Hard Light Productions Forums

Hosted Projects - Standalone => Diaspora => Topic started by: Lt.Cannonfodder on August 14, 2009, 11:42:53 am

Title: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Lt.Cannonfodder on August 14, 2009, 11:42:53 am
Bryan Singer has been confirmed to direct and produce a Battlestar Galactica movie completely unrelated to the show we love and cherish: http://movies.ign.com/articles/101/1014083p1.html

So, uhm, anyone else think this is going to be either really awesome or really fraked up?
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: SpardaSon21 on August 14, 2009, 11:52:16 am
I'm reserving judgment until I know more.  Although I would prefer the movie to be based on the re-imagining rather than being a re-re-imagining.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: StarSlayer on August 14, 2009, 12:07:20 pm
Battlestar Funtopia the Movie?

On further reflection, they better not do anything to frak up the franchise, bad enough I need to explain that its different then the one with Lorne Greene let alone now having some cock up movie to deal with as well.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: newman on August 14, 2009, 12:08:52 pm
I don't think the BSG franchise needs a reimagining, at least not any time soon.
I'll of course watch it and form an opinion based on that, but for now I'm thinking that RDM and the crew did an excellent job on the BSG reimagination that started in 2003, and I'd prefer any further BSG stuff being done by them.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: The E on August 14, 2009, 12:12:15 pm
Who are they going to get that can out-Adama Edward James Olmos?
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: MR_T3D on August 14, 2009, 12:16:51 pm
Who are they going to get that can out-Adama Edward James Olmos?
Christian bale
it will be either set immediately after she is built, or during the 1st cylon war, or both.
just gonna call it here and now.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: TESLA on August 14, 2009, 12:22:22 pm
I think its too soon.

Series just ended, new cast, new style, new shaped Battlestar????

Far too soon for this,

But who knows, may work out okay
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Angelus on August 14, 2009, 12:23:08 pm
It seems, the new movie is based on the original series, not the RIS one.

http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/101/1013496p1.html

Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Demitri on August 14, 2009, 12:50:25 pm
Oh dear. I can see this ending in tears  :(
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Angreifer on August 14, 2009, 12:55:23 pm
Ah, I get it now. Glen Larson is riding the re-imagined BSG wave in order to accomplish his dreams of making a movie based on his original version. Too bad that TOS blew chunks.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: StarSlayer on August 14, 2009, 01:12:32 pm
So in fact the thread title should be "Galactica un-re-imagining"

See what happens when you vote Democrat?  You get happy camp 70s movies about the annihilation of humanity instead of grim/dark drama.  Obama gets you Daggits, Bush gets you snapping babies necks.


Note if you take that seriously actually try to turn this thread into a political debate I will show up where you live and deliver a Mordhau to your face
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: Sidestep on August 14, 2009, 01:30:14 pm
Who are they going to get that can out-Adama Edward James Olmos?

There's only one Bill Adama as far as I'm concerned. If he's not in it I'm not watching.

And to a lesser extent the whole of the rest of the cast  ;)
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Flipside on August 14, 2009, 01:51:06 pm
Well, I'll wait and see, if it has more explosions and less shaky-cam to display them, then it has a possibility to be a good movie, as long as people don't expect it to be like the series.

Personally, as much as I loved the series, I think it'd be quite fun to have a good old fashioned space-shooty movie without 90 minutes of angst, politics and self-loathing ;)
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Ace on August 14, 2009, 02:14:54 pm
So in fact the thread title should be "Galactica un-re-imagining"

See what happens when you vote Democrat?  You get happy camp 70s movies about the annihilation of humanity instead of grim/dark drama.  Obama gets you Daggits, Bush gets you snapping babies necks.


