Hard Light Productions Forums

General FreeSpace => FreeSpace Discussion => Topic started by: Kosh on November 01, 2009, 08:01:30 pm

Title: Beam cannons
Post by: Kosh on November 01, 2009, 08:01:30 pm
Does anyone have any theories for how they work?
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: The E on November 01, 2009, 08:09:47 pm
Pretty well, especially against fighter shields  :p

That being said, we know a piece of phlebotinum called a "Plasma core" is involved in its operation, which needs to be inserted before firing. Their power output can be increased by overloading them, although this is definitely dangerous and can lead to secondary damage on the firing ship.
As for actual technobabble, you are free to create your own.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Aardwolf on November 01, 2009, 08:30:17 pm
"Power up photon beam cannons", "Commence plasma core insertion".
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Asteroth on November 01, 2009, 09:12:04 pm
As evidenced by Aaradwolf they seem to be based on photons, and ineed high enough evergy photons would heat up it's target, but the beam certainly wouldn't be visible and the range would be extremely long. The largest range problems for lasers (just a beam of photons) is diffusion, because of the air particles the beam spreads out after very long distances (If i remeber correctly I think they're good up to like 10-20-30 miles), this problem is of course not quite as relavent cue to the distinct lack of air, thusly the range could be up to interplanetary. The actual amount of damage am am unsure of.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Droid803 on November 01, 2009, 09:26:54 pm
They've also been referred to as "Flux Cannons". Well, only the Lucifer's guns, but I'd presume the GTVA and Shivan instances are based off the same principle.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: NGTM-1R on November 01, 2009, 09:39:01 pm
Electrolasers, accounting for their shield-puncturing (we know shields don't like raw EM in large doses) and other behavior.

I've also posisted the existence of beam-like weapons that stream magentically bottled plasma or antimatter.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: General Battuta on November 01, 2009, 10:21:03 pm
Electrolasers

I think there's a key ingredient of the electrolaser missing, my friend.

Unless, of course, the weapon first deploys a particle medium...but that seems kind of roundabout.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: NGTM-1R on November 01, 2009, 10:48:15 pm
Yes, well, it's not going to work, but neither is any other explanation, so I'm in good company. :P
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Mongoose on November 01, 2009, 11:09:09 pm
Despite the "photon beam" name, I've always felt like they made more sense as some sort of particle plasma cannons, especially with the "plasma core insertion" line.  If one were able to generate a powerful bound magnetic field, one would presumably be able to accelerate charged particles at a decent fraction of c along it, which would probably deliver a massive punch on the other end.  The shield-piercing behavior of AAA beams could be explained away by said incredibly high-energy ions completely overwhelming shield defenses over a focused area, to the point where they impact the hull mostly unhindered.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Asakura on November 01, 2009, 11:10:45 pm
As evidenced by Aaradwolf they seem to be based on photons, and ineed high enough evergy photons would heat up it's target, but the beam certainly wouldn't be visible and the range would be extremely long. The largest range problems for lasers (just a beam of photons) is diffusion, because of the air particles the beam spreads out after very long distances (If i remeber correctly I think they're good up to like 10-20-30 miles), this problem is of course not quite as relavent cue to the distinct lack of air, thusly the range could be up to interplanetary. The actual amount of damage am am unsure of.

The process is called attenuation. It can happen even in space, but the effect is pretty much negligible over distances of the mission area. Just imagine it as an oversized laser, and whether or not the actual beam will be visible should such a thing exist would depend on a lot of things, such as the wavelength and intensity of the beam used.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: deathfun on November 01, 2009, 11:21:10 pm
You folks and your knowledge over this matter

I just know not to be in the beams path when it fires. Too many times have I been massacred for being in the wrong place, at the wrong time
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Asakura on November 02, 2009, 12:02:16 am
I just died 5 times in Rebels & Renegades.

