Hard Light Productions Forums

Hosted Projects - FS2 Required => Blue Planet => Topic started by: Darius on July 12, 2009, 07:23:10 am

Title: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Darius on July 12, 2009, 07:23:10 am
2385, three days after after the reunion between Earth and the GTVA.

Admiral Severanti of the 13th Battlegroup assaults Neptune in the hopes of securing a base for the invasion fleet within the system. This is the First Battle of Neptune.

Credits go to Dilmah G for the mission. Captured with Xfire.

http://www.xfire.com/video/ed94d/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAUQkpmp6Vo
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Fury on July 12, 2009, 07:24:45 am
Someday we will have a nice Neptune skybox made by Herra Tohtori. :D
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: The E on July 12, 2009, 07:33:41 am
Very nice.

When will we get to play it?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 07:37:49 am
When will we get to play it?
It won't have a place in the main campaign AFAIK, better speak to Darius about that one.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 12, 2009, 07:41:29 am
Looking forward to it.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Darius on July 12, 2009, 07:46:03 am
We'll probably bundle it in with the first release :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on July 12, 2009, 08:22:29 am
That's all Dilmah's work? I'm impressed, honestly.

I do have to note, though, that the UEF missiles are clearly not actually missiles, since no defensive fire is directed at them. :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Fury on July 12, 2009, 08:28:19 am
What? Err, aren't you confusing missiles to bombs now? UEF bombs are flagged as bombs however.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 08:30:05 am
That's all Dilmah's work? I'm impressed, honestly.
Oh yes, nine.days. of my life were wasted on that mission.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on July 12, 2009, 08:31:44 am
What? Err, aren't you confusing missiles to bombs now? UEF bombs are flagged as bombs however.

The big ship-to-shippers, unless those weren't actually fired in there and the comment about them was off...
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Fury on July 12, 2009, 08:38:06 am
Oh you mean those that appeared in the video at 3:07 - 3:13? Yeah, those aren't missiles.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Darius on July 12, 2009, 08:41:28 am
The missile cloud from 3:47 onwards is definitely bomb-targetable though :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 08:54:53 am
If any of you get to play it, you'll notice most of the missiles were wiped out by the corvette's defense weaponry. :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mobius on July 12, 2009, 08:57:47 am
Be careful with targetable bombs launched en masse from warships, their use oftentimes results in weird situations. Inferno R1 had the Cruiser Torpedo as untargetable for that reason.

Back on topic: that's a very nice video. You're using an interesting soundtrack (I know that music and I even wanted to cut it for FS use... well, looks like someone preceeded me at it ;)). Speaking of the background, it'd be nice to have a skybox from Herra Tohtori... but for now I would suggest a special starmap. I'll soon contact the BP Team in private about this. :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 09:02:04 am
You're right about the missiles. They're bloody useless in that mission, we're discussing it at the moment.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Fury on July 12, 2009, 09:02:25 am
Can you elaborate on the problems with targetable capship missiles?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mobius on July 12, 2009, 09:09:16 am
They attract too much enemy fire when getting close to their target, I think. It's possible to use SEXPs to change turret priorities, but doing that in every mission for every ship may become annoying.

Another issue about targetable capship torpedoes is that their either get shot down rapidly (making their use effective only on partially/totally disarmed targets) or they're too difficult to be shot down (so you'll see many turrets firing on the torps without hitting them until the impact).

If I really have to mention my personal experience, I design missions featuring capship torps in a way that somewhat prevents those potential issues from occuring. INFA2 would pose a problem, but I hope to find a good balance... ;)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 12, 2009, 09:36:36 am
Capship missiles attracting a ton of fire is a tactical boon to the UEF. Missile swarms draw off pulse and beam fire that would otherwise be savaging their ships.

Half the effectiveness of the Durga bomber is its ability to approach behind a swarm of vampires - none of this 'get as close as you can before firing your bombs' stuff from retail FS2.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Snail on July 12, 2009, 10:03:43 am
Epic.

Even though I wasn't playing the mission, I could still feel my heart racing. Damn good stuff. I hope the campaign missions of WiH will be similarly fast-paced and atmospheric.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 12, 2009, 10:13:28 am
Son, this is just a preliminary skirmish in a big damn war.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 10:36:40 am
Epic.

Even though I wasn't playing the mission, I could still feel my heart racing. Damn good stuff. I hope the campaign missions of WiH will be similarly fast-paced and atmospheric.
Now imagine 12-20 minutes of that.

Then imagine that 24 times. That, pilot, is War in Heaven.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Rodo on July 12, 2009, 11:45:38 am
good work  :yes:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Droid803 on July 12, 2009, 12:16:41 pm
Hm...that thing with the two counter-rotating sections...
Is that the Narayana? Frontal configuration seems the same as the one in the "Forced Ejection" video.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 12:21:55 pm
Both Frigates have rotating midsections, we'll let you guess :P.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: SpardaSon21 on July 12, 2009, 12:48:34 pm
That video was pure epic win.  If the BP team can maintain that intensity for all of WiH, WiH will easily be one of the best campaigns this community has ever seen.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 12, 2009, 02:44:11 pm
Dangit, the site is giving me trouble........page loads fine, video appears to buffer but nothing happens.....ever  :mad:

Youtube works fine for me, even the UED demo vid on Xfire works..  The battle for neptune won't though. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zQcH7ApL14

Unless this is it, gotta say Darius, if it is.you're slipping ;)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Commander Zane on July 12, 2009, 03:52:37 pm
The music is teh sex.
The ships are teh sex.
The combat is teh sex.
I want to play this NAO. :D
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Snail on July 12, 2009, 03:59:16 pm
:(

It's beautiful. Hats off to teh team.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 12, 2009, 04:21:30 pm
Kay, i managed to watch it. Impressed with the layout :yes: nice. Now i need to build my resolve as I WANT TO PLAY WIH EVEN MORE :mad:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: starbug on July 12, 2009, 04:36:39 pm
 :(  :(   :( That was beautiful, the music was just so epic and from what i could read from the messages, potrays a good story. I really can't wait for this and def hats off to the team  :nod:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: eliex on July 12, 2009, 05:41:09 pm
What hasn't been said already? An excellent job to the team, especially Dilmah G.  :yes:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Darius on July 12, 2009, 08:16:43 pm
Now on Youtube.  :yes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAUQkpmp6Vo
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: High Max on July 12, 2009, 08:38:14 pm
;-)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: eliex on July 12, 2009, 08:55:28 pm
Does the vid show that the player will be playing different characters, one for the GTVA and one of the UE? That's going to be really interesting to see two different perspectives in the same conflict.