Note if you take that seriously actually try to turn this thread into a political debate I will show up where you live and deliver a Mordhau to your face

 :sigh:

Honestly, what the franchise needs is another 15 years or so and another re-boot after that. A show at that time that's maybe a little less grimdark in having characters a bit more "noble" (i.e. most of the characterization in the new show honestly doesn't work, but the actors make it work, they'd be washed out of anything other than a Somalian militia, it's one thing to show a degradation over time, but they should start out a bit more squeaky clean even if they're the misfits before being washed out, modeling the characterization more after one character done right, Gaeta, where they start by-the-book and innocent and after two years on the run perjure themselves and are willing to commit heinous acts while blinding themselves with their idealism works)

But such a new reboot should be keeping the harsh realities of the '00s series (having to abandon thousands without FTL drives, sacrificing people to stop a fire, etc.). ...and a more coherent, cohesive, mythology that can actually be delivered on as opposed to the convoluted self-destructing myth-arcs typical of late 90s early 00s shows.

The best show would be tricking you into thinking it's a "naturalistic scifi" version of the original series (Adama, Apollo, and Starbuck all as role models) and then over the years turning it into an utterly soul-crushing story where everything they believe is wrong and humanity is not only doomed but must die to set things right. :p The end of the series making Moore and Larson crying in the corner like Tobias Funke wishing that the new-age hokey BSGod or the Ships of Light could Deus Ex Machina the Rag Tag Fleet out of danger, but being a REAL naturalistic sci-fi show, no such plot devices would exist ;)

...and yes I've had my Cavilistic rage towards the BSGod since head six appeared in the miniseries. Doesn't stop a lot of the show from working, but does go against the whole premise of a non-technobabble, solid look into human nature.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Flipside on August 14, 2009, 02:22:14 pm
Personally, I'm looking forward to the huge internet flame-war that is bound to follow the announcement of whichever gender Starbuck is ;)
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Ace on August 14, 2009, 02:23:53 pm
Starbuck should be a man, and Apollo a girl. That'll rile them up ;)

One thing to shoot your hypothesis down Slayer:
The Show that Shall not be named was under Reagan.

Death squads and daggits!
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Narvi on August 14, 2009, 03:44:56 pm
At least they don't have to try and integrate the silly finale into this.

Honestly, it's like B5. They completely killed any possible meaningful continuation with that ending.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: NGTM-1R on August 14, 2009, 10:44:45 pm
Honestly, I hope they'll do the smart thing and not **** around with...well, anything, except telling a good war story. People have been afraid of doing that since like 1960, unless they were running a show about WW2 on HBO.

I like to think about what BSG would have been if it had been born of the same sensablities as Fred Saberhagen's Berserker. :/ Bill as Jonathan Karlsen would have really worked, but they up and derailed him very badly sometime after he ended the witch hunt in Season 1. (For frak's sake, the man's father was a civil liberties lawyer.)
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Ace on August 14, 2009, 10:50:45 pm
On that note, it would have been interesting if the "MARX IN SPACE!" episode was in Season 1, dealing with the total lack of an economy. Adama having to struggle between "your strike is putting the survival of the human race on the line" and actually wanting to give them some dignity would have been interesting.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Morwen on August 15, 2009, 06:12:14 am
just

No.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Colonol Dekker on August 15, 2009, 06:21:07 am
Should make the film in this style.......

[attachment deleted by Tolwyn]
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: Bilal18 on August 15, 2009, 11:23:34 am
Who are they going to get that can out-Adama Edward James Olmos?

There's only one Bill Adama as far as I'm concerned. If he's not in it I'm not watching.

And to a lesser extent the whole of the rest of the cast  ;)

Exactly. The re-imagined series was simply put; amazing for me. The cast were perfect. I cant really see me taking a liking to this one. But ill reserve my judgement for later, until more news comes out.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: TESLA on August 15, 2009, 07:19:00 pm
Starbuck should be a man, and Apollo a girl. That'll rile them up ;)

One thing to shoot your hypothesis down Slayer:
The Show that Shall not be named was under Reagan.

Death squads and daggits!

Better yet, a female commander Adama?
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imganining
Post by: Sidestep on August 15, 2009, 10:08:38 pm
Who are they going to get that can out-Adama Edward James Olmos?

There's only one Bill Adama as far as I'm concerned. If he's not in it I'm not watching.

And to a lesser extent the whole of the rest of the cast  ;)

Exactly. The re-imagined series was simply put; amazing for me. The cast were perfect. I cant really see me taking a liking to this one. But ill reserve my judgement for later, until more news comes out.