1st was just getting ripped apart by the Sobek's AAAf.
2nd was getting caught by the Sobek's VSlash.
3rd was getting the Iceni's BGreen jammed in my face.
The last two times were courtesy of the Iceni's AAAf while I chased the fighters around it.

Based on a 60% death by friendly fire, I would presume that the NTF already knew I was an agent before the Sunder.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: deathfun on November 02, 2009, 12:06:52 am
I had the unlucky opportunity to get in the way of the Juggernaut vs the Collie

The Collie wasted me and the Juggernaut took my remains
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Liberator on November 02, 2009, 12:45:13 am
The way I would think it would would would be that during the "wind up phase" where the capacitors are whining as they absorb the charge to fire, the beam cannon is already firing some sort of trace beam which is much lower power than the actual weapon and is also the opposite polarity of the beam particles, so that when the capacitance system reaches maximum saturation and discharges the main particle beam remains focused in a fairly tight beam instead of being like a flash light and spreading out at a wide degree to the actual target.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Black Wolf on November 02, 2009, 03:48:04 am
Well, I think I have a workable theory. First, a "core" of beam material is inserted into a chamber (the "plasma core") - probaby some kind of high atomic weight noble gas, Krypton or Xenon - since we know the GTVA has used them in weapons before. Next, this core is excited by extremely high energy photons up to extremely high temperatures, stripping away the electrons and converting it to a charged plasma. Thirdly, a magnetic control "tube" is initiated to keep the plasma in a coherent beam shape. Finally, a small hole opens in the chamber, aligned with the magnetic controlled "tube", and the extreme pressure of the plasma (plus possibly a degree of magnetic acceleration) forces the particles out along the predetermined path, where they smash into the enemy ship.

The charge glow might be explainable by slightly less than completely airtight seal allowing a small amount of plasma to escape, cuasing the glow around the firing point as they spread out in all directions.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Kosh on November 02, 2009, 05:49:46 am
Quote
Thirdly, a magnetic control "tube" is initiated to keep the plasma in a coherent beam shape.


Based on our known physics today, is that even possible?
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Asakura on November 02, 2009, 05:50:58 am
You know, there is a reason why it is called science fiction.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Stormkeeper on November 02, 2009, 09:38:54 am
Or the 'plasma core' referenced could simply be a cartridge containing the energy required for a full blast. It would help alleviate the draw on the ship's reactor that way.

Also,
You know, there is a reason why it is called science fiction.
QFT.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: nvsblmnc on November 02, 2009, 12:50:37 pm
The way I see it, there are 3 distinct types in use by the GTVA.  My decidedly non-canon interpretation:

Green: Terran beam weapons which work by bleeding off plasma from the ship's reactor.  These have the advantages of being relativley small, allowing a given vessel to carry more of them, and they can be 'overcharged' by forcing greater amounts of plamsa through the emitters.  This comes with the cost of increased thermal load on the cannons, and can also damage the reactors themselves if too much plasma is drained.

Yellow: Vasudan beam weapons which utilise directed photon beams.  These are more powerful than the green Terran beams, but require a dedicated reactor to power them.  As a result of this increased bulk, the weapons are typcially mounted in smaller numbers, and not at all on cruisers.  We've not seen if these can be 'overcharged'.

Blue: Ion beams shared by both races.  These are very energy efficient and have a low thermal load on the emitters, allowing for rapid refiring and continual operation, but do very little damage.  Because they can draw power from the carrying vessel's standard energy grid, practically any vessel of cruiser tonnage or above can mount worrying numbers of these weapons.

As for the Shivans, I like to think of their beams as being some kind of graser, if only due to rule of cool.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Snail on November 02, 2009, 01:25:13 pm
Well, I think I have a workable theory. First, a "core" of beam material is inserted into a chamber (the "plasma core") - probaby some kind of high atomic weight noble gas, Krypton or Xenon - since we know the GTVA has used them in weapons before. Next, this core is excited by extremely high energy photons up to extremely high temperatures, stripping away the electrons and converting it to a charged plasma. Thirdly, a magnetic control "tube" is initiated to keep the plasma in a coherent beam shape. Finally, a small hole opens in the chamber, aligned with the magnetic controlled "tube", and the extreme pressure of the plasma (plus possibly a degree of magnetic acceleration) forces the particles out along the predetermined path, where they smash into the enemy ship.

