Hard Light Productions Forums

Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 06:32:51 am

Title: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 06:32:51 am: More babies were born in the United States in 2007 than in any other year in American history, according to preliminary data reported Wednesday by the National Center for Health Statistics. (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/19/health/19birth.html?ref=us)

For some reason, 40% of them being born to unwed mothers is relevant.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Kosh on March 20, 2009, 07:33:15 am: 400 BABIES!!!!!
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Commander Zane on March 20, 2009, 07:38:25 am: Powerthirst! It's an energy drink for men! MENERGY!

And I blame it on unaccounted immigrants.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: captain-custard on March 20, 2009, 08:00:56 am: its stress related basically , you put most living organisms under stress and it will reproduce more
*

i like stress ;)
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: IronBeer on March 20, 2009, 11:52:43 am: Why is this so special? Increase a population, keep the birthrate constant-ish, and you'll see a numerical increase in the number of births.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 10:39:34 pm: but still, we arw such n anomaly. normally, when you educate women and provide family planning, the birthrates goes down... no, wait abstinen ce only bull****. right. yeah. okay. okaaay.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Scotty on March 20, 2009, 10:46:53 pm: Quote from: IronBeer
Why is this so special?

Just to reiterate.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 10:49:24 pm: more children born in a year than have ever been born? cmon, do you know haow many methbabies that is?
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Scotty on March 20, 2009, 10:55:57 pm: than have ever been born than in any other year previously. Can't leave that out.

Really, what's so flippin important about this? Population increase + same birthrate = more births.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Commander Zane on March 20, 2009, 11:02:51 pm: Quote from: Scotty on March 20, 2009, 10:55:57 pm
Population increase + same birthrate = more births.
To me that just sounds like there's more people but the same number of people having children. :wtf:
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Nuclear1 on March 20, 2009, 11:19:21 pm: POWER-SPAWNING BABIES! YOU'LL HAVE SO MANY BABIES!
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 11:20:23 pm: fuuucck it would suck to be preggdrs.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: StarSlayer on March 20, 2009, 11:21:10 pm: Quote from: Kosh on March 20, 2009, 07:33:15 am
400 BABIES!!!!!

give them Shockolate so they can be good at SPORTS and make the babies run ABNORMALLY FAST
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: iamzack on March 20, 2009, 11:43:12 pm: THEYLL RUN AS FAST AS KENYANS
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Commander Zane on March 20, 2009, 11:57:38 pm: THEN THEY WILL BE DEPORTED BACK TO KENNNNYYYAAAAA!
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Blue Lion on March 21, 2009, 01:14:45 am: For everyone who says "Duh, there are more people, of course they're having more kids" doesn't that kinda ignore the fact that the old record was 1957?

Wouldn't that mean after 1957 that it went down?

You're not at all intrigued about the big gap in time?
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Scotty on March 21, 2009, 02:03:28 am: 1957 was the end of the baby boom. That, and the birth control pill was introduced that year. There was a big decline, but now that there are more people, still having less babies each, more babies were born that year.
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: blackhole on March 21, 2009, 03:24:01 am: TURBOPUNS
Title: Re: BAYBEEEEZZ
Post by: Nuke on March 21, 2009, 09:16:14 am: glad to see americas emergency food supply is stable