The GTVA seems cruel and unreasonable in this. I almost hope they lose.

War is never fun unfortunately.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: blowfish on July 12, 2009, 09:07:04 pm
Does the vid show that the player will be playing different characters, one for the GTVA and one of the UE? That's going to be really interesting to see two different perspectives in the same conflict.

It won't have a place in the main campaign AFAIK, better speak to Darius about that one.

We'll probably bundle it in with the first release :)

My understanding is that it will be a standalone mission, which will fit in with the storyline of the main campaign, but having a different perspective and possibly characters.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: eliex on July 12, 2009, 09:15:05 pm
Whoops, didn't read that.  Thanks for the point-out.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 09:19:34 pm
Does the vid show that the player will be playing different characters, one for the GTVA and one of the UE? That's going to be really interesting to see two different perspectives in the same conflict.

It won't have a place in the main campaign AFAIK, better speak to Darius about that one.

We'll probably bundle it in with the first release :)

My understanding is that it will be a standalone mission, which will fit in with the storyline of the main campaign, but having a different perspective and possibly characters.

Yeah what he said. :)

The GTVA seems cruel and unreasonable in this. I almost hope they lose.
Severanti was a little arrogant, but it was really to contrast Alpha 1's "Mothering" of his wingmates.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: High Max on July 12, 2009, 09:24:16 pm
;-)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 09:31:49 pm
No, that's a military station, the UEF would have had the sense to evacuate it at the commencement of hostilities. Yeah, well it's a tough decision they came to on the course of action.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 12, 2009, 11:25:54 pm
The GTVA will be portrayed sympathetically at times. I agree that Severanti comes across as a bit of a dick here.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 12, 2009, 11:29:53 pm
Yes that was my fault, I hadn't seen Battuta's interpretation of Severanti before I started work. As the war goes on, both sides begin to see the futility.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 12, 2009, 11:33:17 pm
Well, that too, but the GTVA has its reasons for fighting, and they're not going to abandon BETAC, ethical conduct, and the dedicated pursuit of a quick, clean victory just because they're no longer the player's home faction.

A certain Admiral Censored is a good example of someone totally committed to defeating the UEF yet still ethically intact.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mongoose on July 13, 2009, 01:14:56 am
From what I could read, the dialogue in this is some of the most combat-esque I've ever seen implemented in an FS2 mission.  Can't wait to play it. :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 13, 2009, 01:20:11 am
You should see the briefing ;).
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on July 13, 2009, 03:18:50 am
Quote
The GTVA seems cruel and unreasonable in this. I almost hope they lose.
If you mean only the first battle for Neptune, you can read about the outcome in General Battutas first prose (http://blueplanet.hard-light.net/reunion.html) Darius put in the Media section of the BP website.
For the conclusion of the war, we'll have to wait a bit longer.

Anyway here's the last paragraph of the prose, which is about the first battle of Neptune:
Spoiler:
The 13th‘s initial assault on Neptune was repelled. While the defending force – two frigates and four cruisers – was annihilated by beam fire, the UEF fighter corps ripped apart the 13th’s screen and close-assaulted the GTD Meridian with gunship-mounted weapons, demonstrating the UEF’s main advantage over its GTVA counterparts. The Meridian withdrew, losing a Deimos escort in the process (The casualty rate amongst the Aeolus class was low throughout the war, proving the wisdom of the decision to reopen production lines).
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 13, 2009, 03:23:36 am
Just a heads up, both of the BP prose pieces were written by Battuta and critiqued by Darius. However the Inferno piece is Darius' work.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: High Max on July 13, 2009, 05:02:24 am
;-)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 13, 2009, 05:31:55 am
I think we may be able to get it done this year, however don't take my word as fact, Battuta and Darius are the men you seek on that issue :P.

Well that's assuming a hostile species is going to leap in and go "wtfpwn" on every Terran ship ;). But if you have read Battuta's piece, you'll understand why the GTVA had to resort to attacking the UEF in order to take control.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Commander Zane on July 13, 2009, 05:44:03 am
Hopefully the release is before I'm in Iraq. :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 13, 2009, 07:23:20 am
And don't forget the GTVA only commits a few destroyers (no more than five at a time, I believe?) to operations in Sol. There are strategic reserves.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on July 13, 2009, 08:16:41 am
Quote
Just a heads up, both of the BP prose pieces were written by Battuta and critiqued by Darius. However the Inferno piece is Darius' work.
I know. I guess I framed the sentence badly. Now I corrected my previous post.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Snail on July 13, 2009, 09:13:40 am
Question, should the Shivans return, would the GTVA and UEF make peace or continue their pointless war?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on July 13, 2009, 09:21:20 am
You'll have to see if the Shivans return first ;).
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 13, 2009, 09:25:25 am
I will answer no questions, Command!
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Snail on July 13, 2009, 09:27:31 am
Nah, cuz I wos just thinking, a GTVA-UEF fleet would be pretty damned badass.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Maverick on July 13, 2009, 09:34:21 am
With all these teasers that have been released as of late, I was thinking the actual release was not far off at all but from above posts saying anywhere between this year and next year, I'm just hoping this is just a ruse to throw us off lol. Anyways, this keeps looking better and better. The only thing about the video that i kinda didn't like was the fact that Neptune itself made some of the comm chatter unreadable.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Angelus on July 13, 2009, 09:40:51 am
The vid is cool! :yes:

About the shivan thingy...

*takes a look in the Palantir...

...yes they return, then both parties ( GTVA and UEF ) realizor that they have to set aside their conflict for a while and kick some shivan ass, and right after that they...

*Palantir says: please insert coin to continue
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on July 13, 2009, 09:50:29 am
Yeah, some of the skyboxen do that.

As for the release, we're plowing forward. We've been releasing a ton of material lately because we have really enthusiastic team members who've been producing even more material internally.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on July 13, 2009, 11:21:32 am
And because it is summer and thus they have more free time to do the things I'd guess :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Aurora Paradox on July 13, 2009, 04:46:38 pm
That video was epic.  Can't wait till this campaign is released.

Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: High Max on July 13, 2009, 10:37:41 pm
;-)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 14, 2009, 03:04:09 am
Petrarch said at the end of FS2 that "the sealing off of the capellan jump nodes would be a temporary measure at best" (from memory) maybe darius factored that into the story. Maybe not. If they sneak through from the "alterniverse (c)" they:D be bottlenecked against two enemies on either side of the gate (if the gtva  can send support I assume the bugs have been worked out) but I digress.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on July 14, 2009, 07:37:09 am
Random and either incredibly stupid or prescient thought.