The charge glow might be explainable by slightly less than completely airtight seal allowing a small amount of plasma to escape, cuasing the glow around the firing point as they spread out in all directions.
I like this one the best.

Find a way to get the word Flux in there (maybe Flux is the amount of charged plasma being vented?) and I'll officially declare it interesting.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: stuart133 on November 02, 2009, 04:36:09 pm
The way I see it, there are 3 distinct types in use by the GTVA.  My decidedly non-canon interpretation:

Green: Terran beam weapons which work by bleeding off plasma from the ship's reactor.  These have the advantages of being relativley small, allowing a given vessel to carry more of them, and they can be 'overcharged' by forcing greater amounts of plamsa through the emitters.  This comes with the cost of increased thermal load on the cannons, and can also damage the reactors themselves if too much plasma is drained.

Yellow: Vasudan beam weapons which utilise directed photon beams.  These are more powerful than the green Terran beams, but require a dedicated reactor to power them.  As a result of this increased bulk, the weapons are typcially mounted in smaller numbers, and not at all on cruisers.  We've not seen if these can be 'overcharged'.

Blue: Ion beams shared by both races.  These are very energy efficient and have a low thermal load on the emitters, allowing for rapid refiring and continual operation, but do very little damage.  Because they can draw power from the carrying vessel's standard energy grid, practically any vessel of cruiser tonnage or above can mount worrying numbers of these weapons.

As for the Shivans, I like to think of their beams as being some kind of graser, if only due to rule of cool.

I like this one best, except for the graser thing. That would be highly invisible, not red.

I would have said that the red beams are the equivalent of your explanation of the Terran "Green Beams". I would think that the reason the Shivan ones are more powerful in many cases is that the Shivans have better heat sinks and reactors. They have had beams for a lot longer than we have. Especially with the "Trapped Fleet theory".
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: headdie on November 02, 2009, 05:15:47 pm
The way I see it, there are 3 distinct types in use by the GTVA.  My decidedly non-canon interpretation:

Green: Terran beam weapons which work by bleeding off plasma from the ship's reactor.  These have the advantages of being relativley small, allowing a given vessel to carry more of them, and they can be 'overcharged' by forcing greater amounts of plamsa through the emitters.  This comes with the cost of increased thermal load on the cannons, and can also damage the reactors themselves if too much plasma is drained.

Yellow: Vasudan beam weapons which utilise directed photon beams.  These are more powerful than the green Terran beams, but require a dedicated reactor to power them.  As a result of this increased bulk, the weapons are typcially mounted in smaller numbers, and not at all on cruisers.  We've not seen if these can be 'overcharged'.

Blue: Ion beams shared by both races.  These are very energy efficient and have a low thermal load on the emitters, allowing for rapid refiring and continual operation, but do very little damage.  Because they can draw power from the carrying vessel's standard energy grid, practically any vessel of cruiser tonnage or above can mount worrying numbers of these weapons.

As for the Shivans, I like to think of their beams as being some kind of graser, if only due to rule of cool.

I like this one best, except for the graser thing. That would be highly invisible, not red.

I would have said that the red beams are the equivalent of your explanation of the Terran "Green Beams". I would think that the reason the Shivan ones are more powerful in many cases is that the Shivans have better heat sinks and reactors. They have had beams for a lot longer than we have. Especially with the "Trapped Fleet theory".

i like the theory with stuart133s alteration, the different colouring could easily be accounted for by different reactor materials or beam handling method or possibly some kind of enrichment process
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Qent on November 02, 2009, 06:14:09 pm
And their devastating power could be because the beam's wave function collapses and its particles release ZPE microbursts. :nervous:
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Kosh on November 04, 2009, 07:42:29 am
You know, there is a reason why it is called science fiction.