So say we all
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Grizzly on August 17, 2009, 03:40:50 am
Why won't they reboot... say... Wing Commander, instead of re-doeing something that is still fresh in everybody's mind, in a good way?
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: greyscale on August 17, 2009, 02:18:29 pm
Why won't they reboot... say... Wing Commander, instead of re-doeing something that is still fresh in everybody's mind, in a good way?

The Wing Commander series kinda falls into its own niche genre.  The "anthro" community isn't necessarily prominent enough in the film industry to condone a reboot of cats in space per se, however I do agree with you that this reboot announcement is a little too soon in terms of trying to re-brand something that was never broken to begin with.  Albeit, with budget approvals, production time, writing and casting, there's still a lot of steps missing in this equation, but it definitely feels fishy.  Realistically, we might be seeing the movie released in two to three years from now, which will give all of us fans plenty of time to really dig into the news and determine whether it's "good" or "bad."   Now that the show is over, I think this kind of news is a good thing for breathing life into the BSG franchise as a whole, it definitely got me thinking about Diaspora.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Sidestep on August 17, 2009, 03:20:02 pm
It's not quite over yet, we still have The Plan to go...
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: TESLA on August 17, 2009, 07:55:39 pm
It's not quite over yet, we still have The Plan to go...

I must say, i am slightly weary of this though....  :wtf:

just had a bad feeling  :nervous:

Hope im wrong  :yes:

Picturing BSG 1980  :no:

Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: David cgc on August 17, 2009, 08:10:20 pm
I'm not really seeing it.

Cavil: The plan is, everything blows up a week ago. We travel back in time and give advanced technologies to the Nazis, the humans all fly around on invisible motorcycles, and the universe gapes in what-the-frak-ery.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Ace on August 17, 2009, 08:10:33 pm
What, Anders and his flying bike?  :pimp:
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: General Battuta on August 17, 2009, 11:21:19 pm
This show was, in retrospect, over for me ever since Jane Espenson came on board and the great writing clusterfrak of Season 3 post-Exodus began.

The old writers did what they could to salvage it, but with Espenson and Angeli on board, the show's consistency just vanished.

Not looking forward to the huge retcon fest that The Plan looks to be.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Jangiri on August 19, 2009, 11:58:51 pm
all i can say about all of this is "good grief"
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Wolfy on August 20, 2009, 03:43:22 am
Give The Plan a chance :P. (Although, the cylons gave the plan a chance, and look where it got them...)

If it was THAT bad im sure Admiral Adama himself wouldn't be the director
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: General Battuta on August 20, 2009, 10:26:29 am
The two episodes he directed weren't exactly stellar. Pretty okay, but not stellar.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: StarSlayer on August 20, 2009, 11:45:29 am
To be honest for me BSG was firing on all cylinders when it was about an aircraft carrier in space.  The Miniseries, Season 1 and 2 were by far the strongest in my opinion with the Battle of the Rez being the pinnacle.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Lt.Cannonfodder on August 20, 2009, 12:14:42 pm
The show never went bad, it was just hard to keep up so constant level of awesome.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: General Battuta on August 20, 2009, 12:32:00 pm
There were some beautiful, lyrical episodes in the back half of the show, and taken on their own, many of them are incredible. They just didn't come together into a complete story very well.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: MR_T3D on August 20, 2009, 01:38:51 pm
To be honest for me BSG was firing on all cylinders when it was about an aircraft carrier in space.  The Miniseries, Season 1 and 2 were by far the strongest in my opinion with the Battle of the Rez being the pinnacle.
True that, once basic survival became easy for the show, it seemed to slip a little.
basicially after new caprica, if i were to say it jumped the shark, it would be when peggy rams a basestar, then kills another one WITH ITS HANGAR.
and the finale is best summarized in their stage card: frakking hippies.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Locutus of Borg on August 20, 2009, 01:49:47 pm
BSG was perfect in every way possible. Best TV show ever.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: General Battuta on August 20, 2009, 01:56:04 pm
Well, I'd agree, for seasons 1-2, and the first four episodes of Season 3.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Locutus of Borg on August 20, 2009, 09:58:43 pm
I loved 4.5, especially the music.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Jangiri on August 20, 2009, 10:47:16 pm
while some of the parts of the show were better than others the whole show was on a standard higher than most sci-fi shows. so stop nagging about what you didn't like about the show on a forum that is more or less of a fan forum. let's agree it is not as bad as season 2 of heroes.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Bilal18 on August 21, 2009, 05:19:24 am
BSG was perfect in every way possible. Best TV show ever.

So say we all
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on August 30, 2009, 06:06:46 am
At least they don't have to try and integrate the silly finale into this.

Honestly, it's like B5. They completely killed any possible meaningful continuation with that ending.

Continuation? Who needs a continuation. B5 was a story that went from A to B.

Then JMS forgot how to write and came up with Crusade instead
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: The E on August 30, 2009, 06:23:21 am
Crusade had potential, but then succumbed to combination of executive meddling and getting screwed by the network.


I could link to that site, but I won't.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Narvi on August 30, 2009, 08:47:18 am
At least they don't have to try and integrate the silly finale into this.

Honestly, it's like B5. They completely killed any possible meaningful continuation with that ending.

Continuation? Who needs a continuation. B5 was a story that went from A to B.

Then JMS forgot how to write and came up with Crusade instead

I prefer universes where it's possible to see that life goes on outside the main story that's presented. That is to say, where it's not only the heroes of the main arc who do heroic things.

You could have done that with B5, if JMS hadn't decided to go for the "how future historians see the heroes" style as well as
Spoiler:
the whole "humans becoming supersquidbeings"
ending, where any possible continuation will lose its dramatic impact since we know how it ends.

I mean universes like Macross or, hell, even Freespace.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Locutus of Borg on August 30, 2009, 11:11:25 am
Freespace would make an interesting TV show because it isn't character centric.  :yes: :yes:
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Woolie Wool on August 30, 2009, 01:24:38 pm
At least they don't have to try and integrate the silly finale into this.

Honestly, it's like B5. They completely killed any possible meaningful continuation with that ending.

Continuation? Who needs a continuation. B5 was a story that went from A to B.

Then JMS forgot how to write and came up with Crusade instead

I prefer universes where it's possible to see that life goes on outside the main story that's presented. That is to say, where it's not only the heroes of the main arc who do heroic things.

You could have done that with B5, if JMS hadn't decided to go for the "how future historians see the heroes" style as well as
Spoiler:
the whole "humans becoming supersquidbeings"
ending, where any possible continuation will lose its dramatic impact since we know how it ends.

I mean universes like Macross or, hell, even Freespace.

I think the worst thing JMS ever did was get a hard-on for A Canticle for Leibowitz (the inspiration for that awful season 4 finale).
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on August 31, 2009, 08:09:27 am
You could have done that with B5, if JMS hadn't decided to go for the "how future historians see the heroes" style as well as
Spoiler:
the whole "humans becoming supersquidbeings"
ending, where any possible continuation will lose its dramatic impact since we know how it ends.

I mean universes like Macross or, hell, even Freespace.

Well. I'm watching B5 right now again and I'm reminded of how much better it could've been had everything fallen into place. The original ending, as far as I understand it was supposed to be the War without End Episodes. Worst thing that happened to that show was losing Sinclair and picking up Sheridan, it screwed up all the story points they put into season 1 regarding Sinclair and everything Sheridan does is less profound because of it since he's basically just a lock stock replacement. Though I heard Sinclair's actor got cancer or something so obviously had to stop working on the show.

As for the episode in question. Well. I wonder if JMS would have even made the thing. The REAL season 4 finale show is the last episode of Season 5. That's why Ivanova is in it while she's not in the rest of Season 5. Babylon 5 was always intended to be a five-season show but there was some doubt as to whether there would be a season 5 so they had to cram everything into season 4 and then when they got renewed again they had very little for Season 5 so it sucked hard. And part of the renewal for Season 5 was a need to make a new Season 4 finale and thus that episode is born. That episode is interesting though admittedly not my favourite.

Sigh. What could've been . . . .

Why do all the good shows get canned or screwed? (ie Firefly, B5) while lack luster shows continue (Star Trek etcetera).