The Shivans are in fact native to the alterniverse and wouldn't exist in ours except for the Ancients and ther damn it, they blew it all Knossos.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 14, 2009, 07:42:58 am
I repent the stupid comment but thanks for the clarification.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on July 14, 2009, 07:47:24 am
I repent the stupid comment but thanks for the clarification.

I meant mine. :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on July 14, 2009, 07:57:24 am
Oh ok :lol: makes sense now I know the context. That could be a very valid point mate.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Commander Zane on July 16, 2009, 05:15:53 pm
Good question came up on the YouTube video, what is the music used on this video?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mobius on July 16, 2009, 05:22:13 pm
Budget Meeting from King Arthur's (the film) soundtrack...

EDIT: This brings another question... does WiH feature exclusive music?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dragon on July 16, 2009, 05:52:21 pm
Even greater than AoA, at least now.
There will be at least one fully tabled new soundtrack and a handful of non-tabled ones (like Aim, but much better).  :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mobius on July 16, 2009, 06:05:13 pm
I was refering to exclusive music, not new music in general.

By "exclusive" I mean music tracks created for Blue Planet which will be released for the first time with the campaign...
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Darius on July 16, 2009, 10:12:00 pm
Yes.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: manwiththemachinegun on September 21, 2009, 02:06:48 am
There's very much an American Civil War vibe to the conflict here. It's a horrible situation for everyone. For Earth, you have these human rebels coming in and smashing a peaceful community that has existed just fine on its own up until now. For the GTVA, they've SEEN the horrors the Shivans can visit on humanity, far beyond anything Earth experience in the Great War. They KNOW the survival of the human race is at stake, and they're trying to fight fire with fire. Securing Sol and its vast resources and technology would be a massive boon to a government that lost a major star system to Supernova only thirty or so years ago.

It also seems to tie into the bigger theme of whether or not humanity is 'worthy' of survival. While the Shivans I believe are evil in their function and must be fought (because there IS good worth preserving in our species), it's hard to argue the moral high ground when humanity has lapsed right back into civil war after barely defeating the Shivans in the first two Great Wars.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 21, 2009, 02:33:08 am
Well as far as the GTVA goes, they didn't have to wage war on the Sol System because of different governance. And I mean, it's a system, it shouldn't be *that* hard for the GTVA to take control if they fully committed their forces. Then again, look at Afghanistan.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on September 21, 2009, 03:10:11 am
Imagine trying to beat up a pub full of people but your backup can't get through the door to help you.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 21, 2009, 03:26:20 am
Fair enough, but look at the size of the force deployed to deal with Neptune. The GTVA could've done much better than that. And we're talking about space, 3 dimensions, "getting through the door" isn't too much of a problem, especially when the bouncers are your people. Rather than the "Battle of Neptune", why doesn't the GTVA fully commit 2-3 fleets (which could definetely be done, I mean, what's one to do with THIRTEEN fleets?!) and mount a simultaneous on all of the planets in the Sol system? NGTM-1R once said on BP internal that the GTVA could've taken the system in one day, and I have to say I agree with him.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on September 21, 2009, 05:31:53 am
The GTVA's economy is pretty much in ruin most likely tying up a lot of fleet assets in anti-piracy actions. Then they also had various rebellions (again tying up ressources), the diplomatic relations with the vasudans are strained (meaning the vasudans might be unwilling to help in the police actions) and there's always the looming threat of a new Shivan incursion (again tying up ships for the reserve and patrols of their own terretory). Additionally they have to guard the jump node to Sol for the unlikely event of a UEF counterattack into GTVA terretory (Delta Serpentis is after all the seat of government and feel high command).

On top of that they have to carefully choose which personel they send into battle against Sol, to make sure they don't have any more desertions, after all half the fleet that was sent there to conquer a beachhead went over to the UEF.

So I can understand quite well why they can't simply overrun the UEF with a massed assault.

Also I think a simultanous attack on every planet in Sol wouldn't be such a good idea. Considering the superiourity of the UEF fighters, it would probably leave the GTVA capitol ships with a too thin anti-fighter screen. For me a concentrated attack on one target after the other seems to fit better with the strength and weaknesses of the GTVA fleet. Furthermore once they got Sol and Mars I doubt that the rest of the system is going to put up much resistance anymore.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: QuantumDelta on September 21, 2009, 06:49:30 am
With all these teasers that have been released as of late, I was thinking the actual release was not far off at all but from above posts saying anywhere between this year and next year, I'm just hoping this is just a ruse to throw us off lol. Anyways, this keeps looking better and better. The only thing about the video that i kinda didn't like was the fact that Neptune itself made some of the comm chatter unreadable.
Use a different colour hud.

Neptune (The real neptune) would actually be quite a problem for me since I normally use a brilliant white hud, neptune, although mostly blue has white streaks in it's atmosphere.

(http://www.daviddarling.info/images/Neptune_full-disk.jpg)

It's quite likely that neptune wouldn't have any rings by the time BP was around; http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524925.900

And Triton would probably be very visible from that range unless it was on the other side of the planet :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 21, 2009, 08:39:37 am
The GTVA's economy is pretty much in ruin most likely tying up a lot of fleet assets in anti-piracy actions. Then they also had various rebellions (again tying up ressources), the diplomatic relations with the vasudans are strained (meaning the vasudans might be unwilling to help in the police actions) and there's always the looming threat of a new Shivan incursion (again tying up ships for the reserve and patrols of their own terretory). Additionally they have to guard the jump node to Sol for the unlikely event of a UEF counterattack into GTVA terretory (Delta Serpentis is after all the seat of government and feel high command).

On top of that they have to carefully choose which personel they send into battle against Sol, to make sure they don't have any more desertions, after all half the fleet that was sent there to conquer a beachhead went over to the UEF.

So I can understand quite well why they can't simply overrun the UEF with a massed assault.

Also I think a simultanous attack on every planet in Sol wouldn't be such a good idea. Considering the superiourity of the UEF fighters, it would probably leave the GTVA capitol ships with a too thin anti-fighter screen. For me a concentrated attack on one target after the other seems to fit better with the strength and weaknesses of the GTVA fleet. Furthermore once they got Sol and Mars I doubt that the rest of the system is going to put up much resistance anymore.

Mmm, I can see it affecting it, but not crippling it too much, and besides, the desertions were only really prevalent among the 13th Battle Group.