Science fiction has a way of becoming science FACT. I see no one has answered the question though......
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Kolgena on November 05, 2009, 12:21:53 am
Think about how lightsabers work. The principle is the same, so it should be pretty straight forward



...if lightsabers had even a snippet of physics behind their mechanism of operation.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Stormkeeper on November 05, 2009, 01:13:35 am
Yes, they do. (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightsaber)
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: General Battuta on November 05, 2009, 01:15:26 am
That doesn't really qualify as physics so much as technobabble.

We've got plasma cutters in real life, after all.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Kosh on November 10, 2009, 06:59:03 am
Yeah but they don't project continuously moving magnetic pockets away from the ship.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Stormkeeper on November 10, 2009, 05:13:03 pm
Yeah. I think I prefer Hellgate London's explanation for the Molten Edge, e.g fusion reaction contained in a magnetic field.

.... Wait, that sounds like lightsabers!
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Aardwolf on November 12, 2009, 09:00:22 pm
Yeah. I think I prefer Hellgate London's explanation for the Molten Edge, e.g fusion reaction contained in a magnetic field.

.... Wait, that sounds like lightsabers!

Plasma does not imply fusion! Anyway, the contained plasma thing is awfully similar to the idea of a plasma shield, at least as I interpreted it.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: TrashMan on November 13, 2009, 03:11:22 am
I prefer anit-magic field generators myself...How does one make one?
WITH SCIENCE!!!!!
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: NGTM-1R on November 13, 2009, 11:33:51 am
I prefer anit-magic field generators myself...How does one make one?
WITH SCIENCE!!!!!

Jail Scaligetti, is that you?
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: stuart133 on November 13, 2009, 11:39:05 am
Hmmm, I sense Final Fantasy is crawling into this thread.

Back on topic - Surely a lightsaber is just plasma, no fusion needed. That would be stupid as it would run out of fuel quite quickly that way.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Spoon on November 13, 2009, 11:58:30 am
I prefer anit-magic field generators myself...How does one make one?
WITH SCIENCE!!!!!

Jail Scaligetti, is that you?
Bah, nothing a good old starlight breaker cannot befriend fix
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: ChronoReverse on November 13, 2009, 12:09:18 pm
And if that's not enough to make friends peace, five at once will certainly ease diplomatic relationships.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Liberator on November 13, 2009, 06:15:56 pm
Hmmm, I sense Final Fantasy is crawling into this thread.

Back on topic - Surely a lightsaber is just plasma, no fusion needed. That would be stupid as it would run out of fuel quite quickly that way.
Lightsabers are exactly that.  High energy plasma passed through a circular magnetic circuit so that the energy is returned to the power cell with near perfect efficiency.  The only time the power cell is drained is when the saber is used to cut through a substance or the flow is interupted some how.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: General Battuta on November 13, 2009, 06:54:21 pm
Trying to make sense of lightsabers is a really bad idea. Plasma fields don't really work in atmosphere.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Liberator on November 13, 2009, 07:01:58 pm
I'm all but quoting the star wars wiki on the subject, which I kinda stumbled into the other day.  I don't read it on a regular basis.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Droid803 on November 13, 2009, 07:05:00 pm
Well, even it it behaved as described it would still continually lose power to air particles hitting it and whatnot, if it were in an atmospheric environment.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Mongoose on November 13, 2009, 07:15:17 pm
"Handwavium = uber-cool laser sword" seems like a far more satisfying explanation to me. :p
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: General Battuta on November 13, 2009, 07:59:58 pm
I concur.
Title: Re: Beam cannons
Post by: Asakura on November 14, 2009, 05:19:47 am
I prefer anit-magic field generators myself...How does one make one?
WITH SCIENCE!!!!!

Jail Scaligetti, is that you?
Bah, nothing a good old starlight breaker cannot befriend fix

Personally 5 SLBs work better if you have the fin funnels :P