Hard Light Productions Forums
Off-Topic Discussion => General Discussion => Topic started by: iamzack on November 28, 2010, 02:20:31 pm
-
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1619629
-
heh, enjoying life is bad for you, now shut up and suffer.
-
Happy Equilibrium!
-
heh, enjoying life is bad for you, now shut up and suffer.
One possible objection to this proposal remains--that happiness is not negatively valued. However, this objection is dismissed as scientifically irrelevant
Not bad for you, but that's scientifically irrelevent. :D
-
that's my favorite part.
-
What the hell? Did you write this?
-
you would be the one to find this.
Kolgena: 1992, Liverpool University. no.
-
Touche, noticed that after my post. So how did you manage to trawl up this thing?
(Also, there's a 1993 publication under the same title but different authors. Was it a review, or something sketchier?)
-
stumbleupon :)
-
Hee, trollin' science.
-
Actually, they already have medication for that disease (http://www.theonion.com/video/fda-approves-depressant-drug-for-the-annoyingly-ch,14310/).
-
:lol:
-
Some people I know could use a bit of that. :nervous:
-
So is this happiness is bad as in a symptom of having a grape fruit sized tumor pressing up against your brain thats making you giggle at inappropriate ****, or life sucks and if your still happy you need to be treated for it?
-
I love journals that publish political critiques of bull**** trends in science. Good on the authors =)
(For those that don't get it, one of the largest critiques of the DSM is that it bases a good proportion of diagnoses on statistical values of what is normal, which suffers from serious validity concerns).
-
hahaha, I should be careful then when smiling... might cause the wrong diagnosis.
-
Slip up and ill Medicate u.