Assuming the GTVA fully committed, I'd say if the fighter compliment of each ship was sortied, they'd effectively blanket themselves from UEF attack. And what you've got to remember is neither side has had any large scale combat experience as of late, excluding the 13th Battle Group, or Expeditionary Fleet or whatever it's called.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 21, 2009, 10:44:40 am
The GTVA's economy is pretty much in ruin most likely tying up a lot of fleet assets in anti-piracy actions. Then they also had various rebellions (again tying up ressources), the diplomatic relations with the vasudans are strained (meaning the vasudans might be unwilling to help in the police actions) and there's always the looming threat of a new Shivan incursion (again tying up ships for the reserve and patrols of their own terretory). Additionally they have to guard the jump node to Sol for the unlikely event of a UEF counterattack into GTVA terretory (Delta Serpentis is after all the seat of government and feel high command).

On top of that they have to carefully choose which personel they send into battle against Sol, to make sure they don't have any more desertions, after all half the fleet that was sent there to conquer a beachhead went over to the UEF.

So I can understand quite well why they can't simply overrun the UEF with a massed assault.

Also I think a simultanous attack on every planet in Sol wouldn't be such a good idea. Considering the superiourity of the UEF fighters, it would probably leave the GTVA capitol ships with a too thin anti-fighter screen. For me a concentrated attack on one target after the other seems to fit better with the strength and weaknesses of the GTVA fleet. Furthermore once they got Sol and Mars I doubt that the rest of the system is going to put up much resistance anymore.

Destroyers, and Chimeras and Bellerophons, are not antipirate assets. That's an Aeolus' job. The heavy combat units of the fleet are free.  Governmental control is in Beta Aquilae. The trick here is to assemble a fleet with enough firepower that any attempt to stop it will require the UEF to risk being gutted. It should not be hard to do, as the UEF has very limited forces.

The UEF military has not faced a significant threat, real or pyschological, in nearly forty years. It has been inadequately funded for that time, meaning it lacks exercise experience in addition to combat experience. Its logistical depth is poor because it has lacked the means or the reason to develop it. It has no mechanism for replacing losses and few reserves. Just to top it off, it comes from a society that neither respects nor values the need for warriors.

The GTVA military has fought three major enemies in the same period, the Hammer of Light, the NTF, and the Shivans. It operates under the assumption that every new day brings with it the possiblity of Shivan-induced armageddon, and it takes that very seriously. It has been very-well funded for that reason and able to conduct regular, significant exercises. Many low-level officers and senior non-commissioned have combat experience from either the NTF or the Shivans. It's logistical base is well built up to enable commitment of all or most combat ships at any point in the GTVA, since where the Shivans will appear can never be certain. It has mechanisms in place to allow the replacement of losses or the rapid expansion of the fleet in time of war; they are effectively the same thing. And finally, it comes from a society whose warriors represent their only hope in a universe of hostility.

If the GTVA were to commit a significant proportion of its fleet assets, even a quarter, it should easily outnumber the UEF by nearly 2 to 1. It could all be over in a day, the UEF fleet or its means to continue making war crushed. It might take a couple months after that for the actual surrender, if the UEF fleet did not come out and fight to protect its logistical network, but the war would already be decided. That it's not is a political, not a military, choice.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Aardwolf on September 21, 2009, 10:57:12 am
I thought the great dark spot of Neptune had disappeared?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: The E on September 21, 2009, 11:06:19 am
Hmm.
Many low-level officers and senior non-commissioned have combat experience from either the NTF or the Shivans.

This is something I always wondered about. If BP takes place 18 years after the second incursion, how many of those veterans are still in service? While I agree that the GTVA has a level of institutional experience that the UEF lacks, I wonder if the personal experience is still there. Especially among lower ranked Officers.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Rodo on September 21, 2009, 11:36:42 am
well bei was a rookie back then.. I might guess that all veterans are captains or somewhat higher than that.. the other veterans might have been only rookies back on the second incursion.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: QuantumDelta on September 21, 2009, 11:47:45 am
I thought the great dark spot of Neptune had disappeared?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Dark_Spot

It's a bit random :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on September 21, 2009, 11:50:33 am

This is something I always wondered about. If BP takes place 18 years after the second incursion, how many of those veterans are still in service? While I agree that the GTVA has a level of institutional experience that the UEF lacks, I wonder if the personal experience is still there. Especially among lower ranked Officers.

Assuming people cna join up at 18, then a fair number of staff would be between 36 and retirement age. A fair age gap.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: The E on September 21, 2009, 11:52:30 am
True.

....

I really should have done the math beforehand.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Colonol Dekker on September 21, 2009, 11:56:32 am
No worries, Iamzack is making age concious at the moment  ;)

Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on September 21, 2009, 12:56:50 pm
Quote
Destroyers, and Chimeras and Bellerophons, are not antipirate assets.
True, but how many Chimeras and Bellerophons does the GTVA actually have?
Acording to what I read so far, they have very few of the new generation of ships.

Since it's been 50 years since the great war and 18 years since the 2nd great war I'd guess there are very few Orions in service, which would leave you with the Hecate as the most common destroyer. And the Hecate is more of a carrier than a frontline battleship.

Edit:
typo in the years corrected... Thanks Aardwolf
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Aardwolf on September 21, 2009, 03:58:02 pm
It's been 50 since the great war, not 40.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 21, 2009, 04:01:47 pm
This is something I always wondered about. If BP takes place 18 years after the second incursion, how many of those veterans are still in service? While I agree that the GTVA has a level of institutional experience that the UEF lacks, I wonder if the personal experience is still there. Especially among lower ranked Officers.

This is The FutureTM, so I'm making an assumption that the active lifespan of a fighter pilot extends into his fourties. Assume most of them entered active service at about twenty. A lot of the experience would still be there.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: The E on September 21, 2009, 04:07:54 pm
Considering that FS fighter combat doesn't seem as stressful (from an acceleration perspective) as real-life fighter ops, that seems like a safe bet.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 22, 2009, 03:48:50 am
Hmm.
Many low-level officers and senior non-commissioned have combat experience from either the NTF or the Shivans.

This is something I always wondered about. If BP takes place 18 years after the second incursion, how many of those veterans are still in service? While I agree that the GTVA has a level of institutional experience that the UEF lacks, I wonder if the personal experience is still there. Especially among lower ranked Officers.
I'd disagree very much with NGTM-1R's statement there, to give you an idea, pilots in the RAAF who join right out of school, do you a 3 year university degree at the Defence Force-Academy and resume a 12.5 IMPS usually end their IMPS as Squadron Leaders. In 18 Years, + some local conflict, I'd expect Second Incursion Vets to be at least Squadron Leaders, or CAGs. And if we're talking NCO's, I'd say they would've been given Battlefield Commissions by now, and would be Captains at the least.

As far as I'm concerned, the GTVA's Junior Officers would have little to no actual combat experience. However, superior training methods and high quality exercises improved by Battlefield Experience of the people who run them would result in pilots who are much, much, better than the UEF's offering.

