Hard Light Productions Forums

Modding, Mission Design, and Coding => FS2 Open Coding - The Source Code Project (SCP) => Topic started by: DarkShadow- on January 09, 2010, 10:58:06 am

Title: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: DarkShadow- on January 09, 2010, 10:58:06 am
Once I saw the upcoming "no primary linking"-flag, I was wondering if you could add an option (e.g. in ai_profiles) that blocks the double fire mode for secondaries, forcing the player to shoot single missiles. If this already exists somewhere, well, then sorry to disturb you guys.  :)
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Solatar on January 09, 2010, 11:04:49 am
On a per weapon basis, or in general?
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Nuke on January 09, 2010, 11:51:08 am
^ yes
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: TopAce on January 09, 2010, 01:29:19 pm
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Aardwolf on January 09, 2010, 02:27:41 pm
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.

You wouldn't have to. It's not something that would be used in the mediavps, only certain mods.

That said, I reckon it ought to be available both as a per-weapon thing and as a global override.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Dragon on January 09, 2010, 03:58:11 pm
That would be usefull for universes whre there's simply no such thing like double-fire.
Sometimes, it's just unwanted.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: headdie on January 09, 2010, 04:10:41 pm
I'd do that for a per-weapon basis, but only as long as it makes tactical sense ([hint]TAG-B[/hint]) If it's about making the missions longer by depriving ships a portion of their maximum firepower, I wouldn't like to see such a feature.

You wouldn't have to. It's not something that would be used in the mediavps, only certain mods.

That said, I reckon it ought to be available both as a per-weapon thing and as a global override.

a weapon flag would be the most flexible way to do it and have the least unintended effect else were
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Tomo on January 09, 2010, 04:22:29 pm
a weapon flag would be the most flexible way to do it and have the least unintended effect else were
The other usage case is that a particular ship class can't double-fire missiles, but others could.
- Eg a fighter can carry a Big Huge Bang but only fire them one at a time, while a bomber can double-fire them.

So it should be a weapon flag and a ship secondary-bank flag.

However, the weapon flag is more important as a modder can 'fake' the ship-class function by making a TBM copy of an existing weapon.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Nuke on January 09, 2010, 08:32:00 pm
while a per weapon flag would be awesome, id do per ship as a dualfire multipler, it would default to 2. if you want to disable dualfire, you set it to 1, if you set it to 4 you fire 4x as many missiles. this would look awesome on bombers with external weapon mountings.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Dragon on January 10, 2010, 10:02:08 am
That's an awsome idea, Nuke.
I can imagine Steve'o's Saracen dumping it's torpedoes in one salvo from it's wing mountings.
I would definitely like this implemented.
Also, it would be great to be able to set it for individual banks.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Commander Zane on January 10, 2010, 10:15:50 am
*Pictures DoS Saracens quad-salvoing Firestorm Advanced missiles*

ARRRGGHGHH!!!!
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Dragon on January 10, 2010, 10:16:49 am
Actually, Firestorm Advanced is already quad-fired, so linking banks won't change anything.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Commander Zane on January 10, 2010, 10:19:49 am
Wouldn't Nuke's ship multiplier idea + swarm missile = assloads more missiles?
I'm seeing the four pylons launching them all at once.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Dragon on January 10, 2010, 10:26:29 am
If you have one missile you can't fire two of them via double fire.
They will run out of torpedoes, so there's no problem.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: Nuke on January 10, 2010, 12:28:59 pm
Wouldn't Nuke's ship multiplier idea + swarm missile = assloads more missiles?
I'm seeing the four pylons launching them all at once.

i would suspect most modders are capable of basic arithmetic, and could determine proper game balance by disallowing certain missiles on certain ships/banks. the idea is mainly for gunships, who carry the same weapons as a normal bomber/assault ship, but can unleash them in bigger numbers. using swarm weapons would fire lots of missiles, yes, but consider that firing all those missiles at one target is a waste of ammo, and should really only be done on a hard target, like a large freighter. that said it might be better to have a per bank multiplier, rather than a global ship multiplier. so i can set one bank to fire mega-barrages, and another bank to work normally. of course you would still want thatper weapon "no dualfire" tag, for those special super-weapons that would be insane to fire in pairs.
Title: Re: Feature Request: no double fire
Post by: DarkShadow- on January 11, 2010, 11:08:41 am
That would be usefull for universes whre there's simply no such thing like double-fire.
Sometimes, it's just unwanted.

That's exactly the reason. My mod is not taking part in the FS2-universe. Missiles are more realistic here, they're quite powerful weapons, but fighters can't carry lots of missiles, usually between 4-10. Double-fire just seems weird in this mod.

Btw, it's good to see I'm not the only one wanting this feature, and a lot of your ideas are really nice. :)