Even Battlestar, quite honestly could've used more of a roadmap. Seems like the writers didn't know what they were doing through most of season 3 and 4. All this build up and very little in the way of pay off. I liked it a lot more than other people I know, but still could've been better. Highpoint of BSG is the Pegasus-arc with Admiral Ro Laren.  She was awesome.  ;7
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Locutus of Borg on August 31, 2009, 09:42:43 am
You could have done that with B5, if JMS hadn't decided to go for the "how future historians see the heroes" style as well as
Spoiler:
the whole "humans becoming supersquidbeings"
ending, where any possible continuation will lose its dramatic impact since we know how it ends.

I mean universes like Macross or, hell, even Freespace.

Well. I'm watching B5 right now again and I'm reminded of how much better it could've been had everything fallen into place. The original ending, as far as I understand it was supposed to be the War without End Episodes. Worst thing that happened to that show was losing Sinclair and picking up Sheridan, it screwed up all the story points they put into season 1 regarding Sinclair and everything Sheridan does is less profound because of it since he's basically just a lock stock replacement. Though I heard Sinclair's actor got cancer or something so obviously had to stop working on the show.

As for the episode in question. Well. I wonder if JMS would have even made the thing. The REAL season 4 finale show is the last episode of Season 5. That's why Ivanova is in it while she's not in the rest of Season 5. Babylon 5 was always intended to be a five-season show but there was some doubt as to whether there would be a season 5 so they had to cram everything into season 4 and then when they got renewed again they had very little for Season 5 so it sucked hard. And part of the renewal for Season 5 was a need to make a new Season 4 finale and thus that episode is born. That episode is interesting though admittedly not my favourite.

Sigh. What could've been . . . .

Why do all the good shows get canned or screwed? (ie Firefly, B5) while lack luster shows continue (Star Trek etcetera).


Even Battlestar, quite honestly could've used more of a roadmap. Seems like the writers didn't know what they were doing through most of season 3 and 4. All this build up and very little in the way of pay off. I liked it a lot more than other people I know, but still could've been better. Highpoint of BSG is the Pegasus-arc with Admiral Ro Laren.  She was awesome.  ;7

Getting a little contradictory there.  You don't like Star Trek, but she's admiral RO LAREN!?!
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: The E on August 31, 2009, 09:51:50 am
One doesn't need to like shows in order to like characters from them.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: newman on August 31, 2009, 10:21:00 am
True. I loved 7 of 9's tight bodysuit, while hating everything else on Voyager :D
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Mongoose on August 31, 2009, 12:01:24 pm
Why do all the good shows get canned or screwed? (ie Firefly, B5) while lack luster shows continue (Star Trek etcetera).
Um...Enterprise got canned.  After the season when it had become really good. :p
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on August 31, 2009, 09:38:18 pm
Getting a little contradictory there.  You don't like Star Trek, but she's admiral RO LAREN!?!

Actually I like Star Trek. Except for Voyager, Enterprise, and Deep Space 9.
So in other words TNG and TOS and the new movie.

I watch the latter three, but they continually fail to impress me.

Even Enterprise with its . . . what was, Xindi plot was rather boring. The space combat is quite frankly a bunch of ships firing the same **** at eachother, just different colours. Red Beams, Blue Beams, Green Beams, all the same boring crap. The Cast is interesting and the show has potential but I don't think it ever really delivered for me.

And Star Treks continual need to justify everything and revisit old plots is equally annoying. Like, "oh we created a race of Klingon-human hybrids to explain old make-up" or "oh here are the supermen again, and guess what Data's grandad is involved". Give me a break. It's like massive amounts of catering to the fans and some inane need to create continuity or to explain poor FXs (just like the stupid episode in TNG where they learn everyone's genetically related).

DS9 is supposed to be good but every time I tune in I keep thinking Babylon 5 did the same story much better. And I don't like Sisko, his voice and mannerisms are so bland and annoying. Actually the only characters I really like are Dax, Julian and Odo. And Julian gets killed and Dax gets replaced by some other chick so . . . meh. Whatever.

Voyager. Well. I don't need to go into that. I don't think I like any character on the whole ship, though 7of9 is easy on the eyes.


I'm just so sick of shows where they have some basic premise and nothing else. Give me a story with a definite beginning and end and I'll enjoy it 10 times more. But networks for whatever, don't like serials.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: newman on September 01, 2009, 03:33:36 am
And Julian gets killed and Dax gets replaced by some other chick so . . . meh. Whatever.

? Julian survives for the whole show. You sure you watched all of it? DS9 is utter crap for the first 2, 2 and a half seasons, then it really picks up. Problem is, people will have given up on it before that. The first two seasons don't really have a continuing storyline and are basically trying the same thing as other trek but from a station. Later on they have a continuing storyline and it starts to work much better. While the first part of DS9 I find as some of the worst trek ever, the later part I find the best trek has to offer. They actually make a long term continuing story work later on, and finally it's trek without a ship exploring the "unknown", which usually translates into the fact that every week they'll find yet another alien species with a bit different pattern on their forehead, and most problems can be solved by diverting power or explained by subspace distortions.. As much as I liked TNG, it suffered from this badly. Not as badly as Voyager, but still.
Of course, none of it can compare to BSG or Firefly.. :)
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: karajorma on September 01, 2009, 05:24:33 am
Yeah but I will agree that pretty much everything DS9 did, B5 did better.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on September 01, 2009, 05:41:42 am
And Julian gets killed and Dax gets replaced by some other chick so . . . meh. Whatever.

? Julian survives for the whole show. You sure you watched all of it? DS9 is utter crap for the first 2, 2 and a half seasons, then it really picks up. Problem is, people will have given up on it before that.

The doctor? Okay. No I thought I read somewhere that one episode suddenly he's been replaced by a changeling spy and he died somewhere. Maybe I heard wrong. I haven't seen an episode without him in it, but I haven't seen a LOT of the series.

Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Locutus of Borg on September 01, 2009, 06:22:34 am
Spoiler:
He is really in a Dominion prison camp. He comes back with Garak and Garak's father and everybody is happy.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: StarSlayer on September 01, 2009, 08:13:55 am
Of course, none of it can compare to BSG or Firefly.. :)

There isn't enough frelling love for Farscape in this thread of dren.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on September 01, 2009, 09:37:54 am
Of course, none of it can compare to BSG or Firefly.. :)

There isn't enough frelling love for Farscape in this thread of dren.

That's because the DVDs are like 200 dollars a season and I can't bloody-well afford to watch them.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: MR_T3D on September 01, 2009, 02:42:56 pm
Of course, none of it can compare to BSG or Firefly.. :)

There isn't enough frelling love for Farscape in this thread of dren.

That's because the DVDs are like 200 dollars a season and I can't bloody-well afford to watch them.
saw the finale on TV, looked okay, but since it is never on and
woah...200/season? frak that!
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: newman on September 01, 2009, 03:09:58 pm
Checked the UK Amazon, Farscape DVDs are some 25 GBP per season, give or take..
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on September 02, 2009, 01:26:12 am
saw the finale on TV, looked okay, but since it is never on and
woah...200/season? frak that!

Well I think there's some sort of special edition adn that's the only one I've found (at HMV). They're more expensive than even Doctor Who for cryin out loud.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Exeter on September 03, 2009, 04:34:39 am
Well I think there's some sort of special edition adn that's the only one I've found (at HMV). They're more expensive than even Doctor Who for cryin out loud.

Looks like there's a new series boxed set (http://www.amazon.com/Farscape-Complete-Ben-Browder/dp/B002GP7ZWI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1251970258&sr=8-1) releasing November 17th at $105 USD, but for whatever reason the DVDs are only Region 1.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: StarSlayer on September 03, 2009, 07:39:09 am
I frelling want that.
Title: Re: Galactica re-re-imagining
Post by: Akalabeth Angel on September 03, 2009, 08:35:24 am
I frelling want that.

Hell yeah. Got to pick that up when I get some cash.

I dunno if the show's any good but what I've seen I've liked. Very good costume and makeup design (it is Jim Henson after all).
Oh and that white-haired chick is pretty hot too hahaha