This is The FutureTM, so I'm making an assumption that the active lifespan of a fighter pilot extends into his fourties. Assume most of them entered active service at about twenty. A lot of the experience would still be there.
I wouldn't be so sure about a lot of the experience still being there. Pilot training costs a fair bit and the IMPS of Aircrew reflects that, but anyone who wants to retain pilots for 18 years minimum is out of their minds, especially if that stands in a time of war. (Though I would be happy to stay in for 18 years) Based on what's happened in previous conflicts, I'd guess the GTVA were offering 2~5 Year IMPS's at the start of the NTF insurgency, to attract more pilots, and  I would assume that by the end of the conflict, about 60%-80% of their Fighter Corps were made up of Volunteers rather than Career Pilots

Some of the experience would still be there of course, but certainly not more than about 40% by this stage, I mean, the human body just can't handle those kinds of G-Forces/stresses (Wait, does the force of Gravity mean anything in space?) past 50 or so years of age.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dragon on September 22, 2009, 04:35:33 am
(Wait, does the force of Gravity mean anything in space?)
Not gravity, G-forces generated by fighter acceleration, deceleration and turning are what pilots really feel, both in space and in atmosphere.
Gravity has influence on strength of G-forces felt by pilot though, but it can both weaken and strengthen them, based on the maneuver that aircraft is pulling.
For example: In space, G-forces will be equal regardless of direction in which you're accelerating, in atmosphere gravity will strengthen the force felt by pilot when climbing and lessen it when diving.
EDIT: To be precise: If you are accelerating at 1G when diving, you will basically feel nothing, but if you accelerate at the same rate when climbing, you will feel 2G, of course if planet have it's natural gravity equal 1G (like Earth).
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 22, 2009, 04:36:58 am
Ahh I see. Thanks. :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on September 22, 2009, 09:11:22 am
Quote
I'd expect Second Incursion Vets to be at least Squadron Leaders, or CAGs
Of course with the occasional exception, because of disciplinary reasons I'd guess  :p
After all promotions have to be earned (unless you know the right people) and you can always be demoted again.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 22, 2009, 09:26:17 am
Yeah, well in times of peace these don't always have to be earned by Bravery Under Fire (Though a Battlefield Commission would). I mean, the RAAF only deployed one F/A-18 squadron to Iraq, and yet we still have a fairly balanced Chain of Command.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 22, 2009, 01:52:15 pm
I wouldn't be so sure about a lot of the experience still being there. Pilot training costs a fair bit and the IMPS of Aircrew reflects that, but anyone who wants to retain pilots for 18 years minimum is out of their minds, especially if that stands in a time of war. (Though I would be happy to stay in for 18 years) Based on what's happened in previous conflicts, I'd guess the GTVA were offering 2~5 Year IMPS's at the start of the NTF insurgency, to attract more pilots, and  I would assume that by the end of the conflict, about 60%-80% of their Fighter Corps were made up of Volunteers rather than Career Pilots

Some of the experience would still be there of course, but certainly not more than about 40% by this stage, I mean, the human body just can't handle those kinds of G-Forces/stresses (Wait, does the force of Gravity mean anything in space?) past 50 or so years of age.

Culturally, however, the GTVA has a killer reason to enlist and stay enlisted: the Shivans. As I said earlier, this a culture whose only real hope is its warriors. Being a GTVA pilot is not going to be like being a military pilot elsewhere. (For one thing there's no civilian flight industry you can transition into.)  Enlisting offers you some control over your own fate instead of hoping the military keeps the Shivans away. The threat of the Shivans also means that the military almost certainly has broad powers to reactivate veterans in time of war.

Also even assuming some sort of emergency pilot program was instituted right at the the start of the NTF rebellion, it could have at most graduated three classes. The vast majority of pilots in the service would have been career not "for the duration".

Also as noted stresses on GTVA pilots appear to be significantly less because their craft do not accelerate the same way. And, again, this is The FutureTM so improvements in human longetivity is pretty much required. Truthfully, I'm being generous. If we combine the less-stressful fighter combat and the probable advance of human active age, there's no reason someone couldn't by flying Hercs until sixty.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 23, 2009, 03:39:34 am
Fair enough, but I wouldn't bank on the Civilian Flight/Space Industry thing not existing, I mean, people have to get around somehow. And the military lifestyle takes its toll on people, I mean, how much of your life do you really want to spend moving every 2-5 years? Plus family etc, I mean, there are other reasons besides the civilian flight industry people leave the service (For instance, it was a combination of family and the military life that resulted in my Uncles leaving the SLA after 25+ years). On the note of recalling veterans, I wonder if the GTVA would ever go so far as instituting a draft?

I don't know about only three classes, I mean, that's assuming Flight Training is still at what? 6 Months or so? You just can't keep your full regime going, when your fighters need filling, everything that isn't completely essential gets the cut. I can realistically see GTVA Pilot Training in full being cut down to 3 months (1 Month Basic Flight School, Second Month Advanced Flight School, Third Month would be operational conversion, with some subsistence Officer Training thrown in there. Anything else such as COMSURV would easily be cut.) And the GTVA has nearly THIRTY systems, and with the demand for Aircrew/Spacecrew, it makes sense to open at least 5-7 training schools to cover your applicant base. The worst thing the GTVA can do right now is have potential pilots twiddling their thumbs waiting for a Letter of Offer for Pilot Training because of great demand.

Fair enough, we would have advances by then, but sixty sounds a little bit on the high side. Actually, I guess sixty is fairly reasonable by that stage, and having the cut-off at around 70~75 for Service members (dependent on a Medical most likely.)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Imposible Uncorrect on September 23, 2009, 12:26:41 pm
Looks great guys - allthough it reminds me a bit of Battle for Endor (The syndrome). Anyway, I'm looking forward to it.

:)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on September 23, 2009, 01:06:00 pm
It is a bit BoE-esque. There's a reason it's probably gonna be a bonus mission, not part of the main campaign.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 23, 2009, 01:48:10 pm
I don't know about only three classes, I mean, that's assuming Flight Training is still at what? 6 Months or so? You just can't keep your full regime going, when your fighters need filling, everything that isn't completely essential gets the cut. I can realistically see GTVA Pilot Training in full being cut down to 3 months (1 Month Basic Flight School, Second Month Advanced Flight School, Third Month would be operational conversion, with some subsistence Officer Training thrown in there. Anything else such as COMSURV would easily be cut.) And the GTVA has nearly THIRTY systems, and with the demand for Aircrew/Spacecrew, it makes sense to open at least 5-7 training schools to cover your applicant base. The worst thing the GTVA can do right now is have potential pilots twiddling their thumbs waiting for a Letter of Offer for Pilot Training because of great demand.

All GTA pilots are officers, so we're talking a ninety-day wonder officer training program in addition to flight training. I'm making the assumption that standard flight training is about two years from the time the recruit enters the system to the time he's piloting a fightercraft. (Admittedly, you could dispense with a lot of it being physical in practice, but then, we will.) Cutting it in half, first to a year, then again in half to six months, is about what historically people do. Those nations which have in wartime gone below the quarter-peacetime training regimen usually see a drop in pilot quality so sharp as to nullify the benefits.

Of course I'm assuming an integrated training scheme here rather than a seperate preflight and flight one.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Imposible Uncorrect on September 23, 2009, 02:24:41 pm
It is a bit BoE-esque. There's a reason it's probably gonna be a bonus mission, not part of the main campaign.

It looks great, but just a bit unnormal. There are like four or five ships in the area only on the Player-side. What if you'd let the destroyer warp in after a special event. Like after the first attack and it's clear that you can't hold the lines without reinforcements.:)

P.S.: Isn't that the Planet backround from FS2 called "Planeta1"?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 23, 2009, 02:29:50 pm
Considering that FS fighter combat doesn't seem as stressful (from an acceleration perspective) as real-life fighter ops, that seems like a safe bet.

If you want FS to be more realistic, you should consider the actual forces more carefully. "Real" FS, rather than game FS, would probably be dealing with an assortment of nasty forces on the fighters/capships which would assumably be dealt with by the current sci-fi "handwavium" technological conventions such as the "inertail dampner," etc. Despite that, a pilot would still be under a great deal of physical stress from maneuvers.

I can't concieve an 18-year-old officer being in service... unless you're in a REALLY bad way. Which FS often is, but still... At youngest, I'd assume a new officer to be of 20 years at least. And that would still be pretty uncommon. You might get off with 21, but 22+ is probably more in order for a combat fighter pilot under peacetime conditions. That's also given you've sent the pilot through a joint OCS/ROTC program as well as the degree program the individual was engaged in.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: The E on September 23, 2009, 02:42:41 pm
Errrm. No? Since we don't have any canon info to contradict it, we have to assume that FS2 fighter combat is slower than real-life fighter combat.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 23, 2009, 02:47:34 pm
I choose to utilize my imagination in this issue... I'd say it's better that way.  :p
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 23, 2009, 02:57:15 pm
I choose to utilize my imagination in this issue... I'd say it's better that way.  :p

Unfortunately, canoncity > you, unless it's your campaign. :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: QuantumDelta on September 23, 2009, 06:39:50 pm
The speed scale on the ships is meters/second as far as I understand, you can test this against the scale of ships you know the length of from the tech room :P
Almost all of the ships are slower than modern day jet fighters.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mongoose on September 23, 2009, 07:04:40 pm
The only way I've ever been able to bend my mind around the in-game speeds is assuming that they're merely relative numbers to some significant object, but even then it's a stretch. :p
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 23, 2009, 08:32:22 pm
I'm fully aware of those factors...

 :doubt:

You'll note I stated "Real FS" vs. "game FS." I was implying that if one wanted to make a realistic/more realistic environment for the FS universe, you'd put more consideration into such things.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on September 24, 2009, 12:58:55 am
Well, um, who declared the intent to do that?

It is a bit BoE-esque. There's a reason it's probably gonna be a bonus mission, not part of the main campaign.

It looks great, but just a bit unnormal. There are like four or five ships in the area only on the Player-side. What if you'd let the destroyer warp in after a special event. Like after the first attack and it's clear that you can't hold the lines without reinforcements.:)

That wouldn't make much sense given that this is an all-out attack.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on September 24, 2009, 03:16:46 am
Or as all-out as you get when the battlegroup who was supposed to make the assault is inoperational  :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 24, 2009, 03:53:18 am
All GTA pilots are officers, so we're talking a ninety-day wonder officer training program in addition to flight training. I'm making the assumption that standard flight training is about two years from the time the recruit enters the system to the time he's piloting a fightercraft. (Admittedly, you could dispense with a lot of it being physical in practice, but then, we will.) Cutting it in half, first to a year, then again in half to six months, is about what historically people do. Those nations which have in wartime gone below the quarter-peacetime training regimen usually see a drop in pilot quality so sharp as to nullify the benefits.

Of course I'm assuming an integrated training scheme here rather than a seperate preflight and flight one.
Well in regards to Officer Training, currently at the Australian Defence Force Academy, studies are supplemented by an individual "Leadership Subject", so some very, very, basic Leadership skills could be taught in that 90 day window. I mean, what use are golden pilots if all your ships are gone by the time they're ready?

Included Advanced and Basic Flight Training, our pilot's course is hovering around 77 weeks over here, without counting officer training, so I'd say you're right in regards to Flight Training taking around 2 years. Well, the space environment is dramatically different to flying in an atmosphere, for one, there's no ground which may be harmful to the well being of the aircraft :P, which is the biggest difference between comparing current stats to "Future Stats". So what you come down to, is pilot's who either have a natural touch for the joystick (Light handed, soft on the controls) and those who don't, and we could assume Pilot Specialist Testing would've gotten advanced enough by that stage to weed out Heavy-Handed guys and girls who seem to think that the weight of the aircraft co-relates to the effort it takes to move the control surfaces. I mean, we have that already these days, for those of you who've had experience with Modern Selection Programs for Pilots in the Military.

And we saw that in the Battle of Britain, pilots who'd had close to 9 hours flight experience were being posted to Squadrons, and they either had it or they didn't. In retrospect, I'd say 6 months was reasonable as a severely shortened pilot training program, but if the need arose, I could always see pilot training being cut down to 3 months.

Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 24, 2009, 10:21:23 pm
Again recall that wherever there is mass, there is gravity...
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 25, 2009, 03:36:41 am
Edited. :P

But seriously, I'd imagine it'd make a difference in the case of pilots. I mean, being badly shot up doesn't mean nursing the aircraft with an extremely light hand and applying constant control to keep the aircraft from crashing. Because for one, there IS, no crashing in space. Well, not to the severity of that on Earth.  :pimp:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 25, 2009, 10:44:32 am
Despite its piss-poor damage/non-existant collision model, Laminar Research's Space Combat can show you very well what could happen to a space ship when it looses its RCS/maneuvering systems when it doesn't have the proper flight control system to compensate.

If the FCS goes out, you're gonna be in a real bad way. What if the system governing the roll/yaw/pitch/etc. constants goes down? Pull to hard back and you'll spin your brains out... maybe literally. Especially if it's damaged in some way as said before.

If you want a better perspective on this... try a Newtonian sim which accounts for engine position/thruster position and damage to those systems. You might get back to where you need to go heavily damaged and mostly dead, but it will be hard work, to say the least. And you probably won't be getting anywhere fast...  :shaking:
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 25, 2009, 11:08:01 am
Ahh, I didn't think of that. But in the FS-verse...
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: nuone on September 25, 2009, 10:11:55 pm
When I saw this video it freaking broke my damn heart. Blue Planet is truly fantastic, yet the prospect of fighting your own people is disheartening. I will still play it, but will loathe every moment I am not on Earth's side.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on September 25, 2009, 10:15:58 pm
Ohh, I just FRED-ed that mission from a GTVA perspective for the sake of it. You fight for Earth as part of the UEF in BP:WiH. So don't worry. :)
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on September 25, 2009, 10:52:29 pm
When I saw this video it freaking broke my damn heart. Blue Planet is truly fantastic, yet the prospect of fighting your own people is disheartening. I will still play it, but will loathe every moment I am not on Earth's side.

So let me get this straight: It's okay to fight your own people, but only from the side you like? :P
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 25, 2009, 10:55:02 pm
It goes with the times, doesn't it?  :p
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on September 25, 2009, 11:32:52 pm
When I saw this video it freaking broke my damn heart. Blue Planet is truly fantastic, yet the prospect of fighting your own people is disheartening. I will still play it, but will loathe every moment I am not on Earth's side.

Relax. Like Dilmah said, you'll be fighting for the UEF.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Thaeris on September 25, 2009, 11:36:56 pm
When I saw this video it freaking broke my damn heart. Blue Planet is truly fantastic, yet the prospect of fighting your own people is disheartening. I will still play it, but will loathe every moment I am not on Earth's side.

Relax. Like Dilmah said, you'll be fighting for the UEF.

"Calm down, man... You'll still get to kill and maim each other, it's just that you get to wear red instead of green."
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: kaloonzu on October 01, 2009, 09:47:40 pm
When I saw this video it freaking broke my damn heart. Blue Planet is truly fantastic, yet the prospect of fighting your own people is disheartening. I will still play it, but will loathe every moment I am not on Earth's side.

Relax. Like Dilmah said, you'll be fighting for the UEF.

"Calm down, man... You'll still get to kill and maim each other, it's just that you get to wear red instead of green."

i was actually hoping to fight for the Alliance.... Better to have a unified galaxy against the Shivans rather than one with the most sought after star-system in a state of utter hopelessness (read all those Prose articles :))
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 01, 2009, 09:57:33 pm
Yeah, well keep in mind:

Spoiler:
Bei defected to the UEF at the end of AoA (I think..) So while it's not continuing from that thread, it's still only a few pages from where AoA left off, rather than switching the viewpoints too dramatically.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Aardwolf on October 02, 2009, 12:14:04 am
i was actually hoping to fight for the Alliance.... Better to have a unified galaxy against the Shivans rather than one with the most sought after star-system in a state of utter hopelessness (read all those Prose articles :))

I don't think the Shivans would end up coming back unless the GTVA attacks the UEF. And the notion that the UEF has to be subordinate to the GTVA in order to accept military aid, should the Shivans show up again, is kinda zany.

Damn those GTVA warmongers, damn them to hell!

/me jumps into his antique Hercules fighter and starts shooting stuff at random
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on October 02, 2009, 12:38:27 am
It's worth pointing out that FreeSpace 1's Alpha 1 could still be combat-ready as a warship commander or some kind of tactical officer. He'd probably be in his seventies.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: NGTM-1R on October 02, 2009, 05:49:45 am
I just had an idea that I can't share with the public. DAMN YOU BATTUTA.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on October 08, 2009, 11:16:57 am
I don't think the Shivans would end up coming back unless the GTVA attacks the UEF. And the notion that the UEF has to be subordinate to the GTVA in order to accept military aid, should the Shivans show up again, is kinda zany.

Damn those GTVA warmongers, damn them to hell!

I think the idea that the Shivans only attack races at war is a little unsupported. After all, if that's the case why did it take them 14 years to attack in FS1? And where are all the non-warmongering races that the Shivans have left unmolested??? Though maybe that behaviour is part of BP canon, I only played the campaign once and it was months ago. .
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Tomo on October 08, 2009, 11:46:31 am
I think the idea that the Shivans only attack races at war is a little unsupported. After all, if that's the case why did it take them 14 years to attack in FS1?
It makes as much sense as any other theory.
Putting together a decent-sized fleet with a huge destroyer takes a while, not to mention driving it god-knows-how-far across the Universe.
Quote
And where are all the non-warmongering races that the Shivans have left unmolested???
The warmongers squished them!
That is, after all, what warmongers do.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 08, 2009, 11:58:50 am
Well, why did it take the annihilation and enslavement of who knows how many Alien Races by the Ancients until the Shivans decided enough was enough?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on October 08, 2009, 05:58:04 pm
My guess would be it takes them a while to set their eyes on a species, but once that happened, they keep them under observation.
That would explain why they needed years to interfere in the TV war, but showed up only month after the NTF rebellion started.

And it would also explain how the ancients got enough time to eradicate several other species.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mongoose on October 08, 2009, 08:24:18 pm
My guess would be it takes them a while to set their eyes on a species, but once that happened, they keep them under observation.
That would explain why they needed years to interfere in the TV war, but showed up only month after the NTF rebellion started.
The Shivans showing up shortly after the NTF rebellion started was, as far as we know, completely unrelated to the earlier actions of the Lucifer fleet, as the forces we see in FS2 presumably wouldn't have been able to communicate with it.  At the very least, we already know why the Shivans showed up in FS2 when they did: Bosch sent the NTC Trinity to open up the Knossos in Gamma Draconis, and the Shivans presumably detected the newly-opened node and poked their noses through to investigate.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: kaloonzu on October 08, 2009, 09:33:37 pm
My guess would be it takes them a while to set their eyes on a species, but once that happened, they keep them under observation.
That would explain why they needed years to interfere in the TV war, but showed up only month after the NTF rebellion started.
The Shivans showing up shortly after the NTF rebellion started was, as far as we know, completely unrelated to the earlier actions of the Lucifer fleet, as the forces we see in FS2 presumably wouldn't have been able to communicate with it.  At the very least, we already know why the Shivans showed up in FS2 when they did: Bosch sent the NTC Trinity to open up the Knossos in Gamma Draconis, and the Shivans presumably detected the newly-opened node and poked their noses through to investigate.

I don't buy that. We hear at the end of FS1 that "...the Shivans can rebuild them {jump nodes}...". They did not have to wait around for the portal to open, they could have opened the portal themselves. Besides, we also know that the Shivans are a subspace-centric civilization, and probably immediately detect all subspace occurences. That is what triggers their attacks, based on canonical information.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Mongoose on October 08, 2009, 09:54:05 pm
That phrase is spoken from the perspective of the player character; I don't think it was ever meant to be an absolute statement on the Shivans' abilities.  More importantly, we don't have any evidence that the Shivans even knew about the dead node until after the portal was activated; from their perspective on the other side, it was presumably just another dead area of subspace until the Knossos fired up again.  We know for a fact that the Shivans didn't come through the node until immediately after the Trinity activated it, so there's direct evidence to suggest that this line of thinking is correct.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on October 09, 2009, 04:23:50 am
While your theory is credible I wouldn't call it evidence, since them not opening the node themselfs doesn't proofe they couldn't have done it.
The shivans technology is better than that of the GTVA in every single aspect. And if the humans can build a knossos then surely so can the shivans.

Also in one of the command briefings Petrarch comments about the shivans being able to use nodes unkown to the GTVA or too unstable to use for themselfs during the great war. And the gamma draconis/mysterious nebula node was not gone, but too unstable to traverse for allied ships, just like the delta serpentis/sol jumppoint wasn't completely gone, but "only" unpassable. After all the knossos only stabilizes existing nodes, it doesn't create new ones.

But no matter which one is the official canon, we are talking about blue planet here. So it doesn't matter much what volition decided (and neglegted to share with us) to be the real reason behind the shivans actions. What matters is Darius' take on it, which we will most likely learn in BP3, or maybe even in WiH....
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 09, 2009, 04:28:28 am
My guess would be it takes them a while to set their eyes on a species, but once that happened, they keep them under observation.
That would explain why they needed years to interfere in the TV war, but showed up only month after the NTF rebellion started.
The Shivans showing up shortly after the NTF rebellion started was, as far as we know, completely unrelated to the earlier actions of the Lucifer fleet, as the forces we see in FS2 presumably wouldn't have been able to communicate with it.  At the very least, we already know why the Shivans showed up in FS2 when they did: Bosch sent the NTC Trinity to open up the Knossos in Gamma Draconis, and the Shivans presumably detected the newly-opened node and poked their noses through to investigate.

I don't buy that. We hear at the end of FS1 that "...the Shivans can rebuild them {jump nodes}...". They did not have to wait around for the portal to open, they could have opened the portal themselves. Besides, we also know that the Shivans are a subspace-centric civilization, and probably immediately detect all subspace occurences. That is what triggers their attacks, based on canonical information.

You're forgetting the fact that the humans weren't doing a lot to piss the Shivans off, thus they could happily go on their merry way, I mean, if the Shivans cared about Humans fighting each other, how come WWI and WWII weren't ended by some big mass-murdering aliens?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on October 09, 2009, 06:13:14 am
Did you forget the reason for the NTF rebellion?
The NTF were racists who slaughtered Vasudans - including civilians - simply because they were Vasudans.
The very first mission of the FS2 campaign has you defend Vasudan refugees from an NTF assault!
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: QuantumDelta on October 09, 2009, 07:22:34 am
The NTF rebellion was not put together over genocide, the genocidal war was simply a smoke screen -.-
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 09, 2009, 08:06:20 am
Yeah. But in response to Norbert, think about what the Ancients were doing, they were being xenocidal pricks for a little while, before the Shivans showed up. If you will, they're almost like the Universe's SWAT,  for when nature fails. Some dirty atrocities inside an Alliance won't attract Shivan attention until they fight other species. I'm guessing after the Great War, the Shivans may have treated the Terrans and Vasudans as a single entity, rather than different species.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: kaloonzu on October 09, 2009, 11:47:44 am
Yeah. But in response to Norbert, think about what the Ancients were doing, they were being xenocidal pricks for a little while, before the Shivans showed up. If you will, they're almost like the Universe's SWAT,  for when nature fails. Some dirty atrocities inside an Alliance won't attract Shivan attention until they fight other species. I'm guessing after the Great War, the Shivans may have treated the Terrans and Vasudans as a single entity, rather than different species.

I like this theory. I don't have time to elaborate on why though.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on October 09, 2009, 02:32:59 pm
Perhaps, but if they see the GTVA as a single entity, wouldn't that mean, that they have enough inside knowledge to know that the UEF is something different, which would again draw their attention towards the GTVA-UEF war?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 10, 2009, 12:50:25 am
Sorry, I phrased that badly. I meant to convey that the Shivans had assimilated the Vasudans with the Terrans, rather than viewing them as a completely seperate entity from humanity, from their perception. Though, that's an interesting thought, the Shivans treating GTVA members as an entirely different species.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on October 10, 2009, 12:59:20 am
The degree of Shivan information regarding the GTVA could be contingent on exactly how the Nagari process works.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Dilmah G on October 10, 2009, 02:36:39 am
On the topic of Shivan knowledge of the GTVA, did they capture any Humans or Vasudans prior to FS2?
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: eliex on October 10, 2009, 04:21:35 am
Uncertain canonically, but in FS1 the Shivans had no other motive for their enemies apart from complete extermination - FS2, different behaviour.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on October 10, 2009, 05:52:48 am
I don't buy that. We hear at the end of FS1 that "...the Shivans can rebuild them {jump nodes}...". They did not have to wait around for the portal to open, they could have opened the portal themselves. Besides, we also know that the Shivans are a subspace-centric civilization, and probably immediately detect all subspace occurences. That is what triggers their attacks, based on canonical information.

FS1 does say that but FS2 demonstrates something to the complete contrary. I would suggest that if that information was intended to be taken literally at the time, that between the development of FS1 and FS2 that the idea changed and that the Shivans instead are now dependant upon the ancient portal to reach GTVA space.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: -Norbert- on October 10, 2009, 01:36:58 pm
Quote
The degree of Shivan information regarding the GTVA could be contingent on exactly how the Nagari process works.
What's the Nagari process?
Thanks to admiral Bosh the shivans could posses very in-depth infomation about the GTVA as well as ancients and human history (his momologues pictured him as quite knowledgeable about history), maybe even vasudan history. Even though he had no way of knowing what's been going on in Sol.
Title: Re: Video: First Battle of Neptune
Post by: General Battuta on October 10, 2009, 01:39:56 pm
Read Media/Prose, 'Project Nagari. (http://blueplanet.hard-light.net)