without offering possible improvements, here's a couple of suggestions:

A few relatively minor script changes would make the end more believable:
A more direct statement of the GTVA intention to annex, the GTVA should fire warning shots before directly attacking, and should repeat their surrender and boarding demand.
The warning shots could be the trigger for the ship to return fire, and it then should be destroyed almost immediately.

Possibly the ship should 'accidentally' hit some other GTVA capships instead of the flagship with a 'big gun', which would cause them to open fire on the ship as well - thus faster destruction. (Would have to do significant damage in one hit to make that work - railgun?)

That's closer to the kind of 'apparent misunderstanding' that would be believable 'back home' (both sides).
- Remember that the GTVA military do have to answer to civilians. If they're intent on having a war 'for fun', they've got to sell it to the civilians who pay for the war - probably by engineering a misunderstanding.

Also, if the sequence from "Standing orders confirmed" to destruction happens *really fast*, then the player is more likely to be simply blown away by the speed of events and not question them too much.
(Several parts of Derelict don't really make sense, but they happen too fast to question their believability until much later)

Bei's choice to join his father in defection can be triggered by his father's response.

I genuinely thought "That's really crazy. Am I supposed to take out my own capship turrets to save the ship?"
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on March 09, 2009, 11:00:54 pm
While criticism of the ending is welcome (especially on first playthrough!), you're wrong on a few counts.

1) The GTVA had certainly sent probes into the system. In all likelihood it also sent SOC teams to do physical scouting and eavesdrop on transmissions.

2) The Renjian's jump drives hadn't had time to recharge. In any case, the ship's captain must have known they were doomed and simply decided to go down fighting.

3) You need to turn the difficulty up; low difficulty handicaps friendly beams.

I'm not a member of the BP team in any creative capacity; I just handle voice acting. Darius, who does all the creative stuff, is very happy to get feedback. However, the first point has been oft debated here, and the last two are just misunderstandings/technical problems on your end.

To be honest, I remember feeling the same kind of shock the first time I played through. "That didn't make sense," I thought. "How contrived!"

But the more times I've replayed AoA, the more I've realized how closely it fits with the themes of the campaign. It's foreshadowed time and again, and more importantly, it sets up what looks like a truly epic sequel.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Darius on March 10, 2009, 05:10:32 am

A few relatively minor script changes would make the end more believable:
A more direct statement of the GTVA intention to annex, the GTVA should fire warning shots before directly attacking, and should repeat their surrender and boarding demand.
The warning shots could be the trigger for the ship to return fire, and it then should be destroyed almost immediately.

That's actually a really cool idea :) Wish I'd thought of it beforehand. It's probably too late to change the ending like that without it seeming like retconning. :P
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Pred the Penguin on March 10, 2009, 05:23:47 am
The ending didn't make much sense for me either... =/ I'll see if I change my mind after a few more play troughs.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on March 10, 2009, 06:33:38 am
The ending didn't make much sense for me either... =/ I'll see if I change my mind after a few more play troughs.

You may be surprised, Pred, but I didn't like the ending at first. I initially thought that it was an excuse for Darius to make a sequel, but apparently, it isn't.

Speaking of which, does anyone notice that you can order the warships around on Journey's End?
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Pred the Penguin on March 10, 2009, 08:32:05 am
Is it even possible to give them commands?
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: General Battuta on March 10, 2009, 09:00:52 am
Yep.

I remember, playing 'Argonautica' on Insane in a multiplayer co-op mission, I ordered an Aeolus to attack a Moloch instead of jumping out. As I recall, I think it worked.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Darius on March 10, 2009, 09:22:42 am
Well his father did promise Sam a command once they were back in their own universe.. :nervous:  :nervous:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Pred the Penguin on March 10, 2009, 09:56:49 am
From a fighter? :lol:

BTW Darius,
This "我們是人的由於我們的人類"
Doesn't seem to make any sense...
Sorry for being off-topic, but that's also been nagging me for awhile. :P
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on March 10, 2009, 12:12:21 pm
Is it even possible to give them commands?

Yes. Play that mission again, target the Renjian and press C-1. ;)

Well his father did promise Sam a command once they were back in their own universe.. :nervous:  :nervous:

I assume that wasn't an oversight then. :drevil:
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Tomo on March 10, 2009, 02:04:39 pm
1) The GTVA had certainly sent probes into the system. In all likelihood it also sent SOC teams to do physical scouting and eavesdrop on transmissions.
That wouldn't tell you much (if anything) about weapons capability, unless you were lucky enough to watch a live fire test. Military personnel tend to be pretty secretive about the capability of their armament!

Jump drives - fair point. It had only just jumped in.
Quote
3) You need to turn the difficulty up; low difficulty handicaps friendly beams.
Ah yes - forgot I'd turned it down a bit.

Anyway, that will do. Darius has a couple of suggestions and can use them or not - the rest of the campaign was excellent, and I am very much looking forward to the sequel.

- I'm happy to beta test the new one, and even voice act if that's useful.
(I could probably talk my wife into helping if you need female voices)
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Darius on March 13, 2009, 09:25:53 am

BTW Darius,
This "我們是人的由於我們的人類"
Doesn't seem to make any sense...


Yeah my Mandarin is poor to non-existent. I think I'll stick to using Pinyin.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Snail on March 14, 2009, 08:47:51 am
I still think Renjian means man-sword.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Androgeos Exeunt on March 14, 2009, 08:51:24 am
I thought this was covered last year. Darius says it means, "Man-world".
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Snail on March 14, 2009, 08:56:37 am
I thought this was covered last year. Darius says it means, "Man-world".
Sure, sure.
Title: Re: Something nagging me about the ending...
Post by: Droid803 on March 14, 2009, 08:07:45 pm
Long live the sword of man! :nervous: